Is it Impossible for Believers of True Eternal Security to Teach Holy Living?

By -
One of the biggest most sinister accusations of those hypocritical conditional security proponents is that by teaching an if saved, always saved doctrine known as eternal security or what John Calvin would call it as "the perseverance of the saints" which preachers like Charles Haddon Spurgeon had spoken through Biblical historic, is that such people cannot teach holy living.  Therefore, according to the arrogant believers of conditional security, the doctrine of eternal security or the PERSEVERANCE of the saints is nothing more than an excuse and a road to Antinomianism and a teaching of Satan.  

However what saith Scripture?  If you are saved, then there is going to be plenty of changes because of these truths:
  • Every Christian has the listening ear as the mark of a true believer.  They never perish.  Now please stop using John 10 to justify conditional security! (John 10:26-30)
  • Every Christian saved by grace and not by works is prepared unto the workmanship of God in Christ Jesus (NOT MAN) to be equipped in every good work. (Ephesians 2:8-10)
  • Every Christian because they are saved are renewed by God day by day. (2 Corinthians 4:16)
  • Every Christian has a work that God will start and will finish. (Philippians 1:6)
  • Every Christian has God's work in them. (Philippians 2:13)
  • Every Christian has God's grace to teach holy living and be zealous unto good works and not of their own effort (Titus 2:11-15).
  • Every Christian will endure to the end and not depart. (1 John 2:19)

Also if it means that one is going to stay saved if saved, then sanctification continues- that is God's grace will continue to teach holy living to EVERY saved person never to the unsaved.  I do agree with the statement that true regeneration results to a changed life but NEVER to the argument that Christians can stop serving God and depart from the faith.  No- once a Christian, always a Christian and it is marked by continuous good works while never claiming any credit of their own.  It's never an "I did it" type of salvation, it's "God's work at work in me and I do good works only because of Him" type of salvation.  Seriously I rebuke you all works salvation preachers aside from Antinomians for your damnable self-righteousness!

The argument of conditional security is rooted upon self-righteousness and not authentic righteousness because:
  • It wants to take credit on one's good works and endurance to the end to STAY SAVED rather than a person's good works and endurance to end are only because they are saved.
  • While many of its proponents accuse those who believe in the perseverance of the saints to be Antinomian, plenty of them however are gamblers, drinkers and womanizers to name a few.  Look who has the Antinomian lifestyle now!  In other words- HYPOCRITE!