Alexander Hislop's "The Two Babylons" is Not Reliable
Before you accuse me of being a secret Jesuit, I would like to inform you that my quest to discredit "The Two Babylons" is because of its faulty writing and argumentation. I personally have the book but the book itself is filled with logical errors, myths and fables. I would like to point out reasons why the book "The Two Babylons" is not reliable. I. Reasons Why The Book is Not Reliable For Study The book itself is full of guilt by association arguments instead of using the Bible as a parameter for rebuking Catholicism's unbiblical practices More often than not, Hislop's arguments in the book are based on guilt by association. For a Presbyterian pastor, he sure fails to use the Bible as the parameter for right and wrong. It becomes really faulty when all you do is base on what pagans do. For example, Taoists and Buddhists both involve in the idolatry of the worship of the Queen of Heaven while they are involved in charity wo