Skip to main content

Some Roman Catholics Are Misquoting These Verses From Jeremiah to Condemn Pastors

First, take note of the word "some" since in due fairness, some Roman Catholics I know haven't misused these verses for their sensationalist activities and are more or less professional in defending their false doctrine.  Now let's take a look at these verses that were cherry picked from Jeremiah which Roman Catholic fanatics tend to use to justify their attack against born again Christianity.  I don't deny that there are pastors who indeed deserve to be exposed as fakes but Roman Catholic fanatics tend to do their usual double standard of exposing the pastors who sin with sensationalism but hide any the dirty history of the Vatican as much as they could. 

Now let's take a look at the verses and the meaning in context.  Funny that some Roman Catholics are now quoting from the Authorized Version of 1611 to suit their needs when I find most of them hate it.  The Roman Catholic Good News Translation says rulers not pastors.  Pastor is a synonym for shepherd and when these Roman Catholics call their priests their shepherds, aren't they also calling the priests their pastors?  While I don't really use the Catholic translations of the Bible for my nourishment needs since I personally stick to the King James Bible for my spiritual nourishment.  I'd like to take the verses in context and since they're now using the King James (which the Vatican is now trying to claim they gave it to us) I'd like to talk from the King James right now.  

It's time to talk in context.  I find it funny that they should even quote from Jeremiah 10 which warns against graven images for worship.  I wonder do they even understand what they're doing is already idolatry?  They can go ahead and use the Ark of the Covenant argument but the Ark wasn't even put for public display.  The Roman Catholic use of images for worship carries the same logic that pagans use, "We don't worship the image but the one portrayed by the image."  Also, what's important is that in Jeremiah 12:10 from the Good News calls the pastors as "foreign rulers".  Jeremiah 22:22 in the Good News uses the word "leaders" instead of pastors.  Jeremiah 23:1-2 uses the word leaders yet again.  Hmmm are they just using the King James for convenience?  Good expositors such as John Gill and Charles Spurgeon knew these words but most Roman Catholics are too lazy to take Scriptures into context!  The same passages also condemn the false prophets that continue to prophesy lies just like today.  

What's so funny is that do they even read Jeremiah 5:31?  The Roman Catholic Good News Translation even condemns the PRIESTS saying, "Prophets speak nothing but lies; priests rule as the prophets command, and my people offer no objections.  But what will they do when it all comes to an end?"  Now for one, this was the Old Testament under the priesthood from the line of Aaron.  It's annoying how Roman Catholic apologists quote from the Old Testament to justify their priesthood yet try to justify the priestly celibacy.  The Bible doesn't even order priests to remain single otherwise how can Aaron's family be a family of priests?  Aaron the first high priest was succeeded by Eleazar.  As for 1 Corinthians 7:32-35 it doesn't justify priestly celibacy at all.  The same verse they misapplied also requires people to marry than burn in passion.  Still, they stubbornly misapply that verse to justify their doctrine of mandatory celibacy.

As for those misusing the word "pastor" for their convenience then here's what God promised in Jeremiah.  Jeremiah 3:15 in the King James version says, "And I will give you pastors according to mine heart, which shall feed you with knowledge and understanding."  While the Good News still uses rulers, other translations use the word shepherds and rulers.  God condemned not pastors in general but those crooked pastors in particular.  God promised to replace the pastors who were wicked with pastors after His own heart.  God condemned the crooked pastors yesterday and He has been doing it until today.  

What should be made important to know is all about Jeremiah as well.  Jeremiah is the son of Hilkiah one of the PRIESTS.  To even misuse and misrepresent Jeremiah to mandate priestly celibacy is plain stupid and deceptive.  Jeremiah is the son of Hilkiah one of the priests.  The whole priesthood of the Old Testament was perpetuated by the priests marrying virgins (Leviticus 21:13-14) and these verses are still there in the Good News Translation.   They might as well protest to God using 1 Corinthians 7:32-35 and they're going to be in for a big surprise.  The Old Testament priesthood also required them to be Levites and sons of Aaron.  None of the Roman Catholic priests even meet that requirement, they have robes and miters but where are the rest of the vestments required?  It's a very incomplete attire and God requires complete attires.  But as said, the Old Testament priesthood got abolished.  The curtain was ripped open and the Holy of Holies was now accessible but Roman Catholicism decides to stitch the curtain back up. 

Ephesians 4:11 in the Good News also says, "It was He who gave gifts to people; He appointed some to be apostles, others to be prophets, others to be evangelists, others to be pastors and teachers."  So even the Roman Catholic translation admits that God gave apostles, prophets, evangelists and PASTORS for the New Testament.  1 Peter 2:9 of the Good News even declares that all believers are part of this priesthood saying, "But you are the chosen race, the King's priests, the holy nation, God's own people, chosen to proclaim the wonderful acts of God, who called you out of darkness into His own marvelous light."

Popular posts from this blog

Do Feminists Ever Realize That Women Shouldn't Use Acts of Violence Against Men?

It's irritating to be told that men shouldn't use violence on women but the other way around is okay. No, it's not okay to hit anyone regardless of gender out of anger or frustration. If men shouldn't hit women except in acts of self-defense then the other way round should apply. But you have to remember the stupidity of selective justice and selective outrage of feminists. They think men should respect them while they think discriminating against men is okay. Their quest for "equality" is nothing more than a big joke.

Why is it usually a big fuzz when a man hits a woman but not so many people react if a woman hits a man? That kind of hypocrisy is worth addressing. They say men shouldn't hit women because they are "weaker" but is it okay for a person of lower rank to attack a person of higher rank? The word submission doesn't exist in the feminist dictionary unless it's men submitting to them. Whether they like it or not the husband is t…

You Can't Preach About God's Love For Sinners Without Preaching About His Wrath Against Sin

It's a problem that so many quack preachers love to preach God's love for sinners but not about God's wrath against them because He must punish both the sin and the sinner. Everything from God's love to His wrath is dictated by the fact that He is holy and you are not. The message about God's love for sinners will make no sense if you don't preach about God's wrath against sin first. I remembered listening to "Hell's Best Kept Secret" and "True and False Conversion" by Ray Comfort. There was this point where Kirk Cameron talked about what if I sold my property to save someone from a disease. If the person doesn't know anything about the disease then my selling of all my property to pay for the badly needed treatment won't make sense. Another illustration was all about the flight. You have to tell the person that the parachute is not meant to improve the flight but to tell the person that it's for emergency reasons. If you…

It's Not Okay to Be Blindly Loyal to the Pope and His Army of Pharisees

Some rabid Roman Catholics keep sensationalizing the sins of fraud pastors (as if true born again Christians ever support them) while they keep hiding the sins of their priests or Pharisees. They also say that born again Christians are blindly loyal to the pastor never mind that they are blindly loyal to the Pope and his Pharisees. Blind loyalty towards a a prosperity gospel pastor, a so-called successor of a so-called last messenger or any quack preacher is no different than blind loyalty towards the Pope and his Pharisees. Worse, Roman Catholics believe that their Pharisees are instruments in saving their souls or that the Pope supposedly holds salvation in his hands never mind all the priestly scandals are telling them otherwise.

I could remember how often Bible reading is discouraged (and yet some of these rabid Roman Catholics tell me I should read the Bible and I can't get wrong with it) because it could drive me crazy from reading it. Some Roman Catholics I've met &quo…

Don't Even Think About Legalizing Prostitution or Sex Trade

There's some people who seek to legalize prostitution. Some "rational" atheists are already talking about prostitution should be legalized so it could be controlled by the government. The claim that "studies" show that prohibition doesn't work is a lie straight from the pits of Hell. The Israelites were doing sin not because God forbade it but because they were disobedient and the rulers did nothing to prevent those sins. It's not surprising is that the same people who seek to legalize prostitution also want to legalize narcotics and hard liquor all in the name of "succeeding in the war against them".

The logic behind legalizing prostitution is that so the government can control them and tax them. But the problem with the quest to legalize prostitution is that it encourages the sin rather than discourage it. The problem is not the war against prostitution but ignoring Ecclesiastes 8:11. Do you know why the war against prostitution isn't wo…

Is Salvation in Peter's Hands (As Well as the Popes) Because Jesus Supposedly Gave Him the Literal Keys of Heaven?

According to a self-proclaimed Roman Catholic apologist (who I'll probably dub as Mr. Whistle when I mention him) he claimed that salvation is in the hands of Peter because Jesus gave the former the keys of Heaven. The guy is clearly taking things out of context with what he says. I wonder does he even bother to check out the idioms of the Bible since some passages use a figure of speech instead of speaking everything literally?

If he can't get Matthew 16:18 correctly where he said that Peter the Rock even when the Good News Translation for Roman Catholics says otherwise (and worse for them Peter is differentiated as a rock and the Rock is clearly not him) then he also misinterprets Matthew 16:19. Let's try to understand Matthew 16:19 with the keys and what they really mean. In his interpretation he's already telling everyone that born again Christians should just go back to the Roman Catholic institution because the Pope supposedly holds salvation in his hands. I don&…

Atheists With Abusive Mindsets Do Exist

It's a myth over the modern world that there's no such thing as an atheist with an abusive mindset. I can see atheists who claim that abuses only come through theism. I don't deny that there's such a thing as religious people with an abusive mindset such as Roman Catholic fanatics, Islamic extremists and any form of religious extremism. The problem of the claim is that it denies the reality that there's such a thing as atheists who have an abusive mindset. One such person is the late Christopher Hitchens who claims that he has the right o treat religion with ridicule, hatred and contempt. Isn't that an example of an atheist with an abusive mindset? Sad to say, Hitchens himself is still cursing God from the pits of Hell. Christians should pray that Richard Dawkins wouldn't make the same wrong decision as Hitchens.

One horrible atheist blogger claimed he was indeed one of the most scientific people on Earth. Just reading his blog alone is so tiresome that I&…

Why This Ministry DOES NOT Support the Westboro Baptist Church

The Westboro Baptist Church is a so-called Baptist institution founded by Fred Phelps who is a lawyer and a theologian. Is it your average Baptist assembly or is this another of Satan's brain children? I would like to present my stand why this ministry does not support the Westboro Baptist Church and why as a Baptist, I do not support them either:
The founder Fred Phelps who serves as its pastor. I do find it disturbing he says that he supports sound doctrine of good Christian preachers of the past like John Calvin and Charles Haddon Spurgeon but his doctrine is not sound at all. His preaching is definitely not balanced. While I do appreciate him attacking the Great Whore of Revelation, apostasy, ecumenism, homosexuality, abortion, pornography and a lot of sins however he is no better than the Roman Catholic institution which he frequently criticizes. Although he claims to be a Calvinist and a Spurgeon fan, however many of those who are Calvinist preachers like Paul Washer, John …