Male Homosexual Couples May Soon End up Suing Fertility Clinics as Well!
Whenever a person is a homosexual, they are going against the norm and their function. I remembered the quote by the lesbian activist Camille Paglia in which she said, "Homosexuality is not normal. On the contrary it is a challenge to the norm. Nature exists whether academics like it or not. And in nature, procreation is the single relentless rule. That is the norm. Our sexual bodies were designed for reproduction. No one is born gay. The idea is ridiculous. Homosexuality is an adaptation, not an inborn trait."
What I thought would possibly happen is that male homosexual couples may soon consider doing one absurd thing after the other. It's no surprise that the event of homosexual couples who are adopting children because they can't have children. Adoption was supposedly designed for sexually moral couples who cannot have children... at least there is a mother figure and a father figure to guide the child. On the contrary, homosexuality sooner or later wrecks confusion to the mind of the child. One may consider on homosexuality also brings confusion to those who practice it. A single parent home would do a better job than a same sex "parenting" home. The adoption for homosexual couples is already absurd, I already thought of what if male homosexuals will attempt to get pregnant as well.
Creationists (though not necessarily a Christian) and atheists also differ in their approach of how to pursue science and technology. Majority of creationists follow "safe science" or which they are aware there are ethical boundaries. On the other hand, atheists tend to think of "unlimited human progress", even going against ethics and that "nothing is impossible with science". So what if they might actually do the absurd such as to pursue fertility treatments in order to get pregnant? The idea of secular science is challenging common sense and scientific laws (which God ordained to keep nature in check) such as how "sex change" seeks to alter the gender of a homosexual but in the end, only the physical appearance had changed right? The DNA could not be changed and they need hormonal injections to keep that appearance in check.
When I heard of homosexual couples who are getting mad that certain bakers won't cater to their request of a homosexual wedding cake, they would threaten to sue that person for a "hate crime". Likewise, I could already imagine the stupidity of a homosexual male who wants to get pregnant. The fertility clinic may refuse fertility treatment that was designed for females on a male patient because it's just absurd. It would be like asking a French restaurant to serve Italian food, only more stupid because the male homosexual couple may threaten to sue the fertility clinic. A fertility treatment for a woman to get pregnant was designed solely for a woman, not for a man. Even if a man drinks a test tube down the throat, it will just get digested because the male human body was not designed to get pregnant either. Then they might sue the fertility clinic for one absurd reason after the other.
See also:
What I thought would possibly happen is that male homosexual couples may soon consider doing one absurd thing after the other. It's no surprise that the event of homosexual couples who are adopting children because they can't have children. Adoption was supposedly designed for sexually moral couples who cannot have children... at least there is a mother figure and a father figure to guide the child. On the contrary, homosexuality sooner or later wrecks confusion to the mind of the child. One may consider on homosexuality also brings confusion to those who practice it. A single parent home would do a better job than a same sex "parenting" home. The adoption for homosexual couples is already absurd, I already thought of what if male homosexuals will attempt to get pregnant as well.
Creationists (though not necessarily a Christian) and atheists also differ in their approach of how to pursue science and technology. Majority of creationists follow "safe science" or which they are aware there are ethical boundaries. On the other hand, atheists tend to think of "unlimited human progress", even going against ethics and that "nothing is impossible with science". So what if they might actually do the absurd such as to pursue fertility treatments in order to get pregnant? The idea of secular science is challenging common sense and scientific laws (which God ordained to keep nature in check) such as how "sex change" seeks to alter the gender of a homosexual but in the end, only the physical appearance had changed right? The DNA could not be changed and they need hormonal injections to keep that appearance in check.
When I heard of homosexual couples who are getting mad that certain bakers won't cater to their request of a homosexual wedding cake, they would threaten to sue that person for a "hate crime". Likewise, I could already imagine the stupidity of a homosexual male who wants to get pregnant. The fertility clinic may refuse fertility treatment that was designed for females on a male patient because it's just absurd. It would be like asking a French restaurant to serve Italian food, only more stupid because the male homosexual couple may threaten to sue the fertility clinic. A fertility treatment for a woman to get pregnant was designed solely for a woman, not for a man. Even if a man drinks a test tube down the throat, it will just get digested because the male human body was not designed to get pregnant either. Then they might sue the fertility clinic for one absurd reason after the other.
See also: