Skip to main content

Logical Fallacies in Apologetics

In the world of apologetics, there will always be a series of logical fallacies. It's best to know these as to at least, present the truth thoroughly. Each one must be avoided and below is a list of some commonly used logical fallacies and how they are being used.


Ad hominem- Attacking the individual instead of the argument

Example: "Ray Comfort is not qualified to argue that evolution isn't real because he is not a biologist."


Appeal to force- Telling the hearer that something bad will happen if he/she does not accept the argument.

Example: "You agree with what I have to say that Christians need good works to stay saved otherwise you are an Antinomian and a homosexual."


Appeal to pity- Taking advantage of one's pitiful state to win an invalid argument.

Example: A student says, "Well sir/mam it was traffic so that's why I'm late."


Appeal to popularity- Taking advantage of the "majority vote".

Example: A Catholic faith defender says, "We are the ones who are right because of our numbers."


Appeal to tradition- Trying to get someone to accept something because it has been done or believed for a long time.

Example: "I have grown up with Chinese folk religion and the worship of my gods therefore it's right since my ancestors also did it, and since they they weren't Christians, therefore it's wrong to be a Christian."


Argument from silence- This is where just because the person is silent about the matter then he is assumed not to believe in it.

Example: A critic can say, "Well Paul didn't mention about the miracles of Jesus therefore He didn't believe in them."


Begging the Question- Assuming the thing to be true that you are trying to prove. It is circular. This is also known as circular argument.

Example: "You can know the age of the rock layer because of the age of the fossil that was found in it. You can know the age of the fossil because of the age of the rock layer it was found."


Category Mistake/False Analogy- Attributing a property to something that could not possibly have that property.

Example: "Ripe mangoes cause more electric shocks than guyabano when eaten."


Cause and Effect- Assuming that the effect is related to a cause because the events occur together.

Example: "When the rooster crows, the sun rises. Therefore, the rooster causes the sun to rise."


Division- Assuming that what is true for the parts is true for the whole without further examination. This is known as to generalize what can't be generalized.

Example: "The Al Qaida is a Muslim group therefore all Muslims are terrorists."


Equivocation- Using the same term in an argument in different places but the word has different meanings. It can also mean assuming everyone has the same definition as the other.

Example: "God is love. Love is blind. Therefore God is blind."


False Assumptions- In logic as well as in law, "historical precedent" means that the burden of proof rests on those who set forth new theories and not on those whose ideas have already been verified. The old tests the new. The already established authority judges any new claims to authority.

Example: "Islam does not have the burden of proof and that the Qur'an judges the Bible."


False Dilemma- Giving so few choices when in actuality there could be more choices possible or to limit the opponent to a few alternatives when there are more.

Example: "Show me a verse in the Bible that it's forbidden to pray to Mary and the saints and that it's idolatry to do so."


"Genetic" Fallacy- Attempting to endorse or disqualify a claim because of the origin or irrelevant history of the claim.

Example: "Nazareth, what good could come from it?"


Guilt by Association- Rejecting an argument or claim because the person proposing it likes someone whom is disliked by another.

Example: "The fact that Mao Zedong liked classical music, therefore classical music is wrong."


Irrelevance- When you introduce issues which have no logical bearing on the subject under discussion, you are using irrelevant arguments.

Example: "Our traditions are equal to Scripture because of preservation."

Non Sequitur - Comments or information that do not logically follow from a premise or the conclusion.

Example: "It was because my younger sister wished for rain that rain fell."


Phonic Fallacies: The phonetic sound of a word should not be used to twist its meaning.

Example: "Allah is found in the Bible because of the word Allahluiah (perverting Alleluia)."

Playing with synonyms as antonyms- This is the argument where the person uses two words or terms of the same meaning as if they are not the same.

Example: "Salvation is not by good works but by the works of the Law."


Poisoning the Well - Presenting negative information about a person before he/she speaks so as to discredit the person's argument. Mostly done by a vile imagination and direct judgment.

Example: "Don't listen to Pastor Estus Washington Pirkle because he's a loser."


Red Herring - Introducing a topic not related to the subject at hand. This is also commonly known as the flight of ideas.

Example: "Abortion is wrong. On the other hand, my friend is like that rabbit in the children's story."


Special Pleading (double standard) - Applying a standard to another that is different from a standard applied to oneself.

Example: "Salvation is initially by faith alone but it must be maintained by good works to be assured of Heaven. Don't believe me? Read Ephesians 2:10."


Straw Man Argument - Producing an argument about a weaker representation of the truth and attacking it.

Example: "Bible Baptist Church does not care for the poor because it doesn't have donations for the poor in the offering envelope."


Source of knowledge for the logical fallacies: http://carm.org/logical-fallacies-or-fallacies-argumentation

Popular posts from this blog

Spare the Rod, Spoil the Child So Don't Get Surprised Why the Child Doesn't Grow Up Right

Try listening to this video and you may notice a couple of stuff that really show what's wrong with the typical family today. Take a look at what the parents are saying and you may find out why their son is turning out to be a horrible brat. They said that they've never spanked him as a child. He's had his way all his life. Doesn't that tell you that their rebellious son was spoiled all his life? He's not even ready to hear the word no. By not giving him the badly needed dose of Vitamin No when he was a child then the parents are reaping what they sow.

The problem is calling the father an "excellent" father. How can he be an excellent father when he spared the rod? You say you don't punish your child because you love your child. The Bible says in Proverbs 13:14 that true love requires discipline. You can always have discipline without love but never love without discipline. The father in this video admits that his son is not ready to hear the word no.…

Using Santa Claus to Remind People to Keep Christ in Christmas is Pure Hypocrisy

This has got to be one of the biggest hypocrisies I've ever seen. Okay, it's already past December 6, 2017 (which is the traditional feast day of St. Nicholas for Roman Catholics) but I still can't help but get mad at this video. EWTN or Eternal Word Television Network even dares to use Santa Claus to remind us to keep Christ in Christmas. That idea is baloney since parents continue to lie to their children about Santa Claus giving them what they want during Christmas... only if they were good the whole year round. 
Here's Pastor Todd Friel of Wretched as he discusses about what's wrong with Santa Claus. I really listened to this video and I realize why I get mad whenever parents lie about Santa Claus. I was lied to about Santa Claus when I was still a child and I wonder what else have adults lied to me about. No, there's no Santa Claus. It should sicken me how Santa Claus is more popular to the world than Jesus Christ. When John Lennon said they became more p…

The Foolishness of Waiting for Christ's Return Without Preaching the Gospel to the Lost

It's no secret that the world is in terrible times and chances are they're not going to get better. The world is now a huge insane den of iniquity. Signs of the times have shown up such as the rampant immorality growing left and right.
2 Timothy 3:1-7 - This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God; having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away. For of this sort are they which creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts, ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth. 2 Peter 3:3-4 - Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffer…

Was Mary the Earthly Mother of Jesus Born Without Sin?

It would be best to discuss about since today is the Roman Catholic feast of the Feast of the Immaculate Conception. Roman Catholics insist that Mary was supposedly born without sin and the argument goes that if Mary were a sinner then why was Jesus sinless. That is a good question to ask and it would be good to provide some answers based on the Bible.

Luke 1:28 is frequently used to defend the stand on the doctrine of Mary's immaculate conception. The verse has the angel calling out to Mary with the words, "Hail, thou that art highly favoured, the LORD is with thee: blessed art thou among women." But there is a problem with that one. Grace is not given to those who do not need it but towards sinners. There is a failure to take things and read things in context. If Mary was ever conceived without sin then notice verse 29 has her trembling at the angel Gabriel's message. Mary already knew she was a sinner as evidenced in verse 47 with her conversation with Elizabeth.…

What's Wrong with the Ang Dating Daan Movement?

The Ang Dating Daan movement is by the Members Church of God International spearheaded by its pastor (and so-called "prophet") Eliseo Soriano.  While claiming to be an expositor of the Scriptures with his "Itanong Mo Kay Soriano" or "Ask Soriano" In English, this religious group actually isn't Christian as some of the ignorant would want to believe.  Though the group claims the Bible is their only authority (as some cults do) but the problem is that they believe only Eli Soriano may interpret the Scriptures.  This is utter heresy!  Not even a great man in the Scriptures, Charles Spurgeon ever made such a preposterous claim!  This is no better than the "true church" movement by Darwin Fish which is exposed by Pastor Phil Johnson as a heretical movement.  In fact, I'm not going to waste my time debating with ADD members, they are a total waste of my time as every other debate.
Unlike John F. Macarthur of Grace to You that actually encoura…

It's Sickening How Parents Love to Lie About Santa Claus While Wondering Why Their Children Lie to Them

It's really sickening how parents these days will always try to justify the Santa Claus lie isn't it? If you think about it, it's very common to lie during Christmas. What's even worse is that you have parents who lie about Santa Claus and say, "If you lie to me, I'll tell Santa Claus you lied to me and you're not getting any gifts!" Then come Christmas morning and the child discovers that Santa Claus isn't real.

The problem of lying about Santa Claus while teaching your child not to lie is basically follow what I say but not what I do. It's a bad case of double standard. Let's see what the Bible says about the problem of double standard:
Matthew 23:3 - All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that obseve and do, but do not ye after their works; for they say and do not. Romans 2:21-22 - Thou therefore which teachest another, teachest thou not thyself? Thou that preachest a man should not steal dost thou steal? Thou sayest that a man …

What Does Pisseth Against the Wall Mean?

It's really getting bad for some of my Independent Fundamental Baptist brethren to actually even take the words "pisseth against the wall" which appears at least six times in 1 Samuel 23:22, 1 Samuel 25:34, 1 Kings 14:10, 1 Kings 16:11, 1 Kings 21:21 and 2 Kings 9:8 where the King James actually has the words "pisseth against the wall".  Now I am a King James only-ist but I do not support the stupid interpretation of "pisseth against the wall" by some IFB preachers who have become in some way similar to the Catholic Faith Defenders that they argue against when they should spend their time soulwinning.  Actually I even heard that rather outrageous "pisseth against the wall" sermon by Steven Anderson that was so taken out of context.
So what does pisseth against the wall mean? Let us take a look at these six verses and take it on a exegetic view NOT an eisegetic (out of context) view:
1 Samuel 23:22- "And so more also do God unto the ene…

Santa Claus Parenting is NOT a Substitute For the Fear of the LORD Parenting

Christmas is just around the corner and I pray to God that this article will continue to offend those politically correct parents who think lying about Santa Claus is just harmless fun. How does the Bible tell us to parent our children? Proverbs 22:6 says, "Train up the child the way he should go, when he is old, he will not depart from it." So where does Santa Claus parenting fit in that one? There's no place for Santa Claus parenting for this reason. Santa Claus is only meant to believed when you are a child but the Lord Jesus is meant to be believed from childhood to the grave.

So what's the difference between Santa Claus parenting and the fear of the LORD parenting? The difference isn't only with the truth that Santa Claus isn't real and Jesus Christ is real. The reason of parents lying about Santa Claus and parents who tell the truth about Jesus Christ is very different. One only wants their children to do good while the other talks about the natural sin…

The Horrors of the Horrid Family: The Herods and Inbreeding

So here is the family tree of the Herods which I would say is not a happy family.  One can think about the incest and intrigue of this family or the whispers of the world "incestuous" about them considering these events that had transpired in the family tree to the point it's best to call them the Horrids or the Horrors whatever name will fit them better:
1.) Herodias (or Horridias as I want to call her) is the daughter of Aristobulus a much older son of Herod the Great by Mariamne I was married to her half-uncle, Herod Philip I and had a freak daughter named Salome.  Salome wouldn't be a normal child either considering she was born of incest between half-uncle and half-niece.  So she was both granddaughter and great-granddaughter to the wicked Herod the Great.  I guess Salome was a retard too though she did live long enough.  Note also that Herodias was the sister of Herod Agrippa I who was later eaten of worms as the throne was later lost out of her greed.  Also H…

Difference Between A "Good Person" (By Worldly Standards) and a Righteous Person

Romans 5:7-8 says, "For scarcely for a righteous man will one die: yet peradventure for a good man some would even dare to die. But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us."  So where is the difference between a "good person" and a righteous person?  There is God's measuring stick vs. man's measuring stick.  Being a "good person" is when a person is compared to the others.  Let's say they compare "Mr. Nice Guy" with the likes of corrupt politicians.  To worldly standards he is a "good person" because he tries to do what is right (by his own flesh).  They are only good according to the worldly standards.  Many may be better than the other like for example, Mr. Nice Guy may treat everybody well.  However here's the real issue with God there is NO such thing as a good person as Romans 3:12 says, "There is NONE that doeth good, no not one." which goes together wit…