Skip to main content

Logical Fallacies in Apologetics

In the world of apologetics, there will always be a series of logical fallacies. It's best to know these as to at least, present the truth thoroughly. Each one must be avoided and below is a list of some commonly used logical fallacies and how they are being used.


Ad hominem- Attacking the individual instead of the argument

Example: "Ray Comfort is not qualified to argue that evolution isn't real because he is not a biologist."


Appeal to force- Telling the hearer that something bad will happen if he/she does not accept the argument.

Example: "You agree with what I have to say that Christians need good works to stay saved otherwise you are an Antinomian and a homosexual."


Appeal to pity- Taking advantage of one's pitiful state to win an invalid argument.

Example: A student says, "Well sir/mam it was traffic so that's why I'm late."


Appeal to popularity- Taking advantage of the "majority vote".

Example: A Catholic faith defender says, "We are the ones who are right because of our numbers."


Appeal to tradition- Trying to get someone to accept something because it has been done or believed for a long time.

Example: "I have grown up with Chinese folk religion and the worship of my gods therefore it's right since my ancestors also did it, and since they they weren't Christians, therefore it's wrong to be a Christian."


Argument from silence- This is where just because the person is silent about the matter then he is assumed not to believe in it.

Example: A critic can say, "Well Paul didn't mention about the miracles of Jesus therefore He didn't believe in them."


Begging the Question- Assuming the thing to be true that you are trying to prove. It is circular. This is also known as circular argument.

Example: "You can know the age of the rock layer because of the age of the fossil that was found in it. You can know the age of the fossil because of the age of the rock layer it was found."


Category Mistake/False Analogy- Attributing a property to something that could not possibly have that property.

Example: "Ripe mangoes cause more electric shocks than guyabano when eaten."


Cause and Effect- Assuming that the effect is related to a cause because the events occur together.

Example: "When the rooster crows, the sun rises. Therefore, the rooster causes the sun to rise."


Division- Assuming that what is true for the parts is true for the whole without further examination. This is known as to generalize what can't be generalized.

Example: "The Al Qaida is a Muslim group therefore all Muslims are terrorists."


Equivocation- Using the same term in an argument in different places but the word has different meanings. It can also mean assuming everyone has the same definition as the other.

Example: "God is love. Love is blind. Therefore God is blind."


False Assumptions- In logic as well as in law, "historical precedent" means that the burden of proof rests on those who set forth new theories and not on those whose ideas have already been verified. The old tests the new. The already established authority judges any new claims to authority.

Example: "Islam does not have the burden of proof and that the Qur'an judges the Bible."


False Dilemma- Giving so few choices when in actuality there could be more choices possible or to limit the opponent to a few alternatives when there are more.

Example: "Show me a verse in the Bible that it's forbidden to pray to Mary and the saints and that it's idolatry to do so."


"Genetic" Fallacy- Attempting to endorse or disqualify a claim because of the origin or irrelevant history of the claim.

Example: "Nazareth, what good could come from it?"


Guilt by Association- Rejecting an argument or claim because the person proposing it likes someone whom is disliked by another.

Example: "The fact that Mao Zedong liked classical music, therefore classical music is wrong."


Irrelevance- When you introduce issues which have no logical bearing on the subject under discussion, you are using irrelevant arguments.

Example: "Our traditions are equal to Scripture because of preservation."

Non Sequitur - Comments or information that do not logically follow from a premise or the conclusion.

Example: "It was because my younger sister wished for rain that rain fell."


Phonic Fallacies: The phonetic sound of a word should not be used to twist its meaning.

Example: "Allah is found in the Bible because of the word Allahluiah (perverting Alleluia)."

Playing with synonyms as antonyms- This is the argument where the person uses two words or terms of the same meaning as if they are not the same.

Example: "Salvation is not by good works but by the works of the Law."


Poisoning the Well - Presenting negative information about a person before he/she speaks so as to discredit the person's argument. Mostly done by a vile imagination and direct judgment.

Example: "Don't listen to Pastor Estus Washington Pirkle because he's a loser."


Red Herring - Introducing a topic not related to the subject at hand. This is also commonly known as the flight of ideas.

Example: "Abortion is wrong. On the other hand, my friend is like that rabbit in the children's story."


Special Pleading (double standard) - Applying a standard to another that is different from a standard applied to oneself.

Example: "Salvation is initially by faith alone but it must be maintained by good works to be assured of Heaven. Don't believe me? Read Ephesians 2:10."


Straw Man Argument - Producing an argument about a weaker representation of the truth and attacking it.

Example: "Bible Baptist Church does not care for the poor because it doesn't have donations for the poor in the offering envelope."


Source of knowledge for the logical fallacies: http://carm.org/logical-fallacies-or-fallacies-argumentation

Popular posts from this blog

Continue the Reformation Through Expository Preaching

It's not merely enough to protest against Rome. There are many who protest against Rome who are just as heretical as Rome. What's not too surprising is to find some "Baptist" preachers who reject the badly needed art of expository preaching. Why do we need expository preaching? To know why we need it we must first define it.

Defining expository preaching

This is what the book "By the Book: The Whys and Hows of Biblical Preaching" would define expository preaching:
Expository preaching. When the main theme, its main points and further development of the points of the points or sub-points are all derived from the content, context and structural flow of a longer text in Scripture. This is popular when expounding paragraphs, stanzas, and chapters of a book and especially when doing a series of preaching from a book. (p. 45)
Here is the definition from Got Questions on "What is expository preaching?":
Expository preaching involves the exposition, or co…

Continuing the Reformation Also Means Preaching Against Quack Evangelical Pastors

It's so easy to heckle on Roman Catholic priests and similar cultists but hard to acknowledge that Evangelical circles aren't free of wolves in sheep's clothing. What I thought about is how often you may think that a certain pastor is a man of God but he's just as much as a wolf in sheep's clothing as the Roman Catholic priests. Just because a person claims to be a pastor doesn't mean he's a man of God.

Should it be mentioned Jeremiah has condemned irresponsible pastors or shepherds with how they carry their jobs? Read them at Jeremiah 10:21, 12:10, 22:2, 23:1-2 and you'll find out the kind of pastors God hates. Jeremiah 3:15 has God promising to give pastors who will give understanding. The problem is that there are so many pastors who aren't even men of God. They are pastors by profession but they are not pastors in God's eyes. This is a warning to Christians that just because a pastor by profession doesn't mean the person is a man of God.…

The Difference Between Faith Results to Good Works vs. Adding Faith to Good Works

There's a huge argument between the Papists and the Reformers about what authentic faith is. The stand isn't just merely between Papists and the Reformers as it goes as far as Papists, anti-Catholic cults and the true born again Christians (Protestant or not) on what James means by faith without works is dead.

Is James saying that in order to get saved or to stay saved that you must add faith to good works?

Perhaps one reason why Martin Luther once thought of the Book of James as an epistle of straw was because it felt like the author added good works to saving faith. I remembered having a dialogue with a third degree cousin of mine who was a Roman Catholic apologist. He knew I was a former Catholic turned Baptist. I had a conversation with him and he told me that I should examine the Book of James to see good works are required for justification.

The Roman Catholic view as well as the anti-Catholic cultist view tends to use James' writing to justify their heresy. Here'…

What's Wrong with the Ang Dating Daan Movement?

The Ang Dating Daan movement is by the Members Church of God International spearheaded by its pastor (and so-called "prophet") Eliseo Soriano.  While claiming to be an expositor of the Scriptures with his "Itanong Mo Kay Soriano" or "Ask Soriano" In English, this religious group actually isn't Christian as some of the ignorant would want to believe.  Though the group claims the Bible is their only authority (as some cults do) but the problem is that they believe only Eli Soriano may interpret the Scriptures.  This is utter heresy!  Not even a great man in the Scriptures, Charles Spurgeon ever made such a preposterous claim!  This is no better than the "true church" movement by Darwin Fish which is exposed by Pastor Phil Johnson as a heretical movement.  In fact, I'm not going to waste my time debating with ADD members, they are a total waste of my time as every other debate.
Unlike John F. Macarthur of Grace to You that actually encoura…

Plenty of Today's Churches Need a Radical Reformation Against Easy "Christianity"!

Whenever it's the Reformation, it's easy to think about Martin Luther's protest against the Roman Catholic institution. It's easy to think about fighting the Great Whore of Revelation. Here's the question that I'd want to raise, "Do you realize that we're also having churches plagued with easy believism or easy Christianity?" Easy believism is a term that's so easily confused. Some may think that they're easy believists but they reject any notion that a person can get saved and sin all they want. The real easy believists are those who believe that they can be saved and still remain the same. If Rome's doctrine of salvation by works is a sure road to Hell then so is Antinomianism.
It's a common problem today in many churches that they uphold the heresy of easy prayerism. They teach a distorted picture of once saved always saved. Once saved always saved is biblical but we must emphasize on the characteristics of those who are truly …

What Does Pisseth Against the Wall Mean?

It's really getting bad for some of my Independent Fundamental Baptist brethren to actually even take the words "pisseth against the wall" which appears at least six times in 1 Samuel 23:22, 1 Samuel 25:34, 1 Kings 14:10, 1 Kings 16:11, 1 Kings 21:21 and 2 Kings 9:8 where the King James actually has the words "pisseth against the wall".  Now I am a King James only-ist but I do not support the stupid interpretation of "pisseth against the wall" by some IFB preachers who have become in some way similar to the Catholic Faith Defenders that they argue against when they should spend their time soulwinning.  Actually I even heard that rather outrageous "pisseth against the wall" sermon by Steven Anderson that was so taken out of context.
So what does pisseth against the wall mean? Let us take a look at these six verses and take it on a exegetic view NOT an eisegetic (out of context) view:
1 Samuel 23:22- "And so more also do God unto the ene…

Testimony of Former Iglesia Ni Cristo Member, Now a Born Again Christian

Editor's note: 
First and foremost, I would like to thank the Bereans for this wonderful story of a former Iglesia ni Cristo minister (or pastor), now he has become a Baptist Christian.  It's a sad story that some people have just jumped from one cult to another.  Some members of the Watchtower Society, Charismatic Movement or the Iglesia ni Cristo have left Roman Catholicism but they have never truly come to know the truth of salvation is by faith in Christ alone and that any good works after Christian life is but the grace of God at work in the believer.  Now for this brave testimony that I can really share after many years of searching for one testimony which I hope will further bring more INC members to Jesus Christ.

May I begin with a word of prayer that in the midst of all these trouble, I call upon Jesus Christ the Son of God who the Iglesia ni Cristo deny is indeed God, the only way to salvation, that they trust upon their works and church membership than Him alone.  I…