Skip to main content

Trying to Understand the John Calvin/Michael Servetus Incident

I have read how some people have opposed Calvinism due to John Calvin's encounter with the Spanish heretic Michael Servetus.  For someone who struggled in between Protestant doctrine and Baptist doctrine (remember, Baptists are not Protestants), I have thought of how some Baptists are even ignorant of church history together with misinformation on the Reformation.  I'm having modernist Baptists argue that the Reformation was not of God and that Reformed Theology makes salvation complicated.  Worse, they have raised the Calvin/Servetus incident to defend their stand.  Sad to say even some brothers and sisters in Christ do not know the full story and have opposed Calvinism based on a wrong understanding of Servetus and Calvin.

As a learner of the Reformed Theology school of thought, I felt like it's important to understand the whole incident between Calvin and Servetus.  I am afraid but some Calvinist pastors have even believed the lie that Calvin did the grievous mistake of burning Servetus on the stake.  Some Roman Catholics have even dared to raise up Calvin's incident with Servetus never mind that the Inquisition had far more blood on their hands based on history as revealed by the Foxe's Book of Martyrs.  Today, the Roman Catholics are either forced to be silent about it or are told that it's just a myth after some time the late John Paul II supposedly apologized for all the atrocities during the Dark Ages.

Looking at the Calvin/Servetus incident may also be the very standing ground of Reformed Theology because many godly men adhered to Reformed theology like Charles Haddon Spurgeon, John Gill, Jonathan Edwards, George Whitfield in the past and as of present, I am also listening to other Calvinist preachers like John F. MacArthur, Robert Charles Sproul, Ray Comfort, Paul Washer, John Piper and Ian Paisley.  Whenever a Calvinist preacher is childishly given an "award for infamy", I noticed how Calvin is always mentioned together with Servetus.  As part of defending the faith means also debunking some malicious rumors in Christendom and the Calvin/Servetus incident is one of them.

The problem behind the Internet or even the university libraries is that one must scrutinize everything read or heard of.  The same goes for the Calvin/Servetus incident which one may get contradicting sources from one book after another, even in one Christian academy to another.  I have read of some texts from some Roman Catholic sites, some Independent Baptist sites, some modernistic Baptist sites, from Arminian theology sites and the like that Calvin was a monster who burned down Servetus, he was a sadistic madman, he was a tyrant of Geneva and that he exercised full authority towards the execution.  However, later texts prove them to be false and the ashes of Servetus are flung to the faces of those who do not understand.

The reality is that Calvin was a pastor in Geneva, not a political official who held any form of authority.  He could not be the judge, prosecutor and judge three in one of Servetus was because he was not even a citizen in Geneva - if he could not vote, hold arms or hold public office (and in extension, he may even had no power to issue tickets for violation towards offenders who littered their garbage or spat anywhere) so he had no such power.  Now for a quote from Two Ages Pilgrims saying, "After the city council sentenced Servetus to death by burning, Calvin unsuccessfully pleaded with the city council to execute Servetus in a more humane manner such as beheading instead of burning.  And while Servetus waited for his execution, Calvin visited him, pleaded with him to recant to save his life, and prayed with him."

Popular posts from this blog

Sorry Homosexuals, God Owns the Rainbow, Not You!

I found this absolutely funny picture and the maker got it right about homosexual activists getting mad at the rainbow light in the Noah's Park exhibit. Who could forget the time when homosexual marriage was made legal that those who are for it used the rainbow on their pictures on Facebook profiles or in other social networks. They claimed the rainbow as their color. I don't apologize for speaking the truth. The Bible is God's covenant with man and not homosexuality's banner of success. Genesis 9:14-17 - "And it shall come to pass, when I bring a cloud over the earth, that the bow shall be seen in the cloud: and I will remember my covenant, which is between me and you and every living creature of all flesh; and the waters shall no more become a flood to destroy all flesh. And the bow shall be in the cloud; and I will look upon it, that I may remember the everlasting covenant between God and every living creature of all flesh that is upon the earth. And God said …

Politically Correct Organizations Need to Take the Beam Out of Their Own Eye First

Politically correct organizations meddling in worldwide affairs is not anything new. Whether it's the Vatican, the European Union, the United Nations, Human Rights Watch and any organization driven by political correctness (and not all of them are Illuminati or Jesuit ran but they're all still dupes of Satan and most of them don't even know it) it's always a problem that they are indeed meddling. While meddling isn't inherently wrong but here's some problems with politically correct organizations:
They only meddle when it's convenient for them as they are guilty of both selective outrage and selective justice.They meddle in the affairs of others without considering their own yard first.They meddle like as if they own the world.
It's stupid how political correctness demands Christians not to judge others but they end up failing to judge themselves. They are always taking "Judge not and you will not be judged." out of context without knowing wha…

The Error of Comparing Protestantism to New Atheism

The amazing blindness of is too amazing isn't it? I just read an article written yesterday which compares Protestantism to New Atheism. As much as the article is written as professionally as possible in contrast to some self-proclaimed apologists I've had a lot of useless arguments with but I'd like to give a friendly rebuke to the writer Karlo Broussard. It's my sincere prayer that Broussard will see the truth from the pages of the Scripture. 
The writer commits the fallacy of categorical error. He compares Sola Scriptura with Richard Dawkins' views on science. Here's one of the statements that really should be considered a categorical error:
Just as science is the only tool Dawkins and company are willing to use to arrive at knowledge of the natural truth, Protestants use only the Bible for determining what is revealed truth. And as many modern atheists reject anything that science cannot detect, so too do Protestants reject any teaching that is…

The Quest For "Unlimited Human Progress" is Really Destroying the Environment

Every time I read from the news of nature's decline due to pollution, how food supply can soon drop anytime, how plant and animal deaths are massively happening I can't help but blame it on one factor: SIN. Yes, sin and most people think it's a fantasy word. It wasn't just a fantasy word that kicked Adam and Eve out of Eden and cursed the Earth with all its imperfections. Sin brought disease and destruction to mankind. Unfortunately, man is to blame for the wanton destruction of the environment all in the name of "unlimited human progress".

You can't divorce science from the Creator and that's a fact. Yet you have people who want to benefit from science without considering the Creator. Christian scientists were conservative because they were aware of one truth that science without ethics is meaningless. I'd like to expand it to say that studying creation without the Creator is absolutely stupid. People can claim that removing God is the key to &qu…

What Does Pisseth Against the Wall Mean?

It's really getting bad for some of my Independent Fundamental Baptist brethren to actually even take the words "pisseth against the wall" which appears at least six times in 1 Samuel 23:22, 1 Samuel 25:34, 1 Kings 14:10, 1 Kings 16:11, 1 Kings 21:21 and 2 Kings 9:8 where the King James actually has the words "pisseth against the wall".  Now I am a King James only-ist but I do not support the stupid interpretation of "pisseth against the wall" by some IFB preachers who have become in some way similar to the Catholic Faith Defenders that they argue against when they should spend their time soulwinning.  Actually I even heard that rather outrageous "pisseth against the wall" sermon by Steven Anderson that was so taken out of context.
So what does pisseth against the wall mean? Let us take a look at these six verses and take it on a exegetic view NOT an eisegetic (out of context) view:
1 Samuel 23:22- "And so more also do God unto the ene…

What's Wrong with the Ang Dating Daan Movement?

The Ang Dating Daan movement is by the Members Church of God International spearheaded by its pastor (and so-called "prophet") Eliseo Soriano.  While claiming to be an expositor of the Scriptures with his "Itanong Mo Kay Soriano" or "Ask Soriano" In English, this religious group actually isn't Christian as some of the ignorant would want to believe.  Though the group claims the Bible is their only authority (as some cults do) but the problem is that they believe only Eli Soriano may interpret the Scriptures.  This is utter heresy!  Not even a great man in the Scriptures, Charles Spurgeon ever made such a preposterous claim!  This is no better than the "true church" movement by Darwin Fish which is exposed by Pastor Phil Johnson as a heretical movement.  In fact, I'm not going to waste my time debating with ADD members, they are a total waste of my time as every other debate.
Unlike John F. Macarthur of Grace to You that actually encoura…

Testimony of Former Iglesia Ni Cristo Member, Now a Born Again Christian

Editor's note: 
First and foremost, I would like to thank the Bereans for this wonderful story of a former Iglesia ni Cristo minister (or pastor), now he has become a Baptist Christian.  It's a sad story that some people have just jumped from one cult to another.  Some members of the Watchtower Society, Charismatic Movement or the Iglesia ni Cristo have left Roman Catholicism but they have never truly come to know the truth of salvation is by faith in Christ alone and that any good works after Christian life is but the grace of God at work in the believer.  Now for this brave testimony that I can really share after many years of searching for one testimony which I hope will further bring more INC members to Jesus Christ.

May I begin with a word of prayer that in the midst of all these trouble, I call upon Jesus Christ the Son of God who the Iglesia ni Cristo deny is indeed God, the only way to salvation, that they trust upon their works and church membership than Him alone.  I…