Skip to main content

Logical Fallacies in Apologetics

In the world of apologetics, there will always be a series of logical fallacies. It's best to know these as to at least, present the truth thoroughly. Each one must be avoided and below is a list of some commonly used logical fallacies and how they are being used.


Ad hominem- Attacking the individual instead of the argument

Example: "Ray Comfort is not qualified to argue that evolution isn't real because he is not a biologist."


Appeal to force- Telling the hearer that something bad will happen if he/she does not accept the argument.

Example: "You agree with what I have to say that Christians need good works to stay saved otherwise you are an Antinomian and a homosexual."


Appeal to pity- Taking advantage of one's pitiful state to win an invalid argument.

Example: A student says, "Well sir/mam it was traffic so that's why I'm late."


Appeal to popularity- Taking advantage of the "majority vote".

Example: A Catholic faith defender says, "We are the ones who are right because of our numbers."


Appeal to tradition- Trying to get someone to accept something because it has been done or believed for a long time.

Example: "I have grown up with Chinese folk religion and the worship of my gods therefore it's right since my ancestors also did it, and since they they weren't Christians, therefore it's wrong to be a Christian."


Argument from silence- This is where just because the person is silent about the matter then he is assumed not to believe in it.

Example: A critic can say, "Well Paul didn't mention about the miracles of Jesus therefore He didn't believe in them."


Begging the Question- Assuming the thing to be true that you are trying to prove. It is circular. This is also known as circular argument.

Example: "You can know the age of the rock layer because of the age of the fossil that was found in it. You can know the age of the fossil because of the age of the rock layer it was found."


Category Mistake/False Analogy- Attributing a property to something that could not possibly have that property.

Example: "Ripe mangoes cause more electric shocks than guyabano when eaten."


Cause and Effect- Assuming that the effect is related to a cause because the events occur together.

Example: "When the rooster crows, the sun rises. Therefore, the rooster causes the sun to rise."


Division- Assuming that what is true for the parts is true for the whole without further examination. This is known as to generalize what can't be generalized.

Example: "The Al Qaida is a Muslim group therefore all Muslims are terrorists."


Equivocation- Using the same term in an argument in different places but the word has different meanings. It can also mean assuming everyone has the same definition as the other.

Example: "God is love. Love is blind. Therefore God is blind."


False Assumptions- In logic as well as in law, "historical precedent" means that the burden of proof rests on those who set forth new theories and not on those whose ideas have already been verified. The old tests the new. The already established authority judges any new claims to authority.

Example: "Islam does not have the burden of proof and that the Qur'an judges the Bible."


False Dilemma- Giving so few choices when in actuality there could be more choices possible or to limit the opponent to a few alternatives when there are more.

Example: "Show me a verse in the Bible that it's forbidden to pray to Mary and the saints and that it's idolatry to do so."


"Genetic" Fallacy- Attempting to endorse or disqualify a claim because of the origin or irrelevant history of the claim.

Example: "Nazareth, what good could come from it?"


Guilt by Association- Rejecting an argument or claim because the person proposing it likes someone whom is disliked by another.

Example: "The fact that Mao Zedong liked classical music, therefore classical music is wrong."


Irrelevance- When you introduce issues which have no logical bearing on the subject under discussion, you are using irrelevant arguments.

Example: "Our traditions are equal to Scripture because of preservation."

Non Sequitur - Comments or information that do not logically follow from a premise or the conclusion.

Example: "It was because my younger sister wished for rain that rain fell."


Phonic Fallacies: The phonetic sound of a word should not be used to twist its meaning.

Example: "Allah is found in the Bible because of the word Allahluiah (perverting Alleluia)."

Playing with synonyms as antonyms- This is the argument where the person uses two words or terms of the same meaning as if they are not the same.

Example: "Salvation is not by good works but by the works of the Law."


Poisoning the Well - Presenting negative information about a person before he/she speaks so as to discredit the person's argument. Mostly done by a vile imagination and direct judgment.

Example: "Don't listen to Pastor Estus Washington Pirkle because he's a loser."


Red Herring - Introducing a topic not related to the subject at hand. This is also commonly known as the flight of ideas.

Example: "Abortion is wrong. On the other hand, my friend is like that rabbit in the children's story."


Special Pleading (double standard) - Applying a standard to another that is different from a standard applied to oneself.

Example: "Salvation is initially by faith alone but it must be maintained by good works to be assured of Heaven. Don't believe me? Read Ephesians 2:10."


Straw Man Argument - Producing an argument about a weaker representation of the truth and attacking it.

Example: "Bible Baptist Church does not care for the poor because it doesn't have donations for the poor in the offering envelope."


Source of knowledge for the logical fallacies: http://carm.org/logical-fallacies-or-fallacies-argumentation

Popular posts from this blog

Who Will You Believe: Pope Francis or the Bible?

Here's a cartoon of how tragic the afterlife for Roman Catholics would be when they realize that they needed a real, personal relationship with Christ to enter into Heaven. As I grew up as a Roman Catholic I didn't really care about the Bible. I even hear some Roman Catholics are told to never read the Bible for themselves because not everyone should be allowed to read it. The priest often says that reading the Bible alone will confuse you so you need their extrabiblical doctrine. Worse, they are confusing Sola Scriptura with Solo Scriptura. Born again Christians have their tradition but it's dictated by the Bible as a guiding principle to one's lifestyle. It's not that they read only the Bible but rather they have the Bible as their only principle for Christian tradition.

What is this personal relationship? As much as some pastors feel like the term personal Lord and Savior can be dangerous or "personal Savior" may suggest that Jesus is a genie than Lor…

When God Says No, He Means No

When God says no He means no! Do you know why the world is in a mess right now? It's all because Adam and Eve couldn't follow one simple rule that was to never eat of the tree of the fruit of life. I'd like to imagine it that God may have even put an "Off Limits" sign on it. But Satan himself always finds a way to convince people to break the rules.
Genesis 3:1-5 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden? And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden: but of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die. And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die: for God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.
G…

What Christians Can Learn From Joshua and Caleb's Confidence in Seizing the Promised Land

Being a Christian means you can be stuck in a pickle. Today's lesson will be from Numbers 13-14 which talks about the twelve spies to the Land of Canaan. I think any Christian leader going into much trouble today may find this as both a source of vexation and encouragement at the same time. It's a source of vexation because there are so many people like the rebellious Israelites in the wilderness. It's a source of encouragement because it's a reminder that God is still in charge.

The story of Numbers 13 talks about the spying. We see one member of each of the tribes that were given a political inheritance were there. We can see their names are as follows:
Numbers 13:4-13 And these were their names: of the tribe of Reuben, Shammua the son of Zaccur. Of the tribe of Simeon, Shaphat the son of Hori. Of the tribe of Judah, Caleb the son of Jephunneh. Of the tribe of Issachar, Igal the son of Joseph. 8 Of the tribe of Ephraim, Oshea the son of Nun. Of the tribe of Benjamin…

Drunk Driving is Dangerous to Society

Consider this picture of a drunk driving incident. This is the car that the late Princess Diana Spencer, the late Dodi Al Fayed and the late Henri Paul (the driver) were using before their tragic demise. What was also interesting to note is that their driver had high dosages of alcohol prior to this gruesome incident. I don't want to talk about the conspiracy side of things but the whole ugly picture that drunk driving kills. But even after this incident and many similar ones before it is that many people still do it even if the consequences are clear as day.

The Bible warns that being a drunkard is one of the marks of an unsaved person:
1 Corinthians 6:9-10  Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God. 
Those who argue that …

Modernization is Not an Excuse to Dismiss Badly Needed Old-Fashioned Revivals

I remembered reading through Jeremiah can be a chore because the events of that book continue to repeat itself. At the same time, reading through Jeremiah can be a comfort because the prophet chose to stand by God's command even if he momentarily stopped preaching (Jeremiah 20:5). One verse that is used to call for old fashioned revivals is Jeremiah 6:16 which says:
Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein.
It's a problem you start calling for old-fashioned revivals and people will call you outdated or a neanderthal. While there's nothing wrong with modern technology but the problem is when people only care if something is modern. While modernization can be used to evangelize but it can also be used to spread the influence of sin. The same printing press that allowed the late Martin Luther to publish Bibles was also u…

The Prosperity Gospel is an Enemy of Cheerful Giving

I remembered having a lecture on the prosperity gospel. One of the worst lies of the prosperity gospel is that giving money or the tithes and offerings to their pastors will turn you into a millionaire, God will spare them from trouble and that they can have the desires of their wicked heart. That's one of the worst heresies I've heard. On the contrary the more faithful you are to God the more you should expect enemy attacks. Some people I know are faithful in giving and their tithes and offerings yet they are not living as billionaires. The motive of giving in the prosperity gospel is to gain the false promise that God wants us happy, healthy and wealthy all the time. That's not cheerful giving isn't it?

If you give money to God in exchange for material blessings then something is pretty wrong. It's a terrible misapplication of Malachi 3:9-10. Do they even know that the blessings where there isn't enough room to receive it isn't all about becoming a billio…

Politically Correct Parenting Raises Spoiled Brats

Politically correct parenting is already the norm of parenting in this fallen world. What most parents don't see is that everyone needs a healthy dose of both Vitamin Yes and Vitamin No. But like anything beneficial in excess or in scarcity too many people have either too much or too little of Vitamin Yes and Vitamin No. While it's not okay to have an overdose of Vitamin No but what's so upsetting is that many people today take the opposite extreme. They aren't giving enough Vitamin No ad are given too much Vitamin Yes. Either way both are overly misguided approaches in parenting.

Is there anything wrong with giving the child what they want? It depends on what the child wants. If a child wants something that's going to honor God (ex. They want their own copy of the Bible that they can read for themselves) then the parent should say yes if what the child wants is God honoring. But if the child only wants to be like the secular children with all their nice stuff the…