When False Accusers Who Claim to Speak the Truth Get Questioned, They Get Really Itching!
During my past experience, I have remembered how false accusers can get really itchy when questioned or ridiculed and even I have experienced that when I got questioned of the lies I made up. What is worse is that some of these false accusers are two-faced hypocrites like they teach the heresy of works salvation and conditional security yet they themselves live a life inconsistent with what they teach. Like for example many of them are drunkards, womanizers, abrasive, chaotic and all kinds of sinful which should be a very sickening reality. What really happens is that when their ridiculous claims like conspiracy theories start to get questioned, they start to get paranoid, they start to throw lies for their own convenience, they paint the world as they see it and their so-called "truth ministries" are run under very different motives. They play games with their opponents- they know many of the things they say are not true but they have big mouths or are swallowed up in their own delusions.
Isaiah 66:4 has God warning, "I also will choose their delusions and will bring their fears upon them; because when I called, none did answer, when I spake, they did not hear; but they did evil before mine eyes and chose that in which I delighted not." This is a very common problem among those false accusers. They are very deluded or are very prone to bearing grudges against people who question them or ridicule them or have seen the reality. Then they start their mocking games which can be very irritating.
Isaiah 66:4 has God warning, "I also will choose their delusions and will bring their fears upon them; because when I called, none did answer, when I spake, they did not hear; but they did evil before mine eyes and chose that in which I delighted not." This is a very common problem among those false accusers. They are very deluded or are very prone to bearing grudges against people who question them or ridicule them or have seen the reality. Then they start their mocking games which can be very irritating.
My experience can be with Roman Catholic apologists, atheist unions, Ang Dating Daan, Iglesia ni Manalo and anti-Catholic Pentecostal movements to name a few can be like that. Like for example in a debate (which I discourage Christians from ever being part of) they can get very unprofessional with their heckling and childish teasing. Words like "Oh I'm so afraid." or "You (insert bad word)." tend to come from their mouths. Worse, they can even pose a challenge or even a threat like, "You (insert bad word), (insert threat)." They may even threaten to humiliate their opponents in various ways possible. One of the things that can even happen to them is when they can get questioned like, "Well if you accuse me of teaching a license to sin because I teach that you can't lose your salvation, can you explain why so many in your flock or you yourself are living life like you have a license to sin and are Antinomian by action?" they rattle, they go ballistic and get itchy to get into a fight.
Those conspiracy theorists when questioned may start to show their attitude problem because they know for sure that many of the things they are writing are for their own convenience and easily get irritated when people ridicule their muddy claims that must be taken with a grain of salt. Another is when an atheist is given the facts of science, they can then say, "Hey that's not real science. You are in no ground to say that because you're a Christian." which is the Ad Hominem fallacy. In fact, one of the worst incidents that could happen is that they can even resolve to physical violence like they are worse than slum people or animals. That's why I keep away from debates and I would prefer to attack false doctrines and by doing so, it refutes everybody who upholds them. No need for that "one by one expose", these people expose themselves.
Those conspiracy theorists when questioned may start to show their attitude problem because they know for sure that many of the things they are writing are for their own convenience and easily get irritated when people ridicule their muddy claims that must be taken with a grain of salt. Another is when an atheist is given the facts of science, they can then say, "Hey that's not real science. You are in no ground to say that because you're a Christian." which is the Ad Hominem fallacy. In fact, one of the worst incidents that could happen is that they can even resolve to physical violence like they are worse than slum people or animals. That's why I keep away from debates and I would prefer to attack false doctrines and by doing so, it refutes everybody who upholds them. No need for that "one by one expose", these people expose themselves.