Skip to main content

Nine Signs of an Intellectually Dishonest Roman Catholic Apologist

I am always amazed that how it is when me or some other Christian apologist such as Bro. Gerry Soliman always attacked with accusations of intellectual dishonesty.  The issue is whether or not I have never committed the acts below because we are all sinners, but the problem is when a person has been calling the kettle black.  I'll admit I have done some intellectual dishonesty myself and I pray by the grace of God I avoid such illogical stupidity.

1.) The tendency to only read (websites, books, periodicals), listen (audio materials) or watch anything (videos) he or she just agrees with.  

We all have this tendency do we?  It just made me think how some Roman Catholic faith defenders tend to only cite Roman Catholic sources most of the time.  Now I admit that there's my tendency to do so but sometimes, I bother to read through Roman Catholic sources to get information like Alfonsus Ligouri's own prayer to prove Roman Catholics indeed worship Mary to cut through their gobbledygook.

2.) Playing the game of false dilemma.  

I noticed that aside from name calling, there's the tendency to use the "agree with me or you're stupid" or "if you are not for me, you are against me" card.  If an intellectually dishonest atheist can do it, so can an intellectually dishonest Roman Catholic faith defender.  It just reminded me of how these people restrict alternatives whenever they are available.   What they may be ignoring is that even if there's a moral law, people may have a certain degree of freedom like while you are told to dress decently but you have the freedom to dress in any way as long as you are dressed decently.

3.) Getting emotional with those who disagree.  

One of the reasons why I now avoiding debates with Roman Catholic faith defenders is not because I am afraid, it's a huge waste of time.  As said, you debate in their camp and they win and they debate in your camp, you win.  I noticed how often these guys get emotional most especially when anger clouds their judgment and worse, there's a lot of bad words.

4.) Praising one's self above others as professional, well-composed and intellectually honest.  

If atheists call themselves as rational, I have seen many Roman Catholic faith defenders who dare call themselves as professional, well-composed and intellectually honest when in fact they are the opposite.  It was funny to see some of them say they are professional with their actions but they display typical childish behavior.  Worse, they tend to believe once you withdraw, they assume that they won.  As the Bible says in Proverbs 27:2, do not praise yourself, instead wait for the praise of others.

5.) Delivering statements as if they were questions.  

If atheist scholars can do this, so can Roman Catholic faith defenders.  It's all about preparing some really hard questions just to perpetuate the argument.

6.) Attacking the person instead of the argument (Ad Hominem).  

It's simple enough to see how many times a Roman Catholic faith defender loves to attack the person instead of the argument.  This has been one of the most childish tactics used by Roman Catholic faith defenders is to always attack the person instead of the argument.

7.) Quoting from famous Roman Catholic scholars, theologians and apologists usually without backup for their arguments.  

I always find it amazing how these Roman Catholic faith defenders speak from their favorite scholars, theologians and apologists usually without backing up or at least, defending the arguments.  I always felt like that many of them just quote and quote without backing up the statement.  It just reminded me of a Roman Catholic apologist who I debated with when I used to engage in debates. He was only copying and pasting his arguments from certain scholars, theologians and apologists but didn't back them up.

8.) Using of generic catch phrases without much support.  

There are many catchphrases to defend one's intellectual dishonestly like, "studies show", "it's a scientific fact" or "everybody knows" to justify one's blunder.  One good example I can come up with (for illustrative purposes) is that a Roman Catholic faith defender who may be defending Pope Francis' call for a worldwide abolition of death penalty by saying, "Studies show death penalty does not decrease crime." then show the same set of papers that says the same statement with inconsistent back-up, like many anti-death penalty studies also tend to be dishonest or two, confuse death penalty with murder.  Generic catchphrases do not change the truth of the matter.

9.) Not seeing the need to criticize yourself.  

I always find it funny how Roman Catholic apologists can abuse the statement, "Do not judge and you will not be judged." but many of them are pretty judgmental one way or another.  In short, remember the phrase that Jesus said in Matthew 7:3-5 and Luke 6:42 that you must first remove the plank from your own eye before you remove the speck from the other?  It's only right to criticize if you criticize yourself first.  Sad to say but it's much easier to give criticism than to receive it, right?  Their huge egos always prevents them from ever criticizing themselves while it makes them take joy in criticizing others, but never themselves or receiving it from others.


Looking at these traits, I am not saying that Baptist, Protestant or Evangelical apologists aren't guilty of them either.  For a fact, I hope that my fellow Baptists or other non-Baptist Christian brethren would not stoop down to the level of intellectual dishonestly as the opponents have to offer.  At the same time, these nine signs can also be applicable to conspiracy theorists as well.


The idea was taken from "9 Signs That You Might Be An Intellectually Dishonest Atheist"

Popular posts from this blog

Who Will You Believe: Pope Francis or the Bible?

Here's a cartoon of how tragic the afterlife for Roman Catholics would be when they realize that they needed a real, personal relationship with Christ to enter into Heaven. As I grew up as a Roman Catholic I didn't really care about the Bible. I even hear some Roman Catholics are told to never read the Bible for themselves because not everyone should be allowed to read it. The priest often says that reading the Bible alone will confuse you so you need their extrabiblical doctrine. Worse, they are confusing Sola Scriptura with Solo Scriptura. Born again Christians have their tradition but it's dictated by the Bible as a guiding principle to one's lifestyle. It's not that they read only the Bible but rather they have the Bible as their only principle for Christian tradition.

What is this personal relationship? As much as some pastors feel like the term personal Lord and Savior can be dangerous or "personal Savior" may suggest that Jesus is a genie than Lor…

When God Says No, He Means No

When God says no He means no! Do you know why the world is in a mess right now? It's all because Adam and Eve couldn't follow one simple rule that was to never eat of the tree of the fruit of life. I'd like to imagine it that God may have even put an "Off Limits" sign on it. But Satan himself always finds a way to convince people to break the rules.
Genesis 3:1-5 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden? And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden: but of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die. And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die: for God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.

What Christians Can Learn From Joshua and Caleb's Confidence in Seizing the Promised Land

Being a Christian means you can be stuck in a pickle. Today's lesson will be from Numbers 13-14 which talks about the twelve spies to the Land of Canaan. I think any Christian leader going into much trouble today may find this as both a source of vexation and encouragement at the same time. It's a source of vexation because there are so many people like the rebellious Israelites in the wilderness. It's a source of encouragement because it's a reminder that God is still in charge.

The story of Numbers 13 talks about the spying. We see one member of each of the tribes that were given a political inheritance were there. We can see their names are as follows:
Numbers 13:4-13 And these were their names: of the tribe of Reuben, Shammua the son of Zaccur. Of the tribe of Simeon, Shaphat the son of Hori. Of the tribe of Judah, Caleb the son of Jephunneh. Of the tribe of Issachar, Igal the son of Joseph. 8 Of the tribe of Ephraim, Oshea the son of Nun. Of the tribe of Benjamin…

Drunk Driving is Dangerous to Society

Consider this picture of a drunk driving incident. This is the car that the late Princess Diana Spencer, the late Dodi Al Fayed and the late Henri Paul (the driver) were using before their tragic demise. What was also interesting to note is that their driver had high dosages of alcohol prior to this gruesome incident. I don't want to talk about the conspiracy side of things but the whole ugly picture that drunk driving kills. But even after this incident and many similar ones before it is that many people still do it even if the consequences are clear as day.

The Bible warns that being a drunkard is one of the marks of an unsaved person:
1 Corinthians 6:9-10  Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God. 
Those who argue that …

Modernization is Not an Excuse to Dismiss Badly Needed Old-Fashioned Revivals

I remembered reading through Jeremiah can be a chore because the events of that book continue to repeat itself. At the same time, reading through Jeremiah can be a comfort because the prophet chose to stand by God's command even if he momentarily stopped preaching (Jeremiah 20:5). One verse that is used to call for old fashioned revivals is Jeremiah 6:16 which says:
Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein.
It's a problem you start calling for old-fashioned revivals and people will call you outdated or a neanderthal. While there's nothing wrong with modern technology but the problem is when people only care if something is modern. While modernization can be used to evangelize but it can also be used to spread the influence of sin. The same printing press that allowed the late Martin Luther to publish Bibles was also u…

The Prosperity Gospel is an Enemy of Cheerful Giving

I remembered having a lecture on the prosperity gospel. One of the worst lies of the prosperity gospel is that giving money or the tithes and offerings to their pastors will turn you into a millionaire, God will spare them from trouble and that they can have the desires of their wicked heart. That's one of the worst heresies I've heard. On the contrary the more faithful you are to God the more you should expect enemy attacks. Some people I know are faithful in giving and their tithes and offerings yet they are not living as billionaires. The motive of giving in the prosperity gospel is to gain the false promise that God wants us happy, healthy and wealthy all the time. That's not cheerful giving isn't it?

If you give money to God in exchange for material blessings then something is pretty wrong. It's a terrible misapplication of Malachi 3:9-10. Do they even know that the blessings where there isn't enough room to receive it isn't all about becoming a billio…

Politically Correct Parenting Raises Spoiled Brats

Politically correct parenting is already the norm of parenting in this fallen world. What most parents don't see is that everyone needs a healthy dose of both Vitamin Yes and Vitamin No. But like anything beneficial in excess or in scarcity too many people have either too much or too little of Vitamin Yes and Vitamin No. While it's not okay to have an overdose of Vitamin No but what's so upsetting is that many people today take the opposite extreme. They aren't giving enough Vitamin No ad are given too much Vitamin Yes. Either way both are overly misguided approaches in parenting.

Is there anything wrong with giving the child what they want? It depends on what the child wants. If a child wants something that's going to honor God (ex. They want their own copy of the Bible that they can read for themselves) then the parent should say yes if what the child wants is God honoring. But if the child only wants to be like the secular children with all their nice stuff the…