Skip to main content

Homosexual Rights May Soon Destroy a Society With the Consequences of a Homosexual Lifestyle!

It's so annoying that the Gay Mafia (better renamed as the Homosexual Mafia, gay means happy and homosexual is a more appropriate term) keep demanding for political correctness.  They may claim to be the most tolerant and loving people but if they were, why do they criminalize every act of Christianity that was not mean to get rid of them as an act meant to get rid of them?  The answer is in Romans 1:21-25 about their hatred for God. 

To have homosexuals with the right to political correctness, it also means that any propaganda that can undermine a pro-homosexual stand would be banned.  Just think of what if doctors were to present the hard pressing truths about homosexuals and their practices.  If a doctor would one day present concrete studies about it that homosexual activities would be dangerous to those who do it.  Such a doctor would probably lose his or her job for telling the truth about homosexuality and its dangers.  Is it really so wrong to tell people of the dangers of what they do?  It would be awful to withhold the truth about the harms of their sins than to tell them about it.

What is so sad today is that homosexuals are just like the sheep in this picture, the wolf represents the dangers that their homosexual activities are doing then they kick out the person who is warning them.  The person who is warning them may either be a preacher, a doctor or any Christian concerned about their souls.  Instead of listening, they might just respond saying that I shouldn't judge (misquoting Matthew 7:1 ignoring the context of that verse) because the person is not without sin and they call him a self-righteous, legalistic, judgmental Pharisee.  I guess the people stoned the prophets in the Old Testament for the same reason - accusing the prophets of being self-righteous when they are the ones suffering it and accusing them of legalism because they love their sin.  It's very annoying for any Christian to meet self-righteous people who revel in their sin and think nothing is wrong with them.

Many homosexuals even dare say, "Well we are moral people." never mind that even the New Testament condemns homosexuality.  These people take Scriptures out of context like when they tell me something like, "Wow you are a hypocrite, self-righteous Pharisee for wearing mixed fiber, eating pork while going against homosexuality."  What they are ignoring is that mixed fibers had a scientific reason namely as the Jamieson-Fausset-Brown commentary says, "The law, it is to be observed, did not prohibit the Israelites wearing many different kinds of cloths together, but only the two specified; and the observations and researches of modern science have proved that "wool, when combined with linen, increases its power of passing off the electricity from the body.  In hot climates, it brings on malignant fevers and exhausts the strength; and when passing off from the body, it meets with the heated air, inflames and excoriates like a blister." [Whitlaw]. (See Eze 44:17, 18)." 

If doctors were prohibited from showing any of the dangers of homosexuality, I would expect society to die down as a result of the consequences of a homosexual lifestyle because of a lack of knowledge (Hosea 4:6).  It's just like if I don't tell people that the water they are drinking is contaminated or a certain food product causes cancer, that smoking marijuana would destroy a person's mental capacity or a certain medicine turns out to have harmful side effects.  If homosexuality were tolerated I could just imagine the downfall of society that would happen like sexually transmitted diseases, people getting horribly sick from ingesting each other's human waste from the homosexual partner and the list can go on.  If the Muslim extremists or any lunatic won't destroy them, their very own sinful will destroy them and condemn them to an eternity in Hell.  

See also:

Male Sodomy is a Cause for Spread of HIV and AIDS

Popular posts from this blog

Do Feminists Ever Realize That Women Shouldn't Use Acts of Violence Against Men?

It's irritating to be told that men shouldn't use violence on women but the other way around is okay. No, it's not okay to hit anyone regardless of gender out of anger or frustration. If men shouldn't hit women except in acts of self-defense then the other way round should apply. But you have to remember the stupidity of selective justice and selective outrage of feminists. They think men should respect them while they think discriminating against men is okay. Their quest for "equality" is nothing more than a big joke.

Why is it usually a big fuzz when a man hits a woman but not so many people react if a woman hits a man? That kind of hypocrisy is worth addressing. They say men shouldn't hit women because they are "weaker" but is it okay for a person of lower rank to attack a person of higher rank? The word submission doesn't exist in the feminist dictionary unless it's men submitting to them. Whether they like it or not the husband is t…

You Can't Preach About God's Love For Sinners Without Preaching About His Wrath Against Sin

It's a problem that so many quack preachers love to preach God's love for sinners but not about God's wrath against them because He must punish both the sin and the sinner. Everything from God's love to His wrath is dictated by the fact that He is holy and you are not. The message about God's love for sinners will make no sense if you don't preach about God's wrath against sin first. I remembered listening to "Hell's Best Kept Secret" and "True and False Conversion" by Ray Comfort. There was this point where Kirk Cameron talked about what if I sold my property to save someone from a disease. If the person doesn't know anything about the disease then my selling of all my property to pay for the badly needed treatment won't make sense. Another illustration was all about the flight. You have to tell the person that the parachute is not meant to improve the flight but to tell the person that it's for emergency reasons. If you…

It's Not Okay to Be Blindly Loyal to the Pope and His Army of Pharisees

Some rabid Roman Catholics keep sensationalizing the sins of fraud pastors (as if true born again Christians ever support them) while they keep hiding the sins of their priests or Pharisees. They also say that born again Christians are blindly loyal to the pastor never mind that they are blindly loyal to the Pope and his Pharisees. Blind loyalty towards a a prosperity gospel pastor, a so-called successor of a so-called last messenger or any quack preacher is no different than blind loyalty towards the Pope and his Pharisees. Worse, Roman Catholics believe that their Pharisees are instruments in saving their souls or that the Pope supposedly holds salvation in his hands never mind all the priestly scandals are telling them otherwise.

I could remember how often Bible reading is discouraged (and yet some of these rabid Roman Catholics tell me I should read the Bible and I can't get wrong with it) because it could drive me crazy from reading it. Some Roman Catholics I've met &quo…

Don't Even Think About Legalizing Prostitution or Sex Trade

There's some people who seek to legalize prostitution. Some "rational" atheists are already talking about prostitution should be legalized so it could be controlled by the government. The claim that "studies" show that prohibition doesn't work is a lie straight from the pits of Hell. The Israelites were doing sin not because God forbade it but because they were disobedient and the rulers did nothing to prevent those sins. It's not surprising is that the same people who seek to legalize prostitution also want to legalize narcotics and hard liquor all in the name of "succeeding in the war against them".

The logic behind legalizing prostitution is that so the government can control them and tax them. But the problem with the quest to legalize prostitution is that it encourages the sin rather than discourage it. The problem is not the war against prostitution but ignoring Ecclesiastes 8:11. Do you know why the war against prostitution isn't wo…

Is Salvation in Peter's Hands (As Well as the Popes) Because Jesus Supposedly Gave Him the Literal Keys of Heaven?

According to a self-proclaimed Roman Catholic apologist (who I'll probably dub as Mr. Whistle when I mention him) he claimed that salvation is in the hands of Peter because Jesus gave the former the keys of Heaven. The guy is clearly taking things out of context with what he says. I wonder does he even bother to check out the idioms of the Bible since some passages use a figure of speech instead of speaking everything literally?

If he can't get Matthew 16:18 correctly where he said that Peter the Rock even when the Good News Translation for Roman Catholics says otherwise (and worse for them Peter is differentiated as a rock and the Rock is clearly not him) then he also misinterprets Matthew 16:19. Let's try to understand Matthew 16:19 with the keys and what they really mean. In his interpretation he's already telling everyone that born again Christians should just go back to the Roman Catholic institution because the Pope supposedly holds salvation in his hands. I don&…

Atheists With Abusive Mindsets Do Exist

It's a myth over the modern world that there's no such thing as an atheist with an abusive mindset. I can see atheists who claim that abuses only come through theism. I don't deny that there's such a thing as religious people with an abusive mindset such as Roman Catholic fanatics, Islamic extremists and any form of religious extremism. The problem of the claim is that it denies the reality that there's such a thing as atheists who have an abusive mindset. One such person is the late Christopher Hitchens who claims that he has the right o treat religion with ridicule, hatred and contempt. Isn't that an example of an atheist with an abusive mindset? Sad to say, Hitchens himself is still cursing God from the pits of Hell. Christians should pray that Richard Dawkins wouldn't make the same wrong decision as Hitchens.

One horrible atheist blogger claimed he was indeed one of the most scientific people on Earth. Just reading his blog alone is so tiresome that I&…

Why This Ministry DOES NOT Support the Westboro Baptist Church

The Westboro Baptist Church is a so-called Baptist institution founded by Fred Phelps who is a lawyer and a theologian. Is it your average Baptist assembly or is this another of Satan's brain children? I would like to present my stand why this ministry does not support the Westboro Baptist Church and why as a Baptist, I do not support them either:
The founder Fred Phelps who serves as its pastor. I do find it disturbing he says that he supports sound doctrine of good Christian preachers of the past like John Calvin and Charles Haddon Spurgeon but his doctrine is not sound at all. His preaching is definitely not balanced. While I do appreciate him attacking the Great Whore of Revelation, apostasy, ecumenism, homosexuality, abortion, pornography and a lot of sins however he is no better than the Roman Catholic institution which he frequently criticizes. Although he claims to be a Calvinist and a Spurgeon fan, however many of those who are Calvinist preachers like Paul Washer, John …