Skip to main content

John Calvin's Advice: Christians, Do Not Waste Your Time Arguing with Heretical Preachers!

For the New Year, here's a piece of advice of how Reformed students can start the year right from John Calvin...

In spite of the fact that John Calvin had a published debate with Cardinal Jacopo Sadoleto where he wrote that a faith devoid of works is unbiblical, he also said that it is a waste of time to debate with heretics.  Maybe before he said that statement, he used to spend time debating or maybe, he even debated with the Jesuit founder Ignatius of Loyola.  But later, he soon found that in his debate with false preachers that he wasted his time in doing that.  Perhaps it was by his learning experience that he said that arguing with heretics is a total waste of time.

The Geneva Study Bible says in 2 Timothy 2:16, "He reveals the subtilty of Satan, who beginning with these principles, draws us by little and little to ungodliness through the means of that wicked and profane babbling, which gradually increases.  And this he proves by the horrible example of those that taught that the resurrection was already past."  What the comment is saying is simply that Satan really knows how to take advantage of conflicts.  Although Christians are saved but remember, if Satan can make Lot deliberately move into Sodom, make Solomon have the wrong alliances or David commit adultery with Bathsheba which are heavier sins, certainly he can also make Christians lose their testimony by what some may call as lesser sins.  This can be that Satan can mislead Christians in their flesh that they should debate which soon makes the Christian lose their image.  If watered down preaching is wrong then so is teaching the truth in a way that's going as cheesy and offensive as possible.  As much as the truth should offend the sinner, the truth still needs to be spoken in love and not in a way to deliberately offend others like shouting, yelling and cursing at unbelievers.  

While there is a truth war to fight but nowhere in Pastor John F. MacArthur's book "Truth War" did he encourage to do conflict for conflict's sake or to keep debating with heretics after you have rebuked their heresy.  While you need to rebuke heresy and correct heresy but spending time debating on who's right and who's wrong is really a waste of time.  Christians are told to fight for the truth but not to fight with other people.  The more the debate goes on, the more battles and disputes increase which in turn gets rid of Christlike behavior because ungodliness increases in its place.  While it's Christlike to rebuke sin and heresy calling for the person's repentance but it must be done with the motive of love for the other person.  Jesus may have confronted the Pharisees but He did not debate with them nor did he quarrel them.  He warned them and spoke the harsh truth but He did not quarrel with them.  

The debates with heretics appeals to the flesh and since Christians still have their sinful nature (which sins) along with their new nature (which cannot sin), it appeals to the pride of life.  A Christian may refuse the lust of the eyes or the lust of the flesh but they can fail in resisting the pride of life.  Getting involved with debates means appealing to the pride of life.  Like any comfortable bed, sin is very hard to pull out when you get comfortable in it.  Even if a Christian may not find comfort in getting drunk, drug dealing or the obvious sins but it can be very easy to get comfortable with debating with heretics.  When one gets trapped in a debate against heretics, it ends up getting trapped into one's system and it will be very hard to get out.  Like drugs and alcohol, once you pop you cannot easy stop and the same goes for those useless debates with heretics.  It takes God's grace to say no to a debate and a Christian should just say no to debating heretics.  If a Christian can say, "No thanks, I'm a Christian." to vices like drugs and alcohol by God's grace, the same goes for debating with heretics, they have that power to resist it by God's grace.


See also:

Popular posts from this blog

Do Feminists Ever Realize That Women Shouldn't Use Acts of Violence Against Men?

It's irritating to be told that men shouldn't use violence on women but the other way around is okay. No, it's not okay to hit anyone regardless of gender out of anger or frustration. If men shouldn't hit women except in acts of self-defense then the other way round should apply. But you have to remember the stupidity of selective justice and selective outrage of feminists. They think men should respect them while they think discriminating against men is okay. Their quest for "equality" is nothing more than a big joke.

Why is it usually a big fuzz when a man hits a woman but not so many people react if a woman hits a man? That kind of hypocrisy is worth addressing. They say men shouldn't hit women because they are "weaker" but is it okay for a person of lower rank to attack a person of higher rank? The word submission doesn't exist in the feminist dictionary unless it's men submitting to them. Whether they like it or not the husband is t…

You Can't Preach About God's Love For Sinners Without Preaching About His Wrath Against Sin

It's a problem that so many quack preachers love to preach God's love for sinners but not about God's wrath against them because He must punish both the sin and the sinner. Everything from God's love to His wrath is dictated by the fact that He is holy and you are not. The message about God's love for sinners will make no sense if you don't preach about God's wrath against sin first. I remembered listening to "Hell's Best Kept Secret" and "True and False Conversion" by Ray Comfort. There was this point where Kirk Cameron talked about what if I sold my property to save someone from a disease. If the person doesn't know anything about the disease then my selling of all my property to pay for the badly needed treatment won't make sense. Another illustration was all about the flight. You have to tell the person that the parachute is not meant to improve the flight but to tell the person that it's for emergency reasons. If you…

It's Not Okay to Be Blindly Loyal to the Pope and His Army of Pharisees

Some rabid Roman Catholics keep sensationalizing the sins of fraud pastors (as if true born again Christians ever support them) while they keep hiding the sins of their priests or Pharisees. They also say that born again Christians are blindly loyal to the pastor never mind that they are blindly loyal to the Pope and his Pharisees. Blind loyalty towards a a prosperity gospel pastor, a so-called successor of a so-called last messenger or any quack preacher is no different than blind loyalty towards the Pope and his Pharisees. Worse, Roman Catholics believe that their Pharisees are instruments in saving their souls or that the Pope supposedly holds salvation in his hands never mind all the priestly scandals are telling them otherwise.

I could remember how often Bible reading is discouraged (and yet some of these rabid Roman Catholics tell me I should read the Bible and I can't get wrong with it) because it could drive me crazy from reading it. Some Roman Catholics I've met &quo…

Don't Even Think About Legalizing Prostitution or Sex Trade

There's some people who seek to legalize prostitution. Some "rational" atheists are already talking about prostitution should be legalized so it could be controlled by the government. The claim that "studies" show that prohibition doesn't work is a lie straight from the pits of Hell. The Israelites were doing sin not because God forbade it but because they were disobedient and the rulers did nothing to prevent those sins. It's not surprising is that the same people who seek to legalize prostitution also want to legalize narcotics and hard liquor all in the name of "succeeding in the war against them".

The logic behind legalizing prostitution is that so the government can control them and tax them. But the problem with the quest to legalize prostitution is that it encourages the sin rather than discourage it. The problem is not the war against prostitution but ignoring Ecclesiastes 8:11. Do you know why the war against prostitution isn't wo…

Is Salvation in Peter's Hands (As Well as the Popes) Because Jesus Supposedly Gave Him the Literal Keys of Heaven?

According to a self-proclaimed Roman Catholic apologist (who I'll probably dub as Mr. Whistle when I mention him) he claimed that salvation is in the hands of Peter because Jesus gave the former the keys of Heaven. The guy is clearly taking things out of context with what he says. I wonder does he even bother to check out the idioms of the Bible since some passages use a figure of speech instead of speaking everything literally?

If he can't get Matthew 16:18 correctly where he said that Peter the Rock even when the Good News Translation for Roman Catholics says otherwise (and worse for them Peter is differentiated as a rock and the Rock is clearly not him) then he also misinterprets Matthew 16:19. Let's try to understand Matthew 16:19 with the keys and what they really mean. In his interpretation he's already telling everyone that born again Christians should just go back to the Roman Catholic institution because the Pope supposedly holds salvation in his hands. I don&…

Atheists With Abusive Mindsets Do Exist

It's a myth over the modern world that there's no such thing as an atheist with an abusive mindset. I can see atheists who claim that abuses only come through theism. I don't deny that there's such a thing as religious people with an abusive mindset such as Roman Catholic fanatics, Islamic extremists and any form of religious extremism. The problem of the claim is that it denies the reality that there's such a thing as atheists who have an abusive mindset. One such person is the late Christopher Hitchens who claims that he has the right o treat religion with ridicule, hatred and contempt. Isn't that an example of an atheist with an abusive mindset? Sad to say, Hitchens himself is still cursing God from the pits of Hell. Christians should pray that Richard Dawkins wouldn't make the same wrong decision as Hitchens.

One horrible atheist blogger claimed he was indeed one of the most scientific people on Earth. Just reading his blog alone is so tiresome that I&…

Why This Ministry DOES NOT Support the Westboro Baptist Church

The Westboro Baptist Church is a so-called Baptist institution founded by Fred Phelps who is a lawyer and a theologian. Is it your average Baptist assembly or is this another of Satan's brain children? I would like to present my stand why this ministry does not support the Westboro Baptist Church and why as a Baptist, I do not support them either:
The founder Fred Phelps who serves as its pastor. I do find it disturbing he says that he supports sound doctrine of good Christian preachers of the past like John Calvin and Charles Haddon Spurgeon but his doctrine is not sound at all. His preaching is definitely not balanced. While I do appreciate him attacking the Great Whore of Revelation, apostasy, ecumenism, homosexuality, abortion, pornography and a lot of sins however he is no better than the Roman Catholic institution which he frequently criticizes. Although he claims to be a Calvinist and a Spurgeon fan, however many of those who are Calvinist preachers like Paul Washer, John …