Skip to main content

It's Sickening How People Can Sympathize with Criminals over the Victims of Crime

In a world that loves sin, it's already expected to get people to sympathize with criminals over the victims of crime. The call for abolishing death penalty is nothing more than a joke. Some people even claim that death penalty isn't even an effective deterrent to crime. The Vatican is also participating in the same sick joke for several years. It's no surprise to me how the world today cries foul against the death penalty saying it's inhuman and taking many verses out of context.

What verses are these? Here's a few verses I can remember were taken out of context:
  • Exodus 20:13
  • Deuteronomy 5:17 
  • John 8:7

Those are just a few verses that get habitually taken out of context. But let's know that the whole "thou shalt not kill" actually means "thou shalt not murder" in today's modern language. While I personally prefer the King James Bible and I'm personally a King James only-ist but I try to study the Greek and Hebrew in context. The prohibition was against unlawful killing and not against death penalty itself. 

Please continue to read the whole book Exodus before you jump into conclusions. God also ordained the death penalty in Exodus 21:23-24. What an eye for an eye and tooth for a tooth is not a recipe for personal revenge. Anybody who thinks otherwise is taking the Scriptures out of their context. Instead, it's all about how to limit penalties that nobody gets punished more than they committed a crime. If their crime didn't violate the right to life then the death penalty was not given. There was a right to due process and false witnesses were to be put to death (Deuteronomy 19:16-20). Today, perjury is hardly taken seriously never mind that an innocent life could have been taken away. But back then, false witnesses were put to death making sure misjudgments were hardly made.

Let's go to John 8:7 which is also misplaced. When Jesus said to them let He who sinned not cast the first stone, He wasn't going against the death penalty. Instead, what He was against was taking the Law into one's own hands. If you want to be a vigilante then make sure you haven't sinned. The Pharisees were trying to take the law into their hands. Plus, the procedures for death penalty required two valid witnesses, a proper trial with proper evidence and what they did was not even verified for a bit. Plus, the adultery law required both the man and the woman to be sentenced once they're verified for adultery (Deuteronomy 22:22). In later laws, adultery required both the man and the woman to serve sentence in jail depending on the gravity of the offense. 

The attitude that criminals are getting sympathy over victims isn't even biblical. Deuteronomy 13:8-9 and Deuteronomy 19:13 calls no pity for murderers. Although nobody should take satisfaction for the life of an unrepentant murderer but no pity is called for it either. God may not take pleasure in the death of the wicked but He won't hesitate to punish them when the time is right. Just because God commands people not to take pleasure in the death penalty doesn't mean He doesn't command it either. While God takes no pleasure in throwing people into Hell but He will do it because He's just and holy. Just because a necessary course of action is going to hurt doesn't mean you have the option not to do it. If any pity should be given towards them it's at the fact that they died unrepentant. 

Crime is so rampant today as Ecclesiastes 8:11 says that because punishment against sin is not done quickly whenever it's needed so men's hearts are set to do evil. Just think of countries that carry out strict law enforcement according to one's offense. If there's strict law enforcement then people will start to fear God. You can take a look at countries with lower crime rates. It's because people there fear to break the Law. On the other hand, one can take a look at countries that don't have strict law enforcement. It's really chaos all throughout. Instead of following the advice of Ecclesiastes 8:11 we have people who choose to sympathize with crime. While Jesus indeed called for a ministry of reconciliation but it was for the repentant. When He dined with harlots and tax collectors they were already repentant. The adulterous woman was forgiven and not stoned to death because she was repentant. 

Romans 13:1-4 acknowledges it that the government is called to also bear the sword not in vain. A sword is not used to plant vegetables. A garden knife is used to plant vegetables. The sword was used to execute doers of evil to execute wrath upon evildoers, not to murder people out of hate or convenience. Besides, nobody should wonder why crime is so rampant now if that's the case. It's because of certain governments who are not doing their responsibility of punishing crime all in the name of political correctness and humanity. But it's doubtful they ever thought of justice that had to be done. It's no wonder the world is getting worse because of the attitude that's so anti-God and pro-sin. Yet many of them are still crying out to why God's unfair and unjust whenever they become victims of sin. Isn't that really stupid?

See also:

Popular posts from this blog

Who Will You Believe: Pope Francis or the Bible?

Here's a cartoon of how tragic the afterlife for Roman Catholics would be when they realize that they needed a real, personal relationship with Christ to enter into Heaven. As I grew up as a Roman Catholic I didn't really care about the Bible. I even hear some Roman Catholics are told to never read the Bible for themselves because not everyone should be allowed to read it. The priest often says that reading the Bible alone will confuse you so you need their extrabiblical doctrine. Worse, they are confusing Sola Scriptura with Solo Scriptura. Born again Christians have their tradition but it's dictated by the Bible as a guiding principle to one's lifestyle. It's not that they read only the Bible but rather they have the Bible as their only principle for Christian tradition.

What is this personal relationship? As much as some pastors feel like the term personal Lord and Savior can be dangerous or "personal Savior" may suggest that Jesus is a genie than Lor…

When God Says No, He Means No

When God says no He means no! Do you know why the world is in a mess right now? It's all because Adam and Eve couldn't follow one simple rule that was to never eat of the tree of the fruit of life. I'd like to imagine it that God may have even put an "Off Limits" sign on it. But Satan himself always finds a way to convince people to break the rules.
Genesis 3:1-5 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden? And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden: but of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die. And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die: for God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.

What Christians Can Learn From Joshua and Caleb's Confidence in Seizing the Promised Land

Being a Christian means you can be stuck in a pickle. Today's lesson will be from Numbers 13-14 which talks about the twelve spies to the Land of Canaan. I think any Christian leader going into much trouble today may find this as both a source of vexation and encouragement at the same time. It's a source of vexation because there are so many people like the rebellious Israelites in the wilderness. It's a source of encouragement because it's a reminder that God is still in charge.

The story of Numbers 13 talks about the spying. We see one member of each of the tribes that were given a political inheritance were there. We can see their names are as follows:
Numbers 13:4-13 And these were their names: of the tribe of Reuben, Shammua the son of Zaccur. Of the tribe of Simeon, Shaphat the son of Hori. Of the tribe of Judah, Caleb the son of Jephunneh. Of the tribe of Issachar, Igal the son of Joseph. 8 Of the tribe of Ephraim, Oshea the son of Nun. Of the tribe of Benjamin…

Drunk Driving is Dangerous to Society

Consider this picture of a drunk driving incident. This is the car that the late Princess Diana Spencer, the late Dodi Al Fayed and the late Henri Paul (the driver) were using before their tragic demise. What was also interesting to note is that their driver had high dosages of alcohol prior to this gruesome incident. I don't want to talk about the conspiracy side of things but the whole ugly picture that drunk driving kills. But even after this incident and many similar ones before it is that many people still do it even if the consequences are clear as day.

The Bible warns that being a drunkard is one of the marks of an unsaved person:
1 Corinthians 6:9-10  Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God. 
Those who argue that …

Modernization is Not an Excuse to Dismiss Badly Needed Old-Fashioned Revivals

I remembered reading through Jeremiah can be a chore because the events of that book continue to repeat itself. At the same time, reading through Jeremiah can be a comfort because the prophet chose to stand by God's command even if he momentarily stopped preaching (Jeremiah 20:5). One verse that is used to call for old fashioned revivals is Jeremiah 6:16 which says:
Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein.
It's a problem you start calling for old-fashioned revivals and people will call you outdated or a neanderthal. While there's nothing wrong with modern technology but the problem is when people only care if something is modern. While modernization can be used to evangelize but it can also be used to spread the influence of sin. The same printing press that allowed the late Martin Luther to publish Bibles was also u…

The Prosperity Gospel is an Enemy of Cheerful Giving

I remembered having a lecture on the prosperity gospel. One of the worst lies of the prosperity gospel is that giving money or the tithes and offerings to their pastors will turn you into a millionaire, God will spare them from trouble and that they can have the desires of their wicked heart. That's one of the worst heresies I've heard. On the contrary the more faithful you are to God the more you should expect enemy attacks. Some people I know are faithful in giving and their tithes and offerings yet they are not living as billionaires. The motive of giving in the prosperity gospel is to gain the false promise that God wants us happy, healthy and wealthy all the time. That's not cheerful giving isn't it?

If you give money to God in exchange for material blessings then something is pretty wrong. It's a terrible misapplication of Malachi 3:9-10. Do they even know that the blessings where there isn't enough room to receive it isn't all about becoming a billio…

Politically Correct Parenting Raises Spoiled Brats

Politically correct parenting is already the norm of parenting in this fallen world. What most parents don't see is that everyone needs a healthy dose of both Vitamin Yes and Vitamin No. But like anything beneficial in excess or in scarcity too many people have either too much or too little of Vitamin Yes and Vitamin No. While it's not okay to have an overdose of Vitamin No but what's so upsetting is that many people today take the opposite extreme. They aren't giving enough Vitamin No ad are given too much Vitamin Yes. Either way both are overly misguided approaches in parenting.

Is there anything wrong with giving the child what they want? It depends on what the child wants. If a child wants something that's going to honor God (ex. They want their own copy of the Bible that they can read for themselves) then the parent should say yes if what the child wants is God honoring. But if the child only wants to be like the secular children with all their nice stuff the…