Starbucks CEO Howard Schlutz Needs to Repent!
Here's what Washington Post has to say about Starbucks' CEO has with his latest stand on traditional marriage supporters:
This is the entire problem of Starbucks CEO Schlutz. He says he supports diversity of all kinds but why doesn't he support people who don't want gay marriage or better called as homosexual marriage? That's the problem of the complete tolerance movement. You can't have complete tolerance for this reason. If you tolerate what's righteous then you can't tolerate what's wicked. If you tolerate wickedness then you can't tolerate righteousness. If you tolerate the right to homosexuality then you can't tolerate anything that deprives homosexuals of their rights to practice sodomy like being against gay marriage.
Yes, Schutz is intolerant to those who oppose same sex marriage. It's because he's tolerant towards same sex marriage that he must be intolerant towards its opposition. He can't claim to be have complete tolerance because nobody can. If he claims complete tolerance then why isn't he tolerant to businesses who go against homosexual marriage? This just shows how hypocritical the call for complete tolerance can be.
If that's the case then he should also boycott petroleum companies from Muslim countries. Muslim countries don't support same sex marriage and seek to kill homosexuals for being homosexuals. The problem now is that why is he still using gasoline from Muslim countries when these countries are persecuting homosexuals as animals to be slaughtered? Why would anybody call the Christian act of telling homosexuals they're wrong and bringing them the Gospel acts of hatred and discrimination?
See also:
SEATTLE – During the Starbucks annual shareholders meeting, CEO Howard Schultz had a clear message to send to investors who don’t support gay marriage: he doesn’t want your business.
It’s one thing to stick to one’s beliefs, but it’s another thing to allow those beliefs to cross the line and become zealotry. It appears Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz crossed that line during the meeting, mixing his belief system with business.
Schultz went on to claim that Starbucks strives to “embrace diversity of all kinds.” He went on to tell a shareholder who stands behind tradition marriage to sell his shares and invest elsewhere.
Forbes reported that Schultz seemed hostile and intolerant of any shareholders who objected to gay marriage for moral or religious reasons.
During the meeting, shareholder Tom Strobhar (who founded the Corporate Morality Action Center) pointed out that after the company voiced its support for a referendum backing gay marriage in Washington state, a boycott by traditional marriage supporters caused a drop in sales revenue.
What do you think? Is this a bad move on Starbucks’ part?
Freedom Daily contributed to this post.
This is the entire problem of Starbucks CEO Schlutz. He says he supports diversity of all kinds but why doesn't he support people who don't want gay marriage or better called as homosexual marriage? That's the problem of the complete tolerance movement. You can't have complete tolerance for this reason. If you tolerate what's righteous then you can't tolerate what's wicked. If you tolerate wickedness then you can't tolerate righteousness. If you tolerate the right to homosexuality then you can't tolerate anything that deprives homosexuals of their rights to practice sodomy like being against gay marriage.
Yes, Schutz is intolerant to those who oppose same sex marriage. It's because he's tolerant towards same sex marriage that he must be intolerant towards its opposition. He can't claim to be have complete tolerance because nobody can. If he claims complete tolerance then why isn't he tolerant to businesses who go against homosexual marriage? This just shows how hypocritical the call for complete tolerance can be.
If that's the case then he should also boycott petroleum companies from Muslim countries. Muslim countries don't support same sex marriage and seek to kill homosexuals for being homosexuals. The problem now is that why is he still using gasoline from Muslim countries when these countries are persecuting homosexuals as animals to be slaughtered? Why would anybody call the Christian act of telling homosexuals they're wrong and bringing them the Gospel acts of hatred and discrimination?
See also:
- Beware of Being "Politically Correct" Over Being Scripturally Correct
- Eight Logical Fallacies Commonly Used By Politically Correct People
- Just Say No to Political Correctness!
- Liberals Are in a Mess Between Christianity, Islam and Homosexuality!
- Loving People Enough to Tell Them the Whole Truth
- The Hypocrisy of the Complete Tolerance Movement