Responding to The Challenge of "It's Old Testament Only" Argument Frequently Done by Homosexuals

By -
It's amazing to see how homosexuals will continue to justify their vile sin.  Let's get started with Leviticus which is the book that contains God's Law.  God's Law is divided into the ceremonial law, the civil law and the moral law.  One thing is certain, the moral law has remained as is. 

A homosexual once said, "Well you Christians try to monopolize the Law.  If you Christians oppose homosexuality because Leviticus 18:22 says so then doesn't Leviticus 11 forbid you from eating shrimp and bacon?  Well there's more for us and none for you.  You are suffering from a severe double standard when you condemn gays while you indulge in shrimp and bacon!"

Again homosexuals have no clear stand nor clear understanding of the Scripture and they simply refuse to.  They can easily shift from "Well didn't Jesus take it all away in the New Testament." or "The Bible is just a book of fables."  They have no clear stand and they refuse the Word of God.  As atheist and lesbian activist Camille Paglia even admits as a lesbian, nobody is born gay but it's a challenge to the norm.

Now let's take a look at how the "Old Testament only" argument by homosexuals falls flat of Scripture.  Let's take Leviticus 11 and Leviticus 18 INTO CONTEXT.  Leviticus 11 talks about the ceremonial law for Israel for distinction.  Leviticus 18 however has this in verse 2, "After the doings of the Land of Egypt wherein ye dwelt ye shall not do: and after the doings of the Land of Canaan wither I bring you shall ye not do: NEITHER SHALL YE WALK IN THEIR ORDINANCES."

We have Leviticus 18:24 saying, "Defile not ye yourselves in any of these things: for in all these NATIONS are defiled which I cast out before you: And the land is defiled: therefore I do visit the iniquity thereof upon it and the land itself vomiteth out her inhabitants."

So if anything in the Old Testament was irrelevant and the New Testament has "taken it all away", well they fail to see only the ceremonial law went away.  The moral law still remained.  One can also see that Leviticus 18 the same chapter also prohibits incestuous relations.  Also it would mean that human sacrifices, prostitution, dishonest weights, washing of hands, unjust labor practice, human trafficking, etc. should be tolerated then?  Those who try to justify homosexuality are in no surprise have the tendency to be quick to justify harlotry and even incest and bestiality as "perfectly normal".