Skip to main content

Those Who Criticize the Bible Are Those Who Read It Least!

Add the word "wrongly" before criticize though...
I remembered how I've seen people who actually criticize the Bible a lot for being a book of tyranny and oppression.  Some foolishly unrestrained people have been calling Christian schools as places of tyranny, concentration camps and say that the Bible is a book that oppresses man, that it's a symbol of tyranny and it's a book of inconsistencies.  But here's the question that I want to tell them, "How often have you read the Bible to criticize it?"  I may expect an answer saying that they are too intelligent and that they don't need to read it again while they criticize it.  I always feel like saying, "Look, if you read it thoroughly, you'll find out how wrong you are."  The more I think about their refusal to take the Bible into context is because of their intellectual pride, not their intelligence.  What they do not realize is that they are willfully foolish and ignorant while declaring themselves to be wise in their own eyes.  

Reading through their arguments which are hard to digest due to all the profane language and swearing in them (the Bible says in Romans 3:14 and Psalm 10:17 that such mouths are filled with cursing and bitterness), I can see how they quote the Scripture.  The Scriptures they quote are very much taken straight out of context.  Even when they insist that they are not taking Scriptures out of context, they are by their own actions, taking them out of context.  It's been one of the most effective weapons the children of Satan have aside from the use of character assassination and half-truths.  Matthew Slick of Christian Apologetics Research Ministry reveals this truth about atheists saying, "Additionally, after reading much atheist material and debating with them over the internet, I've discovered they often use mockery of God, religious leaders, and the Bible as weapons to further their agenda.  This isn't the case with all atheists as I have had very good conversations with some of them, but ridiculing attitudes are surprisingly prevalent and strong.  Character assassination, half-truths, and out-of-context Bible quotes are typical tools used by many of them in attempts to make Christianity look bad." taken from "Concerning atheist attacks against Theism".

Let us take a look at the fact these unfair critics of the Bible call God a murderous monster.  They usually cite the verses that talks about God's command to kill a certain civilization, the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah and just about every instance God commands warfare without understanding the context.  Some of them even say something as foolish as that sin is just a fantasy word and people were doing all they can to survive then God becomes a killjoy.  This also raises the question that if they believe in the famous Dawkins quote that there is no good, no evil but only pitiless indifference and that if sin is just a fantasy word, what is their ground to condemn a just and holy God as a cruel, murderous and unjust in the first place?  If they knew how wicked the civilizations were which were involved in every form of bloody cruelty then they have to realize, God judges the wicked in due time.  They are most likely to cook up another excuse to continue their hatred for God and their unbelief instead of seeing themselves as worthy for extermination.

What they may also fail to see is that God in spite of His hatred for sin and that He is angry with the wicked at a daily basis that He still has given a chance for mercy to be met.  What is worse is that the atheists make fun of the sacrifice of Jesus on the cross for the sins of man as either just a "fairy tale" or an "unnecessary act".  If they read the Bible in context, blood is required as payment for sin and it's the sinless blood of Jesus that pays for it.  Hebrews 9:10-22 is clear that without the shedding of blood, there is no forgiveness and when Jesus paid for it that all blood sacrifices got abolished as a result.  God could not make man righteous without that payment for sin because He is just.  Jesus offered to be that payment for sin for the helpless sinner.  What they do is that they have spat on God's holiness as a result which is both the basis of His mercy and justice.  Their arrogance would be their downfall.  Only if they humble themselves, stop their hostile rebellion against God and submit to His Son, the Lord Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior can they escape the wrath to come.  

See also:

Popular posts from this blog

Ken Ham's Illustrations on Spiritual Warfare Against Humanism

Dr. Ken Ham of Answers in Genesis made these beautiful illustrations to show what's wrong with the church today. Let's take a look at the two illustrations on how Christians engage their spiritual warfare. 
The first illustration reveals the following:
One member is asleep when he should be doing something.Another person is firing at the balloons because the person who's supposed to fire it is asleep on the job.Somebody is focused on deflecting cannon balls than hitting the source of the cannon balls.Somebody is treating the whole situation like a game.  
By doing so, humanism is victorious whenever the local church is asleep. This is the problem to why Christians tend to fall down in battle at times:
Ezekiel 22:30 And I sought for a man among them, that should make up the hedge, and stand in the gap before Me for the land, that I should not destroy it: but I found none.
In short, if you're not going to stand in the gap on behalf of the land then who will? It's the…

The Ridiculous Roman Catholic View That Marriage Must Be Done Inside Their Church or It's Invalid

I remembered reading through the seven sacraments or ordinances of the Roman Catholic institution in a catechism. One of the teachings is that marriage must be treated as a sacrament. What it also implies is that if your marriage is done in a civil court that even if it was duly registered, that both couples were in a sexually pure union then it's not a marriage. So does that mean that a person can marry in a civil court, get divorced and marry his next spouse in the Roman Catholic institution?

Let's address the issue of civil marriage that is pure and holy. In short there was no incest, no adultery and it was between two people who are eligible for marriage. So why should the Roman Catholic institution even think that two people who got married with the sexually pure prerequisites in the eyes of God should be rejected. Is it because unless it's a priest who performs the marriage then the marriage can't be validated? It's a problem with how Roman Catholics have thei…

Don't Forget That the Roman Catholic Institution Has a Very Long History of Inciting Sedition

The Roman Catholic institution has its long fraudulent history of claiming to be the "One True Church that was founded n 33 A.D. - Holy, Catholic and Apostolic". The word catholic is a synonym for universal but the disciples were never first called Catholics in Antioch but Christians (Acts 11:26). Catholic was used as an old world for universal which some people today are allergic to that word because Catholic has been used to describe people who are members of the Roman Catholic institution. What can be talked about now is the fact that the Roman Catholic institution has had a long history of inciting sedition in governments. While they claim it to be doing the "work of God" or as the Jesuits say "Ad Maiorem Dei Gloriam" or "For the greater glory of God." but is it really?

Doing some study of the history of the Vatican has it shown that the Inquisition and later the Jesuit Order have a lot of bloody rags to answer for. Did you know that many ki…

Testimony of Former Jesuit Priest Victor J. Affonso

To Follow Jesus Without Compromise by Victor J. Affonso
Why I joined the Society of Jesus
At the age of 23, I was a successful commercial artist on the verge of going abroad where a job was awaiting me. I was happy at the prospect of leaving India and thereby also escaping the terrible anguish caused of seeing the misery of the poor in the streets of Bombay.
Political saviors like Gandhi and Nehru had failed in giving true freedom and justice to India’s poor majority. Murder and divisions assailed “independent” India, and so it still is today. All the social works were but a few drops of water in a desert. Yet there was still one solution left: The words of Jesus kept coming to me during prayer, “…For with God ALL things are possible” (Mark 10:27). “Don’t run away!” On another day I heard the words, “Follow My Son — Jesus!” This word finally led me to leave the world and join the Society of Jesus, a missionary order that promised by its very title, its “Spiritual Exercises” and its C…

Understanding Ignatius of Antioch's Statement on the Eucharist

It's already expected that Roman Catholicism takes Scriptures out of context and/or purposely misreads it. If they can't even handle the Word of God with reverence then I don't expect them to handle anything else with reverence except it be the writing of the past Popes and the Roman Catholic priests. One such man is the Christian bishop or overseer. In case Roman Catholics want to argue that the term "bishop" would prove he's one of their kind then they are mistaken. To be a bishop according to 1 Timothy 3:1-7 is to be a church leader. Besides, the same passage says that bishops must be family men of moral dignity which is impossible for a Roman Catholic priest who's bound to celibacy. Please note 1 Corinthians 7:35-37 is not a command for priests to stay single all their lives!
Now here's a popular misquote from the very passage of Ignatius of Antioch to justify the doctrine of transubstantiation: They abstain from the eucharist and from prayer, bec…

What Does Pisseth Against the Wall Mean?

It's really getting bad for some of my Independent Fundamental Baptist brethren to actually even take the words "pisseth against the wall" which appears at least six times in 1 Samuel 23:22, 1 Samuel 25:34, 1 Kings 14:10, 1 Kings 16:11, 1 Kings 21:21 and 2 Kings 9:8 where the King James actually has the words "pisseth against the wall".  Now I am a King James only-ist but I do not support the stupid interpretation of "pisseth against the wall" by some IFB preachers who have become in some way similar to the Catholic Faith Defenders that they argue against when they should spend their time soulwinning.  Actually I even heard that rather outrageous "pisseth against the wall" sermon by Steven Anderson that was so taken out of context.
So what does pisseth against the wall mean? Let us take a look at these six verses and take it on a exegetic view NOT an eisegetic (out of context) view:
1 Samuel 23:22- "And so more also do God unto the ene…

God's Curse Upon Gambling!

One of the greatest hypocrisies that people are facing right now is the sin of legalized gambling. Why do I dare say it is hypocritical? It's because for one legalized gambling promotes all type of filth. We have laws against adultery but not against pornography, we have laws against stealing but not against gambling which is really a sin. Today, Christians must voice out not only against legalized prostitution and legalized pornography, they must also voice against legalized gambling. 1 Timothy 6:10 is true that in these days, the love for money is the root of all evil in the secular world plus gambling is mainly rooted upon the love for money. We ought to think that in every way, money is not evil but the love for it is really evil. Gambling in itself is fed because of the love of money. Pastor Mike Stahl a Baptist preacher had also revealed the ill effects of gambling, in truth it is a very lucrative business that sadly destroys lives. To be honest, gambling has been one of th…