Skip to main content

The Importance of the Ministry of Reconciliation For REPENTANT SINNERS in the Church

There's a statement that the church is not a museum of saints but it's a hospital for sinners.  The statement can be very misleading because what kind of sinners is the church a hospital for?  Isn't the church also a museum for the righteous saints that have gone before the forgiven sinners who are still alive in this world?  The statement might be best said as, "The church is both a museum for saints who's gone before as while it's also a hospital for repentant sinners."

Why should the word repentant be emphasized?  Remember in Matthew 18:15-18 talks about the ministry of reconciliation.  While true Christians will not completely fall away but there are seasons that they fall away.  Just because Christians can't live like the rest of the world doesn't mean that they can't backslide for a season.  Righteous saints are repentant sinners saved by the grace of God.  1 Corinthians 6:9-11, Ephesians 2:8-10 and Titus 2:11-14 shows how God's grace conforms Christians unto good works.  They are given a righteous conduct by the grace of God.  Yet they're still repentant sinners because they still sin even if they no longer live like the rest of the world.  Romans 7:14-25 has Paul still thinking of how he wishes for the day of glorification to come.

The church is a hospital for sinners but it doesn't cater to the unrepentant so they'll have the pleasure of committing sin all over again.  Jesus didn't sin with the sinners He dined with.  Instead, He brought the sinners He dined with to repentance.  These tax collectors he ate with already saw their guilt-laden selves and were burdened with sin.  Zacchaeus the tax collector saw himself in need for Jesus and his life changed as a result.  It's a hospital for repentant sinners seeking for new life from sin and not the freedom to sin.  Any church that tells people they're eternally secure to false converts is cut short of its mission of reconciliation.  Since the first mission of the church is to tell sinners how they can be reconciled with God and be forgiven of their sins so they can be saved from their sins not in their sins.  Any church that teaches you have a license to sin is not part of the Body of Christ.

One proof of true repentance is a continued repentance.  Genuine repentance doesn't stop with salvation but it goes on and on in perfecting repentance before it becomes perfected repentance.  True conversion may not mean that a person is sinless but they sin less.  A true conversion drives a person to conviction to repent of their sins continuously.  John 1:8-9 says that we can't say we're sinless and that if we confess, God will cleanse us from unrighteousness.  When there's continued repentance then there's less and less sin.  This isn't about lighting candles and offering prayers to saints, walking while kneeling and the like because that's just penance.  Repentance is a change of mind that begets a change in purpose.

The reconciliation is not limited to the lost but to the saved.  Sometimes, there's conflict in the church between saved people.  Even if these incidents may not be as huge and scandalous as the rest of the world, when Christians sin their being saved makes them repent.  If you're truly once saved, always saved then there ought to be a different attitude towards sin.  It's because once saved always saved also means once saved will persevere.  Now it doesn't mean all the time that the Christian is always persevering but the fruit of perseverance is produced.  It's because when there's a Christian who falls into sin, they can be stubborn for a season but repentance comes eventually.  David was in denial for a year or so but when Nathan confronted him he fell into repentance.  David was a Christian man, he was still saved during the time he fell into the affair and the proof was that his repentance came out when Nathan confronted him.  Would David have lost his salvation he would have probably been stubborn and degenerate about Nathan's rebuke.  The evidence of his salvation that wasn't lost was that Nathan's call for repentance of his sin with Bathsheba bore the fruit of continued repentance.

Christians are called to chastise and rebuke not out of spite but out of love.  You can always correct without loving but you can't love without correcting.  Hebrews 12:5-7 and Revelation 3:19 says that the Lord Jesus rebukes those He loves.  The wicked world is left to its own destruction.  God doesn't leave those who are His alone.  He doesn't save the person and leaves them on their own.  Instead, it's intimate fellowship that grows in godliness.  The call for reconciliation in the church is because there's genuine repentance.  There are times when things don't function properly so that's why reconciliation is not only about lost sinners but also saved people to make them function better.

Popular posts from this blog

Ken Ham's Illustrations on Spiritual Warfare Against Humanism

Dr. Ken Ham of Answers in Genesis made these beautiful illustrations to show what's wrong with the church today. Let's take a look at the two illustrations on how Christians engage their spiritual warfare. 
The first illustration reveals the following:
One member is asleep when he should be doing something.Another person is firing at the balloons because the person who's supposed to fire it is asleep on the job.Somebody is focused on deflecting cannon balls than hitting the source of the cannon balls.Somebody is treating the whole situation like a game.  
By doing so, humanism is victorious whenever the local church is asleep. This is the problem to why Christians tend to fall down in battle at times:
Ezekiel 22:30 And I sought for a man among them, that should make up the hedge, and stand in the gap before Me for the land, that I should not destroy it: but I found none.
In short, if you're not going to stand in the gap on behalf of the land then who will? It's the…

The Ridiculous Roman Catholic View That Marriage Must Be Done Inside Their Church or It's Invalid

I remembered reading through the seven sacraments or ordinances of the Roman Catholic institution in a catechism. One of the teachings is that marriage must be treated as a sacrament. What it also implies is that if your marriage is done in a civil court that even if it was duly registered, that both couples were in a sexually pure union then it's not a marriage. So does that mean that a person can marry in a civil court, get divorced and marry his next spouse in the Roman Catholic institution?

Let's address the issue of civil marriage that is pure and holy. In short there was no incest, no adultery and it was between two people who are eligible for marriage. So why should the Roman Catholic institution even think that two people who got married with the sexually pure prerequisites in the eyes of God should be rejected. Is it because unless it's a priest who performs the marriage then the marriage can't be validated? It's a problem with how Roman Catholics have thei…

No Moral Absolutes Means No Human Rights

We have the truth that human rights activists are everywhere who reject the truth that there are moral absolutes. Many of them have their idea of "Judge not and you will not be judged." As for the atheistic human activists, they tend to carry out Richard Dawkins' quote from the River Out of Eden which says that there's no good, no evil but only pitiless indifference. They think that there are no such thing as moral absolutes. So if they believe that there are no moral absolutes then why are they fighting for human rights which requires moral absolutes to determine them? After all, Dawkins just said there is no purpose but only pitiless indifference.

Here's another problem with atheists' appeal to human rights. Why do they appeal to human rights when they claim that there are no moral absolutes and morality is relative? Human rights are determined by moral absolutes that God made. When God made His Ten Commandments and gave the whole Law - He made it as the st…

James 2 DOES NOT Teach Works Salvation

In a hasty attempt to defend works salvation, they would appeal to James 2.  It would be time to actually clear the fact that Paul and James DO NOT contradict each other. James 2 DOES NOT teach works salvation in which now can be clearly seen when this whole chapter is being dissected to show that James 2 does not defend the heretic crowd.  So let's try to check out what James 2 really is saying.
So first, it's time to think about these facts to debunk the heretical argument of using James 2:
1.) James 2:14-18 is not talking about works salvation but rather, again showing one's faith by one's works.  James 2:18 is a challenge to show one's faith.  Want to know about faith?  Hebrews 11 talks about the results of faith with some of the heroes of the Bible.  Try to coincide Hebrews 11 and James 2 and one sees the results of faith.  As said, when one says that a faith without works is DEAD because true faith produces good works to validate faith.  That's really th…

Does Salvation by Grace Through Faith in Jesus Christ Grant a License to Sin?

Here's a commonly heard argument saying, "Well salvation by faith alone in Jesus Christ is unjust and grants a license to sin." which is frequently done by most world religions.  They demand people must work for their salvation and for one, it's NOT even realistic or practical as it promotes the idea of a dictator God PLUS it's nothing more than asking for the impossible because God's standard of holiness is a LOT higher than all the good works man does.  Despite all the good man does, still they will fall into sin and the followers of almost every false religion this world has to offer shows that like how your average religious person attends religious services yet he/she falls into sin for the rest of the week, showing he/she is WEAK in the flesh.
Now it's time to really correct the whole erroneous argument as false.  Why?  The Bible says otherwise about what God's salvation by grace through faith really does- it transforms the individual to resist…

What Does Pisseth Against the Wall Mean?

It's really getting bad for some of my Independent Fundamental Baptist brethren to actually even take the words "pisseth against the wall" which appears at least six times in 1 Samuel 23:22, 1 Samuel 25:34, 1 Kings 14:10, 1 Kings 16:11, 1 Kings 21:21 and 2 Kings 9:8 where the King James actually has the words "pisseth against the wall".  Now I am a King James only-ist but I do not support the stupid interpretation of "pisseth against the wall" by some IFB preachers who have become in some way similar to the Catholic Faith Defenders that they argue against when they should spend their time soulwinning.  Actually I even heard that rather outrageous "pisseth against the wall" sermon by Steven Anderson that was so taken out of context.
So what does pisseth against the wall mean? Let us take a look at these six verses and take it on a exegetic view NOT an eisegetic (out of context) view:
1 Samuel 23:22- "And so more also do God unto the ene…

What's Wrong with the Ang Dating Daan Movement?

The Ang Dating Daan movement is by the Members Church of God International spearheaded by its pastor (and so-called "prophet") Eliseo Soriano.  While claiming to be an expositor of the Scriptures with his "Itanong Mo Kay Soriano" or "Ask Soriano" In English, this religious group actually isn't Christian as some of the ignorant would want to believe.  Though the group claims the Bible is their only authority (as some cults do) but the problem is that they believe only Eli Soriano may interpret the Scriptures.  This is utter heresy!  Not even a great man in the Scriptures, Charles Spurgeon ever made such a preposterous claim!  This is no better than the "true church" movement by Darwin Fish which is exposed by Pastor Phil Johnson as a heretical movement.  In fact, I'm not going to waste my time debating with ADD members, they are a total waste of my time as every other debate.
Unlike John F. Macarthur of Grace to You that actually encoura…