Ray Comfort on Unscientific Atheism
April Fool everyone! It does become an issue that atheists say that people who believe in God can't be considered scientific, they say that God is nothing more than a fairy tale BUT little do they realize how many perfect of their "scientific" views are NOT scientific at all? Try to notice the difference of science education in Communist countries vs. to those of democratic ones where Christianity is flourishing. Try to notice how much the American system when it was still a Christian nation progressed with science vs. to when America's public schools soon taught the nonsense of atheism to its schools. Now it's time to present what New Zealand born evangelist Ray Comfort with him talking about atheism. He is also the author of "The Atheist Nightmare" which came out on Charles Darwin's 200th birthday although the latter wasn't an atheist and most likely a Freemason. However, atheists do adhere to that dead guy.
In fact his writings on atheism are far more scientifically accurate than the books written by famed atheist authors. So what are the unscientific views of atheism? It's no longer a best-kept secret. Ray Comfort has admitted that he appeals to Stephen Hawking's theory as "unscientific". Before anybody can say, "Hey Ray Comfort is not a scientist so he is in no position to say that." is guilty of ad hominem. Surely a lot of people are learning science for CHRISTIANS so it's time to give a benefit of the doubt of what is no longer Pastor Ray Comfort's best-kept secret with atheism. He, in fact, opened the box in "Nothing Created Everything -- the scientific impossibility of atheistic evolution" which he shows why atheistic evolution is a bunch of lies.
Here's a good quote below:
It is embarrassingly unscientific to speak of anything creating itself from nothing, common sense says that if something possessed the ability to create itself from nothing, then that something wasn't nothing, it was something -- a very intelligent creative power of some sort. Hawking has violated the unspoken rules of atheism, he isn't supposed to use words like 'create' or even 'made.' They necessitate a Creator and a Maker. Neither are you supposed to let out that the essence of atheism is to believe that nothing created everything, because it's unthinking. It confirms the title of another book I wrote, called, You Can Lead an Atheist to Evidence, but You Can't Make Him Think. Nor should an atheist speak of gravity as being a 'law,' because that also denotes the axiom of a Law-giver. Laws don't happen by themselves. But look at how careless the professor was, with his, 'The Big Bang was the result of the inevitable laws of physics and did not need God to spark the creation of the Universe.