Skip to main content

The Incredible Irony Behind Religious Roman Catholics and Their Sinful Lifestyles!

Whenever I try to update on any Roman Catholic website like its official page or any Roman Catholic faith apologetics blog, I always find one accusation over the other against eternal security.  Eternal security as a doctrine has been muddled up by both Arminians (its doctrine is nothing more than diet Roman Catholicism and to Augustus Toplady, the road back to Rome) and by Antinomians as a license to sin.  For Arminians, the teaching of eternal security drives people to sin and some circles claiming to be born again Christians are stuck with its heresies making them nothing more than a diet Catholic religion where you teach works salvation minus the magisterium, ritualism and the Vatican.  For the Antinomians they tend to sing, "Oh joy that I am free from the law, I can sin freely forevermore."  The heresy is really no different than Roman Catholics with their salvation that is first by faith (initially) but you must keep it by works if you expect to make it into Heaven.  That kind of teaching is still salvation by good works.

Reading through Bro. Gerry Soliman's blog and his arguments for a Biblical view of eternal security (which John Calvin calls as the Perseverance of the Saints) against Roman Catholic apologists, I still cannot help but laugh at the arguments of people against it believing it to teach a license to sin without seeing the full context.  Maybe they only heard the Antinomian's view and ignores the Christian view.  Calvinist or not, any sound-minded Christian would reject Antinomianism.  Non-Calvinists like David W. Cloud, Vernon McGee and Harry Allen Ironside still believed in the Perseverance of the Saints minus election.  Although they rejected the Calvinist view of Unconditional Election as its basis, they still believed that a true convert will endure to the end.  The whole idea of the Perseverance of the Saints is not that the saints should persevere but the will persevere and though they may stumble and fall, they do not permanently fall away.

As a former Roman Catholic who became a born again Christian and now, I'm embracing Reformed Theology in my Christian growth, I have observed how Roman Catholics tend to contradict themselves.  If at one point they say that Protestants and Baptists were just cashed out but they don't hesitate to dole out lots of money for prayers that will never send their loved ones to Heaven.  Some of them even complain that the Protestant and Baptist schools tend to have that "stricter than thou" conservative attitude and they send their children to Jesuit schools because they want to look good or because such schools are a lot more lenient.  What I just mentioned are just severely bad cases of double standard.  They can also say, "Well you always go to church and you are always scolding others like there's no tomorrow." but they are also exactly doing the same thing.  Double standard which is applying a standard to another while having one standard for one's own convenience.

When I think of how do Roman Catholics define repentance, it says, "Voluntary sorrow because it offends God, for having done something wrong, together with the resolve to amend one's conduct by taking the necessary means to avoid the occasions of sin.  To repent is to be sorry for sin with self-condemnation."  Now let's take a look at Biblical repentance vs. Catholic repentance.  Biblical repentance is rooted from metanoneia meaning "a change of mind which begets a change in purpose" which unfortunately the Roman Catholic definition confuses repentance with penance.  While I could agree repentance has voluntary sorrow in seeing God was offended but also says, "taking the necessary means to avoid the occasion of sin."  More often than not, the Roman Catholic's repentance has always been about doing good works to outweigh bad works and by good works, then these end up becoming show business than genuine good works.  The great Reformed Baptist preacher Charles H. Spurgeon said of good works, "It is not enough to do the correct thing, it must be done in a right spirit, and with a pure motive. A good action is not wholly good unless it be done for the glory of God, and because of the greatness and goodness of His holy name."  They end up doing acts of goodness not because they want to give glory to God but only for the sake of self-preservation which there is a difference between doing works because God saved vs. doing of works trying to get God to keep you saved.

How Roman Catholics tend to define a good person, it's all about show business.  I can hear something like that he or she is such a good person because he or she prays the Rosary a lot, attends every feast day possible, faithful in attending Mass, goes to confession regularly and donates lots of money for their local Roman Catholic parish.  However what can be ignored is how a good number of Roman Catholics tend to be living so sinfully while they are religious at the same time.  You can have somebody who prays the Rosary, prays as many Roman Catholic prayers as he would, goes to Mass every Sunday, attends every procession he could, goes to confession regularly, donates money for the Roman Catholic parish, he gives to charity (but it's only for show) and he accommodates the priest for the fiesta but he also lives a very sinful lifestyle such as sexual immorality, cheating others, gambling and the like.  He may be "repentant" during the Lenten season but when it's over, he goes back to his worldly lifestyle.  Besides, I've observed how Roman Catholics end up receiving communion on Sunday if they confessed on a Saturday, never mind they kept sinning from Monday to Friday and the cycle repeats itself proving there's no real repentance at all based on actions!  When I think about it, the whole idea of as long as your good works outweigh your bad works theology is nothing more than a subtle license to sin.  James 2:10-11 warns deeply that it only takes one sin to fall short of God's standard.  Ironic that they preach from James 2 without understanding the context of it.

Taking a look at the news, visit the prisons or read biographies of certain dictators and criminals.  Did you know that Adolph Hitler was a very religious Roman Catholic?  After reading "Alberto Part 3: The Godfathers" from Chick Publications and knowing of the Hitler/Vatican link, I would even assume he goes to confession after every person he's murdered, the priest tells him to do penance then the whole cycle repeats itself again.  Did you know many criminals are very religious Roman Catholics?  When I look at the prison cells based on pictures from prison outreach, a lot of the criminals are in fact, very religious.  You can see a lot of these crooks praying the Rosary and having their idols inside the prison cells.  When you take a look at many corrupt figures of authority many of them are also very religious.  You can see how many of these Jesuit agents are not only a huge bunch of hypocrites but also very sinful.  I'm not too surprised considering that I'm seeing one Jesuit parish after the other are full of people who live like they have a license of sin.

Now do I believe that a truly saved Christian is already free from sin and that flesh is 100% nailed to the cross?  I don't teach such a heresy that a Christian can already achieve sinless perfection.  A Christian can fall into sin and will sin (because of the old nature) but that sin will not drive him or her to pleasure but to the loving discipline of the Father bringing forth continued repentance.  Examples in the Bible are like how Lot was vexed in Sodom, Samson was still a believer, David was convicted by Nathan of his son and repented, Solomon backslid so horribly and God appeared to him more than once, and Peter wept after he lied he was not a Christian as proof such people are indeed saved.  1 Corinthians 6:11 says that when you are saved, you also get sanctified into a new life but there is still sin.  Romans 7:14-25 tells us that Christians will still struggle with sin because of the old nature.  When I just mentioned about why so many Roman Catholics have that wayward lifestyle, it's simple, it's because they are enslaved to any form of sin whether it would be the obvious or self-righteousness.  Any unsaved person who is morally good is enslaved by the sin of self-righteousness just as any body who lives like a devil is enslaved by the sin of wantonness.  Self-righteousness is no different than living wantonly in sin as both lead to Hellfire.  

I also rethink of why Matthew 7:21-23 also includes the words "ye doers of iniquity" in the verse.  Whether you like it or it, Isaiah 64:6 calls all the human righteousness as just filthy rags before the eyes of God.  When I look at verse 22, these people brag about their good works.  It's just like how a Roman Catholic who is living in so much sin can say, "Nothing is wrong with me.  I am fine.  I am a good person.  I go to church every Sunday, I give to the poor and I do all I can as a good person.  I go to confession.  My good works outweigh by bad works."  Their wickedness will soon be exposed on Judgment Day and without a substitute sacrifice for their sins, they are certainly headed for doom.  Instead, Jesus will tell them, "I never knew you.  Depart from me ye that worketh iniquity."  When Jesus said, "I never knew you.", remember salvation cannot be lost, they never had it in the first place and the fact they were workers of iniquity proved that they were never of Christ.  It reminded me of what Pastor Ruben L. Lumagbas Jr. said during one of the Sunday services about somebody might plead to God about accommodating the priest, frequently praying to the saints, having a habit of walking while kneeling and even crucifying himself (a practice that is also condemned by the official Vatican law) but their evil is exposed proving they were charlatans indeed.  

See also:

Popular posts from this blog

Who Will You Believe: Pope Francis or the Bible?

Here's a cartoon of how tragic the afterlife for Roman Catholics would be when they realize that they needed a real, personal relationship with Christ to enter into Heaven. As I grew up as a Roman Catholic I didn't really care about the Bible. I even hear some Roman Catholics are told to never read the Bible for themselves because not everyone should be allowed to read it. The priest often says that reading the Bible alone will confuse you so you need their extrabiblical doctrine. Worse, they are confusing Sola Scriptura with Solo Scriptura. Born again Christians have their tradition but it's dictated by the Bible as a guiding principle to one's lifestyle. It's not that they read only the Bible but rather they have the Bible as their only principle for Christian tradition.

What is this personal relationship? As much as some pastors feel like the term personal Lord and Savior can be dangerous or "personal Savior" may suggest that Jesus is a genie than Lor…

When God Says No, He Means No

When God says no He means no! Do you know why the world is in a mess right now? It's all because Adam and Eve couldn't follow one simple rule that was to never eat of the tree of the fruit of life. I'd like to imagine it that God may have even put an "Off Limits" sign on it. But Satan himself always finds a way to convince people to break the rules.
Genesis 3:1-5 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden? And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden: but of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die. And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die: for God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.

What Christians Can Learn From Joshua and Caleb's Confidence in Seizing the Promised Land

Being a Christian means you can be stuck in a pickle. Today's lesson will be from Numbers 13-14 which talks about the twelve spies to the Land of Canaan. I think any Christian leader going into much trouble today may find this as both a source of vexation and encouragement at the same time. It's a source of vexation because there are so many people like the rebellious Israelites in the wilderness. It's a source of encouragement because it's a reminder that God is still in charge.

The story of Numbers 13 talks about the spying. We see one member of each of the tribes that were given a political inheritance were there. We can see their names are as follows:
Numbers 13:4-13 And these were their names: of the tribe of Reuben, Shammua the son of Zaccur. Of the tribe of Simeon, Shaphat the son of Hori. Of the tribe of Judah, Caleb the son of Jephunneh. Of the tribe of Issachar, Igal the son of Joseph. 8 Of the tribe of Ephraim, Oshea the son of Nun. Of the tribe of Benjamin…

Drunk Driving is Dangerous to Society

Consider this picture of a drunk driving incident. This is the car that the late Princess Diana Spencer, the late Dodi Al Fayed and the late Henri Paul (the driver) were using before their tragic demise. What was also interesting to note is that their driver had high dosages of alcohol prior to this gruesome incident. I don't want to talk about the conspiracy side of things but the whole ugly picture that drunk driving kills. But even after this incident and many similar ones before it is that many people still do it even if the consequences are clear as day.

The Bible warns that being a drunkard is one of the marks of an unsaved person:
1 Corinthians 6:9-10  Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God. 
Those who argue that …

Modernization is Not an Excuse to Dismiss Badly Needed Old-Fashioned Revivals

I remembered reading through Jeremiah can be a chore because the events of that book continue to repeat itself. At the same time, reading through Jeremiah can be a comfort because the prophet chose to stand by God's command even if he momentarily stopped preaching (Jeremiah 20:5). One verse that is used to call for old fashioned revivals is Jeremiah 6:16 which says:
Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein.
It's a problem you start calling for old-fashioned revivals and people will call you outdated or a neanderthal. While there's nothing wrong with modern technology but the problem is when people only care if something is modern. While modernization can be used to evangelize but it can also be used to spread the influence of sin. The same printing press that allowed the late Martin Luther to publish Bibles was also u…

The Prosperity Gospel is an Enemy of Cheerful Giving

I remembered having a lecture on the prosperity gospel. One of the worst lies of the prosperity gospel is that giving money or the tithes and offerings to their pastors will turn you into a millionaire, God will spare them from trouble and that they can have the desires of their wicked heart. That's one of the worst heresies I've heard. On the contrary the more faithful you are to God the more you should expect enemy attacks. Some people I know are faithful in giving and their tithes and offerings yet they are not living as billionaires. The motive of giving in the prosperity gospel is to gain the false promise that God wants us happy, healthy and wealthy all the time. That's not cheerful giving isn't it?

If you give money to God in exchange for material blessings then something is pretty wrong. It's a terrible misapplication of Malachi 3:9-10. Do they even know that the blessings where there isn't enough room to receive it isn't all about becoming a billio…

Politically Correct Parenting Raises Spoiled Brats

Politically correct parenting is already the norm of parenting in this fallen world. What most parents don't see is that everyone needs a healthy dose of both Vitamin Yes and Vitamin No. But like anything beneficial in excess or in scarcity too many people have either too much or too little of Vitamin Yes and Vitamin No. While it's not okay to have an overdose of Vitamin No but what's so upsetting is that many people today take the opposite extreme. They aren't giving enough Vitamin No ad are given too much Vitamin Yes. Either way both are overly misguided approaches in parenting.

Is there anything wrong with giving the child what they want? It depends on what the child wants. If a child wants something that's going to honor God (ex. They want their own copy of the Bible that they can read for themselves) then the parent should say yes if what the child wants is God honoring. But if the child only wants to be like the secular children with all their nice stuff the…