Skip to main content

The Teaching of Radical Grace is a Result of Bad Bible Teaching!

While listening to some of Pastor John F. MacArthur's lectures on expository preaching, I still can't forget the very lesson that, "If you preach, preach from the Bible... EXPOSITORILY."  It reminded me of the instance when he shared the unfortunate interpretation of using John 11 as the passage for the Rapture of the Church when it was talking about the resurrection of Lazarus, the brother of Mary and Martha.  What I cannot help but do was really be amazed at how preachers who do not preach in an expository manner end up coming with a lot more Bible errors.  I may not fully agree with Pastor MacaArthur's interpretations but it doesn't mean I do not agree with the fact that preachers must preach verse by verse, get the meaning of the Scripture before applying it.  No pastor is ever perfect but with sound Bible preaching, going verse by verse, we can minimize error as much as possible. 

Another of the most creeping heresies today is the concept of radical grace which it seems that God is obligated by the terms of justification to just accept the believer's sin and disobedience.  When there's bad Bible teaching, you have preachers holding the Bible but they do not fully believe it.  I was amazed to see hear of a pastor who said this heretical statement, "I dare you to show me in the Bible that the Holy Spirit does not convict sin in the believer."  If I am to ever confront that guy, I can only say to him, "Have you read John 16:13-15?"  If Christians do wrong, does not the Holy Spirit give conviction against the person's sin to the point they cannot keep a habit of sin?  Even non-Calvinist Christian preachers or quasi-easy believists (easy believists in name only but not by doctrine) would ever buy the garbage doctrine that a person can be a Christian but can live sinfully like the rest of the world.  Both groups still believe in the glorious doctrine of the perseverance of the saints that Christians will endure to the end by God's grace.

I have noticed that many times "Easy Christianity" churches do not really do expository preaching.  When it comes to their doctrine of "Carnal Christianity" or defending the idea that a person can get saved and remain the same, they simply quote verses that justify salvation is by grace through faith.  Eternal security is indeed a glorious truth but it is just part of the glorious truth of the Gospel.  What upsets me is that some people have gone as far as to teach that once saved, always saved is a license to sin.  When a pastor preaches about false conversion and Antinomianism, these members of the "Easy Christianity" churches are bound to accuse these preachers in the most ridiculous ways possible like calling somebody a "Calvinist Jesuit agent" which the term is an oxymoron.  The whole claim that John Calvin was a Roman Catholic Jesuit is ridiculous as the term that some of them use namely the "Calvinist Jesuit" which is an oxymoron.  If they hate Calvinists so much as to call them "Jesuits" then they better stop reading the King James Bible which was translated by Calvinists and if Calvinists were Jesuit-schooled scholars then wouldn't that make the King James translation a Jesuit translation?  I guess why the "Easy Christians" want to call the Calvinists as "Jesuits" is because they are repulsed by the idea that anybody who claims to be saved but teaches a license to sin is a false convert.  

The whole heresy that's creeping in some Baptist and Protestant circles that grace is a license to licentiousness is not biblical as Jude warns about that in Jude 1:4.  It's biblical to say that only false converts of an Antinomian gospel think that God's grace grants them a license to sin.  If you read more on God's grace, it changes the life of the believer therefore the whole idea of a fruitless Christianity is absurd.  When it comes to believers, I don't say, "What?  No fruit?" but "What?  You have less fruit?" because Christians produce varying degrees of good fruit and if they produce less, it's time to disciple them.  If anybody claims to be a Christian but does not bear any good fruit, that person is an apostate and was never saved to start with.  If those people who teach God's grace is a license to sin claim to be Scriptural, have they ever read Ephesians 2:10 and Titus 2:11-14.  Some of them will say, "Well, we believe that God's grace teaches righteous living but not all are teachable by God's grace."  Excuse the statement but if God's grace is there then it certainly teaches righteous living and if it saves the sinner from sin, certainly it can make the unteachable, teachable and if you have God's grace, that would make you grow in grace.  Even if the Christian is not sinless, they will certainly sin less as Philippians 1:6-7 says that when God begins the good work in the believer, He is bound to finish it making it impossible for the Christian to still live like a devil.  

See also:

Popular posts from this blog

Do Feminists Ever Realize That Women Shouldn't Use Acts of Violence Against Men?

It's irritating to be told that men shouldn't use violence on women but the other way around is okay. No, it's not okay to hit anyone regardless of gender out of anger or frustration. If men shouldn't hit women except in acts of self-defense then the other way round should apply. But you have to remember the stupidity of selective justice and selective outrage of feminists. They think men should respect them while they think discriminating against men is okay. Their quest for "equality" is nothing more than a big joke.

Why is it usually a big fuzz when a man hits a woman but not so many people react if a woman hits a man? That kind of hypocrisy is worth addressing. They say men shouldn't hit women because they are "weaker" but is it okay for a person of lower rank to attack a person of higher rank? The word submission doesn't exist in the feminist dictionary unless it's men submitting to them. Whether they like it or not the husband is t…

You Can't Preach About God's Love For Sinners Without Preaching About His Wrath Against Sin

It's a problem that so many quack preachers love to preach God's love for sinners but not about God's wrath against them because He must punish both the sin and the sinner. Everything from God's love to His wrath is dictated by the fact that He is holy and you are not. The message about God's love for sinners will make no sense if you don't preach about God's wrath against sin first. I remembered listening to "Hell's Best Kept Secret" and "True and False Conversion" by Ray Comfort. There was this point where Kirk Cameron talked about what if I sold my property to save someone from a disease. If the person doesn't know anything about the disease then my selling of all my property to pay for the badly needed treatment won't make sense. Another illustration was all about the flight. You have to tell the person that the parachute is not meant to improve the flight but to tell the person that it's for emergency reasons. If you…

It's Not Okay to Be Blindly Loyal to the Pope and His Army of Pharisees

Some rabid Roman Catholics keep sensationalizing the sins of fraud pastors (as if true born again Christians ever support them) while they keep hiding the sins of their priests or Pharisees. They also say that born again Christians are blindly loyal to the pastor never mind that they are blindly loyal to the Pope and his Pharisees. Blind loyalty towards a a prosperity gospel pastor, a so-called successor of a so-called last messenger or any quack preacher is no different than blind loyalty towards the Pope and his Pharisees. Worse, Roman Catholics believe that their Pharisees are instruments in saving their souls or that the Pope supposedly holds salvation in his hands never mind all the priestly scandals are telling them otherwise.

I could remember how often Bible reading is discouraged (and yet some of these rabid Roman Catholics tell me I should read the Bible and I can't get wrong with it) because it could drive me crazy from reading it. Some Roman Catholics I've met &quo…

Don't Even Think About Legalizing Prostitution or Sex Trade

There's some people who seek to legalize prostitution. Some "rational" atheists are already talking about prostitution should be legalized so it could be controlled by the government. The claim that "studies" show that prohibition doesn't work is a lie straight from the pits of Hell. The Israelites were doing sin not because God forbade it but because they were disobedient and the rulers did nothing to prevent those sins. It's not surprising is that the same people who seek to legalize prostitution also want to legalize narcotics and hard liquor all in the name of "succeeding in the war against them".

The logic behind legalizing prostitution is that so the government can control them and tax them. But the problem with the quest to legalize prostitution is that it encourages the sin rather than discourage it. The problem is not the war against prostitution but ignoring Ecclesiastes 8:11. Do you know why the war against prostitution isn't wo…

Is Salvation in Peter's Hands (As Well as the Popes) Because Jesus Supposedly Gave Him the Literal Keys of Heaven?

According to a self-proclaimed Roman Catholic apologist (who I'll probably dub as Mr. Whistle when I mention him) he claimed that salvation is in the hands of Peter because Jesus gave the former the keys of Heaven. The guy is clearly taking things out of context with what he says. I wonder does he even bother to check out the idioms of the Bible since some passages use a figure of speech instead of speaking everything literally?

If he can't get Matthew 16:18 correctly where he said that Peter the Rock even when the Good News Translation for Roman Catholics says otherwise (and worse for them Peter is differentiated as a rock and the Rock is clearly not him) then he also misinterprets Matthew 16:19. Let's try to understand Matthew 16:19 with the keys and what they really mean. In his interpretation he's already telling everyone that born again Christians should just go back to the Roman Catholic institution because the Pope supposedly holds salvation in his hands. I don&…

Atheists With Abusive Mindsets Do Exist

It's a myth over the modern world that there's no such thing as an atheist with an abusive mindset. I can see atheists who claim that abuses only come through theism. I don't deny that there's such a thing as religious people with an abusive mindset such as Roman Catholic fanatics, Islamic extremists and any form of religious extremism. The problem of the claim is that it denies the reality that there's such a thing as atheists who have an abusive mindset. One such person is the late Christopher Hitchens who claims that he has the right o treat religion with ridicule, hatred and contempt. Isn't that an example of an atheist with an abusive mindset? Sad to say, Hitchens himself is still cursing God from the pits of Hell. Christians should pray that Richard Dawkins wouldn't make the same wrong decision as Hitchens.

One horrible atheist blogger claimed he was indeed one of the most scientific people on Earth. Just reading his blog alone is so tiresome that I&…

Why This Ministry DOES NOT Support the Westboro Baptist Church

The Westboro Baptist Church is a so-called Baptist institution founded by Fred Phelps who is a lawyer and a theologian. Is it your average Baptist assembly or is this another of Satan's brain children? I would like to present my stand why this ministry does not support the Westboro Baptist Church and why as a Baptist, I do not support them either:
The founder Fred Phelps who serves as its pastor. I do find it disturbing he says that he supports sound doctrine of good Christian preachers of the past like John Calvin and Charles Haddon Spurgeon but his doctrine is not sound at all. His preaching is definitely not balanced. While I do appreciate him attacking the Great Whore of Revelation, apostasy, ecumenism, homosexuality, abortion, pornography and a lot of sins however he is no better than the Roman Catholic institution which he frequently criticizes. Although he claims to be a Calvinist and a Spurgeon fan, however many of those who are Calvinist preachers like Paul Washer, John …