Skip to main content

The Teaching of Radical Grace is a Result of Bad Bible Teaching!

While listening to some of Pastor John F. MacArthur's lectures on expository preaching, I still can't forget the very lesson that, "If you preach, preach from the Bible... EXPOSITORILY."  It reminded me of the instance when he shared the unfortunate interpretation of using John 11 as the passage for the Rapture of the Church when it was talking about the resurrection of Lazarus, the brother of Mary and Martha.  What I cannot help but do was really be amazed at how preachers who do not preach in an expository manner end up coming with a lot more Bible errors.  I may not fully agree with Pastor MacaArthur's interpretations but it doesn't mean I do not agree with the fact that preachers must preach verse by verse, get the meaning of the Scripture before applying it.  No pastor is ever perfect but with sound Bible preaching, going verse by verse, we can minimize error as much as possible. 

Another of the most creeping heresies today is the concept of radical grace which it seems that God is obligated by the terms of justification to just accept the believer's sin and disobedience.  When there's bad Bible teaching, you have preachers holding the Bible but they do not fully believe it.  I was amazed to see hear of a pastor who said this heretical statement, "I dare you to show me in the Bible that the Holy Spirit does not convict sin in the believer."  If I am to ever confront that guy, I can only say to him, "Have you read John 16:13-15?"  If Christians do wrong, does not the Holy Spirit give conviction against the person's sin to the point they cannot keep a habit of sin?  Even non-Calvinist Christian preachers or quasi-easy believists (easy believists in name only but not by doctrine) would ever buy the garbage doctrine that a person can be a Christian but can live sinfully like the rest of the world.  Both groups still believe in the glorious doctrine of the perseverance of the saints that Christians will endure to the end by God's grace.

I have noticed that many times "Easy Christianity" churches do not really do expository preaching.  When it comes to their doctrine of "Carnal Christianity" or defending the idea that a person can get saved and remain the same, they simply quote verses that justify salvation is by grace through faith.  Eternal security is indeed a glorious truth but it is just part of the glorious truth of the Gospel.  What upsets me is that some people have gone as far as to teach that once saved, always saved is a license to sin.  When a pastor preaches about false conversion and Antinomianism, these members of the "Easy Christianity" churches are bound to accuse these preachers in the most ridiculous ways possible like calling somebody a "Calvinist Jesuit agent" which the term is an oxymoron.  The whole claim that John Calvin was a Roman Catholic Jesuit is ridiculous as the term that some of them use namely the "Calvinist Jesuit" which is an oxymoron.  If they hate Calvinists so much as to call them "Jesuits" then they better stop reading the King James Bible which was translated by Calvinists and if Calvinists were Jesuit-schooled scholars then wouldn't that make the King James translation a Jesuit translation?  I guess why the "Easy Christians" want to call the Calvinists as "Jesuits" is because they are repulsed by the idea that anybody who claims to be saved but teaches a license to sin is a false convert.  

The whole heresy that's creeping in some Baptist and Protestant circles that grace is a license to licentiousness is not biblical as Jude warns about that in Jude 1:4.  It's biblical to say that only false converts of an Antinomian gospel think that God's grace grants them a license to sin.  If you read more on God's grace, it changes the life of the believer therefore the whole idea of a fruitless Christianity is absurd.  When it comes to believers, I don't say, "What?  No fruit?" but "What?  You have less fruit?" because Christians produce varying degrees of good fruit and if they produce less, it's time to disciple them.  If anybody claims to be a Christian but does not bear any good fruit, that person is an apostate and was never saved to start with.  If those people who teach God's grace is a license to sin claim to be Scriptural, have they ever read Ephesians 2:10 and Titus 2:11-14.  Some of them will say, "Well, we believe that God's grace teaches righteous living but not all are teachable by God's grace."  Excuse the statement but if God's grace is there then it certainly teaches righteous living and if it saves the sinner from sin, certainly it can make the unteachable, teachable and if you have God's grace, that would make you grow in grace.  Even if the Christian is not sinless, they will certainly sin less as Philippians 1:6-7 says that when God begins the good work in the believer, He is bound to finish it making it impossible for the Christian to still live like a devil.  


See also:

Popular posts from this blog

Ken Ham's Illustrations on Spiritual Warfare Against Humanism

Dr. Ken Ham of Answers in Genesis made these beautiful illustrations to show what's wrong with the church today. Let's take a look at the two illustrations on how Christians engage their spiritual warfare. 
The first illustration reveals the following:
One member is asleep when he should be doing something.Another person is firing at the balloons because the person who's supposed to fire it is asleep on the job.Somebody is focused on deflecting cannon balls than hitting the source of the cannon balls.Somebody is treating the whole situation like a game.  
By doing so, humanism is victorious whenever the local church is asleep. This is the problem to why Christians tend to fall down in battle at times:
Ezekiel 22:30 And I sought for a man among them, that should make up the hedge, and stand in the gap before Me for the land, that I should not destroy it: but I found none.
In short, if you're not going to stand in the gap on behalf of the land then who will? It's the…

The Ridiculous Roman Catholic View That Marriage Must Be Done Inside Their Church or It's Invalid

I remembered reading through the seven sacraments or ordinances of the Roman Catholic institution in a catechism. One of the teachings is that marriage must be treated as a sacrament. What it also implies is that if your marriage is done in a civil court that even if it was duly registered, that both couples were in a sexually pure union then it's not a marriage. So does that mean that a person can marry in a civil court, get divorced and marry his next spouse in the Roman Catholic institution?

Let's address the issue of civil marriage that is pure and holy. In short there was no incest, no adultery and it was between two people who are eligible for marriage. So why should the Roman Catholic institution even think that two people who got married with the sexually pure prerequisites in the eyes of God should be rejected. Is it because unless it's a priest who performs the marriage then the marriage can't be validated? It's a problem with how Roman Catholics have thei…

James 2 DOES NOT Teach Works Salvation

In a hasty attempt to defend works salvation, they would appeal to James 2.  It would be time to actually clear the fact that Paul and James DO NOT contradict each other. James 2 DOES NOT teach works salvation in which now can be clearly seen when this whole chapter is being dissected to show that James 2 does not defend the heretic crowd.  So let's try to check out what James 2 really is saying.
So first, it's time to think about these facts to debunk the heretical argument of using James 2:
1.) James 2:14-18 is not talking about works salvation but rather, again showing one's faith by one's works.  James 2:18 is a challenge to show one's faith.  Want to know about faith?  Hebrews 11 talks about the results of faith with some of the heroes of the Bible.  Try to coincide Hebrews 11 and James 2 and one sees the results of faith.  As said, when one says that a faith without works is DEAD because true faith produces good works to validate faith.  That's really th…

Don't Forget That the Roman Catholic Institution Has a Very Long History of Inciting Sedition

The Roman Catholic institution has its long fraudulent history of claiming to be the "One True Church that was founded n 33 A.D. - Holy, Catholic and Apostolic". The word catholic is a synonym for universal but the disciples were never first called Catholics in Antioch but Christians (Acts 11:26). Catholic was used as an old world for universal which some people today are allergic to that word because Catholic has been used to describe people who are members of the Roman Catholic institution. What can be talked about now is the fact that the Roman Catholic institution has had a long history of inciting sedition in governments. While they claim it to be doing the "work of God" or as the Jesuits say "Ad Maiorem Dei Gloriam" or "For the greater glory of God." but is it really?

Doing some study of the history of the Vatican has it shown that the Inquisition and later the Jesuit Order have a lot of bloody rags to answer for. Did you know that many ki…

Does Salvation by Grace Through Faith in Jesus Christ Grant a License to Sin?

Here's a commonly heard argument saying, "Well salvation by faith alone in Jesus Christ is unjust and grants a license to sin." which is frequently done by most world religions.  They demand people must work for their salvation and for one, it's NOT even realistic or practical as it promotes the idea of a dictator God PLUS it's nothing more than asking for the impossible because God's standard of holiness is a LOT higher than all the good works man does.  Despite all the good man does, still they will fall into sin and the followers of almost every false religion this world has to offer shows that like how your average religious person attends religious services yet he/she falls into sin for the rest of the week, showing he/she is WEAK in the flesh.
Now it's time to really correct the whole erroneous argument as false.  Why?  The Bible says otherwise about what God's salvation by grace through faith really does- it transforms the individual to resist…

Testimony of Former Jesuit Priest Victor J. Affonso

To Follow Jesus Without Compromise by Victor J. Affonso
Why I joined the Society of Jesus
At the age of 23, I was a successful commercial artist on the verge of going abroad where a job was awaiting me. I was happy at the prospect of leaving India and thereby also escaping the terrible anguish caused of seeing the misery of the poor in the streets of Bombay.
Political saviors like Gandhi and Nehru had failed in giving true freedom and justice to India’s poor majority. Murder and divisions assailed “independent” India, and so it still is today. All the social works were but a few drops of water in a desert. Yet there was still one solution left: The words of Jesus kept coming to me during prayer, “…For with God ALL things are possible” (Mark 10:27). “Don’t run away!” On another day I heard the words, “Follow My Son — Jesus!” This word finally led me to leave the world and join the Society of Jesus, a missionary order that promised by its very title, its “Spiritual Exercises” and its C…

What Does Pisseth Against the Wall Mean?

It's really getting bad for some of my Independent Fundamental Baptist brethren to actually even take the words "pisseth against the wall" which appears at least six times in 1 Samuel 23:22, 1 Samuel 25:34, 1 Kings 14:10, 1 Kings 16:11, 1 Kings 21:21 and 2 Kings 9:8 where the King James actually has the words "pisseth against the wall".  Now I am a King James only-ist but I do not support the stupid interpretation of "pisseth against the wall" by some IFB preachers who have become in some way similar to the Catholic Faith Defenders that they argue against when they should spend their time soulwinning.  Actually I even heard that rather outrageous "pisseth against the wall" sermon by Steven Anderson that was so taken out of context.
So what does pisseth against the wall mean? Let us take a look at these six verses and take it on a exegetic view NOT an eisegetic (out of context) view:
1 Samuel 23:22- "And so more also do God unto the ene…