Skip to main content

The Stupidity of People Who Condone to Abortion and Condemn the Death Penalty at the Same Time

One of the greatest hypocrisies of people today is that they are against the death penalty while they are for abortion.  By the Word of God, this is really hypocritical considering the reality that the Bible both condemns abortion and orders the death penalty for certain crimes.

I hear more often than not that the death penalty is barbaric and inhumane.  I hear people whine and say that death penalty supporting states are barbaric.  At the same time, a lot of these people (not all) say that abortion is perfectly okay because the fetus is "just a glob".  That is a huge lie considering that science proves life begins at heartbeat.  Even introductory biology shows that the fetus is a living person otherwise it would not grow, it would not be able to kick the mother's womb, it would not take nourishment and it would not be born as a child.  It is not an "it" but a he or a she.

Do you know that God considers the life of the fetus to be sacred?  Below is the verse that shows that God has ordained a crime against any damage to an unborn fetus.  
Exodus 21:22-23 - "If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished, according as the woman's husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine. And if any mischief follow, then thou shalt give life for life,"

One can say, "Oh that is just Old Testament Law.  It is obsolete." never mind that person saying that line may hate the entire Bible.  What people do not realize is that the moral law has not changed.  You may go ahead and eat shrimp and bacon all you care because of Peter's vision in Acts 10:1-16.  While I do not advocate the eating of carnivorous and/or rabies carrier animals due to the health hazards but eating of pork, shrimp, squid, octopus and the like can be considered safe with proper safety measures.  If the Old Testament was become completely obsolete then murder, thievery, human sacrifice, incest and every other sin condemned under the moral law should be perfectly okay.  But no, when it comes to the moral law - it more or less remains the same.

The death penalty was prescribed against murderers.  People can go ahead and say that death penalty is now obsolete because we are in the New Testament.  They can also misquote Jesus' case with the adulterous woman out of context without realizing that her trial was not even legal to start with.  In John 8:1-11, the whole issue was about talking the Law into your hands.  The Pharisees sought to trick Jesus into breaking the Law.  Jesus showed compassion to the repentant adulterous woman.  At the same time, know that the prescription of adultery required both the man and the woman (Leviticus 20:10, Deuteronomy 22:22) to be stoned.  The man was nowhere there plus there was no due process.  The death penalty required a due process to prevent innocent people from getting killed.

In the proper use of the death penalty, it was never about revenge but protection of society.  When we have the eye for eye, tooth for tooth system, it was meant to be the standard for punishing offenses and not about carrying one's personal vendetta.  The Old Testament did not even encourage revenge as Deuteronomy 23:35 says that the LORD alone will avenge for every wrong.  When He said eye for an eye and tooth for a tooth, it means He will also avenge wrongs in due time and it was also set that punishment must be dealt with according to offense.  Littering meant you paid a fine, stealing meant you need to restore with interest and coldblooded murder meant you paid with your life.  It is not a harsh or unjust law but it kept society safe and in check.

The Bible recommends that perjury can also put a person to death (Deuteronomy 19:18-19).  Many innocent people go to jail because perjury is not treated as a criminal offense.  Judges who do not punish perjury had refused to think how much the person suffered for a crime that they did not commit.  Lying in court to get an innocent person punished is a huge crime in the eyes of a holy, righteous God.  It should not be just a slap in the wrist.  If perjury cases got the punishment meet for the false accuser's intent then there will be much less cases.  If false witnesses either had to spend jail time or even get the death penalty depending on the criminal offense they accused the innocent party of doing then there would be a huge drop of lying in court.  Doing so is not an unjust act but it protects people from getting punished for what they did not do.

In their quest to be "pro-life", how can they be pro-life if they refuse to execute murderers and other dangerous criminals while they support the abortion of defenseless unborn babies?  Unborn babies are truly innocent and dangerous criminals are a threat to society.  The death penalty for dangerous criminals or to shoot down a dangerous criminal protects human rights.  To go against just and proper death penalty is a real violation of the rights to life.  To abort a child is a violation of the unborn to life.  Society today no thanks to their rebellion against God has fallen into more foolishness than you can imagine when it comes to their definition of pro-life.


See also:

Popular posts from this blog

It's Not Okay to Be Blindly Loyal to the Pope and His Army of Pharisees

Some rabid Roman Catholics keep sensationalizing the sins of fraud pastors (as if true born again Christians ever support them) while they keep hiding the sins of their priests or Pharisees. They also say that born again Christians are blindly loyal to the pastor never mind that they are blindly loyal to the Pope and his Pharisees. Blind loyalty towards a a prosperity gospel pastor, a so-called successor of a so-called last messenger or any quack preacher is no different than blind loyalty towards the Pope and his Pharisees. Worse, Roman Catholics believe that their Pharisees are instruments in saving their souls or that the Pope supposedly holds salvation in his hands never mind all the priestly scandals are telling them otherwise.

I could remember how often Bible reading is discouraged (and yet some of these rabid Roman Catholics tell me I should read the Bible and I can't get wrong with it) because it could drive me crazy from reading it. Some Roman Catholics I've met &quo…

The Error of Comparing Protestantism to New Atheism

The amazing blindness of Catholic.com is too amazing isn't it? I just read an article written yesterday which compares Protestantism to New Atheism. As much as the article is written as professionally as possible in contrast to some self-proclaimed apologists I've had a lot of useless arguments with but I'd like to give a friendly rebuke to the writer Karlo Broussard. It's my sincere prayer that Broussard will see the truth from the pages of the Scripture. 
The writer commits the fallacy of categorical error. He compares Sola Scriptura with Richard Dawkins' views on science. Here's one of the statements that really should be considered a categorical error:
Just as science is the only tool Dawkins and company are willing to use to arrive at knowledge of the natural truth, Protestants use only the Bible for determining what is revealed truth. And as many modern atheists reject anything that science cannot detect, so too do Protestants reject any teaching that is…

Don't Even Think About Legalizing Prostitution or Sex Trade

There's some people who seek to legalize prostitution. Some "rational" atheists are already talking about prostitution should be legalized so it could be controlled by the government. The claim that "studies" show that prohibition doesn't work is a lie straight from the pits of Hell. The Israelites were doing sin not because God forbade it but because they were disobedient and the rulers did nothing to prevent those sins. It's not surprising is that the same people who seek to legalize prostitution also want to legalize narcotics and hard liquor all in the name of "succeeding in the war against them".

The logic behind legalizing prostitution is that so the government can control them and tax them. But the problem with the quest to legalize prostitution is that it encourages the sin rather than discourage it. The problem is not the war against prostitution but ignoring Ecclesiastes 8:11. Do you know why the war against prostitution isn't wo…

The Quest For "Unlimited Human Progress" is Really Destroying the Environment

Every time I read from the news of nature's decline due to pollution, how food supply can soon drop anytime, how plant and animal deaths are massively happening I can't help but blame it on one factor: SIN. Yes, sin and most people think it's a fantasy word. It wasn't just a fantasy word that kicked Adam and Eve out of Eden and cursed the Earth with all its imperfections. Sin brought disease and destruction to mankind. Unfortunately, man is to blame for the wanton destruction of the environment all in the name of "unlimited human progress".

You can't divorce science from the Creator and that's a fact. Yet you have people who want to benefit from science without considering the Creator. Christian scientists were conservative because they were aware of one truth that science without ethics is meaningless. I'd like to expand it to say that studying creation without the Creator is absolutely stupid. People can claim that removing God is the key to &qu…

Politically Correct Organizations Need to Take the Beam Out of Their Own Eye First

Politically correct organizations meddling in worldwide affairs is not anything new. Whether it's the Vatican, the European Union, the United Nations, Human Rights Watch and any organization driven by political correctness (and not all of them are Illuminati or Jesuit ran but they're all still dupes of Satan and most of them don't even know it) it's always a problem that they are indeed meddling. While meddling isn't inherently wrong but here's some problems with politically correct organizations:
They only meddle when it's convenient for them as they are guilty of both selective outrage and selective justice.They meddle in the affairs of others without considering their own yard first.They meddle like as if they own the world.
It's stupid how political correctness demands Christians not to judge others but they end up failing to judge themselves. They are always taking "Judge not and you will not be judged." out of context without knowing wha…

What Does Pisseth Against the Wall Mean?

It's really getting bad for some of my Independent Fundamental Baptist brethren to actually even take the words "pisseth against the wall" which appears at least six times in 1 Samuel 23:22, 1 Samuel 25:34, 1 Kings 14:10, 1 Kings 16:11, 1 Kings 21:21 and 2 Kings 9:8 where the King James actually has the words "pisseth against the wall".  Now I am a King James only-ist but I do not support the stupid interpretation of "pisseth against the wall" by some IFB preachers who have become in some way similar to the Catholic Faith Defenders that they argue against when they should spend their time soulwinning.  Actually I even heard that rather outrageous "pisseth against the wall" sermon by Steven Anderson that was so taken out of context.
So what does pisseth against the wall mean? Let us take a look at these six verses and take it on a exegetic view NOT an eisegetic (out of context) view:
1 Samuel 23:22- "And so more also do God unto the ene…

Why This Ministry DOES NOT Support the Westboro Baptist Church

The Westboro Baptist Church is a so-called Baptist institution founded by Fred Phelps who is a lawyer and a theologian. Is it your average Baptist assembly or is this another of Satan's brain children? I would like to present my stand why this ministry does not support the Westboro Baptist Church and why as a Baptist, I do not support them either:
The founder Fred Phelps who serves as its pastor. I do find it disturbing he says that he supports sound doctrine of good Christian preachers of the past like John Calvin and Charles Haddon Spurgeon but his doctrine is not sound at all. His preaching is definitely not balanced. While I do appreciate him attacking the Great Whore of Revelation, apostasy, ecumenism, homosexuality, abortion, pornography and a lot of sins however he is no better than the Roman Catholic institution which he frequently criticizes. Although he claims to be a Calvinist and a Spurgeon fan, however many of those who are Calvinist preachers like Paul Washer, John …