Some Roman Catholic Apologists Tend to Change Their Stance Whenever It Is Deemed Convenient for Them
Some Roman Catholics whether they like to admit it or not change their stance a lot whenever it is deemed convenient. I can just give a few examples of this hypocrisy as far as I have observed based on personal experience. This is not true for all Roman Catholic apologists but this is true for some of them.
1.) Says that no born again Christian pastor ever suffers for Christ but laughs whenever a born again Christian pastor is persecuted for their faith
It is common for Roman Catholic apologists to sensationalize the sufferings of their priests who are persecuted for their beliefs. They can say that no pastor ever suffers like those martyred priests in some areas of the world. But when born again Christian pastors are suffering for spreading the Gospel of Christ there is the huge tendency to laugh at them and ridicule them.
2.) Says that born again Christians teach a license to sin but then says they are also legalistic killjoys
This is another contradicting statement considering how can you be a legalistic killjoy and teach that people can sin all they want at the same time? Legalism and Antinomianism are two opposing evils which cannot walk together but take you to Hell either way. They tend to misrepresent the Biblical stand of Sola Fide saying that born again Christians say that good works are not necessary. However let the man of God go against the vices that are common among religious Roman Catholics like smoking, drinking, gambling and womanizing then they are to cry foul and call born again Christians as legalistic killjoys. It is contradictory to say born again Christians teach a license to sin if they are also said to be people who forbid a lot of sinful stuff they are enjoying. Some even go as far as to compare the man of God to Adolph Hitler and born again Christians to Nazis to sensationalize their false accusation.
3.) Quotes from the Bible to justify their doctrine then quotes from the Canon Law when the Bible disagrees with them
Some Roman Catholics tend to say that they do believe that the Bible is the final authority so they will misquote the Bible to justify praying (or asking intercession) from Mary, conditional security, salvation that requires faith plus good works rather than faith that results to good works, celibacy for priesthood, the papacy and other extrabiblical traditions that evolved throughout the centuries. But when you start taking things into context, many of them tend to open the Canon Law as their final reference over what the Bible has to say. They just love to say that Sola Scriptura is self-refuting to suit their needs.
Conclusion:
Based on these examples above, it is already a common observation for Roman Catholics to change their stance only for their convenience. This happens a lot during their debates which not only shows their dirty tactics but also their lack of professionalism.
1.) Says that no born again Christian pastor ever suffers for Christ but laughs whenever a born again Christian pastor is persecuted for their faith
It is common for Roman Catholic apologists to sensationalize the sufferings of their priests who are persecuted for their beliefs. They can say that no pastor ever suffers like those martyred priests in some areas of the world. But when born again Christian pastors are suffering for spreading the Gospel of Christ there is the huge tendency to laugh at them and ridicule them.
2.) Says that born again Christians teach a license to sin but then says they are also legalistic killjoys
This is another contradicting statement considering how can you be a legalistic killjoy and teach that people can sin all they want at the same time? Legalism and Antinomianism are two opposing evils which cannot walk together but take you to Hell either way. They tend to misrepresent the Biblical stand of Sola Fide saying that born again Christians say that good works are not necessary. However let the man of God go against the vices that are common among religious Roman Catholics like smoking, drinking, gambling and womanizing then they are to cry foul and call born again Christians as legalistic killjoys. It is contradictory to say born again Christians teach a license to sin if they are also said to be people who forbid a lot of sinful stuff they are enjoying. Some even go as far as to compare the man of God to Adolph Hitler and born again Christians to Nazis to sensationalize their false accusation.
3.) Quotes from the Bible to justify their doctrine then quotes from the Canon Law when the Bible disagrees with them
Some Roman Catholics tend to say that they do believe that the Bible is the final authority so they will misquote the Bible to justify praying (or asking intercession) from Mary, conditional security, salvation that requires faith plus good works rather than faith that results to good works, celibacy for priesthood, the papacy and other extrabiblical traditions that evolved throughout the centuries. But when you start taking things into context, many of them tend to open the Canon Law as their final reference over what the Bible has to say. They just love to say that Sola Scriptura is self-refuting to suit their needs.
Conclusion:
Based on these examples above, it is already a common observation for Roman Catholics to change their stance only for their convenience. This happens a lot during their debates which not only shows their dirty tactics but also their lack of professionalism.