Atheism's Failure to Account for Morality

Atheists may say, "Well religion is trash, what matters is one's principles." and they say, "Well Christian, thou shall not bear false witness."  I just have to say this- first atheists can be morally good when they want to be.  However the problem is this- atheists FAIL to account for what is good and bad and that is one hard truth they are refusing to accept which can be evidenced with how atheist governments go from bad to worse.  It just upsets me how many people have become atheists because of their falling away with false Christians or how many atheists were born in Roman Catholic families and later after a tragedy, decide to get mad at God and stop believing. that God exists.  The problem with atheism can lie on subjective morals, not objective morals or in other words as Romans 10:3 says, "Trying to establish their own righteousness being ignorant of the righteousness of God."  

So here's the big question for the atheist, "If there is no God what's your standard for right and wrong."  One big possible question of their principles could be the following:

1.) If it works, it must be good!
2.) The best moral system is if it brings the greatest happiness, the least amount of suffering.

Looking at the arguments above, it's all but relative and subjective that is proof of ignorance of the righteousness of God.  That is, it can lead to altruism (moral relativity) and hedonism or only seeking pleasure.  Some atheists accuse Christians as pitiful losers who don't know how to have fun.  However what is fun is not always beneficial.  Sure it's fun to go to the casino and bet BUT it is not beneficial.  Sin can be pleasant at first but it is no way beneficial.  

And here's been some of the worst atheist arguments I've read.  I am NOT linking their blogs and websites.  I don't want to give them any more traffic than they already have!  

1.) There are no real absolutes.  
2.) Sin is just a fantasy word.
3.) Or quoting Richard Dawkins he says there is no right, no wrong but only PITILESS INDIFFERENCE.

By looking at it, if sin is just a fantasy word THEN Christians cannot be labeled liars and bearers of false witnesses without the reality of sin being presented.  If there are no absolutes, why judge Christians as idiots?  Why would the Irrational Response Squad make Ray Comfort a liar if there are no absolutes?  Hee hee, Ray Comfort presents them truth, they hate it!  If there are no absolutes, then John Macarthur can't be wrong or right either and Paul Washer can't be considered wrong in preaching about that there is a God by the faulty standards of atheism.  Also, I just have to say if there are no moral standards but pitiless indifference then why condemn religious fanaticism like the Inquisition, the 9/11 bombings.. they are NOT works of God but rather man's perverted and twisted view of God.

Then if there is nothing but pitiless indifference then why raise the concern of "innocent people" being killed when in fact atheist dictators like Pol Pot, Mao Zedong, Lenin and Stalin all killed people out of Dawkins' principle of nothing but pitiless indifference making them no better than religious dictator Adolf Hitler?  Seriously atheism is nothing more than a system of hypocrisy.  Hate me all you want BUT your moral system is pretty relativistic!  All I can say is it's playing the game of a hardened heart, hating God and all.  What's also pretty interesting is that atheism DOES fit into Satanism's principle of, "Do thou art will and that is the whole of the law." type of thinking.  

I just hope for every atheist reading this that you are going to come to know the truth!  The Bible OFFERS real objective truth that shows sin is sin because it destroys, it shows a God who does not change and who still remains firm to His precepts.  Seriously you've read what I've written, in fact these very words may judge you on Judgment Day!