Some Atheists and their Ad Hominem (Strawman) and Genetic Fallacy Attacks
Ad Hominem is defined as, "Attacking the individual instead of the argument." and genetic fallacy as "Attempting to endorse or disqualify a claim because of the origin or irrelevant history of the claim." Atheists are very capable of their Ad Hominem or genetic fallacy in their illogical arguments against Christianity showing just how much "respect" they have for science. According to several atheists, you cannot be considered a scientist until you have denounced God in your thinking, you have chosen to reject God and believe in humanism. That claim is really so stupid because of these reasons:
1.) A lot of scientists Christians or not were not atheists.
Christian scientists had Isaac Newton (simplified the study of physics, established Calculus to help simplify computations), Francis Bacon (the big bellringer of the scientific method), George Westinghouse, Nikola Tesla (the man who electrified the world) and Blaise Pascal. For non-Christians we have Roman Catholic scientists included Gregor Mendel (known as the father of genetics), Louis Pasteur (who despite being an unsaved man defended the idea of biogenesis) and Rene Descartes (attributed to Trigonometry) and Egyptians who built the pyramids were theists. Pythagoras though a heathen man contributed the Pythagorean theorem. If according to these atheists that if people who at least believe in a divine being or worship one (or many) can't be scientists, why do they still in the world study science from these books? In fact, even Charles Darwin to who they adhere to was not an atheist. So I guess atheists should even not use electricity, computers, etc. because they were created by creationists who they dub as "morons". In fact many technological companies are not run by atheists but by people who believe in creation but sadly, many of them aren't saved.
Christian scientists had Isaac Newton (simplified the study of physics, established Calculus to help simplify computations), Francis Bacon (the big bellringer of the scientific method), George Westinghouse, Nikola Tesla (the man who electrified the world) and Blaise Pascal. For non-Christians we have Roman Catholic scientists included Gregor Mendel (known as the father of genetics), Louis Pasteur (who despite being an unsaved man defended the idea of biogenesis) and Rene Descartes (attributed to Trigonometry) and Egyptians who built the pyramids were theists. Pythagoras though a heathen man contributed the Pythagorean theorem. If according to these atheists that if people who at least believe in a divine being or worship one (or many) can't be scientists, why do they still in the world study science from these books? In fact, even Charles Darwin to who they adhere to was not an atheist. So I guess atheists should even not use electricity, computers, etc. because they were created by creationists who they dub as "morons". In fact many technological companies are not run by atheists but by people who believe in creation but sadly, many of them aren't saved.
2.) To silence the mouths of people just because they are not atheists and/or scientists equals to that of strawman arguments like telling me I should shut up just because I am not a scientist.
But I am presenting here scientific discoveries by people who shared their knowledge to commoners like me. I bring their discoveries for others to share as a tool to spreading knowledge like this blog does. Does that mean I am not qualified to say the laws of physics straight from the facts because I'm not a physicist? Well I certainly can't teach physics but I can certainly site my limited knowledge of the subject! So atheists aren't as open-minded as they claim to be after all since they want to silence people they know have the truth. In short, they are really scared to admit that God is very real and that they hate Him very much!
But I am presenting here scientific discoveries by people who shared their knowledge to commoners like me. I bring their discoveries for others to share as a tool to spreading knowledge like this blog does. Does that mean I am not qualified to say the laws of physics straight from the facts because I'm not a physicist? Well I certainly can't teach physics but I can certainly site my limited knowledge of the subject! So atheists aren't as open-minded as they claim to be after all since they want to silence people they know have the truth. In short, they are really scared to admit that God is very real and that they hate Him very much!