Skip to main content

Illogical Arguments of Marian Fanatics Towards the Born Again Christian Stand on Mary

One of the many big and not to mention unsubstantiated accusations that any Marian fanatic can cook up is, "You Protestants do not value the mother of Jesus at all.  You hate her.  You downplay her importance.  She's the mother of God and she deserves all the honor that Jesus has.  If you dare deny she is the is the Queen of Heaven and that she can hear our prayers, you are a blasphemer."  This of course results to me getting a series of migraines that no matter how I try to defend my biblical stance on Mary, they just refuse to listen because they have their tendency to think that they are usually right.  No matter how I try to explain from the pages of the Bible, they do not want to listen to reason.  This is actually the logical fallacy of false dilemma when they say, "Unless you believe in the Roman Catholic stand on Mary then you diminish her importance and you are against her."

Born again Christians do not have a problem with Mary as a person.  The problem they have is with the unbiblical teachings that Roman Catholicism has put into Mary.  As a born again Christian, I do not deny that Mary was important to fulfilling the prophecy in Isaiah 7:14 which says that a virgin shall give birth to a child, that Jesus was humanly speaking the Seed of David (Mary's lineage came from David's son Nathan, Joseph's lineage came from David's son Solomon and both came from Bathsheba), that Mary's lineage was indeed from David so she was necessary to fulfill prophecy and her marriage to Joseph would fulfill both the bloodline and legal rights of Jesus' claim to David's dynasty.  Yes, Mary in important in fulfilling the role of prophecy but that does not make believing in her necessary for salvation or that Christians must pray to her to become "worthy of the promises of Christ".

If they insist on using the Wedding Feast in Cana to justify their heresy, I beg them to reconsider reading the same passages concerning Mary and Jesus.  The interaction is written in John 2:3-5 we have this interaction:
When the wine had given out, Jesus' mother said to Him, "They are out of wine."  "You must not tell me what to do." Jesus replied, "My time has not yet come."  Jesus' mother then told the servants, "Do whatever He tells you."

Taking the meaning of the account of the Wedding at Cana, it is obvious that Jesus did not even call Mary as "mother' but instead, He politely told her, "You must not tell me what to do.  My time has not yet come."  The Douay Bible says "And Jesus saith to her: Woman, what is that to me and to thee?  My hour is not yet come."  To understand that further, the whole idea that Jesus said, "My time has not yet come." was that it was not yet the time to reveal that He was the Messiah.  Although He did not call Mary as "mother" but "woman", the Greek word is "gune" which refers to any woman of respect.  Mary was called woman and not mother in Jesus' respect for Mary.  By not calling her woman, the whole idea would have been offensive by the Jewish community.  But nobody in the right mind calls their mother as "woman" instead of "mother".

Now it's time to see Mary's only command is, "Do whatever He tells you." and not "Do whatever I tell you."  Mary knew for sure that she was just another sinner saved by grace.  She knew that she was Jesus' mother only in His humanity but not His divinity as God has no mother.  When Mary gave that order, it can be easily seen as, "Look, don't look to me.  Look to Jesus.  I cannot mediate between you and Him.  Go to Him directly."  She gave no other command except, "Do whatever He tells you."  I find it strange that many Marian devotees say they believe that verse but they are not even really do what Jesus is telling them.  Nowhere in the Bible did Jesus even give any command that we are to ever pray to Mary if we need anything.  Instead, He said in John 14:13 saying and I will be quoting from the Good News Bible again saying, "And I will do whatever you ask for in My Name so that the Father's glory will be shown."

We also read of another passage where Jesus rebuked a person for putting too much importance on Mary's role as Jesus' earthly mother.  In Luke 11:27-28 we read:
When Jesus had said this a woman spoke up from the crowd and said to Him, "How happy is the woman who bore you and nursed you."  But Jesus answered, "Rather, how happy are those who hear the Word of God and obey it."

While my old copy of "The Children's Bible" (which has gone through wear and tear) has the commentator say that, "Jesus wants us to pray to His mother." that is so dead wrong.  Whoever wrote that passage needs to realize the word "but" before "Jesus answered" when it was said, "Rather, how happy are those who hear the Word of God and obey it."  Jesus did not exalt His mother as somebody far more important than other women, instead He said that what was important was not about physical relationships but spiritual relationships. It was about being His follower, not His family member.  If Mary had so much value to mediating then Jesus or the Apostles would have said it.  But instead, everything points directly to Jesus and none to Mary when it comes to believing on somebody to get saved.  If Mary could save, she would have not said in Luke 1:47, "My heart praises the LORD, my soul is glad because of God my Savior."

1 Timothy 2:5 says in the Good News Translation, "For there is one God and there is one who brings God and human beings together, the man Christ Jesus."  Mary is not a mediator between Jesus and humans, no she had no such role.  She was important but not that important to the point that nobody could get to Jesus without her.  All men must come directly to Jesus Christ.  A pastor can pray on behalf of a church member but he is not the one who brings God and human beings together.  The Greek word is μεσίτης (mesitēs) meaning one who intervenes between the two.  Intercession is all about intervening in behalf for another but a mediator is someone who intervenes between the two in order to restore peace and friendship.  In short, a pastor can intercede on behalf of another but he cannot mediate between God and man.  Only the Lord Jesus Christ could do that.  The Good News' translation is even easier to understand than the King James when it comes to the use of words but why do many Roman Catholic Marian fanatics still remain stubborn to the fact that Mary is no co-Mediator or co-Redeemer, all those teachings are not Biblical at all.

See also:

Popular posts from this blog

Ken Ham's Illustrations on Spiritual Warfare Against Humanism

Dr. Ken Ham of Answers in Genesis made these beautiful illustrations to show what's wrong with the church today. Let's take a look at the two illustrations on how Christians engage their spiritual warfare. 
The first illustration reveals the following:
One member is asleep when he should be doing something.Another person is firing at the balloons because the person who's supposed to fire it is asleep on the job.Somebody is focused on deflecting cannon balls than hitting the source of the cannon balls.Somebody is treating the whole situation like a game.  
By doing so, humanism is victorious whenever the local church is asleep. This is the problem to why Christians tend to fall down in battle at times:
Ezekiel 22:30 And I sought for a man among them, that should make up the hedge, and stand in the gap before Me for the land, that I should not destroy it: but I found none.
In short, if you're not going to stand in the gap on behalf of the land then who will? It's the…

The Ridiculous Roman Catholic View That Marriage Must Be Done Inside Their Church or It's Invalid

I remembered reading through the seven sacraments or ordinances of the Roman Catholic institution in a catechism. One of the teachings is that marriage must be treated as a sacrament. What it also implies is that if your marriage is done in a civil court that even if it was duly registered, that both couples were in a sexually pure union then it's not a marriage. So does that mean that a person can marry in a civil court, get divorced and marry his next spouse in the Roman Catholic institution?

Let's address the issue of civil marriage that is pure and holy. In short there was no incest, no adultery and it was between two people who are eligible for marriage. So why should the Roman Catholic institution even think that two people who got married with the sexually pure prerequisites in the eyes of God should be rejected. Is it because unless it's a priest who performs the marriage then the marriage can't be validated? It's a problem with how Roman Catholics have thei…

Don't Forget That the Roman Catholic Institution Has a Very Long History of Inciting Sedition

The Roman Catholic institution has its long fraudulent history of claiming to be the "One True Church that was founded n 33 A.D. - Holy, Catholic and Apostolic". The word catholic is a synonym for universal but the disciples were never first called Catholics in Antioch but Christians (Acts 11:26). Catholic was used as an old world for universal which some people today are allergic to that word because Catholic has been used to describe people who are members of the Roman Catholic institution. What can be talked about now is the fact that the Roman Catholic institution has had a long history of inciting sedition in governments. While they claim it to be doing the "work of God" or as the Jesuits say "Ad Maiorem Dei Gloriam" or "For the greater glory of God." but is it really?

Doing some study of the history of the Vatican has it shown that the Inquisition and later the Jesuit Order have a lot of bloody rags to answer for. Did you know that many ki…

Testimony of Former Jesuit Priest Victor J. Affonso

To Follow Jesus Without Compromise by Victor J. Affonso
Why I joined the Society of Jesus
At the age of 23, I was a successful commercial artist on the verge of going abroad where a job was awaiting me. I was happy at the prospect of leaving India and thereby also escaping the terrible anguish caused of seeing the misery of the poor in the streets of Bombay.
Political saviors like Gandhi and Nehru had failed in giving true freedom and justice to India’s poor majority. Murder and divisions assailed “independent” India, and so it still is today. All the social works were but a few drops of water in a desert. Yet there was still one solution left: The words of Jesus kept coming to me during prayer, “…For with God ALL things are possible” (Mark 10:27). “Don’t run away!” On another day I heard the words, “Follow My Son — Jesus!” This word finally led me to leave the world and join the Society of Jesus, a missionary order that promised by its very title, its “Spiritual Exercises” and its C…

Understanding Ignatius of Antioch's Statement on the Eucharist

It's already expected that Roman Catholicism takes Scriptures out of context and/or purposely misreads it. If they can't even handle the Word of God with reverence then I don't expect them to handle anything else with reverence except it be the writing of the past Popes and the Roman Catholic priests. One such man is the Christian bishop or overseer. In case Roman Catholics want to argue that the term "bishop" would prove he's one of their kind then they are mistaken. To be a bishop according to 1 Timothy 3:1-7 is to be a church leader. Besides, the same passage says that bishops must be family men of moral dignity which is impossible for a Roman Catholic priest who's bound to celibacy. Please note 1 Corinthians 7:35-37 is not a command for priests to stay single all their lives!
Now here's a popular misquote from the very passage of Ignatius of Antioch to justify the doctrine of transubstantiation: They abstain from the eucharist and from prayer, bec…

What Does Pisseth Against the Wall Mean?

It's really getting bad for some of my Independent Fundamental Baptist brethren to actually even take the words "pisseth against the wall" which appears at least six times in 1 Samuel 23:22, 1 Samuel 25:34, 1 Kings 14:10, 1 Kings 16:11, 1 Kings 21:21 and 2 Kings 9:8 where the King James actually has the words "pisseth against the wall".  Now I am a King James only-ist but I do not support the stupid interpretation of "pisseth against the wall" by some IFB preachers who have become in some way similar to the Catholic Faith Defenders that they argue against when they should spend their time soulwinning.  Actually I even heard that rather outrageous "pisseth against the wall" sermon by Steven Anderson that was so taken out of context.
So what does pisseth against the wall mean? Let us take a look at these six verses and take it on a exegetic view NOT an eisegetic (out of context) view:
1 Samuel 23:22- "And so more also do God unto the ene…

God's Curse Upon Gambling!

One of the greatest hypocrisies that people are facing right now is the sin of legalized gambling. Why do I dare say it is hypocritical? It's because for one legalized gambling promotes all type of filth. We have laws against adultery but not against pornography, we have laws against stealing but not against gambling which is really a sin. Today, Christians must voice out not only against legalized prostitution and legalized pornography, they must also voice against legalized gambling. 1 Timothy 6:10 is true that in these days, the love for money is the root of all evil in the secular world plus gambling is mainly rooted upon the love for money. We ought to think that in every way, money is not evil but the love for it is really evil. Gambling in itself is fed because of the love of money. Pastor Mike Stahl a Baptist preacher had also revealed the ill effects of gambling, in truth it is a very lucrative business that sadly destroys lives. To be honest, gambling has been one of th…