Skip to main content

Illogical Arguments of Marian Fanatics Towards the Born Again Christian Stand on Mary

One of the many big and not to mention unsubstantiated accusations that any Marian fanatic can cook up is, "You Protestants do not value the mother of Jesus at all.  You hate her.  You downplay her importance.  She's the mother of God and she deserves all the honor that Jesus has.  If you dare deny she is the is the Queen of Heaven and that she can hear our prayers, you are a blasphemer."  This of course results to me getting a series of migraines that no matter how I try to defend my biblical stance on Mary, they just refuse to listen because they have their tendency to think that they are usually right.  No matter how I try to explain from the pages of the Bible, they do not want to listen to reason.  This is actually the logical fallacy of false dilemma when they say, "Unless you believe in the Roman Catholic stand on Mary then you diminish her importance and you are against her."

Born again Christians do not have a problem with Mary as a person.  The problem they have is with the unbiblical teachings that Roman Catholicism has put into Mary.  As a born again Christian, I do not deny that Mary was important to fulfilling the prophecy in Isaiah 7:14 which says that a virgin shall give birth to a child, that Jesus was humanly speaking the Seed of David (Mary's lineage came from David's son Nathan, Joseph's lineage came from David's son Solomon and both came from Bathsheba), that Mary's lineage was indeed from David so she was necessary to fulfill prophecy and her marriage to Joseph would fulfill both the bloodline and legal rights of Jesus' claim to David's dynasty.  Yes, Mary in important in fulfilling the role of prophecy but that does not make believing in her necessary for salvation or that Christians must pray to her to become "worthy of the promises of Christ".

If they insist on using the Wedding Feast in Cana to justify their heresy, I beg them to reconsider reading the same passages concerning Mary and Jesus.  The interaction is written in John 2:3-5 we have this interaction:
When the wine had given out, Jesus' mother said to Him, "They are out of wine."  "You must not tell me what to do." Jesus replied, "My time has not yet come."  Jesus' mother then told the servants, "Do whatever He tells you."

Taking the meaning of the account of the Wedding at Cana, it is obvious that Jesus did not even call Mary as "mother' but instead, He politely told her, "You must not tell me what to do.  My time has not yet come."  The Douay Bible says "And Jesus saith to her: Woman, what is that to me and to thee?  My hour is not yet come."  To understand that further, the whole idea that Jesus said, "My time has not yet come." was that it was not yet the time to reveal that He was the Messiah.  Although He did not call Mary as "mother" but "woman", the Greek word is "gune" which refers to any woman of respect.  Mary was called woman and not mother in Jesus' respect for Mary.  By not calling her woman, the whole idea would have been offensive by the Jewish community.  But nobody in the right mind calls their mother as "woman" instead of "mother".

Now it's time to see Mary's only command is, "Do whatever He tells you." and not "Do whatever I tell you."  Mary knew for sure that she was just another sinner saved by grace.  She knew that she was Jesus' mother only in His humanity but not His divinity as God has no mother.  When Mary gave that order, it can be easily seen as, "Look, don't look to me.  Look to Jesus.  I cannot mediate between you and Him.  Go to Him directly."  She gave no other command except, "Do whatever He tells you."  I find it strange that many Marian devotees say they believe that verse but they are not even really do what Jesus is telling them.  Nowhere in the Bible did Jesus even give any command that we are to ever pray to Mary if we need anything.  Instead, He said in John 14:13 saying and I will be quoting from the Good News Bible again saying, "And I will do whatever you ask for in My Name so that the Father's glory will be shown."

We also read of another passage where Jesus rebuked a person for putting too much importance on Mary's role as Jesus' earthly mother.  In Luke 11:27-28 we read:
When Jesus had said this a woman spoke up from the crowd and said to Him, "How happy is the woman who bore you and nursed you."  But Jesus answered, "Rather, how happy are those who hear the Word of God and obey it."

While my old copy of "The Children's Bible" (which has gone through wear and tear) has the commentator say that, "Jesus wants us to pray to His mother." that is so dead wrong.  Whoever wrote that passage needs to realize the word "but" before "Jesus answered" when it was said, "Rather, how happy are those who hear the Word of God and obey it."  Jesus did not exalt His mother as somebody far more important than other women, instead He said that what was important was not about physical relationships but spiritual relationships. It was about being His follower, not His family member.  If Mary had so much value to mediating then Jesus or the Apostles would have said it.  But instead, everything points directly to Jesus and none to Mary when it comes to believing on somebody to get saved.  If Mary could save, she would have not said in Luke 1:47, "My heart praises the LORD, my soul is glad because of God my Savior."

1 Timothy 2:5 says in the Good News Translation, "For there is one God and there is one who brings God and human beings together, the man Christ Jesus."  Mary is not a mediator between Jesus and humans, no she had no such role.  She was important but not that important to the point that nobody could get to Jesus without her.  All men must come directly to Jesus Christ.  A pastor can pray on behalf of a church member but he is not the one who brings God and human beings together.  The Greek word is μεσίτης (mesitēs) meaning one who intervenes between the two.  Intercession is all about intervening in behalf for another but a mediator is someone who intervenes between the two in order to restore peace and friendship.  In short, a pastor can intercede on behalf of another but he cannot mediate between God and man.  Only the Lord Jesus Christ could do that.  The Good News' translation is even easier to understand than the King James when it comes to the use of words but why do many Roman Catholic Marian fanatics still remain stubborn to the fact that Mary is no co-Mediator or co-Redeemer, all those teachings are not Biblical at all.

See also:

Popular posts from this blog

Pastor Robert Kent Jesalva Evangelizing to Manny Pacquiao

Apparently Manny Pacquiao has already received Jesus Christ as his Lord and Savior.  Here is a picture of Pastor Robert Kent Jesalva evangelizing Manny Pacquiao to the Lord.  Now pray that his was a real conversion and that his family will follow too.  Now looks like the Vatican has lost another faithful ally... pray that the Lord will lead Pacquiao's life to a different direction.  I just hope though our churches will continue the type of preaching that Pastor Ray Comfort carries out namely the use of the Law in preaching.

Let's just pray that if Pacquiao had a false conversion, it would be a real one as Paul Washer would repeatedly warn, "The only evidence of eternal security is continued fellowship."  True Christians will definitely continue to receive trials as life goes by to continue assuring them this that their conversion was real and to cure all doubts that they possess salvation and can't lose it.

What's Wrong with the Ang Dating Daan Movement?

The Ang Dating Daan movement is by the Members Church of God International spearheaded by its pastor (and so-called "prophet") Eliseo Soriano.  While claiming to be an expositor of the Scriptures with his "Itanong Mo Kay Soriano" or "Ask Soriano" In English, this religious group actually isn't Christian as some of the ignorant would want to believe.  Though the group claims the Bible is their only authority (as some cults do) but the problem is that they believe only Eli Soriano may interpret the Scriptures.  This is utter heresy!  Not even a great man in the Scriptures, Charles Spurgeon ever made such a preposterous claim!  This is no better than the "true church" movement by Darwin Fish which is exposed by Pastor Phil Johnson as a heretical movement.  In fact, I'm not going to waste my time debating with ADD members, they are a total waste of my time as every other debate.
Unlike John F. Macarthur of Grace to You that actually encoura…

What Does Pisseth Against the Wall Mean?

It's really getting bad for some of my Independent Fundamental Baptist brethren to actually even take the words "pisseth against the wall" which appears at least six times in 1 Samuel 23:22, 1 Samuel 25:34, 1 Kings 14:10, 1 Kings 16:11, 1 Kings 21:21 and 2 Kings 9:8 where the King James actually has the words "pisseth against the wall".  Now I am a King James only-ist but I do not support the stupid interpretation of "pisseth against the wall" by some IFB preachers who have become in some way similar to the Catholic Faith Defenders that they argue against when they should spend their time soulwinning.  Actually I even heard that rather outrageous "pisseth against the wall" sermon by Steven Anderson that was so taken out of context.
So what does pisseth against the wall mean? Let us take a look at these six verses and take it on a exegetic view NOT an eisegetic (out of context) view:
1 Samuel 23:22- "And so more also do God unto the ene…

Politically Correct People Tend to Think That They Have the Right to Offend Others But Not to be Offended By Others

Politically correct people have this new problem where they tend to think they have the right to offend others while they have the right not to be offended by others. What examples can be pointed out with politically correct people's demands that they can offend others while having the right not to be offended? Here's a few examples that could be enumerated and observed daily with how hypocritical politically people can get:

Feminists get offensive with their so-called "women's rights" but when somebody criticizes them regardless of gender then they tend to go on a full outburst. They get mad when a man hits a woman but think it's okay for a woman to hit a man that is unless if it's the frustrated housewife who slaps her husband for constant infidelity.The LGBT Community of lesbians, gays, bisexuals and transgenders insist that people should accept their homosexuality as "normal", it's okay for them to post hate comments against Christianity …

Testimony of Former Iglesia Ni Cristo Member, Now a Born Again Christian

Editor's note: 
First and foremost, I would like to thank the Bereans for this wonderful story of a former Iglesia ni Cristo minister (or pastor), now he has become a Baptist Christian.  It's a sad story that some people have just jumped from one cult to another.  Some members of the Watchtower Society, Charismatic Movement or the Iglesia ni Cristo have left Roman Catholicism but they have never truly come to know the truth of salvation is by faith in Christ alone and that any good works after Christian life is but the grace of God at work in the believer.  Now for this brave testimony that I can really share after many years of searching for one testimony which I hope will further bring more INC members to Jesus Christ.

May I begin with a word of prayer that in the midst of all these trouble, I call upon Jesus Christ the Son of God who the Iglesia ni Cristo deny is indeed God, the only way to salvation, that they trust upon their works and church membership than Him alone.  I…

The Idea Homosexuality Harms No One is a Huge Lie From the Pits of Hell!

Homosexuals have their tendency to say that if I am not affected by what they do personally then I should just shut up and leave them alone.  They say that they are just a "normal loving couple" and that their activities are "perfectly safe".  They may be able to deceive the public with false statistics but God cannot be fooled.  I can be fooled, I can fall into doubt but my God is greater than all my weaknesses.  The picture above this paragraph shows some facts from Christian Apologetics Research Ministries on some documented research on how homosexuality harms those who practice it.
A lot of painful facts really need to be addressed when it comes to homosexual activities.  Every sin has its consequence that is why God hates sin.  God hates sin because of the harm it brings.  God is not trying to be a cosmic killjoy when He forbids homosexuality because He knows the consequences it will bring to those who practice it.  Instead, He is doing so in order to protect…

Difference Between A "Good Person" (By Worldly Standards) and a Righteous Person

Romans 5:7-8 says, "For scarcely for a righteous man will one die: yet peradventure for a good man some would even dare to die. But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us."  So where is the difference between a "good person" and a righteous person?  There is God's measuring stick vs. man's measuring stick.  Being a "good person" is when a person is compared to the others.  Let's say they compare "Mr. Nice Guy" with the likes of corrupt politicians.  To worldly standards he is a "good person" because he tries to do what is right (by his own flesh).  They are only good according to the worldly standards.  Many may be better than the other like for example, Mr. Nice Guy may treat everybody well.  However here's the real issue with God there is NO such thing as a good person as Romans 3:12 says, "There is NONE that doeth good, no not one." which goes together wit…