Fundamental Baptist Christian

Here's a comic strip that actually describes how self-contradictory it is to become an atheist. I could remember listening and viewing through various atheist videos on Youtube, read some atheist blogs such as "Darwin Killed God" (though it turns out Charles Darwin wasn't an atheist either) where they always say that they don't believe in creationism because it's supposed to say that God simply used a magic wand to make things appear. They claim that intelligent design is impossible and nature only came by evolution. However, one has to analyze the very structures revealed by biology. Did you know that the human eye is even more powerful than the camera? Did you know that the human body is the most complex machinery ever? Did you know that the human brain invented the computer? These are all very complex structures which couldn't just come by random accident. Yet, that's what atheists want to believe that nature and life just came by accident, t...

If you noticed the word compelling was spelled as "compelling", it's to deliver from sarcasm of the whole problem of evolution. Many "compelling" evidences of evolution are questionable at best yet these "experts" don't even want to have them questioned. Above this paragraph is a picture of atheist scientist Richard Dawkins showing his chart of a cartoon of whales with feet. Wait... haven't we seen this tactic used by evolutionists before? They just love to say that the evidence is "overwhelming" but the so-called fossil record is questionable. It's time to ask them a question to how did they know the exact image where the piece of bone supposedly came from? A good example is how a single piece of skull can be said that it came from this person and he supposedly looked like this. They just have their incredibly evil imaginations to draw imaginary cavemen and claim that they already knew everything. Part of their tactic also i...

There's always the hypocrisy that people say, "Only man wrote the Bible!" to dismiss the Bible. Now here's the bigger question that I might want to ask them, "If you say only man wrote the Bible, why are you putting those books by famous atheists as infallible. Why don't you even question them?" They may hypocritically reply that these men have reached perfection. This creates a contradiction since they won't believe the Bible because only man wrote it but they elevate these men have "reached perfection" in writing books defending atheism. One of Satan's biggest lies is teaching evolution as a scientific fact when it isn't. Evolution doesn't necessarily have to be atheistic. The idea of man evolving into a god is already older than Charles Darwin's Origin of Species. Some religions suggest it that you can become a god. Several pagan religions in the East feature that some of their gods and goddesses they worship were onc...

Here's a diagram between a 15 pixel camera and that the normal eye goes for 574 megapixels. The 15 pixel security camera has a creator proving that it does not come by accident. Yet for the atheist, they would believe that nature and eye has an accident. It just reminds me of a stubborn atheist who said, "Well the camera didn't have a magic wand, it was not magically created like you creationists claim that we were magically created." That has to be plain double standard considering that they claim they don't believe in hocus pocus yet it requires hocus pocus before the eye can be so fantastically well-assembled with all its complex networks. If the camera requires a blueprint and some careful assemblage before it comes a functional camera, how much more would the eye require an Intelligent Designer. Take a look at the parts of the human eye. If you had to study for a biology exam that requires you to label each part of the eye, don't you need to syst...

Looking at how atheists tend to brag that they are the most "scientific" people on Earth because they reject God the Author of science, I found this quote by Ray Comfort to be very true. It's really weird how people complain their children aren't behaving right, are lying to them, doing what's wrong because of these two lies that are widespread namely (1) there are no moral absolutes and (2) they are just animals. Speaking of animals, some people even use the misbehavior of animals to justify their misbehavior like a sexually promiscuous lifestyle, incest or homosexuality. So don't tell me the'll also eat their own dirt or urinate everywhere because animals do it? It also becomes wrong like, "Don't act like an animal." when you are teaching people that they are animals. I am still reminded of the hypocrisy of famous atheist Richard Dawkins who said this: "The total amount of suffering per year in the natural world is beyond all de...

It's a major challenge to be facing skeptics and atheists especially when it comes to the creation vs. evolution discussion.  For the creationist, a single piece of skull is evidence for creation and for the evolutionist, a single piece of skull is evidence for evolution.  While I have observed how atheists can be very rude and insensitive to their opponents (while being very touchy individuals themselves), however it's never easy to keep your cool especially if you are near the children of Satan.  If I couldn't stand the bad attitude of Roman Catholic apologists, I don't expect any better from an atheist.  When I read their blogs, they are so full of cursing and bitterness that I choose to avert mine eyes and these days, I won't even comment on their blogs because debating with them is useless. Knowledge about science is certainly a must for every Christian because God is the Author of science.  I encourage them to deeply study scientific facts that would ...

I wanted to discuss about how evolution itself is really a misleading topic.  It's not even science and if Christian biology teachers should discuss evolution, they should show from scientific facts to debunk evolution and defend creation.  Whether evolutionists like it or not, a single skull is not even enough evidence to defend their claims of men and apes sharing the same ancestor or men evolving from apes. Here's the problem with a single skull "evidence".  A single skull can just be anybody's skull or two, some people are born deformed or it may have just been the skull of an ape.  The more I think of how a single skull is always used as "evidence", the more I am aware why atheistic evolutionists use the fallacy of false dilemma to get people to listen to them.  It's, "If you don't believe me then you are not scientific." type of talk or "Christians are too retarded to discuss science." never mind that many of the ...

It's awkward how people claim to be scientific but hate the One who wrote the laws of science in the first place.  Did these atheists know that most of the scientists they are learning from are really Christian scientists?  Sad to say but Romans 1:18-32 speaks of the sad truth of man's sinfulness especially when it comes to homosexuality.  Just because God uplifted the sentence of stoning homosexuals to death does not mean it has become morally acceptable.  Romans 1:22 warns, "Professing to be wives, they became fools."  In what way have they become fools?  You might want to teach all the stupidity that evolution teaches. Teaching the concept of evolution (especially at the atheistic viewpoint) as science really defeats critical thinking.  When you ask an evolutionist for proof, they either present very weak proof like a single tooth or skull or to cut a long story short, they resolve to the logical fallacy of false dilemma saying something like, "...

Let me remind you that NOT all evolutionists are atheists as some of Charles Darwin's disciples were religious people and the late Pope John Paul II embraced evolution as fact.  However it seems to be that all atheists accept evolution because the alternative, that is special creation is "unthinkable" for them.  It also seems to be that believing in evolution seems to be an essential part of atheism.  It's time to tackle on the logical fallacies that evolutionists make.  It would be important to know their logical fallacies aside from gathering scientific evidence against evolution. Ad Hominen - Attacking the person instead of the argument Evolutionist have attacked somebody who talks against evolution simply because the person is not a biologist.  They think that unless you have a Ph.D in Biology, you have no right to argue that evolution is unscientific.  Then again, since when have they been really open-minded to biologists who don't beleive in evolu...

Evolutionists whether atheists or not are really quick to say, "Well the evidence for evolution is OVERWHELMING! Either you check it out or you don't." then they say, "Hey NEVER question the evidence!" every time the absurdity of the matter is even brought up. Some use supposed DNA tests, invoke the name of "science", carbon-14 and the fossil record. The absurdity of the evidence goes with all the so-called evidence that was just from the following - a chimpanzee, a jaw bone, one tooth, another jawbone, just some broken bones which are really unscientific. The scientists are already acting as if they were already fully aware of the origin of the fossil by just looking at it. There was no investigation whatsoever and suddenly, you are not even allowed to question something like, "Sir how did you figure out that tooth was the Nebraska man?" which violates the scientific value of giving scrutiny to what is taught. Christians are commanded ...

Francis Bacon is not an atheist but a Christian. If atheism (depending on who) considers that anybody who believes in God is a retard, they must reject the scientific method as well. If Francis Bacon believed in God then it means, he must be a retard, right? Remember the writings of Francis Bacon, a CHRISTIAN, led to the founding of the Royal Society of London. "There are two books laid before us to study, to prevent our falling into error; first, the volume of the Scriptures, which reveal the will of God; then the volume of the Creatures, which express His power." was one quotation. He had established that the Bible reveals the will of God then any science book expresses His power. For the atheist, such a statement would be a retardation so why should the atheist adhere to the scientific method? If they were to adhere to the scientific method, wouldn't they be adhering to a product of retardation? Then they might as well try to create their own methodol...

One of the biggest lies of the secular scientist is that science will eventually disprove God.  But does scientific study disprove the idea of God?  That is what the atheist scientist wants the world to believe.  To them, they have certainly become the most scientific individuals, the most enlightened individuals because they choose not to believe in God.  Remember the keyword is "choose".  The Bible according to them is just a book if fairy tales and must be dismissed as just another ancient book in order to become scientific. But does science disprove the notion of God?  One may want to take a look at how science is even defined in the first place.  Science is rooted the Latin word "scientia" or knowledge.  A layman's definition of science is a systematic enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations.  It is also a body of knowledge itself that can be rationally explained and reliably applied. ...

If there's any type of Christian who should talk about evolution as impossible, it would be Christians in the field of science.  Most atheists would normally object saying that Christians are "subhumans" who are in need for "extermination" yet some will say "yet they are surprisingly educated".  The problem is also almost every religion in the world has little or no problem embracing Darwin's stupid theory because of their pagan foundations believing that man came from animals!  Well, either you believe it or not but evolution is a cruel sick joke that is not scientific.  Christian education MUST teach why evolution is impossible than just skip that chapter altogether.  Teach them what evolution is and why it is impossible.  Also note Charles Darwin is not an atheist.

One of the biggest problems today in the secular system is bullying especially when these schools become too lenient to the point that the delegated authorities and students become monsters themselves. In fact, children bullying other children is one clear proof of the reality that man is not basically good. Romans 3:10-19 is clear that is a reality that must be faced about the sinfulness of man. Children bully other children for many reasons like some are mistreated themselves at home, others are spoiled brats who think they can get away with all the wickedness they do is always wrong. Problem is with the philosophy of man is basically good and you may want to think also of the GODLESS system of evolution taught in both public and private schools. Ever since America took away the paddle from the school as "child abuse", a lot of incidents have happened in the public schools and it happened all because the Bible got outlawed.  The problem of teaching evolution also is t...

It's a major concern for Christian education if its students know science yet they do not know how to debunk the silly tall tale of evolution. The most marred subject in science by God haters is none other than biology, vandalized, scandalized and they could not accept Creationism because they want the alternative that would make them imagine the God they hate isn't there.  I just had a few thoughts that in the biology books, there are plenty facts yet when it comes to evolution, it's the garbage part.  If you are a Christian who  is a biology teacher in a Christian educational system, here's some creative tips for students so they can help debunk evolution: 1.) Share the works of Kent Hovind, G. Thomas Sharp, David N. Menton and Lee Strobel to name a few who are creation scientists.   2.) Talk about scientists who believed in intelligent design. 3.) Show them the real truth of the Scopes Monkey Trial.  It's very important the truth comes out an...

I just ran across this rather disturbing scene from the heathen series "Planet of the Apes". There's been that crazy attempt to turn Koko the Gorilla into a human by training her to be one, when she could not even do so. As said, Darwin's ideas of evolution are not at all scientific and should just be dismissed as pagan nonsense. Christian schools should teach the students WHY evolution is impossible with the basic facts to higher facts in science. There is really NO conflict between Christianity and science, not like what the typical people say... in fact evolution in itself is from a religious thought just as creation is. Many pagan religion in fact have a link with the monkey or that, they do believe in man coming from lower animals. Just imagine the ideas of a monkey searching for manuscripts or pigs building houses- that's the silly idea of "evolution"! Now here's the big question, "If you believe you came from an ape or man is an...

While visiting Chick.com, I found these rather interesting questions on the Battle Cry Newsletter: Evolutionists wake up each morning to tiptoe around important problems their worldview won’t let them resolve. Here are three basic examples: Matter: where did everything come from?  Evolutionists generally follow the atheists in saying: “From the Big Bang, an explosion.” They convince themselves that a made-up explosion called the Big Bang which exists only in their imagination was different from all explosions that people have actually observed. They think the Big Bang produced matter! Explosions that we observe don’t produce matter. Real estate people don’t drop bombs on houses to fix leaky roofs. Explosions don’t do anything like what evolutionists claim the Big Bang did. Life: how did it start and how does it work?  Evolutionists accept the atheist’s claim that some of the matter produced by the imagined big bang came together and made a living cell w...

Anyone who has ever watched the monkeys and apes at a zoo, couldn't help but notice their resemblance to humans. By comparison, the bears in the zoo are not nearly as similar to humans as are the apes. Still, bears are warm-blooded mammals and thus are more similar to humans than are cold-blooded reptiles like the alligators. Alligators, however, do have legs and true lungs and thus are more similar to humans than are the fish. But even fish have bony vertebrae and thus are more similar to human than are the insects. And even insects are made up of many specialized cells and thus are more similar to humans than are the bacteria. Finally, all living things, including bacteria, have basically the same type of molecules that appear to be essential for life itself and share a common genetic code mechanism for their reproduction. Clearly there is an underlying common theme to all of life. Inquisitive people will naturally wonder why this is so. Until the time of Darwin, over 130 ye...

The evolutionist's notion that man evolved by chance from ape-like creatures is largely based upon certain anatomical similarities between apes and men. Being convinced that such similarities "prove" an evolutionary relationship, paleoanthropologists have declared certain fossil apes to be particularly "man-like" and, thus, ancestral to man. Similarly, in an effort to fill the gap between apes and men, certain fossil men have been declared to be "ape-like" and, thus, ancestral to at least "modern" man. You might say this latter effort seeks to make a "monkey" out of man. Humans are rarely found in the fossil record. This may be partly explained by the sort of habitat in which man typically lived, and by the extraordinary conditions required for fossilization (sudden burial in water-borne sediment which hardens before decomposition of the bones). The best known human fossils are of Cro-Magnon man (whose marvelous paintings are found...

Most evolutionists insist that the occurrence of evolution is an indisputable fact, even if it's exact mechanism must remain speculative. Since evolution is believed to occur far too slowly to be discernible in the time frame of human observers, we must examine prehistoric evidence in the fossil record if we are to observe the "fact" of evolution. In his book Historical Geology, evolutionist C.O. Dunbar said: "Fossils provide the only historical, documentary evidence that life has evolved from simpler to more and more complex forms." But what does the fossil evidence say, and does it really support the evolutionary view of origins -- or is it perhaps more consistent with Creation? Fossilization typically occurs when organisms (either living or dead) are deposited from water into sediment. In some instances, the sediment solidifies making a cast of the entombed organism; in others, the organic material of the organism itself is replaced by mineral to form a ston...