Atheists Contradict Themselves By Admiring Well-Made Designs While Rejecting the Truth of God's Intelligent Design

By -
Here's a comic strip that actually describes how self-contradictory it is to become an atheist. I could remember listening and viewing through various atheist videos on Youtube, read some atheist blogs such as "Darwin Killed God" (though it turns out Charles Darwin wasn't an atheist either) where they always say that they don't believe in creationism because it's supposed to say that God simply used a magic wand to make things appear. They claim that intelligent design is impossible and nature only came by evolution.

However, one has to analyze the very structures revealed by biology. Did you know that the human eye is even more powerful than the camera? Did you know that the human body is the most complex machinery ever? Did you know that the human brain invented the computer? These are all very complex structures which couldn't just come by random accident. Yet, that's what atheists want to believe that nature and life just came by accident, that it took millions of years of random disasters until man finally appeared. Talk about taking away the gods and goddesses from various evolution stories in ancient civilizations to bring forth atheistic evolution. 

They say that Christians are anti-science and "living in the Dark Ages" yet look who's talking. Has state atheism really helped countries progress? One could take a look at the dark history of state atheism as it brought their own version of the dark ages. Mao Zedong, Pol Pot and Joseph Stalin were well-known brutal atheist dictators. They were responsible for wrecking their countries instead of bringing the promise of unlimited human progress. History has proven that state atheism has been no different than state theism. The massacre done by the Khmer Rouge's state atheistic policies is no different than the massacre done by Islamic militants. 

If the very idea of Richard Dawkins' quote from "The River Out of Eden" were true then for what reason should science be studied in the first place? Science reveals one thing that everything has a design and a purpose. Also, science in its proper place requires the belief in a higher Being. Did you know that Francis Bacon the man who pioneered the scientific method was a Christian? Did you know Isaac Newton was a Christian? Yet atheist scientists today insist that unless you're an atheist then you're not a scientist - all the while they still hypocritically benefit from the science textbooks written and some various inventions brought forth by those who they even call as "creationist zombies". 

The problem of atheism is that their stupidity isn't intellectual but moral. They could process various scientific data in their head while they stupidly reject God who is responsible for science's wonders. Why are they morally stupid regardless of their intelligence? Here's what the Bible (which they love to attack even if they claim it's just a book of fables) has to say about them to explain why they reject the truth of God's Intelligent Design:
Romans 1:28-32 
And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient; [29] Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, [30] Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, [31] Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful: [32] Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.

See also: