Skip to main content

How Militant Atheism Actually Disrupts True Science!

Atheistic reasoning is usually quick to say, "Unless people get rid of the notion that God exists, that the Bible is just a book of fables, we cannot progress in science.  Science is only achievable if you get rid of the notion of God in people.".  Richard Dawkins an evolutionary biologist had stated the lie that all scientists now accept evolution which is based on the logical fallacy of division, that what is true for one is used as the basis of what is true for all.  He is known as a huge opponent of Christianity and creationism/theism.  However let us see the truth behind the statement of atheists and their claims.  The blogger who calls himself "Human Ape" of "Darwin Killed God" has prattled more nonsense than another, saying that atheists are the most enlightened people in the world and that Christians are too lazy to study science.

However history has proven how an atheistic mindset actually disrupts science.  Human Ape proudly displayed Richard Dawkins' quote saying, "The total amount of suffering per year in the natural world is beyond all decent contemplation.  During the minute that it takes me to compose this sentence, thousands of animals are being eaten alive, many others are running for their lives, whimpering with fear, others are slowly being devoured from within by rasping parasites, thousands of all kinds are dying of starvation, thirst, and disease.  It must be so.  If there ever is a time of plenty, this very fact will automatically lead to an increase in the population until the natural state of starvation and misery is restored. In a universe of electrons and selfish genes, blind physical forces and genetic replication, some people are going to get hurt, other people are going to get lucky, and you won't find any rhyme or reason in it, nor any justice.  The universe that we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil, no good, nothing but pitiless indifference.".  In short, for the atheist, there is really no morals but they hypocritically appeal to it to disagree with anyone who goes against their ideals.

A scientific viewpoint seeks to study DESIGN AND PURPOSE while having a governance of ethics.  If one believes that there is no design or purpose, what's the use of studying science right?  When we study biology, we study about life.  Anatomy tells us the very PURPOSE AND DESIGN of the human body and the bodies of every type of living organism.  When we study science, we realize that the purpose of the scorpion's sting is to defend itself or that we also realize how creatures without a skeleton could still move by studying its anatomy.  It seeks to learn why monkeys don't have an appendix and humans do.  The old militant accusation of Christians using God as an excuse not to study science is further disproved when a lot of scientific study sprang out from Christian ideals or the belief that there is a God.  Even if Louis Pasteur was not a Christian, he still acknowledged God in his studies of bacteriology.  Isaac Newton a devoted Protestant contributed much to the study of physics, revealing design and purpose.

Atheistic scientists can also be very dishonest while hypocritically accusing Christians of dishonesty.  Looking at how atheistic evolutionists seek to "prove" their "evidences" for evolution, you may want to learn of the dishonest procedures that they have used.  Evidences of evolution because of "fossils not seen" end up getting to several points of absurdity like a single tooth, a piece of skull, a hip bone and you name it.  One good question that can be asked is, "How sure are you that piece of skull is an evidence for atheistic evolution and that there is no God?" they start to either make up stories or get super-defensive as a caught con-artist.  While they play the victim with the movie "The Scopes Monkey Trial" the contrary is true.  The whole movie was a bunch of lies to discredit Christianity.  They would make up any lie like, "All scientists believe in evolution." while conveniently and purposely ignoring the truth that not all scientists believe in evolution.  They would lie for their very own convenience.  In fact, they are even lying to themselves that there is no God even if they know He exists and they hate Him.

At the same time, one may take a look at how "progress" is actually taking place in militant atheist states.  The Marxist form of Communism had brought Russia down to poverty.  North Korea was brought to poverty thanks to a militant atheist mindset by the Kim Dynasty (and right now King Kim Jun Un's life shows how much you are a fool in living life like there is no God).  During Pol Pot's regime, Cambodia had literally become a massive graveyard in his battle to remove any ideology that didn't agree with his atheistic mindset.  Mao Zedong was also a mass murderer atheist who hated God with a passion and brought China to such a sorry state.  Atheism itself is also an opium to society as Romans 1:21-28 states that the atheist really knows God exists but such a person hates God, doesn't want to retain God in one's mind and the result was always that they profess to be wise, they became fools.  Atheists think that they can "expose" Christians of their stupidity but they only expose themselves as an irrational idiot.  After all, if they say I don't believe God because I can't see Him, why do they still breathe the air they cannot see right?

See also:

Popular posts from this blog

Who Will You Believe: Pope Francis or the Bible?

Here's a cartoon of how tragic the afterlife for Roman Catholics would be when they realize that they needed a real, personal relationship with Christ to enter into Heaven. As I grew up as a Roman Catholic I didn't really care about the Bible. I even hear some Roman Catholics are told to never read the Bible for themselves because not everyone should be allowed to read it. The priest often says that reading the Bible alone will confuse you so you need their extrabiblical doctrine. Worse, they are confusing Sola Scriptura with Solo Scriptura. Born again Christians have their tradition but it's dictated by the Bible as a guiding principle to one's lifestyle. It's not that they read only the Bible but rather they have the Bible as their only principle for Christian tradition.

What is this personal relationship? As much as some pastors feel like the term personal Lord and Savior can be dangerous or "personal Savior" may suggest that Jesus is a genie than Lor…

When God Says No, He Means No

When God says no He means no! Do you know why the world is in a mess right now? It's all because Adam and Eve couldn't follow one simple rule that was to never eat of the tree of the fruit of life. I'd like to imagine it that God may have even put an "Off Limits" sign on it. But Satan himself always finds a way to convince people to break the rules.
Genesis 3:1-5 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden? And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden: but of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die. And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die: for God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.

What Christians Can Learn From Joshua and Caleb's Confidence in Seizing the Promised Land

Being a Christian means you can be stuck in a pickle. Today's lesson will be from Numbers 13-14 which talks about the twelve spies to the Land of Canaan. I think any Christian leader going into much trouble today may find this as both a source of vexation and encouragement at the same time. It's a source of vexation because there are so many people like the rebellious Israelites in the wilderness. It's a source of encouragement because it's a reminder that God is still in charge.

The story of Numbers 13 talks about the spying. We see one member of each of the tribes that were given a political inheritance were there. We can see their names are as follows:
Numbers 13:4-13 And these were their names: of the tribe of Reuben, Shammua the son of Zaccur. Of the tribe of Simeon, Shaphat the son of Hori. Of the tribe of Judah, Caleb the son of Jephunneh. Of the tribe of Issachar, Igal the son of Joseph. 8 Of the tribe of Ephraim, Oshea the son of Nun. Of the tribe of Benjamin…

Drunk Driving is Dangerous to Society

Consider this picture of a drunk driving incident. This is the car that the late Princess Diana Spencer, the late Dodi Al Fayed and the late Henri Paul (the driver) were using before their tragic demise. What was also interesting to note is that their driver had high dosages of alcohol prior to this gruesome incident. I don't want to talk about the conspiracy side of things but the whole ugly picture that drunk driving kills. But even after this incident and many similar ones before it is that many people still do it even if the consequences are clear as day.

The Bible warns that being a drunkard is one of the marks of an unsaved person:
1 Corinthians 6:9-10  Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God. 
Those who argue that …

Modernization is Not an Excuse to Dismiss Badly Needed Old-Fashioned Revivals

I remembered reading through Jeremiah can be a chore because the events of that book continue to repeat itself. At the same time, reading through Jeremiah can be a comfort because the prophet chose to stand by God's command even if he momentarily stopped preaching (Jeremiah 20:5). One verse that is used to call for old fashioned revivals is Jeremiah 6:16 which says:
Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein.
It's a problem you start calling for old-fashioned revivals and people will call you outdated or a neanderthal. While there's nothing wrong with modern technology but the problem is when people only care if something is modern. While modernization can be used to evangelize but it can also be used to spread the influence of sin. The same printing press that allowed the late Martin Luther to publish Bibles was also u…

The Prosperity Gospel is an Enemy of Cheerful Giving

I remembered having a lecture on the prosperity gospel. One of the worst lies of the prosperity gospel is that giving money or the tithes and offerings to their pastors will turn you into a millionaire, God will spare them from trouble and that they can have the desires of their wicked heart. That's one of the worst heresies I've heard. On the contrary the more faithful you are to God the more you should expect enemy attacks. Some people I know are faithful in giving and their tithes and offerings yet they are not living as billionaires. The motive of giving in the prosperity gospel is to gain the false promise that God wants us happy, healthy and wealthy all the time. That's not cheerful giving isn't it?

If you give money to God in exchange for material blessings then something is pretty wrong. It's a terrible misapplication of Malachi 3:9-10. Do they even know that the blessings where there isn't enough room to receive it isn't all about becoming a billio…

Politically Correct Parenting Raises Spoiled Brats

Politically correct parenting is already the norm of parenting in this fallen world. What most parents don't see is that everyone needs a healthy dose of both Vitamin Yes and Vitamin No. But like anything beneficial in excess or in scarcity too many people have either too much or too little of Vitamin Yes and Vitamin No. While it's not okay to have an overdose of Vitamin No but what's so upsetting is that many people today take the opposite extreme. They aren't giving enough Vitamin No ad are given too much Vitamin Yes. Either way both are overly misguided approaches in parenting.

Is there anything wrong with giving the child what they want? It depends on what the child wants. If a child wants something that's going to honor God (ex. They want their own copy of the Bible that they can read for themselves) then the parent should say yes if what the child wants is God honoring. But if the child only wants to be like the secular children with all their nice stuff the…