How Militant Atheism Actually Disrupts True Science!
Atheistic reasoning is usually quick to say, "Unless people get rid of the notion that God exists, that the Bible is just a book of fables, we cannot progress in science. Science is only achievable if you get rid of the notion of God in people.". Richard Dawkins an evolutionary biologist had stated the lie that all scientists now accept evolution which is based on the logical fallacy of division, that what is true for one is used as the basis of what is true for all. He is known as a huge opponent of Christianity and creationism/theism. However let us see the truth behind the statement of atheists and their claims. The blogger who calls himself "Human Ape" of "Darwin Killed God" has prattled more nonsense than another, saying that atheists are the most enlightened people in the world and that Christians are too lazy to study science.
However history has proven how an atheistic mindset actually disrupts science. Human Ape proudly displayed Richard Dawkins' quote saying, "The total amount of suffering per year in the natural world is beyond all decent contemplation. During the minute that it takes me to compose this sentence, thousands of animals are being eaten alive, many others are running for their lives, whimpering with fear, others are slowly being devoured from within by rasping parasites, thousands of all kinds are dying of starvation, thirst, and disease. It must be so. If there ever is a time of plenty, this very fact will automatically lead to an increase in the population until the natural state of starvation and misery is restored. In a universe of electrons and selfish genes, blind physical forces and genetic replication, some people are going to get hurt, other people are going to get lucky, and you won't find any rhyme or reason in it, nor any justice. The universe that we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil, no good, nothing but pitiless indifference.". In short, for the atheist, there is really no morals but they hypocritically appeal to it to disagree with anyone who goes against their ideals.
A scientific viewpoint seeks to study DESIGN AND PURPOSE while having a governance of ethics. If one believes that there is no design or purpose, what's the use of studying science right? When we study biology, we study about life. Anatomy tells us the very PURPOSE AND DESIGN of the human body and the bodies of every type of living organism. When we study science, we realize that the purpose of the scorpion's sting is to defend itself or that we also realize how creatures without a skeleton could still move by studying its anatomy. It seeks to learn why monkeys don't have an appendix and humans do. The old militant accusation of Christians using God as an excuse not to study science is further disproved when a lot of scientific study sprang out from Christian ideals or the belief that there is a God. Even if Louis Pasteur was not a Christian, he still acknowledged God in his studies of bacteriology. Isaac Newton a devoted Protestant contributed much to the study of physics, revealing design and purpose.
However history has proven how an atheistic mindset actually disrupts science. Human Ape proudly displayed Richard Dawkins' quote saying, "The total amount of suffering per year in the natural world is beyond all decent contemplation. During the minute that it takes me to compose this sentence, thousands of animals are being eaten alive, many others are running for their lives, whimpering with fear, others are slowly being devoured from within by rasping parasites, thousands of all kinds are dying of starvation, thirst, and disease. It must be so. If there ever is a time of plenty, this very fact will automatically lead to an increase in the population until the natural state of starvation and misery is restored. In a universe of electrons and selfish genes, blind physical forces and genetic replication, some people are going to get hurt, other people are going to get lucky, and you won't find any rhyme or reason in it, nor any justice. The universe that we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil, no good, nothing but pitiless indifference.". In short, for the atheist, there is really no morals but they hypocritically appeal to it to disagree with anyone who goes against their ideals.
A scientific viewpoint seeks to study DESIGN AND PURPOSE while having a governance of ethics. If one believes that there is no design or purpose, what's the use of studying science right? When we study biology, we study about life. Anatomy tells us the very PURPOSE AND DESIGN of the human body and the bodies of every type of living organism. When we study science, we realize that the purpose of the scorpion's sting is to defend itself or that we also realize how creatures without a skeleton could still move by studying its anatomy. It seeks to learn why monkeys don't have an appendix and humans do. The old militant accusation of Christians using God as an excuse not to study science is further disproved when a lot of scientific study sprang out from Christian ideals or the belief that there is a God. Even if Louis Pasteur was not a Christian, he still acknowledged God in his studies of bacteriology. Isaac Newton a devoted Protestant contributed much to the study of physics, revealing design and purpose.
Atheistic scientists can also be very dishonest while hypocritically accusing Christians of dishonesty. Looking at how atheistic evolutionists seek to "prove" their "evidences" for evolution, you may want to learn of the dishonest procedures that they have used. Evidences of evolution because of "fossils not seen" end up getting to several points of absurdity like a single tooth, a piece of skull, a hip bone and you name it. One good question that can be asked is, "How sure are you that piece of skull is an evidence for atheistic evolution and that there is no God?" they start to either make up stories or get super-defensive as a caught con-artist. While they play the victim with the movie "The Scopes Monkey Trial" the contrary is true. The whole movie was a bunch of lies to discredit Christianity. They would make up any lie like, "All scientists believe in evolution." while conveniently and purposely ignoring the truth that not all scientists believe in evolution. They would lie for their very own convenience. In fact, they are even lying to themselves that there is no God even if they know He exists and they hate Him.
At the same time, one may take a look at how "progress" is actually taking place in militant atheist states. The Marxist form of Communism had brought Russia down to poverty. North Korea was brought to poverty thanks to a militant atheist mindset by the Kim Dynasty (and right now King Kim Jun Un's life shows how much you are a fool in living life like there is no God). During Pol Pot's regime, Cambodia had literally become a massive graveyard in his battle to remove any ideology that didn't agree with his atheistic mindset. Mao Zedong was also a mass murderer atheist who hated God with a passion and brought China to such a sorry state. Atheism itself is also an opium to society as Romans 1:21-28 states that the atheist really knows God exists but such a person hates God, doesn't want to retain God in one's mind and the result was always that they profess to be wise, they became fools. Atheists think that they can "expose" Christians of their stupidity but they only expose themselves as an irrational idiot. After all, if they say I don't believe God because I can't see Him, why do they still breathe the air they cannot see right?
See also:
- Christian Schools Should Teach the Scientific Evidence Against Evolution in Their Science Classs!
- Common Sense Really Tells Atheistic Evolution is Impossible!
- Does Science Disprove God or Prove God?
- Scoffers In The Last Days
- The FOOLishness of Atheism
- Thomas Heinze's Questions to Poke Fun at Evolutionists
- Why Evolution is NOT Science