Skip to main content

It's Stupid to Preach Grace Without Preaching the Law First!

A lot of those who engage with "Easy Christianity" not only water down their preaching from just telling people they're sinners without telling them why to simply "repeat after me and you are saved" - you also have people who are never told that they are sinners while preaching the grace of God.  The grace of God is something that is undeserved and not worked for but that means nothing to a person who is still lost in sin.  Many people today live very sinful lives yet they believe nothing is wrong with them because works salvation is nothing more than, "Doing more good than bad." but the Law of God is either you keep it all or perish.

Whenever I reread the Old Testament Law, all I can say is, "Lord, how can I keep all of these without Your grace?"  The reason is the Law can be followed to a certain extent by sinful man but to keep it completely is just impossible.  James 2:10-11 and Romans 3:1-019 makes it clear that it takes only takes one violation of the Law to be considered a transgressor.  To God, the person who stole candy is already worthy of Hell as the person who stole gold bars.  Nobody can say, "But LORD, I stole candy, that wasn't a big offense?"  Absolute holiness and perfection means there is nothing impure or unholy that will ever make it before the righteous standards of God's Law.

Galatians 3:24 says that the Law is the schoolmaster that brings us to faith in Christ.  There is really and absolutely no salvation without the Law.  The Law is not merely suggestions but they are commandments that you have to follow.  When God tells you to do something you ought to do it.  It cannot be dismissed as merely a suggestion.  The Law not only sets things in order but it also shows people that they have violated the precepts of God.  1 Timothy 1:9 says that the Law was not made for righteous people but for sinners.  As Martin Luther calls the Law, it is a mirror that exposes our ugliness and imperfections before a holy and righteous God.  The more one sees the Law, the more one sees the ugliness and imperfection of the lost sinner.

Using the Ten Commandments in preaching and soulwinning is not works salvation but shows sinners their need for salvation.  I remembered Ray Comfort's evangelism that asks people about the ten commandments to show them their sinfulness.  The standard of the Law is impossible to keep.  Do you remember the rich young ruler who said, "All these have I kept since childhood?"  While the story is misused by the works crowd to justify their heresy, the "Easy Christianity" crowd do not see the full meaning of it as well.  When Jesus said to the rich young ruler that he lacked one thing, it showed our helplessness to keep the whole Law.  The rich young ruler sought to justify himself when he said, "All these I have kept since youth."  I cannot say yes to that and that's why I need to be saved from my sins because I myself cannot do it.

God's grace also means nothing to a person who loves their sin.  As I mentioned earlier, many people that they are right with God but their lifestyles show that they are lost.  It is like a person who attends Sunday services, prays the Rosary a lot, tries to be as religious as possible while engaging in several vices such as womanizing, gambling, alcoholism that such shall not inherit God's Kingdom (1 Corinthians 6:9-10).  If people love their sin then true salvation means nothing to them because they want salvation to sin and not from sin.  False converts do not want a real Gospel preaching because they want to sin all they please.  They want to believe Jesus died so they can sin all they please not the grace to live a life pleasing to God.  Many of them think they are saved because of some degree of good works but their lifestyle shows that they are lost as ever.

See also:

Popular posts from this blog

Do Feminists Ever Realize That Women Shouldn't Use Acts of Violence Against Men?

It's irritating to be told that men shouldn't use violence on women but the other way around is okay. No, it's not okay to hit anyone regardless of gender out of anger or frustration. If men shouldn't hit women except in acts of self-defense then the other way round should apply. But you have to remember the stupidity of selective justice and selective outrage of feminists. They think men should respect them while they think discriminating against men is okay. Their quest for "equality" is nothing more than a big joke.

Why is it usually a big fuzz when a man hits a woman but not so many people react if a woman hits a man? That kind of hypocrisy is worth addressing. They say men shouldn't hit women because they are "weaker" but is it okay for a person of lower rank to attack a person of higher rank? The word submission doesn't exist in the feminist dictionary unless it's men submitting to them. Whether they like it or not the husband is t…

You Can't Preach About God's Love For Sinners Without Preaching About His Wrath Against Sin

It's a problem that so many quack preachers love to preach God's love for sinners but not about God's wrath against them because He must punish both the sin and the sinner. Everything from God's love to His wrath is dictated by the fact that He is holy and you are not. The message about God's love for sinners will make no sense if you don't preach about God's wrath against sin first. I remembered listening to "Hell's Best Kept Secret" and "True and False Conversion" by Ray Comfort. There was this point where Kirk Cameron talked about what if I sold my property to save someone from a disease. If the person doesn't know anything about the disease then my selling of all my property to pay for the badly needed treatment won't make sense. Another illustration was all about the flight. You have to tell the person that the parachute is not meant to improve the flight but to tell the person that it's for emergency reasons. If you…

It's Not Okay to Be Blindly Loyal to the Pope and His Army of Pharisees

Some rabid Roman Catholics keep sensationalizing the sins of fraud pastors (as if true born again Christians ever support them) while they keep hiding the sins of their priests or Pharisees. They also say that born again Christians are blindly loyal to the pastor never mind that they are blindly loyal to the Pope and his Pharisees. Blind loyalty towards a a prosperity gospel pastor, a so-called successor of a so-called last messenger or any quack preacher is no different than blind loyalty towards the Pope and his Pharisees. Worse, Roman Catholics believe that their Pharisees are instruments in saving their souls or that the Pope supposedly holds salvation in his hands never mind all the priestly scandals are telling them otherwise.

I could remember how often Bible reading is discouraged (and yet some of these rabid Roman Catholics tell me I should read the Bible and I can't get wrong with it) because it could drive me crazy from reading it. Some Roman Catholics I've met &quo…

Don't Even Think About Legalizing Prostitution or Sex Trade

There's some people who seek to legalize prostitution. Some "rational" atheists are already talking about prostitution should be legalized so it could be controlled by the government. The claim that "studies" show that prohibition doesn't work is a lie straight from the pits of Hell. The Israelites were doing sin not because God forbade it but because they were disobedient and the rulers did nothing to prevent those sins. It's not surprising is that the same people who seek to legalize prostitution also want to legalize narcotics and hard liquor all in the name of "succeeding in the war against them".

The logic behind legalizing prostitution is that so the government can control them and tax them. But the problem with the quest to legalize prostitution is that it encourages the sin rather than discourage it. The problem is not the war against prostitution but ignoring Ecclesiastes 8:11. Do you know why the war against prostitution isn't wo…

Is Salvation in Peter's Hands (As Well as the Popes) Because Jesus Supposedly Gave Him the Literal Keys of Heaven?

According to a self-proclaimed Roman Catholic apologist (who I'll probably dub as Mr. Whistle when I mention him) he claimed that salvation is in the hands of Peter because Jesus gave the former the keys of Heaven. The guy is clearly taking things out of context with what he says. I wonder does he even bother to check out the idioms of the Bible since some passages use a figure of speech instead of speaking everything literally?

If he can't get Matthew 16:18 correctly where he said that Peter the Rock even when the Good News Translation for Roman Catholics says otherwise (and worse for them Peter is differentiated as a rock and the Rock is clearly not him) then he also misinterprets Matthew 16:19. Let's try to understand Matthew 16:19 with the keys and what they really mean. In his interpretation he's already telling everyone that born again Christians should just go back to the Roman Catholic institution because the Pope supposedly holds salvation in his hands. I don&…

Atheists With Abusive Mindsets Do Exist

It's a myth over the modern world that there's no such thing as an atheist with an abusive mindset. I can see atheists who claim that abuses only come through theism. I don't deny that there's such a thing as religious people with an abusive mindset such as Roman Catholic fanatics, Islamic extremists and any form of religious extremism. The problem of the claim is that it denies the reality that there's such a thing as atheists who have an abusive mindset. One such person is the late Christopher Hitchens who claims that he has the right o treat religion with ridicule, hatred and contempt. Isn't that an example of an atheist with an abusive mindset? Sad to say, Hitchens himself is still cursing God from the pits of Hell. Christians should pray that Richard Dawkins wouldn't make the same wrong decision as Hitchens.

One horrible atheist blogger claimed he was indeed one of the most scientific people on Earth. Just reading his blog alone is so tiresome that I&…

Why This Ministry DOES NOT Support the Westboro Baptist Church

The Westboro Baptist Church is a so-called Baptist institution founded by Fred Phelps who is a lawyer and a theologian. Is it your average Baptist assembly or is this another of Satan's brain children? I would like to present my stand why this ministry does not support the Westboro Baptist Church and why as a Baptist, I do not support them either:
The founder Fred Phelps who serves as its pastor. I do find it disturbing he says that he supports sound doctrine of good Christian preachers of the past like John Calvin and Charles Haddon Spurgeon but his doctrine is not sound at all. His preaching is definitely not balanced. While I do appreciate him attacking the Great Whore of Revelation, apostasy, ecumenism, homosexuality, abortion, pornography and a lot of sins however he is no better than the Roman Catholic institution which he frequently criticizes. Although he claims to be a Calvinist and a Spurgeon fan, however many of those who are Calvinist preachers like Paul Washer, John …