Skip to main content

Praying to Mary is Always Wrong

Roman Catholics even have their dumb excuse that aside that some of them lie that they are not praying to Mary, some of them say that they are not praying to the pagan goddess in Jeremiah 7 and 44.  I would agree with Roman Catholics that they are not praying to that exact goddess that the apostate Jews were praying to during the time of Jeremiah.  It was impossible for the Jews to be offering incense to Mary that time because she was not yet born but it was an act of idolatry nonetheless.  Depending on which culture, there were different versions of the Queen of Heaven like you can have Hera for the Greeks, Juno for the Romans, Devaki for the Indians, Isis for the Egyptians, Shing Moo for the Chinese and many other versions of the Queen of Heaven were made even in their home country as several goddesses were soon made for different reasons.  But it did not matter what name they gave the Queen of Heaven idol, it was still false worship nonetheless.

Roman Catholics can say, "But we are not praying to a goddess or to Semiramis, we are praying to Mary.  We must give her honor as Jesus gave her honor."  Do they even know the difference between respect and worship for starters?  Christians are commanded to respect authority figures and their parents but they are not taught to worship or pray to their parents or authority figures.  Respect for Mary is acknowledging her importance and to view her as an important role model in Christian life.  It is not like how Roman Catholics have already overemphasized her to the point that she has had become a goddess and maybe, they just refuse to acknowledge it that Alphonsus Liguori really worshiped her in one of his prayers.  Worse, they have attributed to her the very traits that should have been to God alone.

These titles are wrongly given to Mary and just because they are not praying to Semiramis (or any other pagan goddess) does not make their errors right:
  • Conceived without sin (please check on 2 Corinthians 5:21)
  • Our intercessor (please check on 1 Timothy 2:5, Hebrews 7:21-25)
  • The ark of the covenant
  • Gate of Heaven (please check John 10:1)
  • Our life, our hope, our salvation
  • Queen of Heaven (please check Jeremiah 44)
  • Help of Christians
  • Glory of Israel (please check 1 Samuel 5:29)
  • Morning star (please check Revelation 22:16)
  • Our Help (please check Hebrews 13:6)
  • The way, the truth and the life (please check John 14:6)
  • Author and finisher of our faith (please check Hebrews 12:2)

What can be seen is how Mary is elevated to godhood while their doctrine denies it but to call her the "Mother of God" is absolute garbage.  Even if some of the best Mariologists say that Mary is not the mother of the Trinity but the term "Mother of God" implies she is above God.  The doctrine that Jesus could never say no to Mary is an assault and an affront to the fact that He is God Almighty.  Mary was only His mother in His humanity but in His divinity, Mary is beneath Him.  To explain it clearly, Jesus being the Word of God and is God made Mary.  He has no obligation to do what His earthly mother says because she was only His mother in His humanity but never in His divinity.  When Mary said in John 2:5 saying, "Do whatever He tells you.", it should already be clear that she wanted people to understand that they should go directly to Jesus and not from her to Jesus.  Mary is the mother of God in His humanity through the Lord Jesus Christ but to say Jesus is still under her control is really a subtle attack on the very sovereignty on Jesus Christ the Son as the Second Person in LORD God Almighty.  Mary who is just human knows for well who is above her and she knows she is no different than any other sinner saved by the grace of God.

Even if Roman Catholics are honest about the fact they are not praying to a pagan goddess but they have in a way treated and turned Mary into a pagan goddess.  They are no better than the people in Jeremiah 44:16-19 says, "We refuse to listen to what you have told us in the name of the LORD. We will do everything that we said we would. We will offer sacrifices to our goddess, the Queen of Heaven, and we will pour out wine offerings to her, just as we and our ancestors, our king and our leaders, used to do in the towns of Judah and in the streets of Jerusalem. Then we had plenty of food, we were prosperous, and had no troubles. But ever since we stopped sacrificing to the Queen of Heaven and stopped pouring out wine offerings to her, we have had nothing, and our people have died in war and of starvation.  And the women added, When we baked cakes shaped like the Queen of Heaven, offered sacrifices to her, and poured out wine offerings to her, our husbands approved of what we were doing." (Good News Translation for Roman Catholics)

Mary worshipers also have that same attitude as the people who were worshiping the Queen of Heaven in Jeremiah 44.  Even if they do not call Mary a goddess but they have made her a goddess by their actions.  You tell them that they are in the wrong, they are most likely going to say the same old game where they say born again Christians hate Mary for refusing to venerate her.  They will also invoke the name of their ancestors saying they will keep that tradition especially if several generations before them were Roman Catholics.  They are also quick to blame any act of not doing their vows to pray to Mary or to do any offering for her to bring misfortune never mind it is their idolatry that causes trouble.  Most of them are going to keep a stubborn, hard-headed attitude towards their fanatical devotion to Mary just because she is the mother of Jesus in His humanity to the point they accuse born again Christians of supposedly diminishing her importance.  I could not imagine how angry Jeremiah was especially when he finally gave them one more warning before he left them to perish.   

They may say, "Would not Jesus be happy if we respected His mother."  Excuse me but this is more than respect.  As I mentioned earlier that they have already turned Mary into a goddess by their actions.  Why is it that every time they pray they even say, "Pray for us oh holy mother of God that we may be made worthy of the promises of Christ."  That practice is not even biblical because wherever the Gospels is preached, it is not the name of Mary that was declared but Jesus.  In Acts 2, we do not even have Peter calling people to believe in Mary but in Jesus.  Romans 10:9-13 does not put Mary at all but Jesus.  While Mary was important in fulfilling prophecy but she plays no part in redeeming the lost sinner.  She was the vessel that brought Jesus Christ into the world but she is by any means a co-mediator nor do people have to pass by her.  If you want to be made worthy of the promises of Christ, you can be made worthy by repenting of your sins and receiving Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior, no need to pass through Mary, go directly to Him.

See also:

Popular posts from this blog

Do Feminists Ever Realize That Women Shouldn't Use Acts of Violence Against Men?

It's irritating to be told that men shouldn't use violence on women but the other way around is okay. No, it's not okay to hit anyone regardless of gender out of anger or frustration. If men shouldn't hit women except in acts of self-defense then the other way round should apply. But you have to remember the stupidity of selective justice and selective outrage of feminists. They think men should respect them while they think discriminating against men is okay. Their quest for "equality" is nothing more than a big joke.

Why is it usually a big fuzz when a man hits a woman but not so many people react if a woman hits a man? That kind of hypocrisy is worth addressing. They say men shouldn't hit women because they are "weaker" but is it okay for a person of lower rank to attack a person of higher rank? The word submission doesn't exist in the feminist dictionary unless it's men submitting to them. Whether they like it or not the husband is t…

You Can't Preach About God's Love For Sinners Without Preaching About His Wrath Against Sin

It's a problem that so many quack preachers love to preach God's love for sinners but not about God's wrath against them because He must punish both the sin and the sinner. Everything from God's love to His wrath is dictated by the fact that He is holy and you are not. The message about God's love for sinners will make no sense if you don't preach about God's wrath against sin first. I remembered listening to "Hell's Best Kept Secret" and "True and False Conversion" by Ray Comfort. There was this point where Kirk Cameron talked about what if I sold my property to save someone from a disease. If the person doesn't know anything about the disease then my selling of all my property to pay for the badly needed treatment won't make sense. Another illustration was all about the flight. You have to tell the person that the parachute is not meant to improve the flight but to tell the person that it's for emergency reasons. If you…

It's Not Okay to Be Blindly Loyal to the Pope and His Army of Pharisees

Some rabid Roman Catholics keep sensationalizing the sins of fraud pastors (as if true born again Christians ever support them) while they keep hiding the sins of their priests or Pharisees. They also say that born again Christians are blindly loyal to the pastor never mind that they are blindly loyal to the Pope and his Pharisees. Blind loyalty towards a a prosperity gospel pastor, a so-called successor of a so-called last messenger or any quack preacher is no different than blind loyalty towards the Pope and his Pharisees. Worse, Roman Catholics believe that their Pharisees are instruments in saving their souls or that the Pope supposedly holds salvation in his hands never mind all the priestly scandals are telling them otherwise.

I could remember how often Bible reading is discouraged (and yet some of these rabid Roman Catholics tell me I should read the Bible and I can't get wrong with it) because it could drive me crazy from reading it. Some Roman Catholics I've met &quo…

Don't Even Think About Legalizing Prostitution or Sex Trade

There's some people who seek to legalize prostitution. Some "rational" atheists are already talking about prostitution should be legalized so it could be controlled by the government. The claim that "studies" show that prohibition doesn't work is a lie straight from the pits of Hell. The Israelites were doing sin not because God forbade it but because they were disobedient and the rulers did nothing to prevent those sins. It's not surprising is that the same people who seek to legalize prostitution also want to legalize narcotics and hard liquor all in the name of "succeeding in the war against them".

The logic behind legalizing prostitution is that so the government can control them and tax them. But the problem with the quest to legalize prostitution is that it encourages the sin rather than discourage it. The problem is not the war against prostitution but ignoring Ecclesiastes 8:11. Do you know why the war against prostitution isn't wo…

Is Salvation in Peter's Hands (As Well as the Popes) Because Jesus Supposedly Gave Him the Literal Keys of Heaven?

According to a self-proclaimed Roman Catholic apologist (who I'll probably dub as Mr. Whistle when I mention him) he claimed that salvation is in the hands of Peter because Jesus gave the former the keys of Heaven. The guy is clearly taking things out of context with what he says. I wonder does he even bother to check out the idioms of the Bible since some passages use a figure of speech instead of speaking everything literally?

If he can't get Matthew 16:18 correctly where he said that Peter the Rock even when the Good News Translation for Roman Catholics says otherwise (and worse for them Peter is differentiated as a rock and the Rock is clearly not him) then he also misinterprets Matthew 16:19. Let's try to understand Matthew 16:19 with the keys and what they really mean. In his interpretation he's already telling everyone that born again Christians should just go back to the Roman Catholic institution because the Pope supposedly holds salvation in his hands. I don&…

Atheists With Abusive Mindsets Do Exist

It's a myth over the modern world that there's no such thing as an atheist with an abusive mindset. I can see atheists who claim that abuses only come through theism. I don't deny that there's such a thing as religious people with an abusive mindset such as Roman Catholic fanatics, Islamic extremists and any form of religious extremism. The problem of the claim is that it denies the reality that there's such a thing as atheists who have an abusive mindset. One such person is the late Christopher Hitchens who claims that he has the right o treat religion with ridicule, hatred and contempt. Isn't that an example of an atheist with an abusive mindset? Sad to say, Hitchens himself is still cursing God from the pits of Hell. Christians should pray that Richard Dawkins wouldn't make the same wrong decision as Hitchens.

One horrible atheist blogger claimed he was indeed one of the most scientific people on Earth. Just reading his blog alone is so tiresome that I&…

Why This Ministry DOES NOT Support the Westboro Baptist Church

The Westboro Baptist Church is a so-called Baptist institution founded by Fred Phelps who is a lawyer and a theologian. Is it your average Baptist assembly or is this another of Satan's brain children? I would like to present my stand why this ministry does not support the Westboro Baptist Church and why as a Baptist, I do not support them either:
The founder Fred Phelps who serves as its pastor. I do find it disturbing he says that he supports sound doctrine of good Christian preachers of the past like John Calvin and Charles Haddon Spurgeon but his doctrine is not sound at all. His preaching is definitely not balanced. While I do appreciate him attacking the Great Whore of Revelation, apostasy, ecumenism, homosexuality, abortion, pornography and a lot of sins however he is no better than the Roman Catholic institution which he frequently criticizes. Although he claims to be a Calvinist and a Spurgeon fan, however many of those who are Calvinist preachers like Paul Washer, John …