Skip to main content

Do Roman Catholics Really Understand True Repentance?

Considering today is Ash Wednesday, I really thought of addressing the issue of repentance with Roman Catholics who either regard me as a "separated brethren" or a "heretic".  I always find Lent to be the season to be hypocritical, to make sober of one's faces, the best time to be judgmental and the best time to brag in false humility.  For the sake of Roman Catholic readers, I will start quoting from the Good News Translation (GNT) which is commonly used by Roman Catholics as opposed to the Calvinist translated King James Bible (KJB).

The Catholic definition of repentance is:
"Voluntary sorrow because it offends God, for having done something wrong, together with the resolve to amend one's conduct by taking the necessary means to avoid the occasions of sin. To repent is to be sorry for sin with self-condemnation. (Etym. Latin repoenitere, to be very sorry, regret intensely.)"  

It is true that repentance is all about being sorry for sin but there is a difference between repenting of one's sin and the result of repenting of one's sin.  The Greek for repentance is metanoneia which is a change in mind which results to a change in purpose.  A changed life does not mean you have repented, it can be a sham but a genuinely changed life comes out of a genuine repentance.  The whole idea of lighting candles, offering vain repetitive prayers, walking while kneeling, praying the Rosary and going to the confessional are not repentance.  It is a false kind of repentance confused with penance because a lot of people do religious works to make up for their misdeeds then they repeat the same sins, then they do religious works again.  A true repentance makes a person sin less and less while a false repentance makes a person sin more and more.

Colossians 2:16-19 in the GNT says:
"So let no one make rules about what you eat or drink or about holy days or the New Moon Festival or the Sabbath.  All such things are only a shadow of things in the future; the reality is Christ.  Do not allow yourselves to be condemned by anyone who claims to be superior because of special visions and who insists on false humility and the worship of angels.  For no reason at all, such people are all puffed up by their human way of thinking and have stopped holding on to Christ, who is the head of the body.  Under Christ's control the whole body is nourished and held together by its joints and ligaments, and it grows as God wants it to grow."

The Roman Catholic system tends to lean on judging about what to eat or drink.  It reminded me that after I became a Christian and I ate meat during Lent, I was soon condemned for doing so.  I have tried receiving comments from Roman Catholic priests who claim they are superior because of these "special visions".  While they claim not to worship angels but by praying to them, they are actually exhibiting the worship of angels.  The whole playing on latria and dulia is nothing more than confusion to the speaker.  Their system has nothing but false humility because while fasting and abstinence are indeed noble deeds but to advertise it in public then condemning others is committing the sin of hypocrisy.

1 Timothy 4:1-5 in the GNT also says:
"The Spirit says clearly that some people will abandon the faith in later times; they will obey lying spirits and follow the teachings of demons.  Such teachings are spread by deceitful liars, whose consciences are dead, as if burnt with a hot iron.  Such people teach that it is wrong to marry and to eat certain foods.  But God created those foods to be eaten, after a prayer of thanks, by those who are believers and have come to know the truth.  Everything that God has created is good; nothing is to be rejected, but everything is to be received with a prayer of thanks, because the Word of God and the prayer make it acceptable to God."

The idea of commanding people to abstain from certain foods for religious reasons as a form of legalism is a doctrine of demons.  We can understand if the doctor commands you not to eat certain types of meat for health reasons (ex. rabies producing animals like dogs, cats and monkeys) but to tell people they will burn in Hell if they eat meat on Lent is not biblical.  What is worse is that many Roman Catholics even dare to brag about their abstinence in social media to trumpet their abstinence aside from the dirty ash on their foreheads.  They are quick to condemn people who have been seen eating a burger instead of a vegetarian or fish meal on that day.  That is nothing more than false humility rooted in so much pride and sheer hypocrisy.

You can go ahead and throw ashes unto your head but have not any real repentance.  1 Kings 21:29 says, "Have you noticed how Ahab has humbled himself before me?  Since he has done this, I will not bring disaster on him during his lifetime; it will be during his son's lifetime that I will bring disaster on Ahab's family."  Ahab went ahead and did some sackcloth and mourning but the next chapter proves he was not truly repentant of his unbelief.  Many people today have used ritualism in the place of genuine repentance.  People end up trusting in religious rituals that cannot take away sins over the loving Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ who is the only one who can by grace bring a changed life towards all who He had saved.

See also:

Popular posts from this blog

It's Not Okay to Be Blindly Loyal to the Pope and His Army of Pharisees

Some rabid Roman Catholics keep sensationalizing the sins of fraud pastors (as if true born again Christians ever support them) while they keep hiding the sins of their priests or Pharisees. They also say that born again Christians are blindly loyal to the pastor never mind that they are blindly loyal to the Pope and his Pharisees. Blind loyalty towards a a prosperity gospel pastor, a so-called successor of a so-called last messenger or any quack preacher is no different than blind loyalty towards the Pope and his Pharisees. Worse, Roman Catholics believe that their Pharisees are instruments in saving their souls or that the Pope supposedly holds salvation in his hands never mind all the priestly scandals are telling them otherwise.

I could remember how often Bible reading is discouraged (and yet some of these rabid Roman Catholics tell me I should read the Bible and I can't get wrong with it) because it could drive me crazy from reading it. Some Roman Catholics I've met &quo…

The Error of Comparing Protestantism to New Atheism

The amazing blindness of is too amazing isn't it? I just read an article written yesterday which compares Protestantism to New Atheism. As much as the article is written as professionally as possible in contrast to some self-proclaimed apologists I've had a lot of useless arguments with but I'd like to give a friendly rebuke to the writer Karlo Broussard. It's my sincere prayer that Broussard will see the truth from the pages of the Scripture. 
The writer commits the fallacy of categorical error. He compares Sola Scriptura with Richard Dawkins' views on science. Here's one of the statements that really should be considered a categorical error:
Just as science is the only tool Dawkins and company are willing to use to arrive at knowledge of the natural truth, Protestants use only the Bible for determining what is revealed truth. And as many modern atheists reject anything that science cannot detect, so too do Protestants reject any teaching that is…

Don't Even Think About Legalizing Prostitution or Sex Trade

There's some people who seek to legalize prostitution. Some "rational" atheists are already talking about prostitution should be legalized so it could be controlled by the government. The claim that "studies" show that prohibition doesn't work is a lie straight from the pits of Hell. The Israelites were doing sin not because God forbade it but because they were disobedient and the rulers did nothing to prevent those sins. It's not surprising is that the same people who seek to legalize prostitution also want to legalize narcotics and hard liquor all in the name of "succeeding in the war against them".

The logic behind legalizing prostitution is that so the government can control them and tax them. But the problem with the quest to legalize prostitution is that it encourages the sin rather than discourage it. The problem is not the war against prostitution but ignoring Ecclesiastes 8:11. Do you know why the war against prostitution isn't wo…

The Quest For "Unlimited Human Progress" is Really Destroying the Environment

Every time I read from the news of nature's decline due to pollution, how food supply can soon drop anytime, how plant and animal deaths are massively happening I can't help but blame it on one factor: SIN. Yes, sin and most people think it's a fantasy word. It wasn't just a fantasy word that kicked Adam and Eve out of Eden and cursed the Earth with all its imperfections. Sin brought disease and destruction to mankind. Unfortunately, man is to blame for the wanton destruction of the environment all in the name of "unlimited human progress".

You can't divorce science from the Creator and that's a fact. Yet you have people who want to benefit from science without considering the Creator. Christian scientists were conservative because they were aware of one truth that science without ethics is meaningless. I'd like to expand it to say that studying creation without the Creator is absolutely stupid. People can claim that removing God is the key to &qu…

Politically Correct Organizations Need to Take the Beam Out of Their Own Eye First

Politically correct organizations meddling in worldwide affairs is not anything new. Whether it's the Vatican, the European Union, the United Nations, Human Rights Watch and any organization driven by political correctness (and not all of them are Illuminati or Jesuit ran but they're all still dupes of Satan and most of them don't even know it) it's always a problem that they are indeed meddling. While meddling isn't inherently wrong but here's some problems with politically correct organizations:
They only meddle when it's convenient for them as they are guilty of both selective outrage and selective justice.They meddle in the affairs of others without considering their own yard first.They meddle like as if they own the world.
It's stupid how political correctness demands Christians not to judge others but they end up failing to judge themselves. They are always taking "Judge not and you will not be judged." out of context without knowing wha…

What Does Pisseth Against the Wall Mean?

It's really getting bad for some of my Independent Fundamental Baptist brethren to actually even take the words "pisseth against the wall" which appears at least six times in 1 Samuel 23:22, 1 Samuel 25:34, 1 Kings 14:10, 1 Kings 16:11, 1 Kings 21:21 and 2 Kings 9:8 where the King James actually has the words "pisseth against the wall".  Now I am a King James only-ist but I do not support the stupid interpretation of "pisseth against the wall" by some IFB preachers who have become in some way similar to the Catholic Faith Defenders that they argue against when they should spend their time soulwinning.  Actually I even heard that rather outrageous "pisseth against the wall" sermon by Steven Anderson that was so taken out of context.
So what does pisseth against the wall mean? Let us take a look at these six verses and take it on a exegetic view NOT an eisegetic (out of context) view:
1 Samuel 23:22- "And so more also do God unto the ene…

Why This Ministry DOES NOT Support the Westboro Baptist Church

The Westboro Baptist Church is a so-called Baptist institution founded by Fred Phelps who is a lawyer and a theologian. Is it your average Baptist assembly or is this another of Satan's brain children? I would like to present my stand why this ministry does not support the Westboro Baptist Church and why as a Baptist, I do not support them either:
The founder Fred Phelps who serves as its pastor. I do find it disturbing he says that he supports sound doctrine of good Christian preachers of the past like John Calvin and Charles Haddon Spurgeon but his doctrine is not sound at all. His preaching is definitely not balanced. While I do appreciate him attacking the Great Whore of Revelation, apostasy, ecumenism, homosexuality, abortion, pornography and a lot of sins however he is no better than the Roman Catholic institution which he frequently criticizes. Although he claims to be a Calvinist and a Spurgeon fan, however many of those who are Calvinist preachers like Paul Washer, John …