Skip to main content

Do Roman Catholics Really Understand True Repentance?

Considering today is Ash Wednesday, I really thought of addressing the issue of repentance with Roman Catholics who either regard me as a "separated brethren" or a "heretic".  I always find Lent to be the season to be hypocritical, to make sober of one's faces, the best time to be judgmental and the best time to brag in false humility.  For the sake of Roman Catholic readers, I will start quoting from the Good News Translation (GNT) which is commonly used by Roman Catholics as opposed to the Calvinist translated King James Bible (KJB).

The Catholic definition of repentance is:
"Voluntary sorrow because it offends God, for having done something wrong, together with the resolve to amend one's conduct by taking the necessary means to avoid the occasions of sin. To repent is to be sorry for sin with self-condemnation. (Etym. Latin repoenitere, to be very sorry, regret intensely.)"  

It is true that repentance is all about being sorry for sin but there is a difference between repenting of one's sin and the result of repenting of one's sin.  The Greek for repentance is metanoneia which is a change in mind which results to a change in purpose.  A changed life does not mean you have repented, it can be a sham but a genuinely changed life comes out of a genuine repentance.  The whole idea of lighting candles, offering vain repetitive prayers, walking while kneeling, praying the Rosary and going to the confessional are not repentance.  It is a false kind of repentance confused with penance because a lot of people do religious works to make up for their misdeeds then they repeat the same sins, then they do religious works again.  A true repentance makes a person sin less and less while a false repentance makes a person sin more and more.

Colossians 2:16-19 in the GNT says:
"So let no one make rules about what you eat or drink or about holy days or the New Moon Festival or the Sabbath.  All such things are only a shadow of things in the future; the reality is Christ.  Do not allow yourselves to be condemned by anyone who claims to be superior because of special visions and who insists on false humility and the worship of angels.  For no reason at all, such people are all puffed up by their human way of thinking and have stopped holding on to Christ, who is the head of the body.  Under Christ's control the whole body is nourished and held together by its joints and ligaments, and it grows as God wants it to grow."

The Roman Catholic system tends to lean on judging about what to eat or drink.  It reminded me that after I became a Christian and I ate meat during Lent, I was soon condemned for doing so.  I have tried receiving comments from Roman Catholic priests who claim they are superior because of these "special visions".  While they claim not to worship angels but by praying to them, they are actually exhibiting the worship of angels.  The whole playing on latria and dulia is nothing more than confusion to the speaker.  Their system has nothing but false humility because while fasting and abstinence are indeed noble deeds but to advertise it in public then condemning others is committing the sin of hypocrisy.

1 Timothy 4:1-5 in the GNT also says:
"The Spirit says clearly that some people will abandon the faith in later times; they will obey lying spirits and follow the teachings of demons.  Such teachings are spread by deceitful liars, whose consciences are dead, as if burnt with a hot iron.  Such people teach that it is wrong to marry and to eat certain foods.  But God created those foods to be eaten, after a prayer of thanks, by those who are believers and have come to know the truth.  Everything that God has created is good; nothing is to be rejected, but everything is to be received with a prayer of thanks, because the Word of God and the prayer make it acceptable to God."

The idea of commanding people to abstain from certain foods for religious reasons as a form of legalism is a doctrine of demons.  We can understand if the doctor commands you not to eat certain types of meat for health reasons (ex. rabies producing animals like dogs, cats and monkeys) but to tell people they will burn in Hell if they eat meat on Lent is not biblical.  What is worse is that many Roman Catholics even dare to brag about their abstinence in social media to trumpet their abstinence aside from the dirty ash on their foreheads.  They are quick to condemn people who have been seen eating a burger instead of a vegetarian or fish meal on that day.  That is nothing more than false humility rooted in so much pride and sheer hypocrisy.

You can go ahead and throw ashes unto your head but have not any real repentance.  1 Kings 21:29 says, "Have you noticed how Ahab has humbled himself before me?  Since he has done this, I will not bring disaster on him during his lifetime; it will be during his son's lifetime that I will bring disaster on Ahab's family."  Ahab went ahead and did some sackcloth and mourning but the next chapter proves he was not truly repentant of his unbelief.  Many people today have used ritualism in the place of genuine repentance.  People end up trusting in religious rituals that cannot take away sins over the loving Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ who is the only one who can by grace bring a changed life towards all who He had saved.

See also:

Popular posts from this blog

Ken Ham's Illustrations on Spiritual Warfare Against Humanism

Dr. Ken Ham of Answers in Genesis made these beautiful illustrations to show what's wrong with the church today. Let's take a look at the two illustrations on how Christians engage their spiritual warfare. 
The first illustration reveals the following:
One member is asleep when he should be doing something.Another person is firing at the balloons because the person who's supposed to fire it is asleep on the job.Somebody is focused on deflecting cannon balls than hitting the source of the cannon balls.Somebody is treating the whole situation like a game.  
By doing so, humanism is victorious whenever the local church is asleep. This is the problem to why Christians tend to fall down in battle at times:
Ezekiel 22:30 And I sought for a man among them, that should make up the hedge, and stand in the gap before Me for the land, that I should not destroy it: but I found none.
In short, if you're not going to stand in the gap on behalf of the land then who will? It's the…

The Ridiculous Roman Catholic View That Marriage Must Be Done Inside Their Church or It's Invalid

I remembered reading through the seven sacraments or ordinances of the Roman Catholic institution in a catechism. One of the teachings is that marriage must be treated as a sacrament. What it also implies is that if your marriage is done in a civil court that even if it was duly registered, that both couples were in a sexually pure union then it's not a marriage. So does that mean that a person can marry in a civil court, get divorced and marry his next spouse in the Roman Catholic institution?

Let's address the issue of civil marriage that is pure and holy. In short there was no incest, no adultery and it was between two people who are eligible for marriage. So why should the Roman Catholic institution even think that two people who got married with the sexually pure prerequisites in the eyes of God should be rejected. Is it because unless it's a priest who performs the marriage then the marriage can't be validated? It's a problem with how Roman Catholics have thei…

No Moral Absolutes Means No Human Rights

We have the truth that human rights activists are everywhere who reject the truth that there are moral absolutes. Many of them have their idea of "Judge not and you will not be judged." As for the atheistic human activists, they tend to carry out Richard Dawkins' quote from the River Out of Eden which says that there's no good, no evil but only pitiless indifference. They think that there are no such thing as moral absolutes. So if they believe that there are no moral absolutes then why are they fighting for human rights which requires moral absolutes to determine them? After all, Dawkins just said there is no purpose but only pitiless indifference.

Here's another problem with atheists' appeal to human rights. Why do they appeal to human rights when they claim that there are no moral absolutes and morality is relative? Human rights are determined by moral absolutes that God made. When God made His Ten Commandments and gave the whole Law - He made it as the st…

James 2 DOES NOT Teach Works Salvation

In a hasty attempt to defend works salvation, they would appeal to James 2.  It would be time to actually clear the fact that Paul and James DO NOT contradict each other. James 2 DOES NOT teach works salvation in which now can be clearly seen when this whole chapter is being dissected to show that James 2 does not defend the heretic crowd.  So let's try to check out what James 2 really is saying.
So first, it's time to think about these facts to debunk the heretical argument of using James 2:
1.) James 2:14-18 is not talking about works salvation but rather, again showing one's faith by one's works.  James 2:18 is a challenge to show one's faith.  Want to know about faith?  Hebrews 11 talks about the results of faith with some of the heroes of the Bible.  Try to coincide Hebrews 11 and James 2 and one sees the results of faith.  As said, when one says that a faith without works is DEAD because true faith produces good works to validate faith.  That's really th…

Does Salvation by Grace Through Faith in Jesus Christ Grant a License to Sin?

Here's a commonly heard argument saying, "Well salvation by faith alone in Jesus Christ is unjust and grants a license to sin." which is frequently done by most world religions.  They demand people must work for their salvation and for one, it's NOT even realistic or practical as it promotes the idea of a dictator God PLUS it's nothing more than asking for the impossible because God's standard of holiness is a LOT higher than all the good works man does.  Despite all the good man does, still they will fall into sin and the followers of almost every false religion this world has to offer shows that like how your average religious person attends religious services yet he/she falls into sin for the rest of the week, showing he/she is WEAK in the flesh.
Now it's time to really correct the whole erroneous argument as false.  Why?  The Bible says otherwise about what God's salvation by grace through faith really does- it transforms the individual to resist…

What Does Pisseth Against the Wall Mean?

It's really getting bad for some of my Independent Fundamental Baptist brethren to actually even take the words "pisseth against the wall" which appears at least six times in 1 Samuel 23:22, 1 Samuel 25:34, 1 Kings 14:10, 1 Kings 16:11, 1 Kings 21:21 and 2 Kings 9:8 where the King James actually has the words "pisseth against the wall".  Now I am a King James only-ist but I do not support the stupid interpretation of "pisseth against the wall" by some IFB preachers who have become in some way similar to the Catholic Faith Defenders that they argue against when they should spend their time soulwinning.  Actually I even heard that rather outrageous "pisseth against the wall" sermon by Steven Anderson that was so taken out of context.
So what does pisseth against the wall mean? Let us take a look at these six verses and take it on a exegetic view NOT an eisegetic (out of context) view:
1 Samuel 23:22- "And so more also do God unto the ene…

What's Wrong with the Ang Dating Daan Movement?

The Ang Dating Daan movement is by the Members Church of God International spearheaded by its pastor (and so-called "prophet") Eliseo Soriano.  While claiming to be an expositor of the Scriptures with his "Itanong Mo Kay Soriano" or "Ask Soriano" In English, this religious group actually isn't Christian as some of the ignorant would want to believe.  Though the group claims the Bible is their only authority (as some cults do) but the problem is that they believe only Eli Soriano may interpret the Scriptures.  This is utter heresy!  Not even a great man in the Scriptures, Charles Spurgeon ever made such a preposterous claim!  This is no better than the "true church" movement by Darwin Fish which is exposed by Pastor Phil Johnson as a heretical movement.  In fact, I'm not going to waste my time debating with ADD members, they are a total waste of my time as every other debate.
Unlike John F. Macarthur of Grace to You that actually encoura…