Skip to main content

If Your Gospel Is Celebrating Sin, Then It Is Not the Real Gospel of Jesus Christ at All

The Antinomian "gospel" is just as twisted and perverted as the gospel of works - both of them have a wrong definition of repentance.  In works salvation, repentance of sin means repenting by doing good or doing rituals.  In Antinomianism, repentance may either be merely a change of mind but not about sin or it declares repentance as works.  To repent of your sins is not works salvation because to repent means a change of mind.  When a person changes their mind about their sins, it makes them see that they cannot work for their salvation and that it leads to repentance of unbelief to believing on the Lord Jesus Christ.  When a person has changed their minds about their sins and has gotten saved - there is no reason for such a person to think that they are free to sin all they want.  Instead, they are slowly freed from sin, they desire to be free from sin and they want to live better because of an attitude of gratitude for the Lord Jesus Christ.

Acts 17:30 calls men everywhere to repent.  Whenever there is preaching, the word "repent" cannot be separated from it.  Some may argue that the word repent does not appear in the Gospel of John but the message of repentance is still there.  People refuse to come to Christ because of their love for sin which needs to be repented of (John 3:20).  When people love their sin, they hate the Gospel but they would be willing to buy another gospel that saves them only from the penalty of sin but never from sin itself.  To preach another gospel that condones sin and says you can sin all you want and still be considered a Christian is a false assurance.  If doing your best to enter Heaven is not assurance then so is a gospel that permits people to sin freely.  Such a false gospel has also led many to lives as wantons as the works salvation crowd who ironically have many who love sin.  The Gospel has been a call to repentance of sin, not celebrating it.

Why do some sinner's prayer evangelism work in spite of what some may call to be a flawed method of evangelism?  It was not because of the sinner's prayer but because it was not an easy prayerist message.  When the pastor led the sinner to a sinner's prayer, he does not use a watered down message but preaches it in full.  He may have used the ten commandments to convict the lost sinner, to show them their need for salvation and there is a real genuine repentance.  That is why some people get saved in spite of a sinner's prayer evangelism because of a full presentation of the Gospel that calls sinners to genuine repentance.  If such people who were led had shown signs of false conversion - these pastors are most likely to confront the possibility of a false conversion.  They are most likely going to tell these people that their sinfulness show that they are not saved, that they need to get right with God and that they are only fooling themselves.

Jesus is Lord, no questions asked and if your Jesus is not Lord then you are not saved to start with.  It is the declaration that every Christian has Jesus as the Lord of their life.  This submission may not yet be total, this repentance is not yet perfect but it is a continuous submission to His Lordship and a continual repentance as fruits of genuine repentance and submission.  If faith is planted and God's grace is there, there ought to be a change.  Titus 2:11-14 and Ephesians 2:10 shows how God's grace makes the unteachable unto good works as teachable unto good works.  James 2:14-26 warns that a faith devoid of works is a faith that is not real but dead.  Nobody can say that a person can get saved and never result to any good works because Scriptures state in 1 Corinthians 6:11 that a life change happens because of true conversion.  Nobody can get saved and never change because God is greater than all the sins we have.  It is not the work of man but the work of God and Philippians 1:6-7 states that when God begins a good work in a person then He is bound to finish it.


See also:

Popular posts from this blog

It's Not Okay to Be Blindly Loyal to the Pope and His Army of Pharisees

Some rabid Roman Catholics keep sensationalizing the sins of fraud pastors (as if true born again Christians ever support them) while they keep hiding the sins of their priests or Pharisees. They also say that born again Christians are blindly loyal to the pastor never mind that they are blindly loyal to the Pope and his Pharisees. Blind loyalty towards a a prosperity gospel pastor, a so-called successor of a so-called last messenger or any quack preacher is no different than blind loyalty towards the Pope and his Pharisees. Worse, Roman Catholics believe that their Pharisees are instruments in saving their souls or that the Pope supposedly holds salvation in his hands never mind all the priestly scandals are telling them otherwise.

I could remember how often Bible reading is discouraged (and yet some of these rabid Roman Catholics tell me I should read the Bible and I can't get wrong with it) because it could drive me crazy from reading it. Some Roman Catholics I've met &quo…

The Error of Comparing Protestantism to New Atheism

The amazing blindness of Catholic.com is too amazing isn't it? I just read an article written yesterday which compares Protestantism to New Atheism. As much as the article is written as professionally as possible in contrast to some self-proclaimed apologists I've had a lot of useless arguments with but I'd like to give a friendly rebuke to the writer Karlo Broussard. It's my sincere prayer that Broussard will see the truth from the pages of the Scripture. 
The writer commits the fallacy of categorical error. He compares Sola Scriptura with Richard Dawkins' views on science. Here's one of the statements that really should be considered a categorical error:
Just as science is the only tool Dawkins and company are willing to use to arrive at knowledge of the natural truth, Protestants use only the Bible for determining what is revealed truth. And as many modern atheists reject anything that science cannot detect, so too do Protestants reject any teaching that is…

Don't Even Think About Legalizing Prostitution or Sex Trade

There's some people who seek to legalize prostitution. Some "rational" atheists are already talking about prostitution should be legalized so it could be controlled by the government. The claim that "studies" show that prohibition doesn't work is a lie straight from the pits of Hell. The Israelites were doing sin not because God forbade it but because they were disobedient and the rulers did nothing to prevent those sins. It's not surprising is that the same people who seek to legalize prostitution also want to legalize narcotics and hard liquor all in the name of "succeeding in the war against them".

The logic behind legalizing prostitution is that so the government can control them and tax them. But the problem with the quest to legalize prostitution is that it encourages the sin rather than discourage it. The problem is not the war against prostitution but ignoring Ecclesiastes 8:11. Do you know why the war against prostitution isn't wo…

The Quest For "Unlimited Human Progress" is Really Destroying the Environment

Every time I read from the news of nature's decline due to pollution, how food supply can soon drop anytime, how plant and animal deaths are massively happening I can't help but blame it on one factor: SIN. Yes, sin and most people think it's a fantasy word. It wasn't just a fantasy word that kicked Adam and Eve out of Eden and cursed the Earth with all its imperfections. Sin brought disease and destruction to mankind. Unfortunately, man is to blame for the wanton destruction of the environment all in the name of "unlimited human progress".

You can't divorce science from the Creator and that's a fact. Yet you have people who want to benefit from science without considering the Creator. Christian scientists were conservative because they were aware of one truth that science without ethics is meaningless. I'd like to expand it to say that studying creation without the Creator is absolutely stupid. People can claim that removing God is the key to &qu…

Politically Correct Organizations Need to Take the Beam Out of Their Own Eye First

Politically correct organizations meddling in worldwide affairs is not anything new. Whether it's the Vatican, the European Union, the United Nations, Human Rights Watch and any organization driven by political correctness (and not all of them are Illuminati or Jesuit ran but they're all still dupes of Satan and most of them don't even know it) it's always a problem that they are indeed meddling. While meddling isn't inherently wrong but here's some problems with politically correct organizations:
They only meddle when it's convenient for them as they are guilty of both selective outrage and selective justice.They meddle in the affairs of others without considering their own yard first.They meddle like as if they own the world.
It's stupid how political correctness demands Christians not to judge others but they end up failing to judge themselves. They are always taking "Judge not and you will not be judged." out of context without knowing wha…

What Does Pisseth Against the Wall Mean?

It's really getting bad for some of my Independent Fundamental Baptist brethren to actually even take the words "pisseth against the wall" which appears at least six times in 1 Samuel 23:22, 1 Samuel 25:34, 1 Kings 14:10, 1 Kings 16:11, 1 Kings 21:21 and 2 Kings 9:8 where the King James actually has the words "pisseth against the wall".  Now I am a King James only-ist but I do not support the stupid interpretation of "pisseth against the wall" by some IFB preachers who have become in some way similar to the Catholic Faith Defenders that they argue against when they should spend their time soulwinning.  Actually I even heard that rather outrageous "pisseth against the wall" sermon by Steven Anderson that was so taken out of context.
So what does pisseth against the wall mean? Let us take a look at these six verses and take it on a exegetic view NOT an eisegetic (out of context) view:
1 Samuel 23:22- "And so more also do God unto the ene…

Why This Ministry DOES NOT Support the Westboro Baptist Church

The Westboro Baptist Church is a so-called Baptist institution founded by Fred Phelps who is a lawyer and a theologian. Is it your average Baptist assembly or is this another of Satan's brain children? I would like to present my stand why this ministry does not support the Westboro Baptist Church and why as a Baptist, I do not support them either:
The founder Fred Phelps who serves as its pastor. I do find it disturbing he says that he supports sound doctrine of good Christian preachers of the past like John Calvin and Charles Haddon Spurgeon but his doctrine is not sound at all. His preaching is definitely not balanced. While I do appreciate him attacking the Great Whore of Revelation, apostasy, ecumenism, homosexuality, abortion, pornography and a lot of sins however he is no better than the Roman Catholic institution which he frequently criticizes. Although he claims to be a Calvinist and a Spurgeon fan, however many of those who are Calvinist preachers like Paul Washer, John …