Skip to main content

Feminist Media's Selective Outrage

Feminism is a movement that was supposed to talk about women's rights but ends up as a power struggle. Before they start throwing darts at me I could agree with some things they bring up like abusive husbands and male sexists who mistreat women. There are housewives battered by abusive husbands, sexually molested female employees by their male bosses, women raped to satisfy the pleasures of male chauvinists, women humiliated because they're women and unwanted daughters who get sold by their chauvinist fathers because they weren't born as sons. I am against those things that I just mentioned earlier but these feminists only want to grab power, turn the tables around and not implement any real justice. They have a very wrong view of women's rights. They think that the Bible is against women's rights because wives are told to submit to their husbands. If and if they bother to take things into context they'll realize that the Bible also commands husbands to love their wives (Ephesians 5:25, Colossians 3:19). Submission is a two-way street of respect and not a quest for domination.

Let's touch one area of the feminist media's selective outrage namely the issue of hitting someone. I remembered being told that I shouldn't hit her because she's a woman. It's a problem where even men say, "She's a woman so you shouldn't hit her." There's one thing that can be agreed upon: it's wrong to hit a person if it was just an act of insult. The problem of the feminist media is how often they side with a woman being hit by a man just because she's a woman. One should wonder on how would they react if a woman hit a woman. I guess these groups suffer a bad case of double standard where it's not okay for a man to hit a woman but it's okay for a woman to hit a man. I guess they want every woman who's guilty of acts of violence against men to be freed. They feel like it's okay to mistreat men but not women. I wonder do they even realize that their own movement also discriminates women who don't agree with their stupidity?

This also goes for which women they side with. Some feminist media's selective outrage tends to favor homewrecking whores over proper and godly women. The feminist movement violates the women's rights for choice. They can make fun of the housewives as "parasites" never mind that the housewife model is in the Bible. Whether they like it or not the Bible has different roles for married and unmarried people. Single people provide for themselves. Married people must provide for each other. I think they also miss the point several times when they don't see it that the Bible also protects the right of the wives. If a woman slaps her husband and the paramour these feminists would want to protect the paramour instead of the wife. It should be hypocritical to laugh at housewives while helping women get a divorce because the husband had an an affair. Adultery is adultery regardless of whether it's the husband or the wife who commits it. A battered husband is just as much as a victim of violence as a battered wife. A woman who's a criminal is still a criminal. Justice doesn't punish based on genders but based on offenses committed regardless of gender.

Should I also mention the issue of abortion is where feminist media's hypocrisy tends to stand out a lot? I find it disgusting why a wicked woman like Margaret Sanger is even hailed as a hero for women's rights. The problem of women who are for abortion are supporting the very sin that could have prevented several women from being born into the world. It's stupid to get outraged over the female babies who are aborted because they are female while supporting a woman's right to abort her child. If they support abortion then they have no right to criticize sexist fathers who demand a gender selective abortion. It's wrong to abort an unborn child or get rid of an unwanted infant because of its gender. It's also stupid to criticize willing child sacrifice to pagan gods if they support the evils of women's rights to have an abortion.

But for them it's all part of their "rights" that's why many of them think that God is a control freak. They fail to see that God has ordained men and women differently but these differences are complementary. Women are made different than men yet they are made to help each other. As Matthew Henry had once commented in Genesis that Eve was taken out of the rib to be Adam's equal and to be his beloved. That's something feminists always fail to see or deliberately fail to see for their own convenience.

See also:

Popular posts from this blog

Sorry Homosexuals, God Owns the Rainbow, Not You!

I found this absolutely funny picture and the maker got it right about homosexual activists getting mad at the rainbow light in the Noah's Park exhibit. Who could forget the time when homosexual marriage was made legal that those who are for it used the rainbow on their pictures on Facebook profiles or in other social networks. They claimed the rainbow as their color. I don't apologize for speaking the truth. The Bible is God's covenant with man and not homosexuality's banner of success. Genesis 9:14-17 - "And it shall come to pass, when I bring a cloud over the earth, that the bow shall be seen in the cloud: and I will remember my covenant, which is between me and you and every living creature of all flesh; and the waters shall no more become a flood to destroy all flesh. And the bow shall be in the cloud; and I will look upon it, that I may remember the everlasting covenant between God and every living creature of all flesh that is upon the earth. And God said …

Politically Correct Organizations Need to Take the Beam Out of Their Own Eye First

Politically correct organizations meddling in worldwide affairs is not anything new. Whether it's the Vatican, the European Union, the United Nations, Human Rights Watch and any organization driven by political correctness (and not all of them are Illuminati or Jesuit ran but they're all still dupes of Satan and most of them don't even know it) it's always a problem that they are indeed meddling. While meddling isn't inherently wrong but here's some problems with politically correct organizations:
They only meddle when it's convenient for them as they are guilty of both selective outrage and selective justice.They meddle in the affairs of others without considering their own yard first.They meddle like as if they own the world.
It's stupid how political correctness demands Christians not to judge others but they end up failing to judge themselves. They are always taking "Judge not and you will not be judged." out of context without knowing wha…

The Error of Comparing Protestantism to New Atheism

The amazing blindness of Catholic.com is too amazing isn't it? I just read an article written yesterday which compares Protestantism to New Atheism. As much as the article is written as professionally as possible in contrast to some self-proclaimed apologists I've had a lot of useless arguments with but I'd like to give a friendly rebuke to the writer Karlo Broussard. It's my sincere prayer that Broussard will see the truth from the pages of the Scripture. 
The writer commits the fallacy of categorical error. He compares Sola Scriptura with Richard Dawkins' views on science. Here's one of the statements that really should be considered a categorical error:
Just as science is the only tool Dawkins and company are willing to use to arrive at knowledge of the natural truth, Protestants use only the Bible for determining what is revealed truth. And as many modern atheists reject anything that science cannot detect, so too do Protestants reject any teaching that is…

The Quest For "Unlimited Human Progress" is Really Destroying the Environment

Every time I read from the news of nature's decline due to pollution, how food supply can soon drop anytime, how plant and animal deaths are massively happening I can't help but blame it on one factor: SIN. Yes, sin and most people think it's a fantasy word. It wasn't just a fantasy word that kicked Adam and Eve out of Eden and cursed the Earth with all its imperfections. Sin brought disease and destruction to mankind. Unfortunately, man is to blame for the wanton destruction of the environment all in the name of "unlimited human progress".

You can't divorce science from the Creator and that's a fact. Yet you have people who want to benefit from science without considering the Creator. Christian scientists were conservative because they were aware of one truth that science without ethics is meaningless. I'd like to expand it to say that studying creation without the Creator is absolutely stupid. People can claim that removing God is the key to &qu…

What Does Pisseth Against the Wall Mean?

It's really getting bad for some of my Independent Fundamental Baptist brethren to actually even take the words "pisseth against the wall" which appears at least six times in 1 Samuel 23:22, 1 Samuel 25:34, 1 Kings 14:10, 1 Kings 16:11, 1 Kings 21:21 and 2 Kings 9:8 where the King James actually has the words "pisseth against the wall".  Now I am a King James only-ist but I do not support the stupid interpretation of "pisseth against the wall" by some IFB preachers who have become in some way similar to the Catholic Faith Defenders that they argue against when they should spend their time soulwinning.  Actually I even heard that rather outrageous "pisseth against the wall" sermon by Steven Anderson that was so taken out of context.
So what does pisseth against the wall mean? Let us take a look at these six verses and take it on a exegetic view NOT an eisegetic (out of context) view:
1 Samuel 23:22- "And so more also do God unto the ene…

What's Wrong with the Ang Dating Daan Movement?

The Ang Dating Daan movement is by the Members Church of God International spearheaded by its pastor (and so-called "prophet") Eliseo Soriano.  While claiming to be an expositor of the Scriptures with his "Itanong Mo Kay Soriano" or "Ask Soriano" In English, this religious group actually isn't Christian as some of the ignorant would want to believe.  Though the group claims the Bible is their only authority (as some cults do) but the problem is that they believe only Eli Soriano may interpret the Scriptures.  This is utter heresy!  Not even a great man in the Scriptures, Charles Spurgeon ever made such a preposterous claim!  This is no better than the "true church" movement by Darwin Fish which is exposed by Pastor Phil Johnson as a heretical movement.  In fact, I'm not going to waste my time debating with ADD members, they are a total waste of my time as every other debate.
Unlike John F. Macarthur of Grace to You that actually encoura…

Testimony of Former Iglesia Ni Cristo Member, Now a Born Again Christian

Editor's note: 
First and foremost, I would like to thank the Bereans for this wonderful story of a former Iglesia ni Cristo minister (or pastor), now he has become a Baptist Christian.  It's a sad story that some people have just jumped from one cult to another.  Some members of the Watchtower Society, Charismatic Movement or the Iglesia ni Cristo have left Roman Catholicism but they have never truly come to know the truth of salvation is by faith in Christ alone and that any good works after Christian life is but the grace of God at work in the believer.  Now for this brave testimony that I can really share after many years of searching for one testimony which I hope will further bring more INC members to Jesus Christ.

May I begin with a word of prayer that in the midst of all these trouble, I call upon Jesus Christ the Son of God who the Iglesia ni Cristo deny is indeed God, the only way to salvation, that they trust upon their works and church membership than Him alone.  I…