Skip to main content

Feminist Media's Selective Outrage

Feminism is a movement that was supposed to talk about women's rights but ends up as a power struggle. Before they start throwing darts at me I could agree with some things they bring up like abusive husbands and male sexists who mistreat women. There are housewives battered by abusive husbands, sexually molested female employees by their male bosses, women raped to satisfy the pleasures of male chauvinists, women humiliated because they're women and unwanted daughters who get sold by their chauvinist fathers because they weren't born as sons. I am against those things that I just mentioned earlier but these feminists only want to grab power, turn the tables around and not implement any real justice. They have a very wrong view of women's rights. They think that the Bible is against women's rights because wives are told to submit to their husbands. If and if they bother to take things into context they'll realize that the Bible also commands husbands to love their wives (Ephesians 5:25, Colossians 3:19). Submission is a two-way street of respect and not a quest for domination.

Let's touch one area of the feminist media's selective outrage namely the issue of hitting someone. I remembered being told that I shouldn't hit her because she's a woman. It's a problem where even men say, "She's a woman so you shouldn't hit her." There's one thing that can be agreed upon: it's wrong to hit a person if it was just an act of insult. The problem of the feminist media is how often they side with a woman being hit by a man just because she's a woman. One should wonder on how would they react if a woman hit a woman. I guess these groups suffer a bad case of double standard where it's not okay for a man to hit a woman but it's okay for a woman to hit a man. I guess they want every woman who's guilty of acts of violence against men to be freed. They feel like it's okay to mistreat men but not women. I wonder do they even realize that their own movement also discriminates women who don't agree with their stupidity?

This also goes for which women they side with. Some feminist media's selective outrage tends to favor homewrecking whores over proper and godly women. The feminist movement violates the women's rights for choice. They can make fun of the housewives as "parasites" never mind that the housewife model is in the Bible. Whether they like it or not the Bible has different roles for married and unmarried people. Single people provide for themselves. Married people must provide for each other. I think they also miss the point several times when they don't see it that the Bible also protects the right of the wives. If a woman slaps her husband and the paramour these feminists would want to protect the paramour instead of the wife. It should be hypocritical to laugh at housewives while helping women get a divorce because the husband had an an affair. Adultery is adultery regardless of whether it's the husband or the wife who commits it. A battered husband is just as much as a victim of violence as a battered wife. A woman who's a criminal is still a criminal. Justice doesn't punish based on genders but based on offenses committed regardless of gender.

Should I also mention the issue of abortion is where feminist media's hypocrisy tends to stand out a lot? I find it disgusting why a wicked woman like Margaret Sanger is even hailed as a hero for women's rights. The problem of women who are for abortion are supporting the very sin that could have prevented several women from being born into the world. It's stupid to get outraged over the female babies who are aborted because they are female while supporting a woman's right to abort her child. If they support abortion then they have no right to criticize sexist fathers who demand a gender selective abortion. It's wrong to abort an unborn child or get rid of an unwanted infant because of its gender. It's also stupid to criticize willing child sacrifice to pagan gods if they support the evils of women's rights to have an abortion.

But for them it's all part of their "rights" that's why many of them think that God is a control freak. They fail to see that God has ordained men and women differently but these differences are complementary. Women are made different than men yet they are made to help each other. As Matthew Henry had once commented in Genesis that Eve was taken out of the rib to be Adam's equal and to be his beloved. That's something feminists always fail to see or deliberately fail to see for their own convenience.

See also:

Popular posts from this blog

Ken Ham's Illustrations on Spiritual Warfare Against Humanism

Dr. Ken Ham of Answers in Genesis made these beautiful illustrations to show what's wrong with the church today. Let's take a look at the two illustrations on how Christians engage their spiritual warfare. 
The first illustration reveals the following:
One member is asleep when he should be doing something.Another person is firing at the balloons because the person who's supposed to fire it is asleep on the job.Somebody is focused on deflecting cannon balls than hitting the source of the cannon balls.Somebody is treating the whole situation like a game.  
By doing so, humanism is victorious whenever the local church is asleep. This is the problem to why Christians tend to fall down in battle at times:
Ezekiel 22:30 And I sought for a man among them, that should make up the hedge, and stand in the gap before Me for the land, that I should not destroy it: but I found none.
In short, if you're not going to stand in the gap on behalf of the land then who will? It's the…

The Ridiculous Roman Catholic View That Marriage Must Be Done Inside Their Church or It's Invalid

I remembered reading through the seven sacraments or ordinances of the Roman Catholic institution in a catechism. One of the teachings is that marriage must be treated as a sacrament. What it also implies is that if your marriage is done in a civil court that even if it was duly registered, that both couples were in a sexually pure union then it's not a marriage. So does that mean that a person can marry in a civil court, get divorced and marry his next spouse in the Roman Catholic institution?

Let's address the issue of civil marriage that is pure and holy. In short there was no incest, no adultery and it was between two people who are eligible for marriage. So why should the Roman Catholic institution even think that two people who got married with the sexually pure prerequisites in the eyes of God should be rejected. Is it because unless it's a priest who performs the marriage then the marriage can't be validated? It's a problem with how Roman Catholics have thei…

Don't Forget That the Roman Catholic Institution Has a Very Long History of Inciting Sedition

The Roman Catholic institution has its long fraudulent history of claiming to be the "One True Church that was founded n 33 A.D. - Holy, Catholic and Apostolic". The word catholic is a synonym for universal but the disciples were never first called Catholics in Antioch but Christians (Acts 11:26). Catholic was used as an old world for universal which some people today are allergic to that word because Catholic has been used to describe people who are members of the Roman Catholic institution. What can be talked about now is the fact that the Roman Catholic institution has had a long history of inciting sedition in governments. While they claim it to be doing the "work of God" or as the Jesuits say "Ad Maiorem Dei Gloriam" or "For the greater glory of God." but is it really?

Doing some study of the history of the Vatican has it shown that the Inquisition and later the Jesuit Order have a lot of bloody rags to answer for. Did you know that many ki…

Testimony of Former Jesuit Priest Victor J. Affonso

To Follow Jesus Without Compromise by Victor J. Affonso
Why I joined the Society of Jesus
At the age of 23, I was a successful commercial artist on the verge of going abroad where a job was awaiting me. I was happy at the prospect of leaving India and thereby also escaping the terrible anguish caused of seeing the misery of the poor in the streets of Bombay.
Political saviors like Gandhi and Nehru had failed in giving true freedom and justice to India’s poor majority. Murder and divisions assailed “independent” India, and so it still is today. All the social works were but a few drops of water in a desert. Yet there was still one solution left: The words of Jesus kept coming to me during prayer, “…For with God ALL things are possible” (Mark 10:27). “Don’t run away!” On another day I heard the words, “Follow My Son — Jesus!” This word finally led me to leave the world and join the Society of Jesus, a missionary order that promised by its very title, its “Spiritual Exercises” and its C…

Understanding Ignatius of Antioch's Statement on the Eucharist

It's already expected that Roman Catholicism takes Scriptures out of context and/or purposely misreads it. If they can't even handle the Word of God with reverence then I don't expect them to handle anything else with reverence except it be the writing of the past Popes and the Roman Catholic priests. One such man is the Christian bishop or overseer. In case Roman Catholics want to argue that the term "bishop" would prove he's one of their kind then they are mistaken. To be a bishop according to 1 Timothy 3:1-7 is to be a church leader. Besides, the same passage says that bishops must be family men of moral dignity which is impossible for a Roman Catholic priest who's bound to celibacy. Please note 1 Corinthians 7:35-37 is not a command for priests to stay single all their lives!
Now here's a popular misquote from the very passage of Ignatius of Antioch to justify the doctrine of transubstantiation: They abstain from the eucharist and from prayer, bec…

What Does Pisseth Against the Wall Mean?

It's really getting bad for some of my Independent Fundamental Baptist brethren to actually even take the words "pisseth against the wall" which appears at least six times in 1 Samuel 23:22, 1 Samuel 25:34, 1 Kings 14:10, 1 Kings 16:11, 1 Kings 21:21 and 2 Kings 9:8 where the King James actually has the words "pisseth against the wall".  Now I am a King James only-ist but I do not support the stupid interpretation of "pisseth against the wall" by some IFB preachers who have become in some way similar to the Catholic Faith Defenders that they argue against when they should spend their time soulwinning.  Actually I even heard that rather outrageous "pisseth against the wall" sermon by Steven Anderson that was so taken out of context.
So what does pisseth against the wall mean? Let us take a look at these six verses and take it on a exegetic view NOT an eisegetic (out of context) view:
1 Samuel 23:22- "And so more also do God unto the ene…

God's Curse Upon Gambling!

One of the greatest hypocrisies that people are facing right now is the sin of legalized gambling. Why do I dare say it is hypocritical? It's because for one legalized gambling promotes all type of filth. We have laws against adultery but not against pornography, we have laws against stealing but not against gambling which is really a sin. Today, Christians must voice out not only against legalized prostitution and legalized pornography, they must also voice against legalized gambling. 1 Timothy 6:10 is true that in these days, the love for money is the root of all evil in the secular world plus gambling is mainly rooted upon the love for money. We ought to think that in every way, money is not evil but the love for it is really evil. Gambling in itself is fed because of the love of money. Pastor Mike Stahl a Baptist preacher had also revealed the ill effects of gambling, in truth it is a very lucrative business that sadly destroys lives. To be honest, gambling has been one of th…