Atheists Should Consider Rejecting EVERYTHING Isaac Newton Contributed to Science!
Isaac Newton was born on December 25, 1642 and has been recorded to be a devout Protestant Christian. The atheist has continued to call Christianity as a threat to towards the way of "unlimited human progress". If one has to be a scientist to be an atheist, then one may consider Isaac Newton to be otherwise an obstruction to science. Therefore it takes a lot of courage to reject the contributions of Isaac Newton to science. I cannot imagine Math and Science without the mention of Newton.
So for a "retard", Newton is "surprisingly" educated. Let us think of some of the things atheists must reject in their study of science if no Christian is to contribute to science itself:
Calculus. It was termed as fluxional method for higher Mathematics by him. Whoever made the name calculus must have wanted a simpler term. The discipline of calculus is almost in every field from its use to compute break even points and revenues in business to the building of the most complex structures. Without Calculus, I doubt it that building projects would ever move as fast as they are today.
Theories and applications related to optics. Another contribution you cannot deny is when he put forward the theory of colors. Also, he created the reflecting telescope which magnified objects forty times. The experiment on colors was no mumbo-jumbo. He experimented on it for years to prove himself right or wrong about certain stuff. The reflecting telescope of yesterday has become the model for better telescopes today.
The laws of motion explained. He wrote "Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy" which explained the three laws of motion and the universal principle of gravitation. He had made physical science clearer to understand than it was. Without that book, I doubt it progress would have been possible without Newton.
Why atheists MUST reject Newton's contribution? If the atheist says that the Bible is just a book of fairy tales and only unsound mind reads it, then they must reject Newton's contributions BECAUSE according to their standards, he would be a retard. He said, "I have a fundamental belief in the Bible as written by men who are inspired. I study the Bible daily." If scientists who believe in God aren't credible then there's much to reject. They should really attempt to disprove EVERYTHING Newton contributed to the study of science to prove that you have to be an atheist to be a scientist.
What is beautiful about creation science is that they really know their limits. They respect the God who wrote the laws of man. If atheists can at least accept some laws of physics, why do they reject God? The problem is never intellectual but it's a moral problem. They can have high intelligence all they want but the Bible calls anyone who rejects God as a morally stupid person. They are stupid not because of an lack of intelligence but because they foolishly choose to fight God who they know exists but they don't want to accept Him.