Skip to main content

The Foolishness of Comparing the Black Nazarene to the Ark of the Covenant

Roman Catholics have their stubbornness that aside from saying that those former Catholics who converted to the born again Christian faith (or what they perceive is the born again Christian faith) were just "misinformed" (They can try and tell that to priests and nuns who have left the system), they also insist that the Black Nazarene is justifiable because of the Ark of the Covenant.  There is a huge difference between them considering the Ark of the Covenant vs. the Black Nazarene.  This is committing the logical fallacy of categorical mistake.

Let us first take a look at the Ark of the Covenant in context to see if it fits in the justification of the Black Nazarene to be used for the parade.  Joshua 3 talks about the Ark of the Covenant which we read the order of the procession.  We read in verses 3-4 that the Levites were to bear it plus there is a space between the people and the Ark of the Covenant of 2,000 cubits or 914.4 meters.  This is a huge contrast to all the chaos that happens because of the devotees during the Black Nazarene procession or just any idolatrous procession.  I am afraid that every year, more and more people are dying without Christ during the entire riot.  If they accuse me of hating Roman Catholics it is because of how the world defines love today.  The truth is born again Christians love Roman Catholics enough to tell them the truth that they are lost and that they need to be saved.  

Roman Catholics may also argue, "God told Moses to make images of cherubim, you are taking the Bible out of context." while they are the ones taking the Bible out of context.  Note that after the images of the cherubim were made, Numbers 4:5-6 commands Moses to cover the Ark of the Covenant with it and they were to be hidden in the Holy of Holies.  In further context, verse 15 also warns that the Ark of the Covenant was not meant to be touched at all.  How the Jews treated the images were far different.  The images of the cherubim were hidden unlike the idols of every religion that uses graven images in worship.  You see pagan temples having the images of their gods and goddesses openly displayed and you have Roman Catholic parishes with their images of the people they pray to whether it would be Mary, any of the apostles, historical saints they claim to be their own, another Jesus or their canonizes saints widely displayed to be seen or the idols are even touched believing they have healing power.  So much for saying that it is just mere representation and that they are not worshiping the image but the one being worshiped.  

They may also use the incident in Joshua 7:6-7 to justify the Black Nazarene or any act of idolatry any further.  In the claim of any idolater, they always say that they are not praying to the image but the one portrayed by the image which does not meet the category.  The huge difference was that Joshua was not praying to the images or the ark but to God.  The ark was not even meant to be an image to represent God.  The Ark was to be later hidden from the public in contrast to Roman Catholic icons used for worship.  People were affectionately touching the Black Nazarene, the were hoping to get some healing from it which is one good reason why I am so against it.  Some Roman Catholics may have unintentionally revealed the powerlessness of their idol when they say that if the Black Nazarene is just a piece of wood, why go against it?  Yes it is just a piece of wood but the deception is why I am against it.  People are made to trust in a god that cannot walk, it has to be carried because it cannot walk (Jeremiah 10:3-5).

I am still amazed to how some Catholic apologists can say, "Well I do agree it is idolatry to worship the image in the place of the true God."  As long as the folly of saying that they are not worshiping the image but the one portrayed by the image persists, it is like giving more liquor to the alcoholic beverages hoping that person would recover.  Remember the incident of the Golden Calf?  The people thought it was going to be a feast to the LORD but instead it became one huge ugly mess.  It is also amazing how Roman Catholic apologetic sites and ministries may acknowledge the existence of Exodus 20:4-5 but you do not see those verses in the Roman Catholic version of the ten commandments.  While I agree with some Catholic apologists that worshiping an image in God's place is idolatry but they are contradicting themselves with their actions.  

Popular posts from this blog

Ken Ham's Illustrations on Spiritual Warfare Against Humanism

Dr. Ken Ham of Answers in Genesis made these beautiful illustrations to show what's wrong with the church today. Let's take a look at the two illustrations on how Christians engage their spiritual warfare. 
The first illustration reveals the following:
One member is asleep when he should be doing something.Another person is firing at the balloons because the person who's supposed to fire it is asleep on the job.Somebody is focused on deflecting cannon balls than hitting the source of the cannon balls.Somebody is treating the whole situation like a game.  
By doing so, humanism is victorious whenever the local church is asleep. This is the problem to why Christians tend to fall down in battle at times:
Ezekiel 22:30 And I sought for a man among them, that should make up the hedge, and stand in the gap before Me for the land, that I should not destroy it: but I found none.
In short, if you're not going to stand in the gap on behalf of the land then who will? It's the…

The Ridiculous Roman Catholic View That Marriage Must Be Done Inside Their Church or It's Invalid

I remembered reading through the seven sacraments or ordinances of the Roman Catholic institution in a catechism. One of the teachings is that marriage must be treated as a sacrament. What it also implies is that if your marriage is done in a civil court that even if it was duly registered, that both couples were in a sexually pure union then it's not a marriage. So does that mean that a person can marry in a civil court, get divorced and marry his next spouse in the Roman Catholic institution?

Let's address the issue of civil marriage that is pure and holy. In short there was no incest, no adultery and it was between two people who are eligible for marriage. So why should the Roman Catholic institution even think that two people who got married with the sexually pure prerequisites in the eyes of God should be rejected. Is it because unless it's a priest who performs the marriage then the marriage can't be validated? It's a problem with how Roman Catholics have thei…

Don't Forget That the Roman Catholic Institution Has a Very Long History of Inciting Sedition

The Roman Catholic institution has its long fraudulent history of claiming to be the "One True Church that was founded n 33 A.D. - Holy, Catholic and Apostolic". The word catholic is a synonym for universal but the disciples were never first called Catholics in Antioch but Christians (Acts 11:26). Catholic was used as an old world for universal which some people today are allergic to that word because Catholic has been used to describe people who are members of the Roman Catholic institution. What can be talked about now is the fact that the Roman Catholic institution has had a long history of inciting sedition in governments. While they claim it to be doing the "work of God" or as the Jesuits say "Ad Maiorem Dei Gloriam" or "For the greater glory of God." but is it really?

Doing some study of the history of the Vatican has it shown that the Inquisition and later the Jesuit Order have a lot of bloody rags to answer for. Did you know that many ki…

Testimony of Former Jesuit Priest Victor J. Affonso

To Follow Jesus Without Compromise by Victor J. Affonso
Why I joined the Society of Jesus
At the age of 23, I was a successful commercial artist on the verge of going abroad where a job was awaiting me. I was happy at the prospect of leaving India and thereby also escaping the terrible anguish caused of seeing the misery of the poor in the streets of Bombay.
Political saviors like Gandhi and Nehru had failed in giving true freedom and justice to India’s poor majority. Murder and divisions assailed “independent” India, and so it still is today. All the social works were but a few drops of water in a desert. Yet there was still one solution left: The words of Jesus kept coming to me during prayer, “…For with God ALL things are possible” (Mark 10:27). “Don’t run away!” On another day I heard the words, “Follow My Son — Jesus!” This word finally led me to leave the world and join the Society of Jesus, a missionary order that promised by its very title, its “Spiritual Exercises” and its C…

Understanding Ignatius of Antioch's Statement on the Eucharist

It's already expected that Roman Catholicism takes Scriptures out of context and/or purposely misreads it. If they can't even handle the Word of God with reverence then I don't expect them to handle anything else with reverence except it be the writing of the past Popes and the Roman Catholic priests. One such man is the Christian bishop or overseer. In case Roman Catholics want to argue that the term "bishop" would prove he's one of their kind then they are mistaken. To be a bishop according to 1 Timothy 3:1-7 is to be a church leader. Besides, the same passage says that bishops must be family men of moral dignity which is impossible for a Roman Catholic priest who's bound to celibacy. Please note 1 Corinthians 7:35-37 is not a command for priests to stay single all their lives!
Now here's a popular misquote from the very passage of Ignatius of Antioch to justify the doctrine of transubstantiation: They abstain from the eucharist and from prayer, bec…

What Does Pisseth Against the Wall Mean?

It's really getting bad for some of my Independent Fundamental Baptist brethren to actually even take the words "pisseth against the wall" which appears at least six times in 1 Samuel 23:22, 1 Samuel 25:34, 1 Kings 14:10, 1 Kings 16:11, 1 Kings 21:21 and 2 Kings 9:8 where the King James actually has the words "pisseth against the wall".  Now I am a King James only-ist but I do not support the stupid interpretation of "pisseth against the wall" by some IFB preachers who have become in some way similar to the Catholic Faith Defenders that they argue against when they should spend their time soulwinning.  Actually I even heard that rather outrageous "pisseth against the wall" sermon by Steven Anderson that was so taken out of context.
So what does pisseth against the wall mean? Let us take a look at these six verses and take it on a exegetic view NOT an eisegetic (out of context) view:
1 Samuel 23:22- "And so more also do God unto the ene…

God's Curse Upon Gambling!

One of the greatest hypocrisies that people are facing right now is the sin of legalized gambling. Why do I dare say it is hypocritical? It's because for one legalized gambling promotes all type of filth. We have laws against adultery but not against pornography, we have laws against stealing but not against gambling which is really a sin. Today, Christians must voice out not only against legalized prostitution and legalized pornography, they must also voice against legalized gambling. 1 Timothy 6:10 is true that in these days, the love for money is the root of all evil in the secular world plus gambling is mainly rooted upon the love for money. We ought to think that in every way, money is not evil but the love for it is really evil. Gambling in itself is fed because of the love of money. Pastor Mike Stahl a Baptist preacher had also revealed the ill effects of gambling, in truth it is a very lucrative business that sadly destroys lives. To be honest, gambling has been one of th…