Skip to main content

The Problem of Some Roman Catholic Apologists Bragging About Their Numbers

Here's a meme of Pope Francis that has been used by some Roman Catholics to actually defend their stand that they are the true church founded on St. Peter.  One of their favorite logical fallacies is to appeal to popularity.  I hear of news Roman Catholics are increasing and these apologists say, "See, we are the one true Church because we are multiplying."  But the whole problem of appealing to popularity is that numbers do not make right.  They can brag they are biggest religion on Earth but does that mean they are the true Church?  Let us see what the Bible says.

Matthew 7:13-14 in the Good News Translation (GNT) says, "Go in through the narrow gate, because the gate to Hell is wide and the road that leads to it is easy, and there are many who travel it.  But the gate to life is narrow and the way that leads to it is hard, and there are few people who find it."  Did you read the words I just underlined?  There are few people that really enter into eternal life, there are many more that enter the wide road to Hell.  Many times in the Bible the majority were wrong as portrayed from the Old Testament to the New Testament.  Noah's Ark only had eight people surviving and the more you read the history of the Jewish people, the more you realize that the righteous were usually a minority.  It is not about numbers but about truth as the old proverb says, "Truth is truth even if nobody believes it."  The truth does not change because only a few believe it, it always remains the truth regardless like a majority vote does not change the laws of science because God wrote them.

What is so irritating about witnessing to Roman Catholics is how they often misuse Scriptures even when the meaning is plain on sight that it does not agree with their doctrine.  John 2:1-12 already shows even in their Good News translation that Jesus clearly told Mary, "You must not tell Me what to do, My time has not yet come." and Mary said, "Do whatever He tells you.", they still insist the mediated there even when the context clearly shows she did not.  They also misinterpret Matthew 16:18 that clearly differentiated Peter from the Rock foundation.  It was already clear that Peter was not the Rock where the church is built on and after they mishandle the context, some of them even said that the keys given to Peter were the seven sacraments when the Bible does not even suggest for the slightest instance that it represented the seven sacraments.  What is worse they accuse born again Christians of mishandling the Scripture even when they cannot understand it.  Do they really think just because many people believe it then it is automatically correct?

Should I even mention that they also brag of the Pope Francis' popularity on the covers saying that the Protestant Christians (and in extension other born again Christian groups) are just "jealous" or that their academies and universities (especially those managed by the Jesuits) are very popular?  What they may have ignored or failed to see is that Luke 6:26 warns ad I'll be quoting again from their approved GNT, "How terrible when all people speak well of you; their ancestors said the very same things about the false prophets."  This does not mean that if people speak well of you that you are already evil but instead, this is a warning towards people who get the flattery of the world.  John 15:18-19 also warns and I'll quote from the GNT saying, "If the world hates you, just remember that it has hated me first.  If you belonged to the world, then the world would love you as its own.  But I chose you from this world, and you do not belong to it; that is why the world hates you."  They can brag all they want that the late Pope John Paul II had masses attending his burial while only a few attended for a godly pastor's funeral.  One belongs to the world and the other does not belong to the world.  Christians can only expect to be lumped together with people who they are not fellows with like common thieves and robbers by those Pharisees.

If they want to appeal to popularity again, I could really point out more big time hypocrisy.  Some of them brag about how Catholic priests are persecuted and no Christian pastor ever gets persecuted for one's faith in Jesus Christ (HUH!?).  First, some of them use the fact they are persecuted then later, they appeal to popularity to prove that they are in the right.  They might need to reconsider that the true prophets of God are not even popular people.  The more I read Jeremiah, the more I expect nothing more than garbage from a world gone mad, I do not expect to received by men and even if I am not a prophet, I still know that if anybody would stand up for Jesus Christ, there is only mockery to expect from the rest of the world.  When they tell me, "If you are a pastor, we are sure you will be a failure because you are a bigot."  But again, have they read the Scripture that the true pastors of God gladly suffered?  They can go ahead and brag how Pope Francis is so well-received then say, "Look your pastor is an outcast."  So much for some of them saying that they do not see any born again Christian suffering for Christ.

Popular posts from this blog

Ken Ham's Illustrations on Spiritual Warfare Against Humanism

Dr. Ken Ham of Answers in Genesis made these beautiful illustrations to show what's wrong with the church today. Let's take a look at the two illustrations on how Christians engage their spiritual warfare. 
The first illustration reveals the following:
One member is asleep when he should be doing something.Another person is firing at the balloons because the person who's supposed to fire it is asleep on the job.Somebody is focused on deflecting cannon balls than hitting the source of the cannon balls.Somebody is treating the whole situation like a game.  
By doing so, humanism is victorious whenever the local church is asleep. This is the problem to why Christians tend to fall down in battle at times:
Ezekiel 22:30 And I sought for a man among them, that should make up the hedge, and stand in the gap before Me for the land, that I should not destroy it: but I found none.
In short, if you're not going to stand in the gap on behalf of the land then who will? It's the…

The Ridiculous Roman Catholic View That Marriage Must Be Done Inside Their Church or It's Invalid

I remembered reading through the seven sacraments or ordinances of the Roman Catholic institution in a catechism. One of the teachings is that marriage must be treated as a sacrament. What it also implies is that if your marriage is done in a civil court that even if it was duly registered, that both couples were in a sexually pure union then it's not a marriage. So does that mean that a person can marry in a civil court, get divorced and marry his next spouse in the Roman Catholic institution?

Let's address the issue of civil marriage that is pure and holy. In short there was no incest, no adultery and it was between two people who are eligible for marriage. So why should the Roman Catholic institution even think that two people who got married with the sexually pure prerequisites in the eyes of God should be rejected. Is it because unless it's a priest who performs the marriage then the marriage can't be validated? It's a problem with how Roman Catholics have thei…

No Moral Absolutes Means No Human Rights

We have the truth that human rights activists are everywhere who reject the truth that there are moral absolutes. Many of them have their idea of "Judge not and you will not be judged." As for the atheistic human activists, they tend to carry out Richard Dawkins' quote from the River Out of Eden which says that there's no good, no evil but only pitiless indifference. They think that there are no such thing as moral absolutes. So if they believe that there are no moral absolutes then why are they fighting for human rights which requires moral absolutes to determine them? After all, Dawkins just said there is no purpose but only pitiless indifference.

Here's another problem with atheists' appeal to human rights. Why do they appeal to human rights when they claim that there are no moral absolutes and morality is relative? Human rights are determined by moral absolutes that God made. When God made His Ten Commandments and gave the whole Law - He made it as the st…

James 2 DOES NOT Teach Works Salvation

In a hasty attempt to defend works salvation, they would appeal to James 2.  It would be time to actually clear the fact that Paul and James DO NOT contradict each other. James 2 DOES NOT teach works salvation in which now can be clearly seen when this whole chapter is being dissected to show that James 2 does not defend the heretic crowd.  So let's try to check out what James 2 really is saying.
So first, it's time to think about these facts to debunk the heretical argument of using James 2:
1.) James 2:14-18 is not talking about works salvation but rather, again showing one's faith by one's works.  James 2:18 is a challenge to show one's faith.  Want to know about faith?  Hebrews 11 talks about the results of faith with some of the heroes of the Bible.  Try to coincide Hebrews 11 and James 2 and one sees the results of faith.  As said, when one says that a faith without works is DEAD because true faith produces good works to validate faith.  That's really th…

Does Salvation by Grace Through Faith in Jesus Christ Grant a License to Sin?

Here's a commonly heard argument saying, "Well salvation by faith alone in Jesus Christ is unjust and grants a license to sin." which is frequently done by most world religions.  They demand people must work for their salvation and for one, it's NOT even realistic or practical as it promotes the idea of a dictator God PLUS it's nothing more than asking for the impossible because God's standard of holiness is a LOT higher than all the good works man does.  Despite all the good man does, still they will fall into sin and the followers of almost every false religion this world has to offer shows that like how your average religious person attends religious services yet he/she falls into sin for the rest of the week, showing he/she is WEAK in the flesh.
Now it's time to really correct the whole erroneous argument as false.  Why?  The Bible says otherwise about what God's salvation by grace through faith really does- it transforms the individual to resist…

What Does Pisseth Against the Wall Mean?

It's really getting bad for some of my Independent Fundamental Baptist brethren to actually even take the words "pisseth against the wall" which appears at least six times in 1 Samuel 23:22, 1 Samuel 25:34, 1 Kings 14:10, 1 Kings 16:11, 1 Kings 21:21 and 2 Kings 9:8 where the King James actually has the words "pisseth against the wall".  Now I am a King James only-ist but I do not support the stupid interpretation of "pisseth against the wall" by some IFB preachers who have become in some way similar to the Catholic Faith Defenders that they argue against when they should spend their time soulwinning.  Actually I even heard that rather outrageous "pisseth against the wall" sermon by Steven Anderson that was so taken out of context.
So what does pisseth against the wall mean? Let us take a look at these six verses and take it on a exegetic view NOT an eisegetic (out of context) view:
1 Samuel 23:22- "And so more also do God unto the ene…

What's Wrong with the Ang Dating Daan Movement?

The Ang Dating Daan movement is by the Members Church of God International spearheaded by its pastor (and so-called "prophet") Eliseo Soriano.  While claiming to be an expositor of the Scriptures with his "Itanong Mo Kay Soriano" or "Ask Soriano" In English, this religious group actually isn't Christian as some of the ignorant would want to believe.  Though the group claims the Bible is their only authority (as some cults do) but the problem is that they believe only Eli Soriano may interpret the Scriptures.  This is utter heresy!  Not even a great man in the Scriptures, Charles Spurgeon ever made such a preposterous claim!  This is no better than the "true church" movement by Darwin Fish which is exposed by Pastor Phil Johnson as a heretical movement.  In fact, I'm not going to waste my time debating with ADD members, they are a total waste of my time as every other debate.
Unlike John F. Macarthur of Grace to You that actually encoura…