Skip to main content

Some Roman Catholics Are Misquoting These Verses From Jeremiah to Condemn Pastors

First, take note of the word "some" since in due fairness, some Roman Catholics I know haven't misused these verses for their sensationalist activities and are more or less professional in defending their false doctrine. Now let's take a look at these verses that were cherry picked from Jeremiah which Roman Catholic fanatics tend to use to justify their attack against born again Christianity. I don't deny that there are pastors who indeed deserve to be exposed as fakes but Roman Catholic fanatics tend to do their usual double standard ofexposing the pastors who sin with sensationalism but hide any the dirty history of the Vatican as much as they could.

Now let's take a look at the verses and the meaning in context. Funny that some Roman Catholics are now quoting from the Authorized Version of 1611 to suit their needs when I find most of them hate it. The Roman Catholic Good News Translation says rulers not pastors. Pastor is a synonym for shepherd and when these Roman Catholics call their priests their shepherds, aren't they also calling the priests their pastors? While I don't really use the Catholic translations of the Bible for my nourishment needs since I personally stick to the King James Bible for my spiritual nourishment. I'd like to take the verses in context and since they're now using the King James (which the Vatican is now trying to claim they gave it to us) I'd like to talk from the King James right now.

It's time to talk in context. I find it funny that they should even quote from Jeremiah 10 which warns against graven images for worship. I wonder do they even understand what they're doing is already idolatry? They can go ahead and use the Ark of the Covenant argument but the Ark wasn't even put for public display. The Roman Catholic use of images for worship carries the same logic that pagans use, "We don't worship the image but the one portrayed by the image." Also, what's important is that in Jeremiah 12:10 from the Good News calls the pastors as "foreign rulers". Jeremiah 22:22 in the Good News uses the word "leaders" instead of pastors. Jeremiah 23:1-2 uses the word leaders yet again. Hmmm are they just using the King James for convenience? Good expositors such as John Gill and Charles Spurgeon knew these words but most Roman Catholics are too lazy to take Scriptures into context! The same passages also condemn the false prophets that continue to prophesy lies just like today.

What's so funny is that do they even read Jeremiah 5:31? The Roman Catholic Good News Translation even condemns the PRIESTS saying,"Prophets speak nothing but lies; priests rule as the prophets command, and my people offer no objections. But what will they do when it all comes to an end?" Now for one, this was the Old Testament under the priesthood from the line of Aaron. It's annoying how Roman Catholic apologists quote from the Old Testament to justify their priesthood yet try to justify the priestly celibacy. The Bible doesn't even order priests to remain single otherwise how can Aaron's family be a family of priests? Aaron the first high priest was succeeded by Eleazar. As for 1 Corinthians 7:32-35 it doesn't justify priestly celibacy at all. The same verse they misapplied also requires people to marry than burn in passion. Still, they stubbornly misapply that verse to justify their doctrine of mandatory celibacy.

As for those misusing the word "pastor" for their convenience then here's what God promised in Jeremiah. Jeremiah 3:15 in the King James version says,"And I will give you pastors according to mine heart, which shall feed you with knowledge and understanding." While the Good News still uses rulers, other translations use the word shepherds and rulers. God condemned not pastors in general but those crooked pastors in particular. God promised to replace the pastors who were wicked with pastors after His own heart. God condemned the crooked pastors yesterday and He has been doing it until today. 

What should be made important to know is all about Jeremiah as well. Jeremiah is the son of Hilkiah one of the PRIESTS. To even misuse and misrepresent Jeremiah to mandate priestly celibacy is plain stupid and deceptive. Jeremiah is the son of Hilkiah one of the priests. The whole priesthood of the Old Testament was perpetuated by the priests marrying virgins (Leviticus 21:13-14) and these verses are still there in the Good News Translation. They might as well protest to God using 1 Corinthians 7:32-35 and they're going to be in for a big surprise. The Old Testament priesthood also required them to be Levites and sons of Aaron. None of the Roman Catholic priests even meet that requirement, they have robes and miters but where are the rest of the vestments required? It's a very incomplete attire and God requires complete attires. But as said, the Old Testament priesthood got abolished. The curtain was ripped open and the Holy of Holies was now accessible but Roman Catholicism decides to stitch the curtain back up.

Did they also miss Jeremiah 2:8 which says, "The priests said not, Where is the LORD? And they that handle the Law knew me not: the pastors also transgressed against Me, and the prophets prophesied by Baala nd walked after things that do not profit." After using all those verses to condemn the pastorhood why did they suddenly leave that out? It's cherry picking from the Scriptures and cults just love to do that. 

Ephesians 4:11 in the Good News also says,"It was He who gave gifts to people; He appointed some to be apostles, others to be prophets, others to be evangelists, others to be pastors and teachers." So even the Roman Catholic translation admits that God gave apostles, prophets, evangelists and PASTORS for the New Testament. 1 Peter 2:9 of the Good News even declares that all believers are part of this priesthood saying,"But you are the chosen race, the King's priests, the holy nation, God's own people, chosen to proclaim the wonderful acts of God, who called you out of darkness into His own marvelous light."

Popular posts from this blog

Hebrews 6:4-6 Explained

Hebrews 6:4-6 says, "For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost, and have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come, if they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame."
This verse is another that is being used by the works salvation crowd as a means to prove again that salvation can be lost.  However what does this mean?  This again shows the fact that once a Christian, always a Christian and that means, you cannot lose your salvation.  So notice the words "IF they fall away" but as said, Christians DO NOT fall away from the faith even if they fall into sin because they are still sinners (1 John 1:8, 1 John 2:1) but they have power over sin because of the Lord Jesus Christ's grace in their lives (Titus 2:11-15).  As said, Christians are now partakers…

What's Wrong with the Ang Dating Daan Movement?

The Ang Dating Daan movement is by the Members Church of God International spearheaded by its pastor (and so-called "prophet") Eliseo Soriano.  While claiming to be an expositor of the Scriptures with his "Itanong Mo Kay Soriano" or "Ask Soriano" In English, this religious group actually isn't Christian as some of the ignorant would want to believe.  Though the group claims the Bible is their only authority (as some cults do) but the problem is that they believe only Eli Soriano may interpret the Scriptures.  This is utter heresy!  Not even a great man in the Scriptures, Charles Spurgeon ever made such a preposterous claim!  This is no better than the "true church" movement by Darwin Fish which is exposed by Pastor Phil Johnson as a heretical movement.  In fact, I'm not going to waste my time debating with ADD members, they are a total waste of my time as every other debate.
Unlike John F. Macarthur of Grace to You that actually encoura…

Misunderstanding "Turn the Other Cheek" Can Be Life Threatening

One of the biggest misconceptions is the statement of "turn the other cheek"? Does that mean that Christians are taught not to sue anyone and not to do self-defense? It's best to understand what turn the other cheek in Matthew 5:39 means.

So what does a slap in the face mean? A slap isn't always a literal slap. It should be known that a slap may also mean an insult or name-calling. The Jewish culture in Jesus' day had already misused and abused the eye for eye and tooth for tooth rule in Exodus 21:24. Instead of using it as a standard for punishing offenses, they have misused it in order to pursue personal revenge or think that God allows personal revenge. They took the whole verse out of context ignoring verses in the Old Testament that clearly forbade revenge. Did they even read Deuteronomy 32:39 that says that revenge is not ours but God's? It's probable that their culture that day that even a mere insult already warranted someone the right to hit the…

Honoring Martin Luther King Jr. as a Hero Continues the Counter-Reformation

The celebration of the 500 years of the Reformation last October 31, 2017 doesn't mean that the Vatican won't continue to celebrate the Counter-Reformation. The Counter-Reformation celebrated its 470th year last December 13, 2015 since it started last December 13, 1545. It was Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s birthday day yesterday. Celebrating his day should never be associated with born again Christians regardless of denomination. Whether they're Baptist or Protestant, it's an insult to blend in with the celebration of Dr. King's birthday. If Martin Luther started the Reformation then Martin Luther King Jr. was certainly a tool for continuing the Counter-Reformation.

If a Baptist pastor or a Protestant pastor gets honors and recognition from the Vatican, or is openly working with them -- then that's a time to sound the red alarm that a wolf in sheep's clothing is around. How can any Baptist or Protestant pastor even think for a second that the Reformation…

Professional Christian Apologists Should Avoid Having Formal Discussions With Amateur (or Self-Proclaimed) Catholic Apologists

I remembered watching a couple of old discussions conducted by professional Roman Catholic apologists such as Mitch Pacwa SJ and Dr. Taylor Marshall (the owner of the video above). I have seen through the debates between Evangelical vs. Roman Catholic in the John Ankerburg show or those conducted by Dr. James R. White of the Alpha and Omega Ministries (AOM). But there's a specific group of people that should be brought up namely amateur (or self-proclaimed)Catholic apologists. 
What's with dealing with amateur or self-proclaimed Catholic apologists? Unlike their fellow Roman Catholic apologists that I have mentioned or others who have had a formal debate with Dr. White, these people are merely self-proclaimed. You can check their background and you may find that they don't have any real training in how to be an effective apologist. They may have simply made themselves as apologists without any real training.

You can observe the big difference between the self-proclaimed C…

Warning: Unsaved Pastors Are Seeking to Destroy the Flock

Whether you believe it or not unsaved pastors do exist. They are pastors in name only but not pastors whom God has appointed in Ephesians 4:11 and Jeremiah 3:15. Anybody can be a pastor but not anybody is truly a man of God. The book of Jeremiah is so full of condemnation of wicked pastors (shepherds) and priests who were not men of God. Jeremiah 5:31 has the priests getting popularity as they bear rule by their means. Today, you've got pastors becoming popular as they run things not the biblical way but their own twisted way. It bothers me to think how some quack pastors are  They are the erring pastors in Jeremiah. In the Old Testament, they are comparable to the priests who have erred in so much error. It's just like how the sons of Eli were indeed priests in the Old Testament but the sons of Satan who is also called Belial in the Old Testament (1 Samuel 2:12).

2 Timothy 4:3-5 warns that the last days will be full of false teachers. These are pastors who don't teach the…

The Horrors of the Horrid Family: The Herods and Inbreeding

So here is the family tree of the Herods which I would say is not a happy family.  One can think about the incest and intrigue of this family or the whispers of the world "incestuous" about them considering these events that had transpired in the family tree to the point it's best to call them the Horrids or the Horrors whatever name will fit them better:
1.) Herodias (or Horridias as I want to call her) is the daughter of Aristobulus a much older son of Herod the Great by Mariamne I was married to her half-uncle, Herod Philip I and had a freak daughter named Salome.  Salome wouldn't be a normal child either considering she was born of incest between half-uncle and half-niece.  So she was both granddaughter and great-granddaughter to the wicked Herod the Great.  I guess Salome was a retard too though she did live long enough.  Note also that Herodias was the sister of Herod Agrippa I who was later eaten of worms as the throne was later lost out of her greed.  Also H…

What Does Pisseth Against the Wall Mean?

It's really getting bad for some of my Independent Fundamental Baptist brethren to actually even take the words "pisseth against the wall" which appears at least six times in 1 Samuel 23:22, 1 Samuel 25:34, 1 Kings 14:10, 1 Kings 16:11, 1 Kings 21:21 and 2 Kings 9:8 where the King James actually has the words "pisseth against the wall".  Now I am a King James only-ist but I do not support the stupid interpretation of "pisseth against the wall" by some IFB preachers who have become in some way similar to the Catholic Faith Defenders that they argue against when they should spend their time soulwinning.  Actually I even heard that rather outrageous "pisseth against the wall" sermon by Steven Anderson that was so taken out of context.
So what does pisseth against the wall mean? Let us take a look at these six verses and take it on a exegetic view NOT an eisegetic (out of context) view:
1 Samuel 23:22- "And so more also do God unto the ene…

Paul Washer's Quote to Slam the Prosperity Gospel

I really am so annoyed with all the prosperity gospel garbage because it is not biblical doctrine.  When I became a Christian, it is not about what it has done for me but what I have done for God.  If I am going to follow Christ, I can only expect to be ridiculed and persecuted.  If I am going to follow Christ then I expect the whole world to leave me behind.  Why do I expect that?  John 15:18-19 warns that the Christians are not of the world.  James 4:4 warns that you cannot be a friend of both the world and of God.

It is utterly foolish to say, "Receive Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior and you will get healing and prosperity.  You will get a Mercedes Benz."  The more I read through the words of Jesus, the more I realize He did not promise any of those garbage that the prosperity crowd promises.  Instead, I read more warnings about persecution for His Name's sake.  Being a Christian can also mean being unpopular, hated, rejected, a laughingstock for the wrong reas…

Do You Give Your Tithes and Offerings from a Loving Heart?

It's time to talk about the topic of giving. This would be a very touchy topic because man is inherently selfish after the fall. I remembered reading across the rules on offerings and one verse struck me the most. I remembered what Malachi 3:10-11 says that people can rob God in tithes and offerings. The tithes and offerings were used to support the Levites' work. Anyone who says tithes are unbiblical need to reread that verse.

Tithing has been silent in the New Testament. I haven't read much about tithing being emphasized. Instead, we have the emphasis of the cheerful giver (2 Corinthians 9:7). It's amazing how some pseudo-Christian sects and some churches that's supposedly Christian (ex. some Baptist and Evangelical churches) have even gone as far as to monitor and chase their members for not tithing. While I do still believe in tithing is necessary to help maintain the local churches but no church should coerce the tithes out of their members.

Do you know that w…