Skip to main content

Filipino Racists Who Are Also Roman Catholic Fanatics Contradict Themselves

Let's focus on another division within Rome. This is the trend of Roman Catholics who are Filipino racists. This may be the mindset of Filipino racists who are also practicing Roman Catholics:
  • If you're a Filipino then you should practice Roman Catholicism.
  • The born again Christian faith must be rejected as something that was just "made in America". They believe that Billy Graham is the founder of the born again Christian group during the 1970s.
  • They may also be adhering to the ideology that Filipinos are the most powerful race in the world.

It's time to address the foolishness of their foolish arguments one by one. This would point out how they are self-contradictory individuals.

1.) The argument that if you're a Filipino then you should practice Roman Catholicism relies on the logical fallacy called appealing to tradition 

These people may insist that because Roman Catholicism was practiced in the Philippines for several centuries now that they must indeed become Roman Catholics. They may claim that Roman Catholicism is an inseparable part of being a Filipino. They insist that since they were raised Roman Catholics then they will die as Roman Catholics no matter how wrong it is. They want to remain as Roman Catholics with the fear that they may lose their identity as Filipinos.

What they may be ignoring the major fact that the Philippines wasn't always populated by mostly Roman Catholics. The religion was brought in by the Spanish colonizers and wasn't always in the Philippines. The natives of the Philippines were once practitioners of ethnic tribal religions. So why are they not practicing ethnic tribal religion instead of Roman Catholicism since ethnic religion was also practiced by their ancestors? I guess they'll just reply that since the tribal religion has gone extinct and that God supposedly moved the covenant from Israel to them. Please show a specific verse in context.

2.) The idea that born again Christian didn't exist until the 1970s and is just an American invention of Billy Graham is riddled with contradictory claims  

Billy Graham was already addressed as a friend of the Jesuits in the Catholic Herald of June 3, 1966 and he's still openly a friend of the Jesuits. Graham's crusades didn't create born again Christianity. Being a born again Christian is not about joining a sect called "born again". Need I remind you that Graham himself is supposedly a Baptist pastor in name and profession? One important fact about Graham is his fellowship with the Popes or that he considers Roman Catholics as part of the family in Christ. The late John Paul II regarded him as a brother in Christ. If Graham founded born again Christianity and John Paul II regarded the former as a brother then shouldn't Roman Catholics embrace born again Christians as family? That's quite a dilemma for their fanaticism.

Also the idea that born again Christianity was just a term invented by Americans is also contradictory. Even the 1899 Douay Catholic Bible translate "born from above" as "born again" which puts the claim in a dilemma. They appeal to the Greek whenever it's convenient never mind that the Greek actually contradicts them. Did they know that the word baptize comes from the word baptizo which means to immerse or that catholic was meant as a descriptive word and not the official name of the church?

3.) The idea of the Filipino master race while practicing Roman Catholicism puts them in a bigger dilemma 

As said earlier, the Philippines wasn't always a nation full of Roman Catholics and that the Spaniards brought the religion to the country. If they hate foreigners so much or keep blaming foreigners for their problems, they need to remember that the Roman Catholic institution is a worldwide organization. You have Roman Catholics in almost every part of the globe so what makes them think that the Philippines is so "special"? Did God just move His covenant from the Jews to the Filipinos? They'll probably just misquote verses in the same way as the members of the Iglesia Ni Cristo (Manalo).

Jesus was born in His humanity in a Jewish home. While they can claim that the Pope is the successor of Peter (and Peter is a Jew) but they have to answer if the Popes were Filipinos. For those of them who are have their xenophobic hostilities, they need to ask themselves if the Vatican is located in the Philippines or in Italy or if the Pope is a foreigner or not. This should also be another dilemma that the Filipino language is a mixture of several languages and that today's Filipino alphabet could not be possible without foreign influence. Not to mention when they may be attending Masses officiated in American-English singing hymns in English along with Filipino hymns. The Roman Catholic translations were originally written in Latin and not in Filipino..

What's also funny is that Filipino racists who are Roman Catholics may also have all their bizarre beliefs not supported by the official Roman Catholic doctrine. Some of these beliefs include not bathing on Good Friday, some of them may believe Jesus dies every Good Friday, the belief of folk monsters not recognized to be real by Roman Catholic doctrine, wearing of garlic to repel evil spirits and voluntary crucifixion as a form of penance. Many of these doctrines have been officially shunned as heretical by the Roman Catholic institution and a result of syncretism between Filipino folk religion and Roman Catholicism.

Popular posts from this blog

Ken Ham's Illustrations on Spiritual Warfare Against Humanism

Dr. Ken Ham of Answers in Genesis made these beautiful illustrations to show what's wrong with the church today. Let's take a look at the two illustrations on how Christians engage their spiritual warfare. 
The first illustration reveals the following:
One member is asleep when he should be doing something.Another person is firing at the balloons because the person who's supposed to fire it is asleep on the job.Somebody is focused on deflecting cannon balls than hitting the source of the cannon balls.Somebody is treating the whole situation like a game.  
By doing so, humanism is victorious whenever the local church is asleep. This is the problem to why Christians tend to fall down in battle at times:
Ezekiel 22:30 And I sought for a man among them, that should make up the hedge, and stand in the gap before Me for the land, that I should not destroy it: but I found none.
In short, if you're not going to stand in the gap on behalf of the land then who will? It's the…

The Ridiculous Roman Catholic View That Marriage Must Be Done Inside Their Church or It's Invalid

I remembered reading through the seven sacraments or ordinances of the Roman Catholic institution in a catechism. One of the teachings is that marriage must be treated as a sacrament. What it also implies is that if your marriage is done in a civil court that even if it was duly registered, that both couples were in a sexually pure union then it's not a marriage. So does that mean that a person can marry in a civil court, get divorced and marry his next spouse in the Roman Catholic institution?

Let's address the issue of civil marriage that is pure and holy. In short there was no incest, no adultery and it was between two people who are eligible for marriage. So why should the Roman Catholic institution even think that two people who got married with the sexually pure prerequisites in the eyes of God should be rejected. Is it because unless it's a priest who performs the marriage then the marriage can't be validated? It's a problem with how Roman Catholics have thei…

James 2 DOES NOT Teach Works Salvation

In a hasty attempt to defend works salvation, they would appeal to James 2.  It would be time to actually clear the fact that Paul and James DO NOT contradict each other. James 2 DOES NOT teach works salvation in which now can be clearly seen when this whole chapter is being dissected to show that James 2 does not defend the heretic crowd.  So let's try to check out what James 2 really is saying.
So first, it's time to think about these facts to debunk the heretical argument of using James 2:
1.) James 2:14-18 is not talking about works salvation but rather, again showing one's faith by one's works.  James 2:18 is a challenge to show one's faith.  Want to know about faith?  Hebrews 11 talks about the results of faith with some of the heroes of the Bible.  Try to coincide Hebrews 11 and James 2 and one sees the results of faith.  As said, when one says that a faith without works is DEAD because true faith produces good works to validate faith.  That's really th…

Don't Forget That the Roman Catholic Institution Has a Very Long History of Inciting Sedition

The Roman Catholic institution has its long fraudulent history of claiming to be the "One True Church that was founded n 33 A.D. - Holy, Catholic and Apostolic". The word catholic is a synonym for universal but the disciples were never first called Catholics in Antioch but Christians (Acts 11:26). Catholic was used as an old world for universal which some people today are allergic to that word because Catholic has been used to describe people who are members of the Roman Catholic institution. What can be talked about now is the fact that the Roman Catholic institution has had a long history of inciting sedition in governments. While they claim it to be doing the "work of God" or as the Jesuits say "Ad Maiorem Dei Gloriam" or "For the greater glory of God." but is it really?

Doing some study of the history of the Vatican has it shown that the Inquisition and later the Jesuit Order have a lot of bloody rags to answer for. Did you know that many ki…

Does Salvation by Grace Through Faith in Jesus Christ Grant a License to Sin?

Here's a commonly heard argument saying, "Well salvation by faith alone in Jesus Christ is unjust and grants a license to sin." which is frequently done by most world religions.  They demand people must work for their salvation and for one, it's NOT even realistic or practical as it promotes the idea of a dictator God PLUS it's nothing more than asking for the impossible because God's standard of holiness is a LOT higher than all the good works man does.  Despite all the good man does, still they will fall into sin and the followers of almost every false religion this world has to offer shows that like how your average religious person attends religious services yet he/she falls into sin for the rest of the week, showing he/she is WEAK in the flesh.
Now it's time to really correct the whole erroneous argument as false.  Why?  The Bible says otherwise about what God's salvation by grace through faith really does- it transforms the individual to resist…

Testimony of Former Jesuit Priest Victor J. Affonso

To Follow Jesus Without Compromise by Victor J. Affonso
Why I joined the Society of Jesus
At the age of 23, I was a successful commercial artist on the verge of going abroad where a job was awaiting me. I was happy at the prospect of leaving India and thereby also escaping the terrible anguish caused of seeing the misery of the poor in the streets of Bombay.
Political saviors like Gandhi and Nehru had failed in giving true freedom and justice to India’s poor majority. Murder and divisions assailed “independent” India, and so it still is today. All the social works were but a few drops of water in a desert. Yet there was still one solution left: The words of Jesus kept coming to me during prayer, “…For with God ALL things are possible” (Mark 10:27). “Don’t run away!” On another day I heard the words, “Follow My Son — Jesus!” This word finally led me to leave the world and join the Society of Jesus, a missionary order that promised by its very title, its “Spiritual Exercises” and its C…

What Does Pisseth Against the Wall Mean?

It's really getting bad for some of my Independent Fundamental Baptist brethren to actually even take the words "pisseth against the wall" which appears at least six times in 1 Samuel 23:22, 1 Samuel 25:34, 1 Kings 14:10, 1 Kings 16:11, 1 Kings 21:21 and 2 Kings 9:8 where the King James actually has the words "pisseth against the wall".  Now I am a King James only-ist but I do not support the stupid interpretation of "pisseth against the wall" by some IFB preachers who have become in some way similar to the Catholic Faith Defenders that they argue against when they should spend their time soulwinning.  Actually I even heard that rather outrageous "pisseth against the wall" sermon by Steven Anderson that was so taken out of context.
So what does pisseth against the wall mean? Let us take a look at these six verses and take it on a exegetic view NOT an eisegetic (out of context) view:
1 Samuel 23:22- "And so more also do God unto the ene…