Skip to main content

Politically Correct People Are Whiny Crybabies Who Hate the Inconvenient Truth

Politically correct people are too easy to offend. Just tell them the inconvenient truth and they start whining like there's no tomorrow. Share a Christian post against any legalized sin on social media and expect it to be reported for spam or reported as hate speech against people. That should be considered funny as to how many social media pages are actually doing real hate crimes and they are still entitled to do what they do on their respective social media platforms.

So many people spread hate about Christianity, Christians report them and the administrators of the social media pages usually don't do a thing about it even when it violates community standards. A good example is when warning homosexuals of the dangers of their activities is considered a hate crime while a homosexual's desire to murder Christians may no longer be considered a hate crime. It's pure selective justice and selective outrage by those who consider themselves liberals by worldly standards. When the politically correct people report Christian posts then expect the posts to be taken down. It's all because these politically correct have every right to be a crybaby and punish those who offended them even for the most petty of reasons.

Social media platforms that could be used to spread the truth of God's Word are now used by their liberal owners and administrators to prevent it. You could consider how often Christians using the social media to spread the truth can face it with the possibility that their account will get banned. Why is this happening? Unfortunately, most people today can't tell the difference between a hate crime and telling the truth that offends them. As the world redefines the meaning of love into tolerance for sin and false religion then Christians can expect themselves to be considered criminals even when they aren't criminals by God's standards. If the Lord Jesus Christ who is 100% sinless gets crucified in between two thieves then Christians can expect to be put in the middle of two really guilty criminals who had what's coming for them. A Christian is already considered as much as a sinner as people who the politically crybaby hates for a good reason. A Christian getting lumped together with a Muslim extremist or any extremist is no surprise. It's frustrating but it happens because such people don't want the truth. They love their delusions and it's been the same thing over and over (Isaiah 30:10, Jeremiah 5:31). 

They also have their crybaby tendencies when the truth hits them or only when it offends them. Its' like people who accuse others of being hateful and dishonest while they are hateful and dishonest themselves. They attack people who disagree with them even if the other person isn't forcing their views. They accuse others of violating their right to believe what they want while they do it themselves. They are just like childhood bullies who dominate the playground. They enforce their own rules and they suddenly say it's unfair when they are defeated by another person. It's always been about them and only them isn't it? I guess this explains why when politically correct people get rightfully arrested they play the oppression card never mind they are oppressors themselves. They always consider themselves the victim whenever something happens to them. While Christians shouldn't bully politically correct people but why is it okay for politically correct people to bully Christians? That's a bad case of double standard isn't it? 

Worse, today's governments love to cater to politically correct crybabies. One good reason why politically correct crybabies grow in numbers is because certain governments allow it. Many governments today don't follow Romans 13:1-3. Instead of being those who bear the sword to slay evil they instead throw away the sword to protect evildoers. Some have gone as far as to protect lawbreakers instead of people who obey the law. You could think of depraved tyrants who have often protected sinful living whenever it's convenient. Nero himself was said to be an incestuous bisexual reprobate. Many Roman emperors had questionable behavior and legalizing sinful practices. The Herods were a family linked with inbred marriages that resulted to several freaks born out of incestuous relationships. Herodias was a crybaby who had John the Baptist beheaded for pointing out her incestuous (since Herod Antipas is her half-uncle) and adulterous (since Herod Antipas was married to Phaeselis, daughter of Aretas IV) relationship. Ahab and Jezebel only followed the trends of the pagan kingdoms than God's law. These kinds of governments have gone against the very reason why God ordained governments in the first place. Governments were made to punish evil but many governments have done otherwise with their own brand of selective justice. 

It's really a time for Christians to really keep up with the fight without being violent. It's not a call to beat up those whiny crybabies called politically correct people. It would do no good to keep arguing with them or to present facts without shedding some compassion. It's all about being peaceful as much as possible and if confrontation is necessary it's all about warning these politically correct crybabies out of concern for their souls. Remember, even politically correct crybabies are still the mission field who should be reached out with the Gospel. 

See also:

Popular posts from this blog

Ken Ham's Illustrations on Spiritual Warfare Against Humanism

Dr. Ken Ham of Answers in Genesis made these beautiful illustrations to show what's wrong with the church today. Let's take a look at the two illustrations on how Christians engage their spiritual warfare. 
The first illustration reveals the following:
One member is asleep when he should be doing something.Another person is firing at the balloons because the person who's supposed to fire it is asleep on the job.Somebody is focused on deflecting cannon balls than hitting the source of the cannon balls.Somebody is treating the whole situation like a game.  
By doing so, humanism is victorious whenever the local church is asleep. This is the problem to why Christians tend to fall down in battle at times:
Ezekiel 22:30 And I sought for a man among them, that should make up the hedge, and stand in the gap before Me for the land, that I should not destroy it: but I found none.
In short, if you're not going to stand in the gap on behalf of the land then who will? It's the…

The Ridiculous Roman Catholic View That Marriage Must Be Done Inside Their Church or It's Invalid

I remembered reading through the seven sacraments or ordinances of the Roman Catholic institution in a catechism. One of the teachings is that marriage must be treated as a sacrament. What it also implies is that if your marriage is done in a civil court that even if it was duly registered, that both couples were in a sexually pure union then it's not a marriage. So does that mean that a person can marry in a civil court, get divorced and marry his next spouse in the Roman Catholic institution?

Let's address the issue of civil marriage that is pure and holy. In short there was no incest, no adultery and it was between two people who are eligible for marriage. So why should the Roman Catholic institution even think that two people who got married with the sexually pure prerequisites in the eyes of God should be rejected. Is it because unless it's a priest who performs the marriage then the marriage can't be validated? It's a problem with how Roman Catholics have thei…

No Moral Absolutes Means No Human Rights

We have the truth that human rights activists are everywhere who reject the truth that there are moral absolutes. Many of them have their idea of "Judge not and you will not be judged." As for the atheistic human activists, they tend to carry out Richard Dawkins' quote from the River Out of Eden which says that there's no good, no evil but only pitiless indifference. They think that there are no such thing as moral absolutes. So if they believe that there are no moral absolutes then why are they fighting for human rights which requires moral absolutes to determine them? After all, Dawkins just said there is no purpose but only pitiless indifference.

Here's another problem with atheists' appeal to human rights. Why do they appeal to human rights when they claim that there are no moral absolutes and morality is relative? Human rights are determined by moral absolutes that God made. When God made His Ten Commandments and gave the whole Law - He made it as the st…

James 2 DOES NOT Teach Works Salvation

In a hasty attempt to defend works salvation, they would appeal to James 2.  It would be time to actually clear the fact that Paul and James DO NOT contradict each other. James 2 DOES NOT teach works salvation in which now can be clearly seen when this whole chapter is being dissected to show that James 2 does not defend the heretic crowd.  So let's try to check out what James 2 really is saying.
So first, it's time to think about these facts to debunk the heretical argument of using James 2:
1.) James 2:14-18 is not talking about works salvation but rather, again showing one's faith by one's works.  James 2:18 is a challenge to show one's faith.  Want to know about faith?  Hebrews 11 talks about the results of faith with some of the heroes of the Bible.  Try to coincide Hebrews 11 and James 2 and one sees the results of faith.  As said, when one says that a faith without works is DEAD because true faith produces good works to validate faith.  That's really th…

Does Salvation by Grace Through Faith in Jesus Christ Grant a License to Sin?

Here's a commonly heard argument saying, "Well salvation by faith alone in Jesus Christ is unjust and grants a license to sin." which is frequently done by most world religions.  They demand people must work for their salvation and for one, it's NOT even realistic or practical as it promotes the idea of a dictator God PLUS it's nothing more than asking for the impossible because God's standard of holiness is a LOT higher than all the good works man does.  Despite all the good man does, still they will fall into sin and the followers of almost every false religion this world has to offer shows that like how your average religious person attends religious services yet he/she falls into sin for the rest of the week, showing he/she is WEAK in the flesh.
Now it's time to really correct the whole erroneous argument as false.  Why?  The Bible says otherwise about what God's salvation by grace through faith really does- it transforms the individual to resist…

What Does Pisseth Against the Wall Mean?

It's really getting bad for some of my Independent Fundamental Baptist brethren to actually even take the words "pisseth against the wall" which appears at least six times in 1 Samuel 23:22, 1 Samuel 25:34, 1 Kings 14:10, 1 Kings 16:11, 1 Kings 21:21 and 2 Kings 9:8 where the King James actually has the words "pisseth against the wall".  Now I am a King James only-ist but I do not support the stupid interpretation of "pisseth against the wall" by some IFB preachers who have become in some way similar to the Catholic Faith Defenders that they argue against when they should spend their time soulwinning.  Actually I even heard that rather outrageous "pisseth against the wall" sermon by Steven Anderson that was so taken out of context.
So what does pisseth against the wall mean? Let us take a look at these six verses and take it on a exegetic view NOT an eisegetic (out of context) view:
1 Samuel 23:22- "And so more also do God unto the ene…

What's Wrong with the Ang Dating Daan Movement?

The Ang Dating Daan movement is by the Members Church of God International spearheaded by its pastor (and so-called "prophet") Eliseo Soriano.  While claiming to be an expositor of the Scriptures with his "Itanong Mo Kay Soriano" or "Ask Soriano" In English, this religious group actually isn't Christian as some of the ignorant would want to believe.  Though the group claims the Bible is their only authority (as some cults do) but the problem is that they believe only Eli Soriano may interpret the Scriptures.  This is utter heresy!  Not even a great man in the Scriptures, Charles Spurgeon ever made such a preposterous claim!  This is no better than the "true church" movement by Darwin Fish which is exposed by Pastor Phil Johnson as a heretical movement.  In fact, I'm not going to waste my time debating with ADD members, they are a total waste of my time as every other debate.
Unlike John F. Macarthur of Grace to You that actually encoura…