Skip to main content

Brash Atheists Are Ungrateful People in Science!

Thanks to my brother-in-Christ David W. Cloud, I have discovered more facts on how atheists are ungrateful turds in science.  He has revealed statements from a brash atheist named Richard Dawkins that proves a really biased view against Creationism and how atheists are ungrateful turds:
"Evolution is a fact. Beyond reasonable doubt, beyond serious doubt, beyond sane, informed, intelligent doubt, beyond doubt evolution is a fact. ... Evolution is a fact, and [my] book will demonstrate it. No reputable scientist disputes it, and no unbiased reader will close the book doubting it." (Dawkins, The Greatest Show in Earth, 2010). 
"There is no doubt now; no serious scientist has any doubt that evolution is a fact, in the sense that we are cousins of chimpanzees, monkeys and wombats and cassowaries."  (Dawkins, interview with COSMOS magazine, May 23, 2012).
"... no scientist denies the central truth of [Darwin’s] The Origin, the idea of descent with modification ... plants, animals and everything else descended from a common ancestor" (Steve Jones, Professor of Genetics, University College of London, Darwin’s Ghost, 2000, pp. xvii, xxiii). 
"... no educated person any longer questions the validity of the so-called theory of evolution, which we now know to be a simple fact” (Ernst Mayr, professor of zoology, Harvard University, “Darwin’s Influence on Modern Thought," The Best American Science Writing 2001, edited by Timothy Ferris, p. 141). 
"Evolution is a fact and no educated scientist doubts it” (Gary Huxley, biologist, Brandt University, quoted by Paul McDorman, “Noted Evolutionist Says He Won’t Debate Creationists," World by Design, 2011, p. 1). 
"In fact, all scientists accept the reality of evolution." (Joseph McInerney, director of Biological Sciences Curriculum Study, quoted by David Hill, “Counter Evolutionary,” Education Week, Nov. 20, 1996, p. 7).

When I started to look at these statements, Richard Dawkins is indeed the one who is suffering all the biases.  For him, it looks like that he is already ready to shove things down our throat without critical thinking like:

  • He presents the fallacy of false dilemma that if you believe in Creationism, you are not a scientist and you must believe in evolution to be a scientist.
  • After presenting the false dilemma and several Ad Hominem attacks, he also tries to make sure that once he redefines who the real scientist is, that:
    • He wants to make sure that only those who are evolutionists can be scientists...
    • He wants to "prove" that evolution is a fact and no educated scientists doubts it.
    • Unless you accept the "reality" of evolution, you are not a scientist.

Note: Not all who believe in evolution are atheists.  Evolution has been a pagan doctrine even before Charles Darwin was born!

At the same time, Bill Nye the so-called "Science Guy" (an atheist) and the atheist blogger Human Ape, that teaching Creationism allegedly does the following:
  • Damages the minds of children
  • Harm the economy of any country

However I really need atheist blogger Human Ape and Bill Nye to prove their statements (like Richard Dawkins) with SOLID HARD FACTS and not their biases.  If they believe that being a Creationist means you can't be a scientist, you can't be scientific and that it means, you are retarded.  What they often ignore is that believing in a God adds purpose in life and actually encourages to study science in contrast to Dawkins' famous statement of that there is no design, no no purpose, just pitiless indifference.  In contrast to what they say, Christianity is "test all things" which they don't do, because they would rather believe in a lie than in the truth.

Here are some things atheists need to give up or stop using because these stuff were contributed to science by "retards" especially they engage in genetic fallacy and Ad Hominem attacks:
  • Here are a few of the many disciplines that they need to reject which I could imagine how thin science books will be without them:
    • Bacteriology
    • Edward Arthur Milne's Milne Model
    • Francis Bacon's scientific method
    • Ichthyology
    • Isaac Newton's Calculus
    • Isotopic Chemistry
    • James Clerk Maxwell's equations (Maxwell's Equation
    • John Ambrose Fleming's Right Hand Rule
    • Model Analysis
    • Natural History
  • Here's are a a few of the many list of discoveries they need to refute and they should try to disprove all of them:
    • Anything that Louis Pasteur discovered that contributed to bacteriology
    • Dalton's Law
    • Electromagnetic fields
    • Inert gases
    • Field Theory
    • Genetics
    • Newtonian Physics which includes the law of gravity
    • Nitrous acid formation
    • Rabies
    • Self-induction
  • Here's are a few inventions and innovations that are currently being innovated until the Lord comes that they must also discard because it was created by a "retard":
    • Airplanes
    • Antiseptic surgery
    • Electric motor
    • Electric wheel
    • Hydraulics
    • Hydrostatics
    • Pasteurization
    • Radio telegraph
    • Transatlantic cable
    • Vaccination and immunization

Without these "retards", their study of science would be highly impossible.  It's absurd to study science without recognizing God just as it is stupid to recognize God without studying His creation.
A longer list can be found from Way of Life.

What made me think of atheist stupidity and double standard is that while they claim to be scientific, they enjoy reading science books but they choose to discredit the source and grab the credit.  Also, atheists are more often than not described in the Bible (which they claim is a book of myths yet use it as evidence for their hatred for God) in Romans 1:21-38 as:
  • They know God really exists but they were ungrateful.
  • They became vain in their imaginations.
  • They profess themselves to be wise (even sometimes smarter than everyone and saying Christians are stupid) but their actions show they are foolish with their, "I know everything and I'm always right" attitude.
  • They changed the glory of God (at least in their minds) into an image like to man and animals.
  • They end up dishonoring themselves like pedophilia, adultery and homosexuality.
  • They changed the truth of God for a convenient lie and chose to worship science instead of the One Who created science.
  • They did not like to retain God in their knowledge because they know that judgment is coming for them.  So they would rather live a lie than the truth.

Popular posts from this blog

Who Will You Believe: Pope Francis or the Bible?

Here's a cartoon of how tragic the afterlife for Roman Catholics would be when they realize that they needed a real, personal relationship with Christ to enter into Heaven. As I grew up as a Roman Catholic I didn't really care about the Bible. I even hear some Roman Catholics are told to never read the Bible for themselves because not everyone should be allowed to read it. The priest often says that reading the Bible alone will confuse you so you need their extrabiblical doctrine. Worse, they are confusing Sola Scriptura with Solo Scriptura. Born again Christians have their tradition but it's dictated by the Bible as a guiding principle to one's lifestyle. It's not that they read only the Bible but rather they have the Bible as their only principle for Christian tradition.

What is this personal relationship? As much as some pastors feel like the term personal Lord and Savior can be dangerous or "personal Savior" may suggest that Jesus is a genie than Lor…

When God Says No, He Means No

When God says no He means no! Do you know why the world is in a mess right now? It's all because Adam and Eve couldn't follow one simple rule that was to never eat of the tree of the fruit of life. I'd like to imagine it that God may have even put an "Off Limits" sign on it. But Satan himself always finds a way to convince people to break the rules.
Genesis 3:1-5 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden? And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden: but of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die. And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die: for God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.

What Christians Can Learn From Joshua and Caleb's Confidence in Seizing the Promised Land

Being a Christian means you can be stuck in a pickle. Today's lesson will be from Numbers 13-14 which talks about the twelve spies to the Land of Canaan. I think any Christian leader going into much trouble today may find this as both a source of vexation and encouragement at the same time. It's a source of vexation because there are so many people like the rebellious Israelites in the wilderness. It's a source of encouragement because it's a reminder that God is still in charge.

The story of Numbers 13 talks about the spying. We see one member of each of the tribes that were given a political inheritance were there. We can see their names are as follows:
Numbers 13:4-13 And these were their names: of the tribe of Reuben, Shammua the son of Zaccur. Of the tribe of Simeon, Shaphat the son of Hori. Of the tribe of Judah, Caleb the son of Jephunneh. Of the tribe of Issachar, Igal the son of Joseph. 8 Of the tribe of Ephraim, Oshea the son of Nun. Of the tribe of Benjamin…

Drunk Driving is Dangerous to Society

Consider this picture of a drunk driving incident. This is the car that the late Princess Diana Spencer, the late Dodi Al Fayed and the late Henri Paul (the driver) were using before their tragic demise. What was also interesting to note is that their driver had high dosages of alcohol prior to this gruesome incident. I don't want to talk about the conspiracy side of things but the whole ugly picture that drunk driving kills. But even after this incident and many similar ones before it is that many people still do it even if the consequences are clear as day.

The Bible warns that being a drunkard is one of the marks of an unsaved person:
1 Corinthians 6:9-10  Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God. 
Those who argue that …

Modernization is Not an Excuse to Dismiss Badly Needed Old-Fashioned Revivals

I remembered reading through Jeremiah can be a chore because the events of that book continue to repeat itself. At the same time, reading through Jeremiah can be a comfort because the prophet chose to stand by God's command even if he momentarily stopped preaching (Jeremiah 20:5). One verse that is used to call for old fashioned revivals is Jeremiah 6:16 which says:
Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein.
It's a problem you start calling for old-fashioned revivals and people will call you outdated or a neanderthal. While there's nothing wrong with modern technology but the problem is when people only care if something is modern. While modernization can be used to evangelize but it can also be used to spread the influence of sin. The same printing press that allowed the late Martin Luther to publish Bibles was also u…

The Prosperity Gospel is an Enemy of Cheerful Giving

I remembered having a lecture on the prosperity gospel. One of the worst lies of the prosperity gospel is that giving money or the tithes and offerings to their pastors will turn you into a millionaire, God will spare them from trouble and that they can have the desires of their wicked heart. That's one of the worst heresies I've heard. On the contrary the more faithful you are to God the more you should expect enemy attacks. Some people I know are faithful in giving and their tithes and offerings yet they are not living as billionaires. The motive of giving in the prosperity gospel is to gain the false promise that God wants us happy, healthy and wealthy all the time. That's not cheerful giving isn't it?

If you give money to God in exchange for material blessings then something is pretty wrong. It's a terrible misapplication of Malachi 3:9-10. Do they even know that the blessings where there isn't enough room to receive it isn't all about becoming a billio…

Politically Correct Parenting Raises Spoiled Brats

Politically correct parenting is already the norm of parenting in this fallen world. What most parents don't see is that everyone needs a healthy dose of both Vitamin Yes and Vitamin No. But like anything beneficial in excess or in scarcity too many people have either too much or too little of Vitamin Yes and Vitamin No. While it's not okay to have an overdose of Vitamin No but what's so upsetting is that many people today take the opposite extreme. They aren't giving enough Vitamin No ad are given too much Vitamin Yes. Either way both are overly misguided approaches in parenting.

Is there anything wrong with giving the child what they want? It depends on what the child wants. If a child wants something that's going to honor God (ex. They want their own copy of the Bible that they can read for themselves) then the parent should say yes if what the child wants is God honoring. But if the child only wants to be like the secular children with all their nice stuff the…