Skip to main content

Brash Atheists Are Ungrateful People in Science!

Thanks to my brother-in-Christ David W. Cloud, I have discovered more facts on how atheists are ungrateful turds in science.  He has revealed statements from a brash atheist named Richard Dawkins that proves a really biased view against Creationism and how atheists are ungrateful turds:
"Evolution is a fact. Beyond reasonable doubt, beyond serious doubt, beyond sane, informed, intelligent doubt, beyond doubt evolution is a fact. ... Evolution is a fact, and [my] book will demonstrate it. No reputable scientist disputes it, and no unbiased reader will close the book doubting it." (Dawkins, The Greatest Show in Earth, 2010). 
"There is no doubt now; no serious scientist has any doubt that evolution is a fact, in the sense that we are cousins of chimpanzees, monkeys and wombats and cassowaries."  (Dawkins, interview with COSMOS magazine, May 23, 2012).
"... no scientist denies the central truth of [Darwin’s] The Origin, the idea of descent with modification ... plants, animals and everything else descended from a common ancestor" (Steve Jones, Professor of Genetics, University College of London, Darwin’s Ghost, 2000, pp. xvii, xxiii). 
"... no educated person any longer questions the validity of the so-called theory of evolution, which we now know to be a simple fact” (Ernst Mayr, professor of zoology, Harvard University, “Darwin’s Influence on Modern Thought," The Best American Science Writing 2001, edited by Timothy Ferris, p. 141). 
"Evolution is a fact and no educated scientist doubts it” (Gary Huxley, biologist, Brandt University, quoted by Paul McDorman, “Noted Evolutionist Says He Won’t Debate Creationists," World by Design, 2011, p. 1). 
"In fact, all scientists accept the reality of evolution." (Joseph McInerney, director of Biological Sciences Curriculum Study, quoted by David Hill, “Counter Evolutionary,” Education Week, Nov. 20, 1996, p. 7).

When I started to look at these statements, Richard Dawkins is indeed the one who is suffering all the biases.  For him, it looks like that he is already ready to shove things down our throat without critical thinking like:

  • He presents the fallacy of false dilemma that if you believe in Creationism, you are not a scientist and you must believe in evolution to be a scientist.
  • After presenting the false dilemma and several Ad Hominem attacks, he also tries to make sure that once he redefines who the real scientist is, that:
    • He wants to make sure that only those who are evolutionists can be scientists...
    • He wants to "prove" that evolution is a fact and no educated scientists doubts it.
    • Unless you accept the "reality" of evolution, you are not a scientist.

Note: Not all who believe in evolution are atheists.  Evolution has been a pagan doctrine even before Charles Darwin was born!

At the same time, Bill Nye the so-called "Science Guy" (an atheist) and the atheist blogger Human Ape, that teaching Creationism allegedly does the following:
  • Damages the minds of children
  • Harm the economy of any country

However I really need atheist blogger Human Ape and Bill Nye to prove their statements (like Richard Dawkins) with SOLID HARD FACTS and not their biases.  If they believe that being a Creationist means you can't be a scientist, you can't be scientific and that it means, you are retarded.  What they often ignore is that believing in a God adds purpose in life and actually encourages to study science in contrast to Dawkins' famous statement of that there is no design, no no purpose, just pitiless indifference.  In contrast to what they say, Christianity is "test all things" which they don't do, because they would rather believe in a lie than in the truth.

Here are some things atheists need to give up or stop using because these stuff were contributed to science by "retards" especially they engage in genetic fallacy and Ad Hominem attacks:
  • Here are a few of the many disciplines that they need to reject which I could imagine how thin science books will be without them:
    • Bacteriology
    • Edward Arthur Milne's Milne Model
    • Francis Bacon's scientific method
    • Ichthyology
    • Isaac Newton's Calculus
    • Isotopic Chemistry
    • James Clerk Maxwell's equations (Maxwell's Equation
    • John Ambrose Fleming's Right Hand Rule
    • Model Analysis
    • Natural History
  • Here's are a a few of the many list of discoveries they need to refute and they should try to disprove all of them:
    • Anything that Louis Pasteur discovered that contributed to bacteriology
    • Dalton's Law
    • Electromagnetic fields
    • Inert gases
    • Field Theory
    • Genetics
    • Newtonian Physics which includes the law of gravity
    • Nitrous acid formation
    • Rabies
    • Self-induction
  • Here's are a few inventions and innovations that are currently being innovated until the Lord comes that they must also discard because it was created by a "retard":
    • Airplanes
    • Antiseptic surgery
    • Electric motor
    • Electric wheel
    • Hydraulics
    • Hydrostatics
    • Pasteurization
    • Radio telegraph
    • Transatlantic cable
    • Vaccination and immunization

Without these "retards", their study of science would be highly impossible.  It's absurd to study science without recognizing God just as it is stupid to recognize God without studying His creation.
A longer list can be found from Way of Life.

What made me think of atheist stupidity and double standard is that while they claim to be scientific, they enjoy reading science books but they choose to discredit the source and grab the credit.  Also, atheists are more often than not described in the Bible (which they claim is a book of myths yet use it as evidence for their hatred for God) in Romans 1:21-38 as:
  • They know God really exists but they were ungrateful.
  • They became vain in their imaginations.
  • They profess themselves to be wise (even sometimes smarter than everyone and saying Christians are stupid) but their actions show they are foolish with their, "I know everything and I'm always right" attitude.
  • They changed the glory of God (at least in their minds) into an image like to man and animals.
  • They end up dishonoring themselves like pedophilia, adultery and homosexuality.
  • They changed the truth of God for a convenient lie and chose to worship science instead of the One Who created science.
  • They did not like to retain God in their knowledge because they know that judgment is coming for them.  So they would rather live a lie than the truth.

Popular posts from this blog

Answering Some Atheists Who Claim That They Used to Be Christians

I remembered years ago when I read a now defunct atheist blog who admitted he used to be a Christian. What he meant that he used to be a Christian is that he was once a Roman Catholic. The average world today considers Roman Catholicism as well as other pseudo-Christian groups to be Christian when they aren't. Another atheist said he used to be a Christian until he read the Bible and found passages that horrified him. But there's one truth in that and that's those who criticize the Bible most are those who read it least. They haven't seen the context of events like why God ordered the destruction of evil civilizations. 
The "God's Not Dead" movies are somewhat lacking but this scene really makes think of atheists who claim they were once Christians. In this clip, notice how Professor Radisson claims that he used to be a devoted Christian. Just because someone came from an Evangelical background or family doesn't mean they're Christians. They may …

Pro-Homosexuality Media's Selective Outrage

Homosexuality is a result of man's fallen state (Romans 1:26-27, 1 Corinthians 6:9-10). It's a result of man's unrighteousness and the need to be reconciled. It's no surprise how homosexuality now fills secular entertainment. How often is the LGBT media already invading the media slowly but surely teaching nothing is wrong with homosexuality. It's best for anyone not to spend time over-analyzing pro-homosexual music videos and movies. Instead, one should spend time to rebuking the act which in turn will rebuke anything that promotes the act. This also includes the selective outrage of homosexual media as a result of legalizing same sex marriage.

I thought about a couple of events that passed after the United States of America's Supreme Court legalized homosexual "marriages". Starbucks' CEO Howard Schlutz wouldn't accept any dealings with anyone who is for traditional marriage. You have homosexuals who always love to throw their outrage toward…

What's Wrong with the Ang Dating Daan Movement?

The Ang Dating Daan movement is by the Members Church of God International spearheaded by its pastor (and so-called "prophet") Eliseo Soriano.  While claiming to be an expositor of the Scriptures with his "Itanong Mo Kay Soriano" or "Ask Soriano" In English, this religious group actually isn't Christian as some of the ignorant would want to believe.  Though the group claims the Bible is their only authority (as some cults do) but the problem is that they believe only Eli Soriano may interpret the Scriptures.  This is utter heresy!  Not even a great man in the Scriptures, Charles Spurgeon ever made such a preposterous claim!  This is no better than the "true church" movement by Darwin Fish which is exposed by Pastor Phil Johnson as a heretical movement.  In fact, I'm not going to waste my time debating with ADD members, they are a total waste of my time as every other debate.
Unlike John F. Macarthur of Grace to You that actually encoura…

What Does Pisseth Against the Wall Mean?

It's really getting bad for some of my Independent Fundamental Baptist brethren to actually even take the words "pisseth against the wall" which appears at least six times in 1 Samuel 23:22, 1 Samuel 25:34, 1 Kings 14:10, 1 Kings 16:11, 1 Kings 21:21 and 2 Kings 9:8 where the King James actually has the words "pisseth against the wall".  Now I am a King James only-ist but I do not support the stupid interpretation of "pisseth against the wall" by some IFB preachers who have become in some way similar to the Catholic Faith Defenders that they argue against when they should spend their time soulwinning.  Actually I even heard that rather outrageous "pisseth against the wall" sermon by Steven Anderson that was so taken out of context.
So what does pisseth against the wall mean? Let us take a look at these six verses and take it on a exegetic view NOT an eisegetic (out of context) view:
1 Samuel 23:22- "And so more also do God unto the ene…

Never Say It's Just a Little Sin!

Many times we think that what's small won't kill but many times, we fail to see that what's small may also kill.  A small leak sinks a big ship.  A small spark can set a forest or a neighborhood or even a city on fire.  Likewise, sin even if it's just small damns the person for all eternity.  Words can't describe how heinous sin is and why it must be hated and why people require salvation from it.  Nobody can say, "But LORD it was just a small sin!" on Judgment Day.  Instead, He'll say what He said in Matthew 7:23 to let such people depart from Him, He never knew them because they weren't saved to start with.

Do you know how severe even one tiny sin is?  One sin was enough to damn the human race.  Adam and Eve didn't have to murder anybody nor do all the sin they wanted.  All they had to do was just commit that just one sin.  Likewise, everyone on this Earth is condemned even for just one sin that they commit.  Romans 5:12-14 warns that it wa…

Manny Pacquiao's Conversion: True or False?

Bro. Gerry Soliman of Solutions Finder Apologetics who I wish to soon meet in person has actually raised the issue of rumors that Pacquiao had returned to Roman Catholicism.  The truth of the matter is once saved, always saved.  That is a true Christian remains a true Christian no matter what the circumstances may be by God's grace and true faith in Christ continues by God's grace and not by man's effort.  Anybody who supposedly converted to Christianity but later fell away completely was never saved to begin with (1 John 2:19).  Friends, either you are saved or not and the kind of live you live tells the person you are.  Christians do good works only for God's glory, the works salvationist does it in a vain effort to save himself but fail.  By reading the entry from Bro. Gerry's blog, it looks like Pacquiao had a genuine conversion and not a false one.
I am really annoyed at how dirty Roman Catholic apologists have gotten who now also said that the pastor who prea…

Testimony of Former Iglesia Ni Cristo Member, Now a Born Again Christian

Editor's note: 
First and foremost, I would like to thank the Bereans for this wonderful story of a former Iglesia ni Cristo minister (or pastor), now he has become a Baptist Christian.  It's a sad story that some people have just jumped from one cult to another.  Some members of the Watchtower Society, Charismatic Movement or the Iglesia ni Cristo have left Roman Catholicism but they have never truly come to know the truth of salvation is by faith in Christ alone and that any good works after Christian life is but the grace of God at work in the believer.  Now for this brave testimony that I can really share after many years of searching for one testimony which I hope will further bring more INC members to Jesus Christ.

May I begin with a word of prayer that in the midst of all these trouble, I call upon Jesus Christ the Son of God who the Iglesia ni Cristo deny is indeed God, the only way to salvation, that they trust upon their works and church membership than Him alone.  I…