Brash Atheists Are Ungrateful People in Science!
Thanks to my brother-in-Christ David W. Cloud, I have discovered more facts on how atheists are ungrateful turds in science. He has revealed statements from a brash atheist named Richard Dawkins that proves a really biased view against Creationism and how atheists are ungrateful turds:
"Evolution is a fact. Beyond reasonable doubt, beyond serious doubt, beyond sane, informed, intelligent doubt, beyond doubt evolution is a fact. ... Evolution is a fact, and [my] book will demonstrate it. No reputable scientist disputes it, and no unbiased reader will close the book doubting it." (Dawkins, The Greatest Show in Earth, 2010).
"There is no doubt now; no serious scientist has any doubt that evolution is a fact, in the sense that we are cousins of chimpanzees, monkeys and wombats and cassowaries." (Dawkins, interview with COSMOS magazine, May 23, 2012).
"... no scientist denies the central truth of [Darwin’s] The Origin, the idea of descent with modification ... plants, animals and everything else descended from a common ancestor" (Steve Jones, Professor of Genetics, University College of London, Darwin’s Ghost, 2000, pp. xvii, xxiii).
"... no educated person any longer questions the validity of the so-called theory of evolution, which we now know to be a simple fact” (Ernst Mayr, professor of zoology, Harvard University, “Darwin’s Influence on Modern Thought," The Best American Science Writing 2001, edited by Timothy Ferris, p. 141).
"Evolution is a fact and no educated scientist doubts it” (Gary Huxley, biologist, Brandt University, quoted by Paul McDorman, “Noted Evolutionist Says He Won’t Debate Creationists," World by Design, 2011, p. 1).
"In fact, all scientists accept the reality of evolution." (Joseph McInerney, director of Biological Sciences Curriculum Study, quoted by David Hill, “Counter Evolutionary,” Education Week, Nov. 20, 1996, p. 7).
When I started to look at these statements, Richard Dawkins is indeed the one who is suffering all the biases. For him, it looks like that he is already ready to shove things down our throat without critical thinking like:
- He presents the fallacy of false dilemma that if you believe in Creationism, you are not a scientist and you must believe in evolution to be a scientist.
- After presenting the false dilemma and several Ad Hominem attacks, he also tries to make sure that once he redefines who the real scientist is, that:
- He wants to make sure that only those who are evolutionists can be scientists...
- He wants to "prove" that evolution is a fact and no educated scientists doubts it.
- Unless you accept the "reality" of evolution, you are not a scientist.
Note: Not all who believe in evolution are atheists. Evolution has been a pagan doctrine even before Charles Darwin was born!
At the same time, Bill Nye the so-called "Science Guy" (an atheist) and the atheist blogger Human Ape, that teaching Creationism allegedly does the following:
- Damages the minds of children
- Harm the economy of any country
However I really need atheist blogger Human Ape and Bill Nye to prove their statements (like Richard Dawkins) with SOLID HARD FACTS and not their biases. If they believe that being a Creationist means you can't be a scientist, you can't be scientific and that it means, you are retarded. What they often ignore is that believing in a God adds purpose in life and actually encourages to study science in contrast to Dawkins' famous statement of that there is no design, no no purpose, just pitiless indifference. In contrast to what they say, Christianity is "test all things" which they don't do, because they would rather believe in a lie than in the truth.
Here are some things atheists need to give up or stop using because these stuff were contributed to science by "retards" especially they engage in genetic fallacy and Ad Hominem attacks:
- Here are a few of the many disciplines that they need to reject which I could imagine how thin science books will be without them:
- Bacteriology
- Edward Arthur Milne's Milne Model
- Francis Bacon's scientific method
- Ichthyology
- Isaac Newton's Calculus
- Isotopic Chemistry
- James Clerk Maxwell's equations (Maxwell's Equation
- John Ambrose Fleming's Right Hand Rule
- Model Analysis
- Natural History
- Here's are a a few of the many list of discoveries they need to refute and they should try to disprove all of them:
- Anything that Louis Pasteur discovered that contributed to bacteriology
- Dalton's Law
- Electromagnetic fields
- Inert gases
- Field Theory
- Genetics
- Newtonian Physics which includes the law of gravity
- Nitrous acid formation
- Rabies
- Self-induction
- Here's are a few inventions and innovations that are currently being innovated until the Lord comes that they must also discard because it was created by a "retard":
- Airplanes
- Antiseptic surgery
- Electric motor
- Electric wheel
- Hydraulics
- Hydrostatics
- Pasteurization
- Radio telegraph
- Transatlantic cable
- Vaccination and immunization
Without these "retards", their study of science would be highly impossible. It's absurd to study science without recognizing God just as it is stupid to recognize God without studying His creation.
A longer list can be found from Way of Life.
What made me think of atheist stupidity and double standard is that while they claim to be scientific, they enjoy reading science books but they choose to discredit the source and grab the credit. Also, atheists are more often than not described in the Bible (which they claim is a book of myths yet use it as evidence for their hatred for God) in Romans 1:21-38 as:
- They know God really exists but they were ungrateful.
- They became vain in their imaginations.
- They profess themselves to be wise (even sometimes smarter than everyone and saying Christians are stupid) but their actions show they are foolish with their, "I know everything and I'm always right" attitude.
- They changed the glory of God (at least in their minds) into an image like to man and animals.
- They end up dishonoring themselves like pedophilia, adultery and homosexuality.
- They changed the truth of God for a convenient lie and chose to worship science instead of the One Who created science.
- They did not like to retain God in their knowledge because they know that judgment is coming for them. So they would rather live a lie than the truth.