Skip to main content

Brash Atheists Are Ungrateful People in Science!

Thanks to my brother-in-Christ David W. Cloud, I have discovered more facts on how atheists are ungrateful turds in science.  He has revealed statements from a brash atheist named Richard Dawkins that proves a really biased view against Creationism and how atheists are ungrateful turds:
"Evolution is a fact. Beyond reasonable doubt, beyond serious doubt, beyond sane, informed, intelligent doubt, beyond doubt evolution is a fact. ... Evolution is a fact, and [my] book will demonstrate it. No reputable scientist disputes it, and no unbiased reader will close the book doubting it." (Dawkins, The Greatest Show in Earth, 2010). 
"There is no doubt now; no serious scientist has any doubt that evolution is a fact, in the sense that we are cousins of chimpanzees, monkeys and wombats and cassowaries."  (Dawkins, interview with COSMOS magazine, May 23, 2012).
"... no scientist denies the central truth of [Darwin’s] The Origin, the idea of descent with modification ... plants, animals and everything else descended from a common ancestor" (Steve Jones, Professor of Genetics, University College of London, Darwin’s Ghost, 2000, pp. xvii, xxiii). 
"... no educated person any longer questions the validity of the so-called theory of evolution, which we now know to be a simple fact” (Ernst Mayr, professor of zoology, Harvard University, “Darwin’s Influence on Modern Thought," The Best American Science Writing 2001, edited by Timothy Ferris, p. 141). 
"Evolution is a fact and no educated scientist doubts it” (Gary Huxley, biologist, Brandt University, quoted by Paul McDorman, “Noted Evolutionist Says He Won’t Debate Creationists," World by Design, 2011, p. 1). 
"In fact, all scientists accept the reality of evolution." (Joseph McInerney, director of Biological Sciences Curriculum Study, quoted by David Hill, “Counter Evolutionary,” Education Week, Nov. 20, 1996, p. 7).

When I started to look at these statements, Richard Dawkins is indeed the one who is suffering all the biases.  For him, it looks like that he is already ready to shove things down our throat without critical thinking like:

  • He presents the fallacy of false dilemma that if you believe in Creationism, you are not a scientist and you must believe in evolution to be a scientist.
  • After presenting the false dilemma and several Ad Hominem attacks, he also tries to make sure that once he redefines who the real scientist is, that:
    • He wants to make sure that only those who are evolutionists can be scientists...
    • He wants to "prove" that evolution is a fact and no educated scientists doubts it.
    • Unless you accept the "reality" of evolution, you are not a scientist.

Note: Not all who believe in evolution are atheists.  Evolution has been a pagan doctrine even before Charles Darwin was born!

At the same time, Bill Nye the so-called "Science Guy" (an atheist) and the atheist blogger Human Ape, that teaching Creationism allegedly does the following:
  • Damages the minds of children
  • Harm the economy of any country

However I really need atheist blogger Human Ape and Bill Nye to prove their statements (like Richard Dawkins) with SOLID HARD FACTS and not their biases.  If they believe that being a Creationist means you can't be a scientist, you can't be scientific and that it means, you are retarded.  What they often ignore is that believing in a God adds purpose in life and actually encourages to study science in contrast to Dawkins' famous statement of that there is no design, no no purpose, just pitiless indifference.  In contrast to what they say, Christianity is "test all things" which they don't do, because they would rather believe in a lie than in the truth.

Here are some things atheists need to give up or stop using because these stuff were contributed to science by "retards" especially they engage in genetic fallacy and Ad Hominem attacks:
  • Here are a few of the many disciplines that they need to reject which I could imagine how thin science books will be without them:
    • Bacteriology
    • Edward Arthur Milne's Milne Model
    • Francis Bacon's scientific method
    • Ichthyology
    • Isaac Newton's Calculus
    • Isotopic Chemistry
    • James Clerk Maxwell's equations (Maxwell's Equation
    • John Ambrose Fleming's Right Hand Rule
    • Model Analysis
    • Natural History
  • Here's are a a few of the many list of discoveries they need to refute and they should try to disprove all of them:
    • Anything that Louis Pasteur discovered that contributed to bacteriology
    • Dalton's Law
    • Electromagnetic fields
    • Inert gases
    • Field Theory
    • Genetics
    • Newtonian Physics which includes the law of gravity
    • Nitrous acid formation
    • Rabies
    • Self-induction
  • Here's are a few inventions and innovations that are currently being innovated until the Lord comes that they must also discard because it was created by a "retard":
    • Airplanes
    • Antiseptic surgery
    • Electric motor
    • Electric wheel
    • Hydraulics
    • Hydrostatics
    • Pasteurization
    • Radio telegraph
    • Transatlantic cable
    • Vaccination and immunization

Without these "retards", their study of science would be highly impossible.  It's absurd to study science without recognizing God just as it is stupid to recognize God without studying His creation.
A longer list can be found from Way of Life.

What made me think of atheist stupidity and double standard is that while they claim to be scientific, they enjoy reading science books but they choose to discredit the source and grab the credit.  Also, atheists are more often than not described in the Bible (which they claim is a book of myths yet use it as evidence for their hatred for God) in Romans 1:21-38 as:
  • They know God really exists but they were ungrateful.
  • They became vain in their imaginations.
  • They profess themselves to be wise (even sometimes smarter than everyone and saying Christians are stupid) but their actions show they are foolish with their, "I know everything and I'm always right" attitude.
  • They changed the glory of God (at least in their minds) into an image like to man and animals.
  • They end up dishonoring themselves like pedophilia, adultery and homosexuality.
  • They changed the truth of God for a convenient lie and chose to worship science instead of the One Who created science.
  • They did not like to retain God in their knowledge because they know that judgment is coming for them.  So they would rather live a lie than the truth.

Popular posts from this blog

Continue the Reformation Through Expository Preaching

It's not merely enough to protest against Rome. There are many who protest against Rome who are just as heretical as Rome. What's not too surprising is to find some "Baptist" preachers who reject the badly needed art of expository preaching. Why do we need expository preaching? To know why we need it we must first define it.

Defining expository preaching

This is what the book "By the Book: The Whys and Hows of Biblical Preaching" would define expository preaching:
Expository preaching. When the main theme, its main points and further development of the points of the points or sub-points are all derived from the content, context and structural flow of a longer text in Scripture. This is popular when expounding paragraphs, stanzas, and chapters of a book and especially when doing a series of preaching from a book. (p. 45)
Here is the definition from Got Questions on "What is expository preaching?":
Expository preaching involves the exposition, or co…

Continuing the Reformation Also Means Preaching Against Quack Evangelical Pastors

It's so easy to heckle on Roman Catholic priests and similar cultists but hard to acknowledge that Evangelical circles aren't free of wolves in sheep's clothing. What I thought about is how often you may think that a certain pastor is a man of God but he's just as much as a wolf in sheep's clothing as the Roman Catholic priests. Just because a person claims to be a pastor doesn't mean he's a man of God.

Should it be mentioned Jeremiah has condemned irresponsible pastors or shepherds with how they carry their jobs? Read them at Jeremiah 10:21, 12:10, 22:2, 23:1-2 and you'll find out the kind of pastors God hates. Jeremiah 3:15 has God promising to give pastors who will give understanding. The problem is that there are so many pastors who aren't even men of God. They are pastors by profession but they are not pastors in God's eyes. This is a warning to Christians that just because a pastor by profession doesn't mean the person is a man of God.…

The Difference Between Faith Results to Good Works vs. Adding Faith to Good Works

There's a huge argument between the Papists and the Reformers about what authentic faith is. The stand isn't just merely between Papists and the Reformers as it goes as far as Papists, anti-Catholic cults and the true born again Christians (Protestant or not) on what James means by faith without works is dead.

Is James saying that in order to get saved or to stay saved that you must add faith to good works?

Perhaps one reason why Martin Luther once thought of the Book of James as an epistle of straw was because it felt like the author added good works to saving faith. I remembered having a dialogue with a third degree cousin of mine who was a Roman Catholic apologist. He knew I was a former Catholic turned Baptist. I had a conversation with him and he told me that I should examine the Book of James to see good works are required for justification.

The Roman Catholic view as well as the anti-Catholic cultist view tends to use James' writing to justify their heresy. Here'…

What's Wrong with the Ang Dating Daan Movement?

The Ang Dating Daan movement is by the Members Church of God International spearheaded by its pastor (and so-called "prophet") Eliseo Soriano.  While claiming to be an expositor of the Scriptures with his "Itanong Mo Kay Soriano" or "Ask Soriano" In English, this religious group actually isn't Christian as some of the ignorant would want to believe.  Though the group claims the Bible is their only authority (as some cults do) but the problem is that they believe only Eli Soriano may interpret the Scriptures.  This is utter heresy!  Not even a great man in the Scriptures, Charles Spurgeon ever made such a preposterous claim!  This is no better than the "true church" movement by Darwin Fish which is exposed by Pastor Phil Johnson as a heretical movement.  In fact, I'm not going to waste my time debating with ADD members, they are a total waste of my time as every other debate.
Unlike John F. Macarthur of Grace to You that actually encoura…

What Does Pisseth Against the Wall Mean?

It's really getting bad for some of my Independent Fundamental Baptist brethren to actually even take the words "pisseth against the wall" which appears at least six times in 1 Samuel 23:22, 1 Samuel 25:34, 1 Kings 14:10, 1 Kings 16:11, 1 Kings 21:21 and 2 Kings 9:8 where the King James actually has the words "pisseth against the wall".  Now I am a King James only-ist but I do not support the stupid interpretation of "pisseth against the wall" by some IFB preachers who have become in some way similar to the Catholic Faith Defenders that they argue against when they should spend their time soulwinning.  Actually I even heard that rather outrageous "pisseth against the wall" sermon by Steven Anderson that was so taken out of context.
So what does pisseth against the wall mean? Let us take a look at these six verses and take it on a exegetic view NOT an eisegetic (out of context) view:
1 Samuel 23:22- "And so more also do God unto the ene…

Testimony of Former Iglesia Ni Cristo Member, Now a Born Again Christian

Editor's note: 
First and foremost, I would like to thank the Bereans for this wonderful story of a former Iglesia ni Cristo minister (or pastor), now he has become a Baptist Christian.  It's a sad story that some people have just jumped from one cult to another.  Some members of the Watchtower Society, Charismatic Movement or the Iglesia ni Cristo have left Roman Catholicism but they have never truly come to know the truth of salvation is by faith in Christ alone and that any good works after Christian life is but the grace of God at work in the believer.  Now for this brave testimony that I can really share after many years of searching for one testimony which I hope will further bring more INC members to Jesus Christ.

May I begin with a word of prayer that in the midst of all these trouble, I call upon Jesus Christ the Son of God who the Iglesia ni Cristo deny is indeed God, the only way to salvation, that they trust upon their works and church membership than Him alone.  I…

Paul Washer's Quote to Slam the Prosperity Gospel

I really am so annoyed with all the prosperity gospel garbage because it is not biblical doctrine.  When I became a Christian, it is not about what it has done for me but what I have done for God.  If I am going to follow Christ, I can only expect to be ridiculed and persecuted.  If I am going to follow Christ then I expect the whole world to leave me behind.  Why do I expect that?  John 15:18-19 warns that the Christians are not of the world.  James 4:4 warns that you cannot be a friend of both the world and of God.

It is utterly foolish to say, "Receive Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior and you will get healing and prosperity.  You will get a Mercedes Benz."  The more I read through the words of Jesus, the more I realize He did not promise any of those garbage that the prosperity crowd promises.  Instead, I read more warnings about persecution for His Name's sake.  Being a Christian can also mean being unpopular, hated, rejected, a laughingstock for the wrong reas…