Skip to main content

Cheap Grace Theology is Deadly

Sometimes the term "easy believism" can be misused by people who say they believe it but they do not believe it.  One can say, "I believe in easy believism." but when you ask them their evangelism methods or their beliefs on conversion, they are quick to say, "There is no way that a true believer can ever live in sin for the rest of their life and have no change in life.  If such people claim to be saved but their lifestyle is different otherwise, I dare put a question mark.  Jesus is Lord, you cannot divide Him and if you are saved, you submit to Him on a daily basis and that submission grows."  Then it might be time to say, "You sir, are not an easy believist."  That is very different from the real easy believist or the believer in cheap grace theology.

Cheap grace theology is when you say, "Just believe and everything will be settled forever." without testing the validity of a true conversion.  While it only takes one to believe on the Lord Jesus Christ to be saved but to merely profess belief is not a guarantee for salvation.  John 8:31 has Jesus saying, "If ye continue in My Word, then are ye my disciples indeed."  Even if Christians are not sinless or they can fall into compromise but they continue in God's Word.  There is no way that a person can become a Christian and still remain in such gross disobedience because God's grace does the impossible to redeem a person from one's sinful lifestyle (Titus 2:11-14).  That is definitely not what the "Easy Christian" wants.  They want a Christianity that is so easy, a Christianity that does not have sanctification and they only want Jesus as Savior but not as Lord.  Sad to say their Jesus is not Lord, they are not saved to start with.

While the doctrine of eternal security is true but it is not just merely once saved, always saved.  Do you know the Bible tests the true converts from the false ones?  Matthew 24:13 says that those who endure to the end, the same shall be saved.  At first, it feels like works salvation at first glace but 1 John 2:19 says that those who left the flock were not of the flock.  Many people today make a profession of faith but it was all a sham.  If that faith does not result in perseverance then it is best to call it a sham faith.  If that faith does not result in faithfulness then there was no faith to start with.  It is not works salvation to teach it because we did not say people are saved by their works, instead we say that their works shows who are saved and who is not such as do you do good works to keep yourself saved or do you do good works only out of gratitude for being saved?  Their teaching that grace grants license to sin is just as demonic as anybody who teaches works are required to be saved or to stay saved.

You want the proof of a genuine conversion?  It is not only in times when Christians rise but also in times when they fall.  Just because a person is a true convert does not mean that they are free from doubts, failures and hindrances to their growth.  The difference lies in how they rise up after they fall as Proverbs 24:16 says that a just man falls seven times but rises up from that falling.  The person has the Lordship of Christ in their lives, they are His and God who begins a good work in them will continue to perfect it.  There is really no room for completely falling away that even if they do fall away, God's grace will keep them from completely falling away and it gives them the grace to endure to the end.

See also:

Popular posts from this blog

Do Feminists Ever Realize That Women Shouldn't Use Acts of Violence Against Men?

It's irritating to be told that men shouldn't use violence on women but the other way around is okay. No, it's not okay to hit anyone regardless of gender out of anger or frustration. If men shouldn't hit women except in acts of self-defense then the other way round should apply. But you have to remember the stupidity of selective justice and selective outrage of feminists. They think men should respect them while they think discriminating against men is okay. Their quest for "equality" is nothing more than a big joke.

Why is it usually a big fuzz when a man hits a woman but not so many people react if a woman hits a man? That kind of hypocrisy is worth addressing. They say men shouldn't hit women because they are "weaker" but is it okay for a person of lower rank to attack a person of higher rank? The word submission doesn't exist in the feminist dictionary unless it's men submitting to them. Whether they like it or not the husband is t…

You Can't Preach About God's Love For Sinners Without Preaching About His Wrath Against Sin

It's a problem that so many quack preachers love to preach God's love for sinners but not about God's wrath against them because He must punish both the sin and the sinner. Everything from God's love to His wrath is dictated by the fact that He is holy and you are not. The message about God's love for sinners will make no sense if you don't preach about God's wrath against sin first. I remembered listening to "Hell's Best Kept Secret" and "True and False Conversion" by Ray Comfort. There was this point where Kirk Cameron talked about what if I sold my property to save someone from a disease. If the person doesn't know anything about the disease then my selling of all my property to pay for the badly needed treatment won't make sense. Another illustration was all about the flight. You have to tell the person that the parachute is not meant to improve the flight but to tell the person that it's for emergency reasons. If you…

It's Not Okay to Be Blindly Loyal to the Pope and His Army of Pharisees

Some rabid Roman Catholics keep sensationalizing the sins of fraud pastors (as if true born again Christians ever support them) while they keep hiding the sins of their priests or Pharisees. They also say that born again Christians are blindly loyal to the pastor never mind that they are blindly loyal to the Pope and his Pharisees. Blind loyalty towards a a prosperity gospel pastor, a so-called successor of a so-called last messenger or any quack preacher is no different than blind loyalty towards the Pope and his Pharisees. Worse, Roman Catholics believe that their Pharisees are instruments in saving their souls or that the Pope supposedly holds salvation in his hands never mind all the priestly scandals are telling them otherwise.

I could remember how often Bible reading is discouraged (and yet some of these rabid Roman Catholics tell me I should read the Bible and I can't get wrong with it) because it could drive me crazy from reading it. Some Roman Catholics I've met &quo…

Don't Even Think About Legalizing Prostitution or Sex Trade

There's some people who seek to legalize prostitution. Some "rational" atheists are already talking about prostitution should be legalized so it could be controlled by the government. The claim that "studies" show that prohibition doesn't work is a lie straight from the pits of Hell. The Israelites were doing sin not because God forbade it but because they were disobedient and the rulers did nothing to prevent those sins. It's not surprising is that the same people who seek to legalize prostitution also want to legalize narcotics and hard liquor all in the name of "succeeding in the war against them".

The logic behind legalizing prostitution is that so the government can control them and tax them. But the problem with the quest to legalize prostitution is that it encourages the sin rather than discourage it. The problem is not the war against prostitution but ignoring Ecclesiastes 8:11. Do you know why the war against prostitution isn't wo…

Is Salvation in Peter's Hands (As Well as the Popes) Because Jesus Supposedly Gave Him the Literal Keys of Heaven?

According to a self-proclaimed Roman Catholic apologist (who I'll probably dub as Mr. Whistle when I mention him) he claimed that salvation is in the hands of Peter because Jesus gave the former the keys of Heaven. The guy is clearly taking things out of context with what he says. I wonder does he even bother to check out the idioms of the Bible since some passages use a figure of speech instead of speaking everything literally?

If he can't get Matthew 16:18 correctly where he said that Peter the Rock even when the Good News Translation for Roman Catholics says otherwise (and worse for them Peter is differentiated as a rock and the Rock is clearly not him) then he also misinterprets Matthew 16:19. Let's try to understand Matthew 16:19 with the keys and what they really mean. In his interpretation he's already telling everyone that born again Christians should just go back to the Roman Catholic institution because the Pope supposedly holds salvation in his hands. I don&…

Atheists With Abusive Mindsets Do Exist

It's a myth over the modern world that there's no such thing as an atheist with an abusive mindset. I can see atheists who claim that abuses only come through theism. I don't deny that there's such a thing as religious people with an abusive mindset such as Roman Catholic fanatics, Islamic extremists and any form of religious extremism. The problem of the claim is that it denies the reality that there's such a thing as atheists who have an abusive mindset. One such person is the late Christopher Hitchens who claims that he has the right o treat religion with ridicule, hatred and contempt. Isn't that an example of an atheist with an abusive mindset? Sad to say, Hitchens himself is still cursing God from the pits of Hell. Christians should pray that Richard Dawkins wouldn't make the same wrong decision as Hitchens.

One horrible atheist blogger claimed he was indeed one of the most scientific people on Earth. Just reading his blog alone is so tiresome that I&…

Why This Ministry DOES NOT Support the Westboro Baptist Church

The Westboro Baptist Church is a so-called Baptist institution founded by Fred Phelps who is a lawyer and a theologian. Is it your average Baptist assembly or is this another of Satan's brain children? I would like to present my stand why this ministry does not support the Westboro Baptist Church and why as a Baptist, I do not support them either:
The founder Fred Phelps who serves as its pastor. I do find it disturbing he says that he supports sound doctrine of good Christian preachers of the past like John Calvin and Charles Haddon Spurgeon but his doctrine is not sound at all. His preaching is definitely not balanced. While I do appreciate him attacking the Great Whore of Revelation, apostasy, ecumenism, homosexuality, abortion, pornography and a lot of sins however he is no better than the Roman Catholic institution which he frequently criticizes. Although he claims to be a Calvinist and a Spurgeon fan, however many of those who are Calvinist preachers like Paul Washer, John …