Skip to main content

Handling Christians' Objections Towards the Death Penalty

I remembered having some trouble with my views on death penalty with Roman Catholics. What should have surprised me or not is that some Christians who are truly saved object to the death penalty. They have various reasons which I will address. Part of being a Christian means correcting one's brethren of their mistakes. 

Objection #1: The death penalty is Old Testament law

Some Christians think that the death penalty is just an Old Testament law that got repealed in the New Testament. This is a problem when they fail to study their Bible properly. While they have gotten their soteriology right, they question the conversion of people who claim to be Christians but evidence suggest otherwise but they are against the death penalty. They say that death penalty may belong to the ceremonial law. They may think that Jesus abolished the death penalty in John 8:1-11. But do they know the context? The problem is not the death penalty. The Pharisees should have brought the adulterous woman to the Roman government and not to Jesus. The whole process was a mock trial. In the law concerning adultery both the man and the woman were to be stoned (Deuteronomy 22:22). Jesus was showing people about the foolishness of taking the Law into your hands. 

The New Testament still supported death penalty. Acts 25:11 has Paul not refusing to die if he ever committed any deadly crime. In Romans 13:4 the government is tasked to bear the sword. The sword is not for planting onions but for defensive killing. The government is tasked to punish evildoers and kill them if need be. Revelation 13:10 demands that those who murder must be killed with the sword. The New Testament may allow Christians to eat pork, crustaceans and mollusks but the death penalty is part of the moral law. 

Objection #2: Didn't Jesus say turn the other cheek? 

The expression "turn the other cheek" can be easily mistaken. It's possible to support self-defense while misinterpreting turn the other cheek. Turning the other cheek didn't mean anything about the death penalty. Instead, it's all about how to deal with insults and let-downs. Jesus told them not to let an insult ruin them for life. If they support self-defense then why do they oppose the death penalty for criminals? Death penalty was designed to be defensive killing. 

Some people can contradict themselves with that they think nothing is wrong with a policeman having to kill a dangerous criminal while they think the death penalty is wrong. They may say that turning the other cheek doesn't mean neglecting public safety. What they may have not seen is that death penalty's intended purpose is to execute dangerous criminals who are a threat to society.

Objection #3: Death penalty could end up taking the life of an innocent person

I don't dare deny that death penalty could take the life of an innocent person. I guess they think that this is death penalty for the sake of the death penalty when it isn't. Instead, it's all about having proper procedures and making death penalty the ultimate punishment for the worst of criminals. To say that we must ban the death penalty because an innocent person died would be similar to banning weapons used for self-defense, kitchen utensils, carpentry tools, water or anything that should be used with caution as part of our everyday lives because they were used in a murder scene or somebody died from their misuse. 

What Christians who are against death penalty may not be aware is that innocent people end up in jail because perjury is not punished accordingly. The Bible has a very severe law against perjury. Deuteronomy 19:16-19 says that any false witness who intends to get an innocent person to be executed will be executed instead. Today, perjury has become a very slight matter. Many people get away with a very light sentence when that lying in court could have ended up misusing the judicial system to murder an innocent person. 

Objection #4: Life imprisonment would be better because it prolongs the agony

Some people prefer the life imprisonment not because it seems "humane" but because they believe it will make the person reflect on their sin for the rest of their life. Part of their reasoning is that locking up a person may give them more chances to receive Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior. What they don't see is that life imprisonment can be a waste of government revenues to keep them in like a zoo. Prison food can be horrible and prison uniform can be humiliating but some may prefer to end up in jail because free food and free clothing is better than none.

I would definitely agree that the death penalty would be better. The problem with life imprisonment is that hideous criminals can escape. If the cells started getting overcrowded then it's time to build new cells. If hideous criminals will get the death penalty then it would be easier to make room for new prisoners. Criminals who don't deserve the death penalty shouldn't be lumped in with prisoners who deserve it. Also, if all the government does it lock up dangerous criminals then what's the guarantee that they won't keep escaping? 

See also:

Popular posts from this blog

Answering Some Atheists Who Claim That They Used to Be Christians

I remembered years ago when I read a now defunct atheist blog who admitted he used to be a Christian. What he meant that he used to be a Christian is that he was once a Roman Catholic. The average world today considers Roman Catholicism as well as other pseudo-Christian groups to be Christian when they aren't. Another atheist said he used to be a Christian until he read the Bible and found passages that horrified him. But there's one truth in that and that's those who criticize the Bible most are those who read it least. They haven't seen the context of events like why God ordered the destruction of evil civilizations. 
The "God's Not Dead" movies are somewhat lacking but this scene really makes think of atheists who claim they were once Christians. In this clip, notice how Professor Radisson claims that he used to be a devoted Christian. Just because someone came from an Evangelical background or family doesn't mean they're Christians. They may …

Pro-Homosexuality Media's Selective Outrage

Homosexuality is a result of man's fallen state (Romans 1:26-27, 1 Corinthians 6:9-10). It's a result of man's unrighteousness and the need to be reconciled. It's no surprise how homosexuality now fills secular entertainment. How often is the LGBT media already invading the media slowly but surely teaching nothing is wrong with homosexuality. It's best for anyone not to spend time over-analyzing pro-homosexual music videos and movies. Instead, one should spend time to rebuking the act which in turn will rebuke anything that promotes the act. This also includes the selective outrage of homosexual media as a result of legalizing same sex marriage.

I thought about a couple of events that passed after the United States of America's Supreme Court legalized homosexual "marriages". Starbucks' CEO Howard Schlutz wouldn't accept any dealings with anyone who is for traditional marriage. You have homosexuals who always love to throw their outrage toward…

What's Wrong with the Ang Dating Daan Movement?

The Ang Dating Daan movement is by the Members Church of God International spearheaded by its pastor (and so-called "prophet") Eliseo Soriano.  While claiming to be an expositor of the Scriptures with his "Itanong Mo Kay Soriano" or "Ask Soriano" In English, this religious group actually isn't Christian as some of the ignorant would want to believe.  Though the group claims the Bible is their only authority (as some cults do) but the problem is that they believe only Eli Soriano may interpret the Scriptures.  This is utter heresy!  Not even a great man in the Scriptures, Charles Spurgeon ever made such a preposterous claim!  This is no better than the "true church" movement by Darwin Fish which is exposed by Pastor Phil Johnson as a heretical movement.  In fact, I'm not going to waste my time debating with ADD members, they are a total waste of my time as every other debate.
Unlike John F. Macarthur of Grace to You that actually encoura…

What Does Pisseth Against the Wall Mean?

It's really getting bad for some of my Independent Fundamental Baptist brethren to actually even take the words "pisseth against the wall" which appears at least six times in 1 Samuel 23:22, 1 Samuel 25:34, 1 Kings 14:10, 1 Kings 16:11, 1 Kings 21:21 and 2 Kings 9:8 where the King James actually has the words "pisseth against the wall".  Now I am a King James only-ist but I do not support the stupid interpretation of "pisseth against the wall" by some IFB preachers who have become in some way similar to the Catholic Faith Defenders that they argue against when they should spend their time soulwinning.  Actually I even heard that rather outrageous "pisseth against the wall" sermon by Steven Anderson that was so taken out of context.
So what does pisseth against the wall mean? Let us take a look at these six verses and take it on a exegetic view NOT an eisegetic (out of context) view:
1 Samuel 23:22- "And so more also do God unto the ene…

Never Say It's Just a Little Sin!

Many times we think that what's small won't kill but many times, we fail to see that what's small may also kill.  A small leak sinks a big ship.  A small spark can set a forest or a neighborhood or even a city on fire.  Likewise, sin even if it's just small damns the person for all eternity.  Words can't describe how heinous sin is and why it must be hated and why people require salvation from it.  Nobody can say, "But LORD it was just a small sin!" on Judgment Day.  Instead, He'll say what He said in Matthew 7:23 to let such people depart from Him, He never knew them because they weren't saved to start with.

Do you know how severe even one tiny sin is?  One sin was enough to damn the human race.  Adam and Eve didn't have to murder anybody nor do all the sin they wanted.  All they had to do was just commit that just one sin.  Likewise, everyone on this Earth is condemned even for just one sin that they commit.  Romans 5:12-14 warns that it wa…

Manny Pacquiao's Conversion: True or False?

Bro. Gerry Soliman of Solutions Finder Apologetics who I wish to soon meet in person has actually raised the issue of rumors that Pacquiao had returned to Roman Catholicism.  The truth of the matter is once saved, always saved.  That is a true Christian remains a true Christian no matter what the circumstances may be by God's grace and true faith in Christ continues by God's grace and not by man's effort.  Anybody who supposedly converted to Christianity but later fell away completely was never saved to begin with (1 John 2:19).  Friends, either you are saved or not and the kind of live you live tells the person you are.  Christians do good works only for God's glory, the works salvationist does it in a vain effort to save himself but fail.  By reading the entry from Bro. Gerry's blog, it looks like Pacquiao had a genuine conversion and not a false one.
I am really annoyed at how dirty Roman Catholic apologists have gotten who now also said that the pastor who prea…

Testimony of Former Iglesia Ni Cristo Member, Now a Born Again Christian

Editor's note: 
First and foremost, I would like to thank the Bereans for this wonderful story of a former Iglesia ni Cristo minister (or pastor), now he has become a Baptist Christian.  It's a sad story that some people have just jumped from one cult to another.  Some members of the Watchtower Society, Charismatic Movement or the Iglesia ni Cristo have left Roman Catholicism but they have never truly come to know the truth of salvation is by faith in Christ alone and that any good works after Christian life is but the grace of God at work in the believer.  Now for this brave testimony that I can really share after many years of searching for one testimony which I hope will further bring more INC members to Jesus Christ.

May I begin with a word of prayer that in the midst of all these trouble, I call upon Jesus Christ the Son of God who the Iglesia ni Cristo deny is indeed God, the only way to salvation, that they trust upon their works and church membership than Him alone.  I…