Skip to main content

The Terrible Truth About the Human Heart Revealed by the Law of God!

Jeremiah 17:9 warns that the human heart is so desperately wicked that who can know it.  From the King James Study Bible says this about the human heart:
"The heart (cf. Proverbs 4:23) means man's most innermost being.  The bent of man's natural disposition apart from God's redeeming grace is described as deceitful (lit., crooked) and desperately wicked (incurably sick).  Therefore man cannot trust his own heart but must leave all to God who alone knows the heart and judges all men fairly.  Only a person with a redeemed heart can live with proper fellowship with God (Job 11:13, 1 John 3:18-24)."

Matthew Henry also stated this about the human heart on his commentary on Jeremiah 7:5-11 which I am presenting this excerpt:
"The heart, the conscience of man, in his corrupt and fallen state, is deceitful above all things.  It calls evil good and good evil and cries peace to those whom it does not belong.  Herein the heart is desperately wicked; it is deadly, it s desperate.  Herein is the heart desperately wicked; it is deadly, it id desperate.  The case is bad indeed, if the conscience which should be set right the errors of other faculties is a leader in the delusion.  We cannot know our own hearts nor what they will do in an hour of temptation.  Who can understand his errors?  Much less can we know the hearts of others or depend upon them."

Hebrews 4:12 calls the Word of God as something more powerful than a two edged sword as it pierces, divides the soul and spirit, even revealing the innermost thoughts.  The King James Study Bible says about the Word of God:
"For the Word of God: The reason given for one's careful scrutiny of his life involves the reality that God is intently scrutinizing it.  His word is quick (living).  This word is first in the Greek and is the emphasis.  God's Word is not old or archaic; it is alive.  It is not inept or inactive; it is powerful (active).  It reaches to the inner secrets of man's mind to discern even his thoughts and intents.  Likewise,  God's eye sees man as though he were naked, unable to hide behind excuse or pretense."

Now I'll take something again from Matthew Henry's Concise Commentary on Hebrews 4:11-16:
"The Holy Scriptures are the Word of God.  When God sets it home by His Spirit, it convinces powerfully, converts powerfully, and comforts powerfully.  It makes a soul that has long been proud to be humble and a perverse spirit to be meek and obedient.  Sinful habits that are become as it were natural to the soul and rooted deeply in it are separated cut off by this sword.  It will discover to men their thoughts and purposes, the vileness of many, the bad principles they are moved by, the sinful ends they act to.  The word will show the sinner all that in his heart."

We can see from the Parable of the Sower the four different kinds of soil which represents four different kinds of heart.  There is the stony ground hearer, the shallow ground hearer, the thorny ground hearer and the good soil hearer.  Trying to understand the Parable of the Sower shows what's wrong with today's evangelism methods and that before the Gospel is presented, the person must first be shown that they are sinners or their hearts must first be broken.

It's natural for any man who has been broken to be afraid of his own natural heart.  In the Gospel According to Jesus, Revised and Expanded Edition, p. 135 we read this statement by Dr. John F. MacArthur:
"Nevertheless be encouraged.  The Lord of the harvest can break up even the hardest ground and rid it of the most stubborn weeds (thorns).  Hard soil, shallow soil, or weedy (thorny, emphasis mine) soil may not always stay that way.  God can till the soil of the most stubborn heart.  One ancient Palestinian method of farming was to throw the seed first then plow it under.  That sometimes happens in evangelism.  We sow the seed, and even when it seems that that the hovering birds are about to snatch it away, the Holy Spirit plows it under so it can spout and bear glorious fruit."

The whole reality that the human heart is so wicked that Spurgeon in the quote calls it a dark cellar full of loathsome creatures.  That is what is revealed when the Law looks at our heart.  Going back to the parable of the sower, the heart is so full of stuff that makes a man so stubborn and nobody really starts out as a good soil hearer.  Many start off as worldly, hardened in sin or they are just shallow hearers.  Some people are false converts before they become true converts.  Some had to lose their fortunes before they would respond to the Gospel.  Some rich men didn't want to get saved until they realized that their money can't buy salvation.  Some people used to love sin a lot but later saw that they were not saved and they became good soil hearers.  That is the reason why the Law must be presented because it is the Law that shows man the problem of their hearts and their need for salvation.  Remember, some people have been witnessed to more than once before they got saved.  In my own experience, I was witnessed to several times until I saw myself as a sinner only deserving Hell.

Putting aside the Protestant Reformers or the Protestant Reformation for awhile, remember that their methods of using the Law to witness was not their own invention but it's Biblical evangelism.  When Martin Luther called the Law a hammer, he was quoting Jeremiah 23:29 that described God's Word like a hammer and it was always like a hammer even before he stated that truth.  When Jesus witnessed to people, He always showed them their sinfulness before telling them the good news (John 4).  When the Law is presented, people see themselves, Deuteronomy 31:26 and Romans 3:19 presents the sad, awful truth that we are all guilty before God.  That was what was upheld by the pre-Reformation Baptists and that was even upheld by the Reformers.  During the Protestant Reformation from Luther to John Calvin, they used God's Law to expose to people their sins before they told them the good news.  Besides, some of the staunchest Calvinists would say, "Calvinism came before Calvin." although my non-Calvinist brothers and sisters in Christ may disagree but we can agree on this statement by Calvin saying, "Any teeaching that urges man to trust in himself merely a deception."

It's stupid but true that a lot of Protestant and Baptist churches today are just Protestant or Baptist in name but not in doctrine and practice.  In short, most of them are just nominal Christians and not real Christians.  If churches teaching conditional security gets me upset then so do churches that teach Antinomianism.  The Antinomian is no more no less a false convert than the person who believes good works must be maintained to stay saved rather than good works are maintained because the person is saved.  Worse, they are quick to say that those who say that true faith results to works is a contradiction to the doctrine of faith alone.  Many churches today even do easy evangelism telling people they are sinners and making them say uh-huh rather than using God's Law to reveal that they are sinners.  It would not make sense to the person they are sinners unless they first understand that they are sinners.


See also:

Popular posts from this blog

Ken Ham's Illustrations on Spiritual Warfare Against Humanism

Dr. Ken Ham of Answers in Genesis made these beautiful illustrations to show what's wrong with the church today. Let's take a look at the two illustrations on how Christians engage their spiritual warfare. 
The first illustration reveals the following:
One member is asleep when he should be doing something.Another person is firing at the balloons because the person who's supposed to fire it is asleep on the job.Somebody is focused on deflecting cannon balls than hitting the source of the cannon balls.Somebody is treating the whole situation like a game.  
By doing so, humanism is victorious whenever the local church is asleep. This is the problem to why Christians tend to fall down in battle at times:
Ezekiel 22:30 And I sought for a man among them, that should make up the hedge, and stand in the gap before Me for the land, that I should not destroy it: but I found none.
In short, if you're not going to stand in the gap on behalf of the land then who will? It's the…

The Ridiculous Roman Catholic View That Marriage Must Be Done Inside Their Church or It's Invalid

I remembered reading through the seven sacraments or ordinances of the Roman Catholic institution in a catechism. One of the teachings is that marriage must be treated as a sacrament. What it also implies is that if your marriage is done in a civil court that even if it was duly registered, that both couples were in a sexually pure union then it's not a marriage. So does that mean that a person can marry in a civil court, get divorced and marry his next spouse in the Roman Catholic institution?

Let's address the issue of civil marriage that is pure and holy. In short there was no incest, no adultery and it was between two people who are eligible for marriage. So why should the Roman Catholic institution even think that two people who got married with the sexually pure prerequisites in the eyes of God should be rejected. Is it because unless it's a priest who performs the marriage then the marriage can't be validated? It's a problem with how Roman Catholics have thei…

No Moral Absolutes Means No Human Rights

We have the truth that human rights activists are everywhere who reject the truth that there are moral absolutes. Many of them have their idea of "Judge not and you will not be judged." As for the atheistic human activists, they tend to carry out Richard Dawkins' quote from the River Out of Eden which says that there's no good, no evil but only pitiless indifference. They think that there are no such thing as moral absolutes. So if they believe that there are no moral absolutes then why are they fighting for human rights which requires moral absolutes to determine them? After all, Dawkins just said there is no purpose but only pitiless indifference.

Here's another problem with atheists' appeal to human rights. Why do they appeal to human rights when they claim that there are no moral absolutes and morality is relative? Human rights are determined by moral absolutes that God made. When God made His Ten Commandments and gave the whole Law - He made it as the st…

James 2 DOES NOT Teach Works Salvation

In a hasty attempt to defend works salvation, they would appeal to James 2.  It would be time to actually clear the fact that Paul and James DO NOT contradict each other. James 2 DOES NOT teach works salvation in which now can be clearly seen when this whole chapter is being dissected to show that James 2 does not defend the heretic crowd.  So let's try to check out what James 2 really is saying.
So first, it's time to think about these facts to debunk the heretical argument of using James 2:
1.) James 2:14-18 is not talking about works salvation but rather, again showing one's faith by one's works.  James 2:18 is a challenge to show one's faith.  Want to know about faith?  Hebrews 11 talks about the results of faith with some of the heroes of the Bible.  Try to coincide Hebrews 11 and James 2 and one sees the results of faith.  As said, when one says that a faith without works is DEAD because true faith produces good works to validate faith.  That's really th…

Does Salvation by Grace Through Faith in Jesus Christ Grant a License to Sin?

Here's a commonly heard argument saying, "Well salvation by faith alone in Jesus Christ is unjust and grants a license to sin." which is frequently done by most world religions.  They demand people must work for their salvation and for one, it's NOT even realistic or practical as it promotes the idea of a dictator God PLUS it's nothing more than asking for the impossible because God's standard of holiness is a LOT higher than all the good works man does.  Despite all the good man does, still they will fall into sin and the followers of almost every false religion this world has to offer shows that like how your average religious person attends religious services yet he/she falls into sin for the rest of the week, showing he/she is WEAK in the flesh.
Now it's time to really correct the whole erroneous argument as false.  Why?  The Bible says otherwise about what God's salvation by grace through faith really does- it transforms the individual to resist…

What Does Pisseth Against the Wall Mean?

It's really getting bad for some of my Independent Fundamental Baptist brethren to actually even take the words "pisseth against the wall" which appears at least six times in 1 Samuel 23:22, 1 Samuel 25:34, 1 Kings 14:10, 1 Kings 16:11, 1 Kings 21:21 and 2 Kings 9:8 where the King James actually has the words "pisseth against the wall".  Now I am a King James only-ist but I do not support the stupid interpretation of "pisseth against the wall" by some IFB preachers who have become in some way similar to the Catholic Faith Defenders that they argue against when they should spend their time soulwinning.  Actually I even heard that rather outrageous "pisseth against the wall" sermon by Steven Anderson that was so taken out of context.
So what does pisseth against the wall mean? Let us take a look at these six verses and take it on a exegetic view NOT an eisegetic (out of context) view:
1 Samuel 23:22- "And so more also do God unto the ene…

What's Wrong with the Ang Dating Daan Movement?

The Ang Dating Daan movement is by the Members Church of God International spearheaded by its pastor (and so-called "prophet") Eliseo Soriano.  While claiming to be an expositor of the Scriptures with his "Itanong Mo Kay Soriano" or "Ask Soriano" In English, this religious group actually isn't Christian as some of the ignorant would want to believe.  Though the group claims the Bible is their only authority (as some cults do) but the problem is that they believe only Eli Soriano may interpret the Scriptures.  This is utter heresy!  Not even a great man in the Scriptures, Charles Spurgeon ever made such a preposterous claim!  This is no better than the "true church" movement by Darwin Fish which is exposed by Pastor Phil Johnson as a heretical movement.  In fact, I'm not going to waste my time debating with ADD members, they are a total waste of my time as every other debate.
Unlike John F. Macarthur of Grace to You that actually encoura…