Skip to main content

According to Some Roman Catholic Apologists, Being a Born Again Christian is Unbiblical

I am always amazed with how many people still continue to choose to follow the Pope blindly while condemning the blind followers of a pastor at the same time.  If they really claim to belong to the true church, do they know what Jesus told Nicodemus?  They are always speaking ill of born again Christians but do they really realize the Bible says you must be born again?

John 3:3-8 of the Good News Bible even says:

Jesus answered, "I am telling you the truth: no one can see the Kingdom of God without being born again."  "How can a grown man be born again?" Nicodemus asked. "He certainly cannot enter his mother's womb and be born a second time!"  "I am telling you the truth," replied Jesus, "that no one can enter the Kingdom of God without being born of water and the Spirit.  A person is born physically of human parents, but is born spiritually of the Spirit.  Do not be surprised because I tell you that you must all be born again.  The wind blows wherever it wishes; you hear the sound it makes, but you do not know where it comes from or where it is going. It is like that with everyone who is born of the Spirit."

I am so amazed at how some Roman Catholic apologists can memorize Scriptures and quote it faster than some born again Christians but they do not even know the full context and meaning of the Scriptures.  Some may appeal to the Greek but only for their convenience like they mistake "ekklesia kath'oles" in Acts 9:31 to justify their existence but do they know the full meaning and context of it?  The same goes when some Catholics tend to say that being a born again Christian means to be a heretic, a "burn again" Christian or insert any cuss words beginning with a "b" they can think of just to derail the born again Christianity movement.  I am amazed to how such people can be so arrogant to claim that faith is not enough and that to be guaranteed salvation, you must keep doing good works but many of them really live like they have a license to sin.  Worse. many of them keep quoting verses that tend to go against their favor because either they do not fully understand context or they are just too lazy to actually go beyond memorizing Scriptures.

What is so ironic is that even approved Roman Catholic translations tell them, "You must be born again."  Being born again is not about receiving the sacrament of baptism as an infant or receiving it through baptism as an adult or receiving it through "confirmation" by the Roman Catholic bishop.  They say that those former Roman Catholics who became born again Christians were just "misled" and "misinformed" by the lies of "burn again Christians".  Then again, they should tell that to the priests and nuns who left the Roman Catholic system after reading the Bible.  Those "born again Christians" who became Roman Catholics are what 1 John 2:19 says and I will quote again from the Good News Bible saying, "These people really did not belong to our fellowship, and that is why they left us; if they had belonged to our fellowship, they would have stayed with us.  But they left so that it might be clear that none of them really belonged to us."

To become a born again Christian is not just merely jumping from one denomination to another.  Anybody can join into a denomination of born again Christians but one is not truly born again.  To be born again of the Holy Spirit involves repentance of one's sinfulness.  What does it mean to repent of one's sins?  It does not mean forsaking your sin but rather it is a change of mind towards one's sins seeing them as offensive before God, that Jesus Christ is Lord of all and that there is nothing you can do to merit that salvation.  Today, many people confuse repentance of one's sinfulness to works salvation without realizing that Luke 24:47 says that repentance and remission of sins is part of the Gospel.  It does not mean just praying a sinner's prayer repeat after me evangelism without any proper conviction of sin.  Some do get saved in a sinner's prayer evangelism because the preaching was really convicting them of their sinfulness resulting to genuine repentance.  But the prayer alone does not save because many people say the sinner's prayer without true repentance leading to yet another false conversion.

When one reads the secret history of the Roman Catholic church or the secret history of the Jesuits, the war against born again Christians was never a pretty picture.  During the Dark Ages, the Roman Catholic church attacked pre-Reformation born again Christians.  When the Protestant Reformation was ignited launching the truth of Five Solas then more bloody persecutions came.  To call the whole incident a "misunderstanding" and a "misencounter" rather than a massacre has always been the common tactic.  Some Roman Catholic apologists even say, "Well they deserved it." which inadvertently has them confessing their hateful activities.  The murder of Calvinists on St. Bartholomew's Day, the murder of the Waldenses and all those activities done against born again Christians are something the Vatican does not want the public to know.  That is why any Roman Catholic priest or nun that leaves the system to become a born again Christian might as well be labeled as "merely misinformed to be mislead by those idiots called born again Christians".

After all, Roman Catholics just follow the Pope blindly.  When Pope Francis said all the unbiblical nonsense like that there is salvation outside of Christ, Jews can be saved without receiving Jesus, that atheists can enter Heaven if they do enough good and that having a personal relationship with Jesus is not biblical and a dangerous theology then I am not surprised some Roman Catholic apologists dare say that being a born again Christian is unbiblical.  It would be very important to pray for these people, love them, do good to them and the call of born again Christianity has been this in Romans 12:19-21 saying:

"Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.  Therefore if thine enemy hunger, feed him; if he thirst, give him drink: for in so doing thou shalt heap coals of fire on his head.  Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good."

See also:

Many Roman Catholics Play the Victim Whenever They're Told the Truth!

Popular posts from this blog

Ken Ham's Illustrations on Spiritual Warfare Against Humanism

Dr. Ken Ham of Answers in Genesis made these beautiful illustrations to show what's wrong with the church today. Let's take a look at the two illustrations on how Christians engage their spiritual warfare. 
The first illustration reveals the following:
One member is asleep when he should be doing something.Another person is firing at the balloons because the person who's supposed to fire it is asleep on the job.Somebody is focused on deflecting cannon balls than hitting the source of the cannon balls.Somebody is treating the whole situation like a game.  
By doing so, humanism is victorious whenever the local church is asleep. This is the problem to why Christians tend to fall down in battle at times:
Ezekiel 22:30 And I sought for a man among them, that should make up the hedge, and stand in the gap before Me for the land, that I should not destroy it: but I found none.
In short, if you're not going to stand in the gap on behalf of the land then who will? It's the…

The Ridiculous Roman Catholic View That Marriage Must Be Done Inside Their Church or It's Invalid

I remembered reading through the seven sacraments or ordinances of the Roman Catholic institution in a catechism. One of the teachings is that marriage must be treated as a sacrament. What it also implies is that if your marriage is done in a civil court that even if it was duly registered, that both couples were in a sexually pure union then it's not a marriage. So does that mean that a person can marry in a civil court, get divorced and marry his next spouse in the Roman Catholic institution?

Let's address the issue of civil marriage that is pure and holy. In short there was no incest, no adultery and it was between two people who are eligible for marriage. So why should the Roman Catholic institution even think that two people who got married with the sexually pure prerequisites in the eyes of God should be rejected. Is it because unless it's a priest who performs the marriage then the marriage can't be validated? It's a problem with how Roman Catholics have thei…

No Moral Absolutes Means No Human Rights

We have the truth that human rights activists are everywhere who reject the truth that there are moral absolutes. Many of them have their idea of "Judge not and you will not be judged." As for the atheistic human activists, they tend to carry out Richard Dawkins' quote from the River Out of Eden which says that there's no good, no evil but only pitiless indifference. They think that there are no such thing as moral absolutes. So if they believe that there are no moral absolutes then why are they fighting for human rights which requires moral absolutes to determine them? After all, Dawkins just said there is no purpose but only pitiless indifference.

Here's another problem with atheists' appeal to human rights. Why do they appeal to human rights when they claim that there are no moral absolutes and morality is relative? Human rights are determined by moral absolutes that God made. When God made His Ten Commandments and gave the whole Law - He made it as the st…

James 2 DOES NOT Teach Works Salvation

In a hasty attempt to defend works salvation, they would appeal to James 2.  It would be time to actually clear the fact that Paul and James DO NOT contradict each other. James 2 DOES NOT teach works salvation in which now can be clearly seen when this whole chapter is being dissected to show that James 2 does not defend the heretic crowd.  So let's try to check out what James 2 really is saying.
So first, it's time to think about these facts to debunk the heretical argument of using James 2:
1.) James 2:14-18 is not talking about works salvation but rather, again showing one's faith by one's works.  James 2:18 is a challenge to show one's faith.  Want to know about faith?  Hebrews 11 talks about the results of faith with some of the heroes of the Bible.  Try to coincide Hebrews 11 and James 2 and one sees the results of faith.  As said, when one says that a faith without works is DEAD because true faith produces good works to validate faith.  That's really th…

Does Salvation by Grace Through Faith in Jesus Christ Grant a License to Sin?

Here's a commonly heard argument saying, "Well salvation by faith alone in Jesus Christ is unjust and grants a license to sin." which is frequently done by most world religions.  They demand people must work for their salvation and for one, it's NOT even realistic or practical as it promotes the idea of a dictator God PLUS it's nothing more than asking for the impossible because God's standard of holiness is a LOT higher than all the good works man does.  Despite all the good man does, still they will fall into sin and the followers of almost every false religion this world has to offer shows that like how your average religious person attends religious services yet he/she falls into sin for the rest of the week, showing he/she is WEAK in the flesh.
Now it's time to really correct the whole erroneous argument as false.  Why?  The Bible says otherwise about what God's salvation by grace through faith really does- it transforms the individual to resist…

What Does Pisseth Against the Wall Mean?

It's really getting bad for some of my Independent Fundamental Baptist brethren to actually even take the words "pisseth against the wall" which appears at least six times in 1 Samuel 23:22, 1 Samuel 25:34, 1 Kings 14:10, 1 Kings 16:11, 1 Kings 21:21 and 2 Kings 9:8 where the King James actually has the words "pisseth against the wall".  Now I am a King James only-ist but I do not support the stupid interpretation of "pisseth against the wall" by some IFB preachers who have become in some way similar to the Catholic Faith Defenders that they argue against when they should spend their time soulwinning.  Actually I even heard that rather outrageous "pisseth against the wall" sermon by Steven Anderson that was so taken out of context.
So what does pisseth against the wall mean? Let us take a look at these six verses and take it on a exegetic view NOT an eisegetic (out of context) view:
1 Samuel 23:22- "And so more also do God unto the ene…

What's Wrong with the Ang Dating Daan Movement?

The Ang Dating Daan movement is by the Members Church of God International spearheaded by its pastor (and so-called "prophet") Eliseo Soriano.  While claiming to be an expositor of the Scriptures with his "Itanong Mo Kay Soriano" or "Ask Soriano" In English, this religious group actually isn't Christian as some of the ignorant would want to believe.  Though the group claims the Bible is their only authority (as some cults do) but the problem is that they believe only Eli Soriano may interpret the Scriptures.  This is utter heresy!  Not even a great man in the Scriptures, Charles Spurgeon ever made such a preposterous claim!  This is no better than the "true church" movement by Darwin Fish which is exposed by Pastor Phil Johnson as a heretical movement.  In fact, I'm not going to waste my time debating with ADD members, they are a total waste of my time as every other debate.
Unlike John F. Macarthur of Grace to You that actually encoura…