Skip to main content

Addressing a Poor State of Born Again Christian Apologetics

It is very easy to nitpick on the sins of the Roman Catholic priests but you may be ignoring some pastors deserve to be criticized as well.  Likewise, it is very easy to nitpick on Catholic Faith Defenders without realizing that there are born again Christian apologists regardless of denomination (and many of them belong to the Independent Fundamental Baptist movement) who are really in a poor state of apologetic ministries. 

It is time to really start listing some common problems of a poor state of born again Christian apologetics that stoops them down to the level of their opponents:

Ad Hominem.  If Catholic faith defenders are so fond of attacking the person instead of the argument, some born again Christian apologists are also so found of doing that.  It is very possible to start attacking Catholic faith defenders based on who they are instead of what they argue whether it is sensible or not.

Conspiracy theory approach.  Another problem why so many born again Christians are making Roman Catholics too angry to listen to them is they cite from conspiracy theory materials.  While I do believe a lot of the claims done by Chick Publications but that is not the Gospel.  You can go ahead and inform everyone of the Vatican's deepest darkest secrets and never get anyone saved.  What people need to hear is the Gospel and their sad state as sinners, not about those deep dark secrets that may not even be real.

Guilt by association.  Like it or not, many Christian apologists can be guilty of this one.  Sometimes, we end up arguing by guilt by association instead of using the Bible as a measure of right and wrong.  Some of the dumbest arguments exist in conspiracy theory sites like associating lightning bolt signs with Zeus, LOL with Lucifer Our Lord, hand signals that so and so is an Illuminati without doing any proper research (which also goes back to Ad Hominem) or just saying that so and so does it so it is a pagan practice.  What is ignored is that Christians and non-Christians also do similar activities.  Just because a Roman Catholic priest held a sports gathering does not make it wrong for a pastor to hold a sports gathering.  If you are going to measure right and wrong then use the Bible's standards for right and wrong.

Hasty generalization.  This is when a person decides to jump into a conclusion that what is true for one is true for all.  It is very easy to get angry at Catholic faith defenders who use pastors who deserve to be criticized for their actions to generalize born again Christians yet many born again Christian apologists also use priestly scandals of Rome to generalize Roman Catholics.  This also may apply to how it is very easy to conclude all Muslims are terrorists because of Islamic terrorists like the ISIS.

Missing the point.  It is a problem that many Catholic faith defenders are people who miss the point and many of them are controlled by their emotions.  What I do not dare deny is that some born again Christian apologists also keep missing the point as well.  This is because of cherry picking, getting emotional and not examining the posts in context.  The more I look at many Catholic vs. born again Christian debates, the more I am convinced to stay out of them.  Many of them just keep missing the point that it is either funny or irritating.

Not researching on allegations found on the Internet.  It is very easy to be absorbed with a list of allegations.  Some "truth agents" are just clowns (not necessarily Jesuit agents) who love to smear good people for fun and/or smear other people for personal revenge.  What is so stupid is that many people can be easily misled.  Some of them are just smear used to exaggerate a situation like one may be misled into believing this and that without any proof.  What is so stupid is that many people is that people think that as long as it is in the Internet then it must be true.  If the libraries can have wrong information then how much more the Internet?

Sensationalizing stuff.  Catholic faith defenders have their bad habit of sensationalizing quack pastors and their misdeeds.  Some born again Christians tend to sensationalize the scandals of Catholic priests.  It is easy to see Catholic faith defenders have their mentality of covering up their priests' scandals but to sensationalize such events is already stooping down to the level of the opponent.

Taking verses out of context.  It is possible to keep laughing at Catholic faith defenders for taking verses out of context but what if you are taking verses out of context as well.  One of the worst examples has to be Steven Anderson's "Pisseth Against the Wall" sermon where he misquoted six verses to justify his doctrine that men must pee standing up or the nation faces judgment.  It is no better than Catholic Faith Defenders who have already misquoted plenty of verses to justify the papacy's error or Mary granting intercession.

Use of inappropriate language.  Even if Christians are not going to love the cesspool of sin but they can easily fall into sin when they are in pride or self-reliant.  It is really sad to think some born again Christians can end up using a lot of inappropriate language.  It is a shame really to observe how some born again Christians really end up using a lot of inappropriate language.  Some of them exist with name-calling and cursing making witnessing even more difficult.  Although Christians may not take delight in doing this but they can get stuck up for a certain period of time doing this.

See also:

Popular posts from this blog

Ken Ham's Illustrations on Spiritual Warfare Against Humanism

Dr. Ken Ham of Answers in Genesis made these beautiful illustrations to show what's wrong with the church today. Let's take a look at the two illustrations on how Christians engage their spiritual warfare. 
The first illustration reveals the following:
One member is asleep when he should be doing something.Another person is firing at the balloons because the person who's supposed to fire it is asleep on the job.Somebody is focused on deflecting cannon balls than hitting the source of the cannon balls.Somebody is treating the whole situation like a game.  
By doing so, humanism is victorious whenever the local church is asleep. This is the problem to why Christians tend to fall down in battle at times:
Ezekiel 22:30 And I sought for a man among them, that should make up the hedge, and stand in the gap before Me for the land, that I should not destroy it: but I found none.
In short, if you're not going to stand in the gap on behalf of the land then who will? It's the…

The Ridiculous Roman Catholic View That Marriage Must Be Done Inside Their Church or It's Invalid

I remembered reading through the seven sacraments or ordinances of the Roman Catholic institution in a catechism. One of the teachings is that marriage must be treated as a sacrament. What it also implies is that if your marriage is done in a civil court that even if it was duly registered, that both couples were in a sexually pure union then it's not a marriage. So does that mean that a person can marry in a civil court, get divorced and marry his next spouse in the Roman Catholic institution?

Let's address the issue of civil marriage that is pure and holy. In short there was no incest, no adultery and it was between two people who are eligible for marriage. So why should the Roman Catholic institution even think that two people who got married with the sexually pure prerequisites in the eyes of God should be rejected. Is it because unless it's a priest who performs the marriage then the marriage can't be validated? It's a problem with how Roman Catholics have thei…

No Moral Absolutes Means No Human Rights

We have the truth that human rights activists are everywhere who reject the truth that there are moral absolutes. Many of them have their idea of "Judge not and you will not be judged." As for the atheistic human activists, they tend to carry out Richard Dawkins' quote from the River Out of Eden which says that there's no good, no evil but only pitiless indifference. They think that there are no such thing as moral absolutes. So if they believe that there are no moral absolutes then why are they fighting for human rights which requires moral absolutes to determine them? After all, Dawkins just said there is no purpose but only pitiless indifference.

Here's another problem with atheists' appeal to human rights. Why do they appeal to human rights when they claim that there are no moral absolutes and morality is relative? Human rights are determined by moral absolutes that God made. When God made His Ten Commandments and gave the whole Law - He made it as the st…

James 2 DOES NOT Teach Works Salvation

In a hasty attempt to defend works salvation, they would appeal to James 2.  It would be time to actually clear the fact that Paul and James DO NOT contradict each other. James 2 DOES NOT teach works salvation in which now can be clearly seen when this whole chapter is being dissected to show that James 2 does not defend the heretic crowd.  So let's try to check out what James 2 really is saying.
So first, it's time to think about these facts to debunk the heretical argument of using James 2:
1.) James 2:14-18 is not talking about works salvation but rather, again showing one's faith by one's works.  James 2:18 is a challenge to show one's faith.  Want to know about faith?  Hebrews 11 talks about the results of faith with some of the heroes of the Bible.  Try to coincide Hebrews 11 and James 2 and one sees the results of faith.  As said, when one says that a faith without works is DEAD because true faith produces good works to validate faith.  That's really th…

Does Salvation by Grace Through Faith in Jesus Christ Grant a License to Sin?

Here's a commonly heard argument saying, "Well salvation by faith alone in Jesus Christ is unjust and grants a license to sin." which is frequently done by most world religions.  They demand people must work for their salvation and for one, it's NOT even realistic or practical as it promotes the idea of a dictator God PLUS it's nothing more than asking for the impossible because God's standard of holiness is a LOT higher than all the good works man does.  Despite all the good man does, still they will fall into sin and the followers of almost every false religion this world has to offer shows that like how your average religious person attends religious services yet he/she falls into sin for the rest of the week, showing he/she is WEAK in the flesh.
Now it's time to really correct the whole erroneous argument as false.  Why?  The Bible says otherwise about what God's salvation by grace through faith really does- it transforms the individual to resist…

What Does Pisseth Against the Wall Mean?

It's really getting bad for some of my Independent Fundamental Baptist brethren to actually even take the words "pisseth against the wall" which appears at least six times in 1 Samuel 23:22, 1 Samuel 25:34, 1 Kings 14:10, 1 Kings 16:11, 1 Kings 21:21 and 2 Kings 9:8 where the King James actually has the words "pisseth against the wall".  Now I am a King James only-ist but I do not support the stupid interpretation of "pisseth against the wall" by some IFB preachers who have become in some way similar to the Catholic Faith Defenders that they argue against when they should spend their time soulwinning.  Actually I even heard that rather outrageous "pisseth against the wall" sermon by Steven Anderson that was so taken out of context.
So what does pisseth against the wall mean? Let us take a look at these six verses and take it on a exegetic view NOT an eisegetic (out of context) view:
1 Samuel 23:22- "And so more also do God unto the ene…

What's Wrong with the Ang Dating Daan Movement?

The Ang Dating Daan movement is by the Members Church of God International spearheaded by its pastor (and so-called "prophet") Eliseo Soriano.  While claiming to be an expositor of the Scriptures with his "Itanong Mo Kay Soriano" or "Ask Soriano" In English, this religious group actually isn't Christian as some of the ignorant would want to believe.  Though the group claims the Bible is their only authority (as some cults do) but the problem is that they believe only Eli Soriano may interpret the Scriptures.  This is utter heresy!  Not even a great man in the Scriptures, Charles Spurgeon ever made such a preposterous claim!  This is no better than the "true church" movement by Darwin Fish which is exposed by Pastor Phil Johnson as a heretical movement.  In fact, I'm not going to waste my time debating with ADD members, they are a total waste of my time as every other debate.
Unlike John F. Macarthur of Grace to You that actually encoura…