Skip to main content

You Cannot Be a Christian and Hate the Doctrine of Christian Sanctification

The quote by John Calvin above says, "A man who calls himself Christian and makes no effort to live a sanctified life has no right to the name."  The quote tends to be misquoted by the "Easy Christianity" crowd and even non-Calvinist Christians would say, "I am no Calvinist but there are some things Calvin said I really agree to.  That quote is one of them."  If you are a Christian then things ought to change for the better by the grace of God.  It is really impossible that a person should come to the saving grace of the Lord Jesus Christ but never change, remain the same and remain as wicked before they were saved (1 Corinthians 6:9-11, Titus 2:11-14).  You can hear all the demonic rants by "Easy Christians" that we can have homosexuals remaining as homosexuals after they are saved, that people can sin all they want after they are saved as if there was never an encounter with God's holiness.  A continuous lifestyle of sin is a mark of somebody unsaved and definitely not a mark of a person who is truly saved.  A saved person may fall into sin and carnality but not revel or enjoy it or remain in it indefinitely.

I get it why "Easy Christians" love to say that Reformed Theology makes salvation "complicated".  It is because such people would rather want a Christianity that embraces false converts as if they were true, to have salvation in their sinfulness than salvation from their sinfulness.  It is true that salvation is not a reward for the righteous but this is salvation from sin and not just salvation from Hell.  When it comes to being a Christian it is summarized as, "Saved from sin by the grace of God and not myself." not "Saved in my sin by the grace of God and not myself."  When God saves a person it is not just merely saving them but He saves them from their sin.  Sanctification is part of the new Christian life which delivers people unworthy to inherit God's Kingdom to people to be made righteous by the grace of God.  The very statement, "And such were some of you..." specifies that when it comes to Christianity, you were delivered from a lifestyle of sin to serving the Savior.  A Christian may have some falling away but they cannot live wickedly because of the Holy Spirit.  To say that the Holy Spirit does not convict sin is an insult to His very holiness.  The Holy Spirit is holy and will rebuke sin.

Some people may not immediately or blatantly admit that they hate sanctification but their doctrine may show it.  Sometimes, you can hear these "Easy Christians" talk about the necessity of good works for reward.  I agree good works do get rewarded but to preach a person who gets saved can remain devoid of good works is an utter heresy and an insult to God's life changing grace.  The grace of God inevitably changes the life and discipleship is done to increase fruit bearing not to ensure fruit bearing.  Now Christians even the most mature ones are not 100% sinless but even the immature believer still bears fruit.  Christians may make the wrong decisions and they may make you doubt their salvation at a certain point but fruit will manifest.  The problem with teaching that there are perpetually barren and continuous carnal Christians is an insult to the grace of God and His power.  If the person was unteachable and could not bear fruit but does not the grace of God enable the saved person to be teachable and bear fruit?  The moment that these people teach that sanctification is optional in the Christian life then it is easy to assume that the person really does not value sanctification at all.  No, submitting to Christ as Lord and getting sanctified is not optional but it is the inevitable result of the Christian life!

The message is that true faith begets good works as a result.  James 2:14-26 is not about you have faith and then you must do works to be saved.  On the contrary it means that true faith is destined to produce good works.  A true faith will result to good works and that a false faith does not result to good works.  Today, James the writer of the epistle would probably be considered a "Pharisee" and a "Jesuit" by the "Easy Christianity" crowd.  But the timeless truth is that faith that is genuine results to good works as Romans 3:31 declares that faith does not make the Law void but rather faith establishes the Law.  What does it mean that I am not under Law but under grace?  It means that my obedience to the Law is not because I am under the Law, it is not a burden but a delight that I follow the Law.  I do not follow rules because I have to but I want to follow God's rules because I am now definitely saved.  If anybody teaches that grace is a license to sin then that person is really somebody who as Jude 1:4 describes as a false teacher.


See also:

Popular posts from this blog

Ken Ham's Illustrations on Spiritual Warfare Against Humanism

Dr. Ken Ham of Answers in Genesis made these beautiful illustrations to show what's wrong with the church today. Let's take a look at the two illustrations on how Christians engage their spiritual warfare. 
The first illustration reveals the following:
One member is asleep when he should be doing something.Another person is firing at the balloons because the person who's supposed to fire it is asleep on the job.Somebody is focused on deflecting cannon balls than hitting the source of the cannon balls.Somebody is treating the whole situation like a game.  
By doing so, humanism is victorious whenever the local church is asleep. This is the problem to why Christians tend to fall down in battle at times:
Ezekiel 22:30 And I sought for a man among them, that should make up the hedge, and stand in the gap before Me for the land, that I should not destroy it: but I found none.
In short, if you're not going to stand in the gap on behalf of the land then who will? It's the…

The Ridiculous Roman Catholic View That Marriage Must Be Done Inside Their Church or It's Invalid

I remembered reading through the seven sacraments or ordinances of the Roman Catholic institution in a catechism. One of the teachings is that marriage must be treated as a sacrament. What it also implies is that if your marriage is done in a civil court that even if it was duly registered, that both couples were in a sexually pure union then it's not a marriage. So does that mean that a person can marry in a civil court, get divorced and marry his next spouse in the Roman Catholic institution?

Let's address the issue of civil marriage that is pure and holy. In short there was no incest, no adultery and it was between two people who are eligible for marriage. So why should the Roman Catholic institution even think that two people who got married with the sexually pure prerequisites in the eyes of God should be rejected. Is it because unless it's a priest who performs the marriage then the marriage can't be validated? It's a problem with how Roman Catholics have thei…

Don't Forget That the Roman Catholic Institution Has a Very Long History of Inciting Sedition

The Roman Catholic institution has its long fraudulent history of claiming to be the "One True Church that was founded n 33 A.D. - Holy, Catholic and Apostolic". The word catholic is a synonym for universal but the disciples were never first called Catholics in Antioch but Christians (Acts 11:26). Catholic was used as an old world for universal which some people today are allergic to that word because Catholic has been used to describe people who are members of the Roman Catholic institution. What can be talked about now is the fact that the Roman Catholic institution has had a long history of inciting sedition in governments. While they claim it to be doing the "work of God" or as the Jesuits say "Ad Maiorem Dei Gloriam" or "For the greater glory of God." but is it really?

Doing some study of the history of the Vatican has it shown that the Inquisition and later the Jesuit Order have a lot of bloody rags to answer for. Did you know that many ki…

Testimony of Former Jesuit Priest Victor J. Affonso

To Follow Jesus Without Compromise by Victor J. Affonso
Why I joined the Society of Jesus
At the age of 23, I was a successful commercial artist on the verge of going abroad where a job was awaiting me. I was happy at the prospect of leaving India and thereby also escaping the terrible anguish caused of seeing the misery of the poor in the streets of Bombay.
Political saviors like Gandhi and Nehru had failed in giving true freedom and justice to India’s poor majority. Murder and divisions assailed “independent” India, and so it still is today. All the social works were but a few drops of water in a desert. Yet there was still one solution left: The words of Jesus kept coming to me during prayer, “…For with God ALL things are possible” (Mark 10:27). “Don’t run away!” On another day I heard the words, “Follow My Son — Jesus!” This word finally led me to leave the world and join the Society of Jesus, a missionary order that promised by its very title, its “Spiritual Exercises” and its C…

Understanding Ignatius of Antioch's Statement on the Eucharist

It's already expected that Roman Catholicism takes Scriptures out of context and/or purposely misreads it. If they can't even handle the Word of God with reverence then I don't expect them to handle anything else with reverence except it be the writing of the past Popes and the Roman Catholic priests. One such man is the Christian bishop or overseer. In case Roman Catholics want to argue that the term "bishop" would prove he's one of their kind then they are mistaken. To be a bishop according to 1 Timothy 3:1-7 is to be a church leader. Besides, the same passage says that bishops must be family men of moral dignity which is impossible for a Roman Catholic priest who's bound to celibacy. Please note 1 Corinthians 7:35-37 is not a command for priests to stay single all their lives!
Now here's a popular misquote from the very passage of Ignatius of Antioch to justify the doctrine of transubstantiation: They abstain from the eucharist and from prayer, bec…

What Does Pisseth Against the Wall Mean?

It's really getting bad for some of my Independent Fundamental Baptist brethren to actually even take the words "pisseth against the wall" which appears at least six times in 1 Samuel 23:22, 1 Samuel 25:34, 1 Kings 14:10, 1 Kings 16:11, 1 Kings 21:21 and 2 Kings 9:8 where the King James actually has the words "pisseth against the wall".  Now I am a King James only-ist but I do not support the stupid interpretation of "pisseth against the wall" by some IFB preachers who have become in some way similar to the Catholic Faith Defenders that they argue against when they should spend their time soulwinning.  Actually I even heard that rather outrageous "pisseth against the wall" sermon by Steven Anderson that was so taken out of context.
So what does pisseth against the wall mean? Let us take a look at these six verses and take it on a exegetic view NOT an eisegetic (out of context) view:
1 Samuel 23:22- "And so more also do God unto the ene…

God's Curse Upon Gambling!

One of the greatest hypocrisies that people are facing right now is the sin of legalized gambling. Why do I dare say it is hypocritical? It's because for one legalized gambling promotes all type of filth. We have laws against adultery but not against pornography, we have laws against stealing but not against gambling which is really a sin. Today, Christians must voice out not only against legalized prostitution and legalized pornography, they must also voice against legalized gambling. 1 Timothy 6:10 is true that in these days, the love for money is the root of all evil in the secular world plus gambling is mainly rooted upon the love for money. We ought to think that in every way, money is not evil but the love for it is really evil. Gambling in itself is fed because of the love of money. Pastor Mike Stahl a Baptist preacher had also revealed the ill effects of gambling, in truth it is a very lucrative business that sadly destroys lives. To be honest, gambling has been one of th…