Skip to main content

What Lesson Can Christians Learn from Peter's Denial and Restoration to the Faith?

With Holy Week in mind, it's probably time to move from the daily pattern of reading the Bible from Genesis to Revelation in their proper order to moving forward (or backward) to the four Gospel accounts that talk about Jesus' arrest and crucifixion. You can read Peter's denial in Matthew 26:33-35, Mark 14:29-31, Luke 22:33-34 and the John 13:36-38.

It's very easy to say, "Lord I will never fail you." But Jesus' reply was that before the crow will crow twice, Peter will deny Him thrice. Mark gives the account of the first crowing and the second crowing while the other three accounts talk of only the final crowing. The crowing of the rooster happens twice was during 12:00 A.M. to 3:00 A.M. and the morning watch was around 3:00 A.M. to 6:00 A.M. There is no contradiction to that. It's easy to be arrogant in the flesh and to think highly of one's self. Peter thought that he was self-sufficient. I even wonder did Peter even think that he was capable by his own? Did Peter forget that everything great that a Christian does is by God's power? Jesus already warned His disciples in John 15:1-8 that apart from Him you can do nothing. Peter thought he won't deny Christ but he soon did. Thrice he was asked if he knew Jesus and thrice he said he didn't know him out of fear.

Why would Jesus allow Peter to commit the mistake not once but thrice? Jesus knew it would happen and he could prevent it. Instead, he allowed Peter to fall into that mistake for a good reason. I guess it's to humble Peter. Peter thought he would always be faithful but Jesus proved him wrong. When that happened Peter wept bitterly and confessed his sin. It was a humbling experience for Peter. That experience was probably to teach Peter that only through God's grace can a believer have any power against sin. If the believer decides to trust in their flesh then they are bound to fail. That's what Peter learned the hard way.

John 21 also shows the restoration of Peter. Peter already screwed up by denying Jesus thrice. He's a pastor but him and the deacons went fishing. These verses strike me the most:
John 21:15-17 
So when they had dined, Jesus saith to Simon Peter, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me more than these? He saith unto him, Yea, Lord; thou knowest that I love thee. He saith unto him, Feed my lambs. He saith to him again the second time, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me? He saith unto him, Yea, Lord; thou knowest that I love thee. He saith unto him, Feed my sheep. He saith unto him the third time, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me? Peter was grieved because he said unto him the third time, Lovest thou me? And he said unto him, Lord, thou knowest all things; thou knowest that I love thee. Jesus saith unto him, Feed my sheep.

It's a thrilling thought that Jesus asked Peter thrice "Lovest thou me more than these?" Peter denied Christ thrice. Jesus asked that question thrice. Peter had every right to be grieved because he denied Christ thrice. Yet Jesus still kept saying, "Feed my sheep." three times. Peter had backslid horribly as a pastor. When a pastor backslides so do the deacons. Yet Peter was still restored to his office as a pastor. Peter was restored from his backsliding so he could do the work Jesus wanted him to do - to be a new Testament pastor. Acts 2 reveals how Peter preached the first sermon as the first ordained pastor of the New Testament church.

This reveals that it's very important for pastors to rely on God's grace and for the congregation to pray for their pastor. Jesus prayed for Peter when He said:
Luke 22:32 
But I have prayed for thee, that thy faith fail not: and when thou art converted, strengthen thy brethren.

This is also a pattern that the congregation ought to pray for their God-ordained pastor that he may not fall into grievous error. Jesus prayed for Peter that the latter's faith will fail not. He also encouraged Peter to strengthen the brethren. All this is only possible by God's grace. Peter couldn't be the Rock because he was just a small rock. Instead, Jesus is the Rock (1 Corinthians 10:4) and because He is the Rock the gates of Hell cannot prevail against the Church. Peter couldn't be strengthened against the gates of Hell except through the the grace of God.

I would believe that Paul also had Peter in mind when he wrote this epistle saying:
1 Timothy 3:1-7 
This is a true saying, if a man desire the office of a bishop, he desireth a good work. A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach; not given to wine, no striker, not greedy of filthy lucre; but patient, not a brawler, not covetous; one that ruleth well his own house, having his children in subjection with all gravity; (For if a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of the church of God?) Not a novice, lest being lifted up with pride he fall into the condemnation of the devil. Moreover he must have a good report of them which are without; lest he fall into reproach and the snare of the devil.

Jesus trained Peter through the three years of ministry. Peter was married. No, Peter didn't leave his life but instead brought her along (1 Corinthians 9:5). It would be inconceivable if Peter divorced his wife to become the first Pope to which he isn't. Peter was a husband of one wife. He desired a good work. He had to be trained so he could fulfill his good work. Peter had to be cleaned up because he was pretty impulsive. But did Peter become a qualified pastor by his own power? No, it's the grace of God. Peter should have been disqualified from his office but Jesus restored him. Pastors ordained by God will fall down if they become arrogant like Peter. But there's still the comfort that God doesn't only offer forgiveness for sins but also cleansing and sanctification from them to make the man of God ready to do the job God has assigned to him.

See also:

Popular posts from this blog

Sorry Homosexuals, God Owns the Rainbow, Not You!

I found this absolutely funny picture and the maker got it right about homosexual activists getting mad at the rainbow light in the Noah's Park exhibit. Who could forget the time when homosexual marriage was made legal that those who are for it used the rainbow on their pictures on Facebook profiles or in other social networks. They claimed the rainbow as their color. I don't apologize for speaking the truth. The Bible is God's covenant with man and not homosexuality's banner of success. Genesis 9:14-17 - "And it shall come to pass, when I bring a cloud over the earth, that the bow shall be seen in the cloud: and I will remember my covenant, which is between me and you and every living creature of all flesh; and the waters shall no more become a flood to destroy all flesh. And the bow shall be in the cloud; and I will look upon it, that I may remember the everlasting covenant between God and every living creature of all flesh that is upon the earth. And God said …

Politically Correct Organizations Need to Take the Beam Out of Their Own Eye First

Politically correct organizations meddling in worldwide affairs is not anything new. Whether it's the Vatican, the European Union, the United Nations, Human Rights Watch and any organization driven by political correctness (and not all of them are Illuminati or Jesuit ran but they're all still dupes of Satan and most of them don't even know it) it's always a problem that they are indeed meddling. While meddling isn't inherently wrong but here's some problems with politically correct organizations:
They only meddle when it's convenient for them as they are guilty of both selective outrage and selective justice.They meddle in the affairs of others without considering their own yard first.They meddle like as if they own the world.
It's stupid how political correctness demands Christians not to judge others but they end up failing to judge themselves. They are always taking "Judge not and you will not be judged." out of context without knowing wha…

The Error of Comparing Protestantism to New Atheism

The amazing blindness of is too amazing isn't it? I just read an article written yesterday which compares Protestantism to New Atheism. As much as the article is written as professionally as possible in contrast to some self-proclaimed apologists I've had a lot of useless arguments with but I'd like to give a friendly rebuke to the writer Karlo Broussard. It's my sincere prayer that Broussard will see the truth from the pages of the Scripture. 
The writer commits the fallacy of categorical error. He compares Sola Scriptura with Richard Dawkins' views on science. Here's one of the statements that really should be considered a categorical error:
Just as science is the only tool Dawkins and company are willing to use to arrive at knowledge of the natural truth, Protestants use only the Bible for determining what is revealed truth. And as many modern atheists reject anything that science cannot detect, so too do Protestants reject any teaching that is…

The Quest For "Unlimited Human Progress" is Really Destroying the Environment

Every time I read from the news of nature's decline due to pollution, how food supply can soon drop anytime, how plant and animal deaths are massively happening I can't help but blame it on one factor: SIN. Yes, sin and most people think it's a fantasy word. It wasn't just a fantasy word that kicked Adam and Eve out of Eden and cursed the Earth with all its imperfections. Sin brought disease and destruction to mankind. Unfortunately, man is to blame for the wanton destruction of the environment all in the name of "unlimited human progress".

You can't divorce science from the Creator and that's a fact. Yet you have people who want to benefit from science without considering the Creator. Christian scientists were conservative because they were aware of one truth that science without ethics is meaningless. I'd like to expand it to say that studying creation without the Creator is absolutely stupid. People can claim that removing God is the key to &qu…

What Does Pisseth Against the Wall Mean?

It's really getting bad for some of my Independent Fundamental Baptist brethren to actually even take the words "pisseth against the wall" which appears at least six times in 1 Samuel 23:22, 1 Samuel 25:34, 1 Kings 14:10, 1 Kings 16:11, 1 Kings 21:21 and 2 Kings 9:8 where the King James actually has the words "pisseth against the wall".  Now I am a King James only-ist but I do not support the stupid interpretation of "pisseth against the wall" by some IFB preachers who have become in some way similar to the Catholic Faith Defenders that they argue against when they should spend their time soulwinning.  Actually I even heard that rather outrageous "pisseth against the wall" sermon by Steven Anderson that was so taken out of context.
So what does pisseth against the wall mean? Let us take a look at these six verses and take it on a exegetic view NOT an eisegetic (out of context) view:
1 Samuel 23:22- "And so more also do God unto the ene…

What's Wrong with the Ang Dating Daan Movement?

The Ang Dating Daan movement is by the Members Church of God International spearheaded by its pastor (and so-called "prophet") Eliseo Soriano.  While claiming to be an expositor of the Scriptures with his "Itanong Mo Kay Soriano" or "Ask Soriano" In English, this religious group actually isn't Christian as some of the ignorant would want to believe.  Though the group claims the Bible is their only authority (as some cults do) but the problem is that they believe only Eli Soriano may interpret the Scriptures.  This is utter heresy!  Not even a great man in the Scriptures, Charles Spurgeon ever made such a preposterous claim!  This is no better than the "true church" movement by Darwin Fish which is exposed by Pastor Phil Johnson as a heretical movement.  In fact, I'm not going to waste my time debating with ADD members, they are a total waste of my time as every other debate.
Unlike John F. Macarthur of Grace to You that actually encoura…

Testimony of Former Iglesia Ni Cristo Member, Now a Born Again Christian

Editor's note: 
First and foremost, I would like to thank the Bereans for this wonderful story of a former Iglesia ni Cristo minister (or pastor), now he has become a Baptist Christian.  It's a sad story that some people have just jumped from one cult to another.  Some members of the Watchtower Society, Charismatic Movement or the Iglesia ni Cristo have left Roman Catholicism but they have never truly come to know the truth of salvation is by faith in Christ alone and that any good works after Christian life is but the grace of God at work in the believer.  Now for this brave testimony that I can really share after many years of searching for one testimony which I hope will further bring more INC members to Jesus Christ.

May I begin with a word of prayer that in the midst of all these trouble, I call upon Jesus Christ the Son of God who the Iglesia ni Cristo deny is indeed God, the only way to salvation, that they trust upon their works and church membership than Him alone.  I…